The methods of this paper can easily be extended to non-planar frameworks.
However, since for non-planar frameworks there can be multiple bars that are unshifted by a C2 rotation, for example, some of the formulas become slightly more involved. The methods can also be extended to frameworks in 3-space, which has potential applications in the analysis of space frames, for example.
As has previously been discussed, this paper provides an efficient method for increasing the number of independent states of self-stress in symmetric frame-works. However, finding a realisation of a given graph that has the maximum possible number of states of self-stress (with or without a specified point group symmetry) remains a challenging open problem. Note that maximising the space of self-stresses is equivalent to maximising the space of mechanisms or parallel redrawings (see [30, 35], for example), or the decomposibility of the discrete Airy stress function polyhedron [33], so there are several different but equivalent ways to formulate this problem.
An important tool in analysing a form diagram is the reciprocal diagram or force diagram, which is a geometric construction that has appeared, inde-pendently, in areas such as graphical statics, rigidity theory, scene analysis and computational geometry since the time of Maxwell [30]. In a recent paper McRo-bie et al describe the relationship between mechanisms and states of self-stress in the form and force diagrams [16]. It would be interesting to investigate this relationship with an emphasis on symmetry. This is left to a future paper.
Finally, it would be useful to establish procedures for subdividing faces of a planar framework in such a way that additional non-local self-stresses are created. This is left as another area of future research.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Fields Institute for hosting the 2021 workshop on ‘Progress and Open Problems in Rigidity Theory’ during which this work was started. We also thank Allan McRobie and Toby Mitchell for helpful discussions.
References
[1] Altmann, S.L. and Herzig, P., Point-Group Theory Tables, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1994.
[2] Atkins, P.W., Child, M.S. and Phillips, C.S.G., Tables for Group Theory, OUP, Oxford, 1970.
[3] Baker, W.F., McRobie, A., Mitchell, T. and Mazurek, A., Mechanisms and states of self-stress of planar trusses using graphic statics, Part I: Introduc-tion and background, Proceedings of the IASS, 2015.
[4] Calladine, C.R., Buckminster Fuller’s Tensegrity structures and Clerk Maxwell’s rules for the construction of stiff frames, International Journal of Solids and Structures 14, 161–172, 1978.
[5] Clinch, K., Nixon, A., Schulze, B. and Whiteley, B., Pairing symmetries for Euclidean and spherical frameworks, Discrete and Computational Ge-ometry 64, 483–518, 2020.
[6] Connelly, R., Fowler, P.W., Guest, S.D., Schulze, B., and Whiteley, W.J., When is a symmetric pin-jointed framework isostatic?, International Jour-nal of Solids and Structures, 46, 762–773, 2009.
[7] F¨assler, A. and Stiefel, E., Group Theoretical Methods and Their Applica-tions, Birkh¨auser, first edition, 1992.
[8] Fowler, P.W. and Guest, S.D., A symmetry extension of Maxwell’s rule for rigidity of frames, International Journal of Solids and Structures 37, 1793–1804, 2000.
[9] Ikeshita, R., Infinitesimal rigidity of symmetric frameworks, Master’s the-sis, Department of Mathematical Informatics, The University of Tokyo, 2015.
[10] Izmestiev, I., Projective background of the infinitesimal rigidity of frame-works, Geom. Dedicata 140, 183–203, 2009.
[11] James, G. and Liebeck, M., Representations and Characters of Groups, Cambridge University Press, 1993.
[12] Kangwai, R.D. and Guest, S.D., Symmetry-adapted equilibrium matrices, International Journal of Solids and Structures 37, 1525–1548, 2000.
[13] Kangwai, R.D., Guest, S.D., and Pellegrino, S., An introduction to the analysis of symmetric structures, Computers and Structures 71, 671–688, 1999.
[14] Maxwell, J.C., On the calculation of the equilibrium and stiffness of frames, Phil. Mag. 27, 294–299, 1864. Also: Collected papers, XXVI. Cambridge University Press, 1890.
[15] Maxwell, J.C., On Reciprocal Figures and Diagram of Forces, Philos. Mag.
26, 250–261, 1864.
[16] McRobie, A., Baker, W., Mitchell, T. and Konstantatou, M., Mechanisms and states of self-stress of planar trusses using graphic statics, Part III:
Applications and extensions, Proceedings of the IASS, 2015.
[17] McRobie, A., Millar, C., Zastavni, D. and Baker, W.F., Graphical Stability Analysis of Maillart’s Roof at Chiasso, preprint, 2020.
[18] McWeeny, R., Symmetry: An Introduction to Group Theory and Its Ap-plications, Dover Publications, 2002.
[19] Millar, C., Mazurek, A., Schulze, B., Baker, W.F., Symmetry and the design of self-stressed structures, preprint, 2021.
[20] Millar, C., Mitchell, T., Mazurek, A., Chhabra, A., Beghini, A., Clelland, J., McRobie, A. and Baker, W.F., On designing plane-faced funicular grid-shells, preprint, 2021.
[21] Nixon, A., Schulze, B. and Whiteley, W., Rigidity Through a Projective Lens, preprint, 2021.
[22] Owen, J.C. and Power, S.C., Frameworks, Symmetry and Rigidity, Interna-tional Journal of ComputaInterna-tional Geometry & Applications 20(6),723–750, 2010.
[23] Pellegrino, S., Analysis of prestressed mechanisms, International Journal of Solids and Structures 26(12), 1329–1350, 1990.
[24] Schek, J.H., The force density method for form finding and computation of general networks, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineer-ing 3(1), 115–134, 1974.
[25] Schulze, B., Block-diagonalized rigidity matrices of symmetric frameworks and applications, Beitrage zur Algebra und Geometrie/Contributions to Algebra and Geometry 51, No. 2, 427–466, 2010.
[26] Schulze, B., Symmetric Versions of Laman’s Theorem, Discrete and Com-putational Geometry, Discrete and ComCom-putational Geometry 44(4), 946–
972, 2010.
[27] Schulze, B., Symmetric Laman theorems for the groups C2 and Cs, The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 17(1): 1–61, R154, 2010.
[28] Schulze, B. and Tanigawa, S., Infinitesimal rigidity of symmetric bar-joint frameworks, SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 29(3), 1259–1286, 2015.
[29] Schulze, B. and Whiteley, W., The orbit rigidity matrix of a symmetric framework, Discrete and Computational Geometry 46(3), 561–598, 2011.
[30] Schulze, B. and Whiteley, W., Rigidity and scene analysis, Handbook of Discrete and Computational Geometry, C.D. Toth, J. O’Rourke, J.E. Good-man, editors, Third Edition, Chapman & Hall CRC, 2018.
[31] Schulze, B. and Whiteley, W., Rigidity of symmetric frameworks, Hand-book of Discrete and Computational Geometry, C.D. Toth, J. O’Rourke, J.E. Goodman, editors, Third Edition, Chapman & Hall CRC, 2018.
[32] Serre, J.-P., Linear Representations of Finite Groups, Springer-Verlag, 1977.
[33] Smilansky, Z., Decomposability of polytopes and polyhedra, Geom. Dedi-cata 24, 29–49, 1987.
[34] White, N. and Whiteley, W., The algebraic geometry of stresses in frame-works, SIAM J. Algebraic Discrete Methods 4(4), 481–511, 1983.
[35] Whiteley, W., Some Matroids from Discrete Applied Geometry. In J. Bonin, J. Oxley, and B. Servatius, editors, Matroid Theory, vol. 197 of Contemp.
Math., 171–311, AMS, Providence, 1996.
Appendix
The expression (8) for Γ(m) − Γ(s) for frameworks with rotational symmetry follows from the following proposition.
Proof. It is well known that the sum of the entries of each character At, Pn−1
Suppose next that t = 1. Then
n−1
Now, using the trigonometric identity cos2x = 12cos 2x + 1, we have
Also, using the trigonometric identity sin x cos x =12sin 2x, we have
n−1 the fact that cosine and sine are even and odd functions, respectively.