• No results found

Composition and modelling Case study 1: Bituminous roads

10. ANNEX 2: Additional data and results on the environmental impact

10.2 Composition and modelling Case study 1: Bituminous roads

10.2 Composition and modelling Case study 1: Bituminous roads

10.2.1 Reference case

In Table 20 and Table 21, the modelling of the different life cycle phases for the asphalt types and the foundation within the reference bituminous road is clarified.

Table 20: Modelling of the different life cycle phases of the asphalt types for the reference bituminous road.

Life cycle phase Activities Modelling assumptions A1: Raw material

supply Extraction of

primary resources According to Ecoinvent records, harmonised for Belgium

A2: Transport Transport of

resources to asphalt plant

Transport with heavy truck (16-32 tons)

A3: Manufacturing Production of asphalt in asphalt plant

According to Ecoinvent record for mastic asphalt, harmonised for Belgium, without (primary) resources, including internal transport of resources, electricity use by machinery, machinery, energy use for drying and heating the aggregates and the bitumen and keeping up temperature during stock

A4: Transport Transport of asphalt

to construction site Transport with heavy truck (16-32 tons) over 65 km

A5: Construction

installation process Installation of asphalt on

construction site

Using shuttle buggy, asphalt machine and steamroller no detailed information on this machinery available in the Ecoinvent database, so approximation by using hydraulic digger (1x for top layer and 3x for sublayer)

B4: Replacements Replacement of

asphalt top layer One replacement of asphalt top layer after 10 years

C1: Demolition Demolition of road According to MMG scenarios 2017 [53]

C2: Transport Transport of waste to sorting plant and to landfill

According to MMG scenarios 2017 [53]

C3: Waste

processing Sorting and

crushing of asphalt waste

According to MMG scenarios 2017 [53]

C4: Disposal 5% landfill of

asphalt waste + 95%

recycling

Based on Ecoinvent record for landfill of asphalt waste

Table 21: Modelling of the different life cycle phases of the foundation for the reference

bituminous road.

Life cycle phase Activities Modelling assumptions A1-2-3: Product

stage

Extraction of primary resources, transport and manufacturing

According to Ecoinvent records, harmonised for Belgium

A4: Transport Transport to

construction site Transport with heavy truck (16-32 tons) over 100 km

A5: Construction

installation process Installation of foundation on construction site

Using hydraulic digger and steamroller =>

no data available for steam roller => only hydraulic digger considered

C1: Demolition Demolition of road According to MMG scenarios 2017 [53]

C2: Transport Transport of waste to sorting plant and to landfill

According to MMG scenarios 2017 [53]

C3: Waste processing

Sorting of waste According to MMG scenarios 2017 [53] – without crushing

C4: Disposal 5% landfill of limestone waste + 95% recycling

According to MMG scenarios 2017 [53]

In Table 22, a detailed overview of the composition of the three layers within the reference bituminous road is given, as well as additional information on the resources and their modelling.

Table 22: Composition and modelling of the reference bituminous road SMA-C asphalt top layer (1 ton)

Material

type Component Amount Composition Transport to

asphalt plant Remarks

Filler Composite type II 80 kg/ton 20% lime 80% fly ashes

120 km – heavy truck (16-32 tons)

Fly ash from different sources (20% waste combustion, 20% sludge combustion, 20%

biomass combustion, 40% coal fired electricity power plants) – economic allocation [55]

Coarse

aggregates Porphyry 6.3/10 591 kg/ton 60 km – heavy

truck (16-32 tons) Ecoinvent record for basalt used due to lack of record for porphyry

Porphyry 4/6.3 86 kg/ton 60 km – heavy

truck (16-32 tons) Ecoinvent record for basalt used due to lack of record for porphyry

Fine

aggregates Porphyry 0/2 181 kg/ton 70 km – heavy

truck (16-32 tons) Ecoinvent record for basalt used due to lack of record for porphyry

Bitumen PmB bitumen 62 kg/ton 96.5% pitch 3.5% SBS polymer

60 km – heavy truck (16-32 tons)

Ecoinvent record for synthetic rubber used due to lack of record for SBS polymer

APO-B asphalt sublayer (1 ton) Material

type Component Amount Composition Transport to

asphalt plant Remarks

truck (16-32 tons) Limestone, crushed Broken limestone 6/10 219 kg/ton 70 km – heavy

truck (16-32 tons) Limestone, crushed Broken limestone 2/6 143

kg/ton 60 km – heavy

truck (16-32 tons) Limestone, crushed and washed

Fine

aggregates Broken limestone sand 0/2

191 kg/ton 110 km – heavy

truck (16-32 tons)

Limestone, crushed and washed

River sand (Schelde) 114 kg/ton 125 km – heavy

truck (16-32 tons) Only one Ecoinvent record for sand available Bitumen Road bitumen 50/70 46 kg/ton 100% pitch 60 km – heavy

truck (16-32 tons)

Broken limestone foundation (1 m³) Material

type Component Amount Composition Transport to

construction site Remarks

Broken

stone Broken limestone

0/40 2 200

kg/m³ 100 km – heavy

truck (16-32 tons) Limestone, crushed

10.2.2 Variant case

In Table 23 and Table 24, the modelling of the different life cycle phases for the asphalt types and the foundation for the variant bituminous road is clarified.

Table 23: Modelling of the different life cycle phases of the asphalt types for the variant bituminous road (the differences with the reference case are underlined).

Life cycle phase Activities Modelling assumptions A1: Raw material end-of-waste point falls after sorting and crushing in former lifecycle and no additional

activities are needed – see Table 25 A2: Transport Transport of

resources to asphalt

Transport with heavy truck (16-32 tons) – see Table 25

No transport to asphalt plant necessary since production of recycled aggregates and bitumen takes place at the asphalt plant.

A3: Manufacturing Production of asphalt in asphalt plant

For APO-B asphalt: According to Ecoinvent record for mastic asphalt, harmonised for Belgium, without (primary) resources, including internal transport of resources, electricity use by machinery, machinery, energy use for drying and heating the granulates and the bitumen and keeping up temperature during stock

For AVT asphalt: idem as for APO-B

asphalt, but with 15% reduction in heat and 15% reduction in VOC emissions

A4: Transport Transport of asphalt

to construction site Transport with heavy truck (16-32 tons) over 65 km

A5: Construction

installation process Installation of asphalt on

construction site

Using shuttle buggy, asphalt machine and steamroller => no detailed information on this machinery available in the Ecoinvent database => approximation by using hydraulic digger (1x for top layer and 3x for sublayer)

B4: Replacements Replacement of

asphalt top layer One replacement of asphalt top layer after 10 years

C1: Demolition Demolition of road According to MMG scenarios 2017 [53]

C2: Transport Transport of waste to sorting plant and to landfill

According to MMG scenarios 2017 [53]

According to MMG scenarios 2017 [53]

C4: Disposal 5% landfill of

asphalt waste + 95%

recycling

Based on Ecoinvent record for landfill of asphalt waste

Table 24: Modelling of the different life cycle phases of the foundation for the variant bituminous road (the differences with the reference case are underlined).

Life cycle phase Activities Modelling assumptions A1-2-3: Product

stage Production of

recycled concrete aggregates

No impact of production and transport, since end-of-waste point falls after sorting and crushing in former lifecycle and no additional activities are needed – see Table 25

A4: Transport Transport to

construction site Transport with heavy truck (16-32 tons) over 35 km

A5: Construction

installation process Installation of foundation on construction site

Using hydraulic digger and steamroller =>

no data available in the Ecoinvent

database for steam roller => only hydraulic digger considered

C1: Demolition Demolition of road According to MMG scenarios 2017 [53]

C2: Transport Transport of waste to sorting plant and to landfill

According to MMG scenarios 2017 [53]

C3: Waste

processing Sorting of waste According to MMG scenarios 2017 [53] – without crushing

C4: Disposal 5% landfill of limestone waste + 95% recycling

According to MMG scenarios 2017 [53]

More details on the composition and the modelling assumptions for the variant layers are given in Table 25.

Table 25 : Composition and modelling of the variant bituminous road (the differences with the reference case are underlined) SMA-C AVT asphalt top layer (1 ton)

Material

type Component Amount Composition Transport to

asphalt plant Remarks

Filler Composite type II 80 kg/ton 20% lime 80% fly ash

120 km – heavy truck (16-32 tons)

Fly ash from different sources (20% waste combustion, 20% sludge combustion, 20%

biomass combustion, 40% coal fired electricity power plants) – economic allocation [55]

Coarse

aggregates Porphyry 6.3/10 591 kg/ton 60 km – heavy

truck (16-32 tons) Ecoinvent record for basalt used due to lack of record for porphyry

Porphyry 4/6.3 86 kg/ton 60 km – heavy

truck (16-32 tons) Ecoinvent record for basalt used due to lack of record for porphyry

Fine

aggregates Porphyry 0/2 181 kg/ton 70 km – heavy

truck (16-32 tons) Ecoinvent record for basalt used due to lack of record for porphyry

Bitumen PmB bitumen 62 kg/ton 96.5% pitch 3.5% SBS polymer

60 km – heavy truck (16-32 tons)

Ecoinvent record for synthetic rubber used due to lack of record for SBS polymer

Water Tap water 1.65

kg/ton Harmonised for Belgium

APO-B 50% RA asphalt sublayer (1 ton) Material

type Component Amount Composition Transport to

asphalt plant Remarks

truck (16-32 tons) Limestone, crushed Broken limestone 6/10 162.2

kg/ton 70 km – heavy

truck (16-32 tons) Limestone, crushed

Broken limestone 2/6 76.3

truck (16-32 tons) Limestone, crushed and washed

River sand (Schelde) 0 kg/ton 125 km – heavy

truck (16-32 tons) Only one Ecoinvent record for sand available Recycled

aggregates Recycled minerals from reclaimed

asphalt

477

kg/ton No transport No production impact since end-of-waste point falls after sorting and crushing in former lifecycle and no additional activities are

necessary.

23 kg/ton No transport No production impact since end-of-waste point falls after sorting and crushing in former lifecycle and no additional activities are

necessary.

Recycled concrete aggregates foundation (1 m³) Material

type Component Amount Composition Transport to

construction site Remarks

Recycled

aggregates Recycled concrete

aggregates 2 000

kg/m³ 35 km – heavy

truck (16-32 tons) No production impact since end-of-waste point falls after sorting and crushing in former lifecycle and no additional activities are

necessary.