• No results found

Chapter 5: Data Analysis and Results

5.5 Cointegration Analysis

The Johansen cointegration test is more appropriate as it allows for testing of hypotheses when dummy variables need to be considered in the model, which could not be done with the Engle-Granger methodology. The 2-step Johansen cointegration methodology described earlier will be followed. The dummy variables for the pairs of variables identified earlier have been included as exogenous variables in the model.

5.5.1 Household Consumption predicted by Consumer Confidence

In the first step, cointegrating relationship is analysed where 𝐻𝐢 is the dependent variable, 𝐢𝐢𝐼 is a predictor variable and the exogenous variables 𝐷𝑉𝐢𝐢𝑑1, 𝐷𝑉𝐢𝐢𝑑2, 𝐷𝑉𝐢𝐢𝑑3 and 𝐷𝑉𝐢𝐢𝑑4 are the 4 structural breaks. The results for the Trace test (TT) and Maximum Eigenvalue (ME) tests are given in Table 5.5 with the statistic applicable to each test, the Critical Value (CV) and p-Value (derived from MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999)). The first column is the hypothesis testing the number cointegrating equation(s) (CE(s)) which exist.

Table 5.5: Cointegration Tests: 𝑯π‘ͺ predicted by π‘ͺπ‘ͺ𝑰

Number of cointegrating coefficients πœ·β€² from fitting the error correction model in equation (7), is determined to be:

πœ·β€²= [1.27E βˆ’ 06 0.141268 2.78E βˆ’ 06 βˆ’0.004791] .

Similarly, the matrix of error correction coefficients measuring the speed of convergence to the long run equilibrium is:

𝜢 = [ 1134.127 443.6557 βˆ’ 2.720797 0.160092] .

34 | P a g e

It is determined that the coefficient of 𝐢𝐢𝐼, in the time series model (29), to predict 𝐻𝐢 in the long run is 111286.6. This coefficient indicates that as 𝐢𝐢𝐼 increases in the long run, 𝐻𝐢 will increase.

Similarly, the adjustment coefficient is calculated to be 0.001440. A value between 0 and -1 is an indication of the convergence of the series in the next lag period. A positive adjustment coefficient implies that the process is not converging in the long run and there may be some instabilities. This output implies there could be model specification problems by only including 𝐢𝐢𝐼 as the dependent variable.

5.5.2 Consumer Confidence predicted by Household Consumption

Since the causal direction is not known in advance, the roles of the variables are reversed. That is, 𝐢𝐢𝐼 is now the dependent variable while 𝐻𝐢 is the predictor variable and the exogenous variables 𝐷𝑉𝐢𝐻𝑑1, 𝐷𝑉𝐢𝐻𝑑2 and 𝐷𝑉𝐢𝐻𝑑3 are the 3 structural breaks. The results for the Trace test (TT) and Maximum Eigenvalue (ME) tests are given in Table 5.6 with the statistic applicable to each test, the Critical Value (CV) and p-Value (derived from MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999)).

Table 5.6: Cointegration Tests: π‘ͺπ‘ͺ𝑰 predicted by 𝑯π‘ͺ Number of cointegrating vector) at a 5% level between 𝐢𝐢𝐼 and 𝐻𝐢.

The matrix of cointegrating coefficients is:

The coefficient of 𝐻𝐢 in the time series model (31) to predict 𝐢𝐢𝐼 in the long run is 5.10E-06 which indicates that as 𝐻𝐢 increases in the long run, 𝐢𝐢𝐼 will increase. The adjustment coefficient is -0.378814 which indicates that the deviation from the long-term growth in 𝐢𝐢𝐼 is corrected by 37.88% in the next quarter.

35 | P a g e

5.5.3 Capital Formation predicted by Business Confidence

The cointegrating relationship of business variables is analysed next. In this first case, 𝐢𝐹 is the dependent variable, 𝐡𝐢𝐼 is a predictor variable and the exogenous variables 𝐷𝑉𝐡𝐢𝑑1, 𝐷𝑉𝐡𝐢𝑑2 and 𝐷𝑉𝐡𝐢𝑑3 are the 3 structural breaks. The results for the Trace test (TT) and Maximum Eigenvalue (ME) tests are given in Table 5.7 with the statistic applicable to each test, the Critical Value (CV) and p-Value (derived from MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999)).

Table 5.7: Cointegration Tests: π‘ͺ𝑭 predicted by 𝑩π‘ͺ𝑰

Number of cointegrating vector) at a 5% level between 𝐢𝐹 and 𝐡𝐢𝐼.

The matrix of cointegrating coefficients is:

The coefficient of 𝐡𝐢𝐼 in the time series model (33) to predict 𝐢𝐹 in the long run is -366.3454 which indicates that as 𝐡𝐢𝐼 increases, 𝐢𝐹 will decrease in the long run. This result seems unlikely and could be an indication that other variables need to be included in the model specification to predict 𝐢𝐹.

The adjustment coefficient is -0.063594. This indicates that deviation from the long-term growth in 𝐢𝐹 is corrected by 6.36% in the next quarter. The small adjustment coefficient also indicates there may be additional variables with more information which are involved in the prediction of 𝐢𝐹.

5.5.4 Business Confidence predicted by Capital Formation

The roles of the business variables are reversed next. That is, 𝐡𝐢𝐼 is the dependent variable, 𝐢𝐹 is a predictor variable and the exogenous variables 𝐷𝑉𝐢𝐹𝑑1, 𝐷𝑉𝐢𝐹𝑑2, 𝐷𝑉𝐢𝐹𝑑3 and 𝐷𝑉𝐢𝐹𝑑4 are the 4 structural breaks. The results for the Trace test (TT) and Maximum Eigenvalue (ME) tests are given

36 | P a g e

in Table 5.8 with the statistic applicable to each test, the Critical Value (CV) and p-Value (derived from MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999)).

Table 5.8: Cointegration Tests: 𝑩π‘ͺ𝑰 predicted by π‘ͺ𝑭

Number of cointegrating vector) at a 5% level between 𝐡𝐢𝐼 and 𝐢𝐹.

The matrix of cointegrating coefficients is:

The coefficient of 𝐢𝐹 in the time series model (35) to predict 𝐡𝐢𝐼 in the long run is -0.001898. This indicates that as 𝐢𝐹 increases, 𝐡𝐢𝐼 will decrease in the long run. Similar to the results in Section 5.5.3, this result seems unlikely and could be an indication that additional variables need to be included in the model specification to predict 𝐡𝐢𝐼. The adjustment coefficient is -0.178828. This indicates that deviation from the long-term growth rate in 𝐡𝐢𝐼 is corrected by 17.88% in the next quarter. The small adjustment coefficient also indicates there may be other variables with more information which are involved in the prediction of 𝐡𝐢𝐼.

5.5.5 Business Confidence predicted by Consumer Confidence

The cointegrating relationship between the confidence variables is analysed next. In this first case, 𝐡𝐢𝐼 is the dependent variable, 𝐢𝐢𝐼 is a predictor variable and the exogenous variables 𝐷𝑉𝐢𝐡𝑑1, 𝐷𝑉𝐢𝐡𝑑2 and 𝐷𝑉𝐢𝐡𝑑3 are the 3 structural breaks. The results for the Trace test (TT) and Maximum Eigenvalue (ME) tests are given in Table 5.9 with the statistic applicable to each test, the Critical Value (CV) and p-Value (derived from MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999)).

37 | P a g e

Table 5.9: Cointegration Tests: 𝑩π‘ͺ𝑰 predicted by π‘ͺπ‘ͺ𝑰

Number of cointegrating vector) at a 5% level between 𝐡𝐢𝐼 and 𝐢𝐢𝐼.

The matrix of cointegrating coefficients is:

The coefficient of 𝐢𝐢𝐼 in the time series model (37) to predict 𝐡𝐢𝐼 in the long run is 9.449097 which indicates that as 𝐢𝐢𝐼 increases, 𝐡𝐢𝐼 will increase in the long run. The adjustment coefficient is -0.020325 which indicates that deviation from the long-term growth in 𝐡𝐢𝐼 is corrected by 2.03%

in the next quarter. The small adjustment coefficient indicates there may be additional variables with more information which are involved in the prediction of 𝐡𝐢𝐼.

5.5.6 Consumer Confidence predicted by Business Confidence

The roles of the business variables are reversed next. That is, 𝐢𝐢𝐼 is the dependent variable, 𝐡𝐢𝐼 is a predictor variable and the exogenous variables 𝐷𝑉𝐡𝐢𝐢𝑑1, 𝐷𝑉𝐡𝐢𝐢𝑑2, 𝐷𝑉𝐡𝐢𝐢𝑑3, 𝐷𝑉𝐡𝐢𝐢𝑑4 and 𝐷𝑉𝐡𝐢𝐢𝑑5 are the 5 structural breaks. The results for the Trace test (TT) and Maximum Eigenvalue (ME) tests are given in Table 5.10 with the statistic applicable to each test, the Critical Value (CV) and p-Value (derived from MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999)).

38 | P a g e

Table 5.10: Cointegration Tests: π‘ͺπ‘ͺ𝑰 predicted by 𝑩π‘ͺ𝑰

Number of CE(s)

Eigen value

TT ME

Statistic 5% CV p-Value Statistic 5%

CV p-Value None * 0.138992 20.70524 12.32090 0.0016 20.65185 11.22480 0.0009 At most 1 0.000387 0.053380 4.129906 0.8498 0.053380 4.129906 0.8498 The null hypothesis of no cointegrating vector is rejected using both tests and finds π‘Ÿ = 1 (one cointegrating vector) at a 5% level between 𝐢𝐢𝐼 and 𝐡𝐢𝐼.

The matrix of cointegrating coefficients is:

πœ·β€² = [βˆ’0.131905 0.009171 0.023036 βˆ’0.048799] .

The matrix of error correction coefficients measuring the speed of convergence to the long run equilibrium is:

𝜢 = [ 2.557763 0.018498 0.258386 0.141274] .

The coefficient of 𝐡𝐢𝐼 in the time series model (39) to predict 𝐢𝐢𝐼 in the long run is -0.069526 which indicates that as 𝐡𝐢𝐼 increases, 𝐢𝐢𝐼 will decrease in the long run. The adjustment coefficient is -0.337380 which indicates that deviation from the long-term growth in 𝐢𝐢𝐼 is corrected by 33.74%

in the next quarter.

39 | P a g e

Related documents