• No results found

This chapter consists of a general survey of the main results obtained by the law and economics approach in the field of tort law. It is meant to give a basic overview of the main framework of analysis and suggestions for further insights. Since so far the analysis has centred mainly on American law, much is still to be said in the economic analysis of tort liability in civil law countries.

2.14. References.

Arlen, Jennifer (2000), ‘Tort Damages’, in Boudewijn Bouckaert and Gerrit De Geest (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, vol. II, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

Ben-Shahar, Omri (2000), ‘Causation and Foreseeability’, in Boudewijn Bouckaert and Gerrit De Geest (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, vol. II, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

Bishop, William (1982), “Economic Loss in Tort”, 2 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 1-29.

Bouckaert, Boudewijn and De Geest, Gerrit (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

Brown, John Prather (1973), ‘Toward an Economic Theory of Liability’, 2 Journal of Legal Studies, 323-350.

Calabresi, Guido (1961), ‘Some Thoughts on Risk Distribution and the Law of Torts’, 70 Yale Law Journal, 35-46.

Calabresi, Guido (1970), The Costs of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis, New Haven, Yale University Press.

Calabresi, Guido and Melamed, A. Douglas (1972), ‘Property Rules, Liability Rules and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral’, 85 Harvard Law Review, 1089-1128.

Calfee, John E. and Craswell, Richard (1984), ‘Some Effects of Uncertainty on Compliance with Legal Standards’, 70 Virginia Law Review, 965-1003.

Chung, Tai-Yeong (1993), ‘Efficiency of Comparative Negligence: A Game Theoretic Analysis’, 22 Journal of Legal Studies, 395-404.

Coase, Ronald H. (1960), ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, 3 Journal of Law and Economics, 1-44.

Cooter, Robert D. (1989), ‘Punitive Damages for Deterrence: When and How Much?’, 40 Alabama Law Review, 1143-1196.

Cooter, Robert D. and Ulen, Thomas S. (1986), ‘An Economic Case for Comparative Negligence’, 81 New York University Law Review, 1067-1110.

Cooter, Robert D. and Ulen, Thomas S. (2000), Law and economics, 3rd ed., Reading, Massachusetts, [etc.]: Addison-Wesley.

Craswell, Richard and Calfee, John E. (1986), ‘Deterrence and Uncertain Legal Standards’, 2 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 279-303.

Curran, Christopher (1992), ‘The Spread of the Comparative Negligence Rule in the United States’, 12 International Review of Law and Economics, 317-332.

Dworkin, Ronald M. (1975), Taking Rights Seriously, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.

Edlin, Aaron S. (1994), ‘Efficient Standards of Due Care: Should Courts Find More Parties Negligent under Comparative Negligence?’, 14 International Review of Law and Economics, 21-34.

Emons, Winand (1990a), ‘Efficient Liability Rules for an Economy with Non identical Individuals’, 42 Journal of Public Economics, 89-104.

Emons, Winand (1990b), ‘Some Recent Developments in the Economic Analysis of Liability Law: An Introduction’, 146 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 237-248.

Eörsi, Gyula (1975), ‘Private and Governmental Liability for the Torts of Employees and Organs’, in André Tunc (ed.), Torts, International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen, Mohr.

Faure, Michael (1995), ‘The Limits to Insurability from a Law and Economics Perspective’, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 454-462.

Faure, Michael G. and Van den Bergh, Roger (eds.) (1989), Essays in Law and Economics:

Corporations, Accident Prevention and Compensation for Losses, Antwerpen, Maklu.

Frezza, Giampaolo and Parisi, Francesco (1998), ‘Pietro Trimarchi’, in Backhaus, Jürgen G.

(ed.), Elgar Companion to Law and Economics, Elgar- Ashgate.

Friedman, David (1982), ‘What Is Fair Compensation for Death or Injury?’, 2 International Review of Law and Economics, 81-93.

Grady, Mark (1990), ‘Multiple Tortfeasors and the Economy of Prevention’, 19 Journal of Legal Studies, 653-678.

Grady, Mark F. (1983), ‘A New Positive Economic Theory of Negligence’, 92 Yale Law Journal, 799-829.

Haddock, David D. and Curran, Christopher (1985), ‘An Economic Theory of Comparative Negligence’, 14 Journal of Legal Studies, 49-72.

Honoré, A.M. (1971), ‘Causation and Remoteness of Damage’, in André Tunc (ed.), Torts, International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen, Mohr.

Kahan, Marcel (1989), ‘Causation and Incentives to Take Care under the Negligence Rule’, 18 Journal of Legal Studies, 427-447.

Kaplow, Louis (1994), ‘The Value of Accuracy in Adjudication: An Economic Analysis’, 23 Journal of Legal Studies, 307-401.

Kaplow, Louis and Shavell, Steven (1994), ‘Accuracy in the Assessment of Liability’, 37 Journal of Law and Economics, 1-15.

Kaplow, Louis and Shavell, Steven (1996a), ‘Accuracy in the Assessment of Damages’, 39 Journal of Law and Economics, 191-209.

Kaplow, Louis and Shavell, Steven (1996b), ‘Property Rules versus Liability Rules: An Economic Analysis’, 109 Harvard Law Review, 713-790.

Kaplow, Louis and Shavell Steven (2002), ‘Economic Analysis of Law’, in Hawerback, Alan J. and Feldstein, Martin S. eds., Handbook of Public Economics, Amsterdam, Elsevier Science.

Kornhauser, Lewis A. (1982), ‘An Economic Analysis of the Choice Between Enterprise and Personal Liability for Accidents’, 70 California Law Review, 1345-1392.

Kornhauser, Lewis A. and Revesz, Richard L. (2000), ‘Joint Tortfeasors’, in Boudewijn Bouckaert and Gerrit De Geest (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, vol. II, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

Kraakman, Reinier H. (2000), ‘Vicarious and Corporate Civil Liability’, in Boudewijn Bouckaert and Gerrit De Geest (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, vol. II, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

Krauss, Michael I. (2000), ‘Property Rules versus Liability’, in Boudewijn Bouckaert and Gerrit De Geest (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, vol. II, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

Landes, William M. and Posner, Richard A. (1980), ‘Multiple Tortfeasors: An Economic Analysis’, 9 Journal of Legal Studies, 517-555.

Landes, William M. and Posner, Richard A. (1981), ‘An Economic Theory of Intentional Torts’, 1 International Review of Law and Economics, 127-154.

Landes, William M. and Posner, Richard A. (1983), ‘Causation in Tort Law: an Economic Approach’, 12 Journal of Legal Studies, 109-134.

Landes, William M. and Posner, Richard A. (1984), ‘Tort Law as a Regulatory Regime for Catastrophic Personal Injuries’, 13 Journal of Legal Studies, 417-434.

Landes, William M. and Posner, Richard A. (1985), ‘A Positive Economic Analysis of Products Liability’, 14 Journal of Legal Studies, 535-567.

Landes, William M. and Posner, Richard A. (1986), ‘New Light on Punitive Damages’, 10 Regulation, 33-36.

Landes, William M. and Posner, Richard A. (1987), The Economic Structure of Tort Law, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.

Le Gall, Jean-Pierre (1976), ‘Liability for Persons under Supervision’, in André Tunc (ed.), Torts, International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen, Mohr.

Limpens, Jean, Kruithof, Robert M. and Meinertzhagen-Limpens, Anne (1979), ‘Liability for One’s Own Act’, in André Tunc (ed.), Torts, International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen, Mohr.

Malloy, Robin Paul (1990), Law and Economics: A Comparative Approach to Theory and Practice, St. Paul, West Publishing Company.

Marks, Stephen V. (1994), ‘Discontinuities, Causation, and Grady’s Uncertainty Theorem’, 23 Journal of Legal Studies, 287-301.

Mattei, Ugo (2000), Comparative Law and Economics, Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press.

Mattei, Ugo and Pardolesi, Roberto (1991), 'Law and Economics in Civil Law Countries: A Comparative Approach', 11 International Review of Law and Economics, 265-275.

Mattei, Ugo, Antoniolli, Luisa and Rossato, Andrea (2000), ‘Comparative Law and Economics’, in Boudewijn Bouckaert and Gerrit De Geest (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, vol. II, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

McEwin, R. Ian (2000), ‘No-Fault Compensation Systems’, in Boudewijn Bouckaert and Gerrit De Geest (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, vol. II, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

McGregor, Harvey (1972), ‘Personal Injury and Death’, in André Tunc (ed.), Torts, International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen, Mohr.

Miceli, Thomas J. (1997), Economics of the Law: Torts, Contracts, Property, Litigation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Ogus, Anthony I. (1994), Regulation: Legal Form and Economic Theory, Oxford, Clarendon.

Ollier, Pierre-Dominique and Le Gall, Jean-Pierre (1981), ‘Various Damages’, in André Tunc (ed.), Torts, International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen, Mohr.

Orr, Daniel (1991), ‘The Superiority of Comparative Negligence: Another Vote’, 20 Journal of Legal Studies, 119-129.

Parisi, Francesco (1994), ‘Alterum non Laedere: An Intellectual History of Civil Liability’, 39 American Journal of Jurisprudence, 317-351.

Parisi, Francesco and Posner, Richard A. (1997), International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, Volume II: Contracts, Torts and Criminal Law, London, Edward Elgar.

Png, Ivan Paak-Liang (1986), ‘Optimal Subsidies and Damages in the Presence of Judicial Error’, 6 International Review of Law and Economics, 101-105.

Polinsky, A. Mitchell (1989), An Introduction to Law and Economics, 2nd ed., Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

Polinsky, A. Mitchell and Che, Yeon-Koo (1991), ‘Decoupling Liability: Optimal incentives for Care and Litigation’, 22 Rand Journal of Economics, 562-570.

Polinsky, A. Mitchell and Rogerson, William P. (1983), ‘Product Liability, Consumer Misperceptions, and Market Power’, 14 Bell Journal of Economics, 581-589.

Polinsky, A. Mitchell and Shavell, Steven (1998), ‘Punitive Damages: An Economic Analysis’, 111 Harvard Law Review, 869-962.

Polinsky, A. Mitchell and Shavell, Steven (2000), ‘Punitive Damages’, in Boudewijn Bouckaert and Gerrit De Geest (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, vol. II, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

Polinsky, Mitchell A. and Shavell, Steven (1994), ‘Should Liability be Based on the Harm to the Victim or the Gain to the Injurer?’, 10 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 427-437.

Posner, Richard A. (1973), ‘Strict Liability: A Comment’, 2 Journal of Legal Studies, 205-221.

Posner, Richard A. (1998), Economic Analysis of Law (5th ed.), New York, Aspen Publishers, Inc..

Posner, Richard A. (ed.) (1977), Tort Law: Cases and Economic Analysis, Boston, Little Brown.

Rabin, Robert L. (1985), ‘Tort Recovery for Negligently Inflicted Economic Loss: A Reassessment’, 37 Stanford Law Review, 1513-1538.

Rabin, Robert L. (1993), Perspectives on Tort Law (3rd ed.), Boston, Little Brown.

Radin, Margaret J. (1987), ‘Market Inalienability’, 100 Harvard Law Review, 1849-1937.

Rea, Samuel A., Jr. (1987), ‘The Economics of Comparative Negligence’, 7 International Review of Law and Economics, 149-162.

Rizzo, Mario J. (1982), ‘A Theory of Economic Loss in the Law of Torts’, 11 Journal of Legal Studies, 281-310.

Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1985), ‘Inalienability and the Theory of Property Rights’, 85 Columbia Law Review, 931-969.

Rubinfeld, Daniel L. (1987), ‘The Efficiency of Comparative Negligence’, 16 Journal of Legal Studies, 375-394.

Schäfer, Hans-Bernd (2000), ‘Tort Law: General’, in Boudewijn Bouckaert and Gerrit De Geest (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, vol. II, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

Schäfer, Hans-Bernd and Schönemberger, Andreas (2000), ‘Strict Liability versus Negligence’, in Boudewijn Bouckaert and Gerrit De Geest (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, vol. II, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

Shavell, Steven (1979), ‘On Moral Hazard and Insurance’, 93 Quarterly Journal of Economics, 541-562.

Shavell, Steven (1980a), ‘Strict Liability versus Negligence’, 9 Journal of Legal Studies, 1-25.

Shavell, Steven (1980b), ‘An Analysis of Causation and the Scope of Liability in the Law of Torts’, 9 Journal of Legal Studies, 463-516.

Shavell, Steven (1982), ‘On Liability and Insurance’, 13 Bell Journal of Economics, 120-132.

Shavell, Steven (1984), ‘Liability for Harm versus Regulation of Safety’, 13 Journal of Legal Studies, 357-374.

Shavell, Steven (1985), ‘Uncertainty over Causation and the Determination of Civil Liability’, 28 Journal of Law and Economics, 587-609.

Shavell, Steven (1986), ‘The Judgment Proof Problem’, 6 International Review of Law and Economics, 45-58.

Shavell, Steven (1987), Economic Analysis of Accident Law, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.

Shavell, Steven (1992), 'Liability and the Incentives to Obtain Information about Risk', 21 Journal of Legal Studies, 259-270.

Spence, A. Michael (1977), ‘Consumer Misperceptions, Product Failure and Product Liability’, 64 Review of Economic Studies, 561-572.

Stoll, Hans (1972), ‘Consequences of Liability: Remedies’, in André Tunc (ed.), Torts, International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Tübingen, Mohr.

Sykes, Alan O. (1981), ‘An Efficiency Analysis of Vicarious Liability Under the Law of Agency’, 91 Yale Law Journal, 168-206.

Sykes, Alan O. (1984), ‘The Economics Vicarious Liability”, 93 Yale Law Journal, 1231-1282.

Trimarchi, Pietro (1959a), “Il caso fortuito quale limite della responsabilità per il danno da cose. Contributo and una teoria del rischio di inpresa” (Fortuitous Event as a Limit of the Liability for Damage Caused by Things. Contribution to a Theory of Entrepreneurial Risk), Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile, 808 ff.

Trimarchi, Pietro (1959b), “La responsabilità per il fatto dei dipendenti. Contributo and una teoria del rischio di inpresa” (Liability for Damage Caused by Employees. Contribution to a Theory of Entrepreneurial Risk), Rivista di diritto civile, 604 ff.

Trimarchi, Pietro (1961), Rischio e responsabilità oggettiva (Risk and Strict Liability), Milano, Giuffrè.

Trimarchi, Pietro (1967), Causalità e danno (Causality and Damage), Milano, Giuffrè.

Figures

Figure 1: the basic model

0 x* x

p(x)H + c(x) c(x)

p(x)H Social cost, p(x)H + c(x)

Expected accident cost, p(x)H Cost of precaution, c(x)

0 xs x* x

p(x)H + c2(x) c2(x)

p(x)H + c1(x) c1(x)

p(x)H Social cost, p(x)H + c(x)

Expected accident cost, p(x)H Least cost of precaution, c1(x) Cost of precaution for the other party, c2(x)

Figure 2: alternative precaution

0 xd=x* x

p(x)H + c(x) c(x)

p(x)H Social cost, p(x)H + c(x)

Expected accident cost, p(x)H Cost of care, c(x)

Figure 3: fault-based liability

D C B A

0 xd x

p(x)H + c(x) c(x)

p(x)H Social cost, p(x)H + c(x)

Expected accident cost, p(x)H Cost of care, c(x)

Figure 4: causation and negligence

p(x)H + c(x) c(x)

p(x)H

Figure 5: causation and negligence – due care higher than optimal care D

C B A

0 x* xd x E

Social cost, p(x)H + c(x) Expected accident cost, p(x)H Cost of care, c(x)