Conclusions

In §3, we saw that:

-as a result of the interaction between original particles some shadows, reflexes, ghosts, spectra, alter- egos, or avatars appear in the exact half of the distance that separates such original particles, although each one is in opposite places of the universe,

-the avatars are all together in that single and intermediate point, -the ones who really communicate are the avatars,

77

-the avatars are the operative representatives of the original spins, that is, it is as if the original spins behave like the avatars and thus justify the exceptional attributes of entanglement,

-the avatars of equation (3.43) were obtained from equation (3.34), i.e., the scalar version of SA B . We would have never found the avatars with the Dirac’s notation based on <bra| and |ket> of equation (3.31) since with that notation: values, signs and polarizations (or orientations) of spins are blurred; which is not advisable, in particular, when we try to study different degrees of correlation between them. All this is particularly important considering that the spin is the most conspicuous element of QM. In the end, everything was reduced to a problem of symbolic logic, i.e., a simple problem of mathematical treatment. For this reason, two apparently incompatible theories (GR and QM) have always been united even if we did not see it [71]. Although equation (6.2) collects both theories with traditional tools, we would have never reached it without equation (6.1), since it comes exclusively from scalar notation.

In §4, we saw that:

-when in Table 4.3 of §4.2 we speak of negative mass, we are talking about negative matter and negative energy; where mass and energy are completely conserved, i.e., they are neutralized in the total balance. However, this tells us that the entanglement brings together the matter and antimatter (where it is) of the particles entangled through the avatars. It is as if the avatars reflect the fact that there is a counterpart of each particle entangled in another part. In a way, it is as if Alice and Bob looked at themselves in a mirror, in other words: a kind of self-entanglement between matter and antimatter. All this leads us to ask ourselves if the entanglement is the result of anti-matter almost exclusively and if without anti-matter entanglement would not even exist. This has automatic consequences on: a) the Casimir’s effect [201], which being the result of the joint action of matter- anti-matter pairs, would then be directly linked to entanglement, b) dark energy and matter [89, 202] is a similar case to the latter almost for the same reasons,

-in §4.3, we saw that the avatars sustain the effect called entanglement.

In §5, we saw that:

-in Figure 5.17 as a result of a quantum measurement, the avatars go from being 4 with infinite value in the case of entanglement, to being 2 with finite value in the case of completely independent parti- cles,

-the rest of §5 talks about the extension of the avatars-based analysis to all the possibilities of entanglement.

As a consequence of §6, we know that:

-the entanglement is a hinge that connects the two most important theories of Physics (GR and QM) and not the reason for their disagreement,

-the avatars are an approach to the Theory of Everything (TOE) through the equations (6.1) and (6.2), -the avatars have infinite energy of both signs on both sides of the WREP, which is the kind of

necessary energy to keep a wormhole open. This feature is the fuel for a natural, equivalent and instantaneous transit through the WREP while the entanglement lasts,

-a complete explanation of the instantaneity of the entanglement is possible for the first time without the need of a confrontation between GR and QM. This instantaneity takes place between entangled pairs which constitute a unique state from its member states, in such a way that, when we touch something of this set, we touch everything. Both literature and experiments indicate that entangle- ment is a non-local effect, justifying its instantaneity at the expense of a dispute between GR and QM. Such dispute is saved, in part, by the following slogan: entanglement is instantaneous but does not allow us to transmit useful information without using superluminal signaling which collides with the postulates of the Theory of Relativity. In this work, it has been shown that this is not the case,

78

-we should not confuse a link based on entanglement (LBoE) with teleportation, which is one of the many uses of an LBoE, but it is not the only one. LBoE has infinite bandwidth, null latency, and absence of noise; however, teleportation uses EPR pairs and a series of optical elements which introduce noise in said pairs. Therefore, teleportation in itself will have the bandwidth of the compo- nent with the lowest bandwidth,

-no superluminal velocities are needed to justify the instantaneity of entanglement; therefore, QM is a complete theory, since avatars can communicate at speeds well below that of light. If the original spins were the ones that communicated between themselves, then they would need an infinite speed to do so,

-non locality = dilated locality,

-since gravity and entanglement share the same exceptional attributes: a) there is not a screen that can stop them,

b) they are instantaneous, and c) they have an infinite range;

and based on §6.5, we concluded that there is a strong clue that leads us to say that gravity and entanglement would be expressions of a common phenomenon:

(Gravity = Entanglement)  (GR = QM), where, in both cases the equal sign “=” means avatars.