• No results found

conclusions And implicATions for Work prAcTice, reseArch And policY mAking

The article reflects the main synergies between social entrepreneurial learning and human rights education in the non-formal context, with the conceptual fundament as their basis and preliminary practical experiences in that area as their background. As rigorous research on the impact of this practice has still to be done, they are characterized as ‘preliminary’. The conceptual funda- ment includes discussion of the relationship between social entrepreneurship and human rights, the understanding of human rights education, including its different dimensions-above all, the action-orientation of the dimension ‘learn- ing for human rights’. The main synergies – utilizing the non-formal-context, participation, transformation, empowerment, and action-orientation  –  are identified and briefly explained. These synergies indicate the potential that the combination of social entrepreneurial learning and human rights education can develop.

For youth work practice, the article implies that the combination of social entre- preneurial learning and human rights education can be useful as it enhances the positive practical achievements of both educational approaches. The article also provides some tentative links between the two and invites youth work- ers and researchers to further develop methods and activities combining social entrepreneurial learning and human rights education. It therefore calls for criti- cal participation in the implementation of this combination of social entrepre- neurial learning and human rights education and a review of the practice. There is a need for research into understanding what can be expected from the dynamics of transformation and empowerment, and how they take place. In addition, impact evaluation of the combination of social entrepreneurial learning and human rights education, including specific analysis of the single steps of the educational process would be needed. Particular attention could be put on the participants’ background characteristics and how these have an impact on the outcome of the educational process. This research should in its design and conduct remain grounded in rigor and realism. Only in this way can research contribute to the improvement of the educational programs.

See as a ‘good practice’ of a com- bined social entrepreneurial- and human rights educational-process: www.wasserfuerwasser.ch

The non-profit enterprise ‘Wasser fuer Wasser’ coordinates the sale of tap water in restaurants not for the profit of the restaurants but for the benefit of sustainable and entrepreneurial water-projects world-wide. ‘Wasser fuer Wasser’ has won already several awards, among others the Young Caritas Award and the IHRF-Award.

The article gives an outlook on the potential of the combination of social entre- preneurial learning and human rights education and is an urgent invitation to further, with programmes, funds and other concrete measures, this focus for youth work. Ultimately, the article opens up several reflection questions:

What does ‘social’ in ‘social entrepreneurship’ mean? Who defines it and in whose name? Why does it matter? How can youth work address the risk of profit-maximising enterprises overusing and abusing the concept of social entrepreneurship? How can youth work engage with the entrepreneurial activities that threaten the human rights of people?

Po

lic

y a

PPr

oac

hes i

n en

tre

Pren

eu

ria

l l

ear

nin

g

253

Oser, F. & Biedermann, H. (2007) Partizipation – ein Begriff, der ein Meister der Verwirrung ist, in

Quesel, C. & Oser, F. (Ed.) Die

Mühen der Freiheit. Probleme und Chancen der Partizipation von Kindern und Jugendlichen,

pp.17-38. Zürich: Rüegger. Sandkühler, H.-J. (2010) Art. Menschenrechte, in: Sandkühler,

H.J. (Ed.) Enzyklopädie Philosophie,

pp.1530-1553. Hamburg: Meiner. Santos, F. M. (2010) A Positive Theory of Social Entrepreneurship, in: INSEAD Working Paper n°2009/23/EFE/INSEAD Social Innovation Centre, pp.1-55.

Tibbitts, F. & Kirchschlaeger, P.G.

(2010) Perspectives of Research

on Human Rights Education,

in: Journal of Human Rights Education 2 (1), pp.8-29.

United Nations (2004) ABC-

Teaching Human Rights. Practical Activities for primary und second- ary schools, New York: UN.

United Nations Human

Rights (2013) United Nations

Declaration on Human Rights Education and Training.

www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/ Education/Training/Pages/ UNDHREducationTraining.aspx accessed 20 June 2013. Wasser für Wasser (WfW) (2013) wasserfuerwasser.ch accessed 20 June 2013.

references

noTes

Ippoliti, E. (2006) United Nations

Efforts to Support Human Rights Education at the National Level, in Kirchschlaeger, P.G., & Kirchschlaeger, T. et al. (Eds.)

Menschenrechte und Bildung,

Internationales Menschenrechtsforum Luzern (IHRF), Band. III, pp.327- 337. Bern: Stämpfli Verlag.

Kaelin, W., Mueller, L., Wyttenbach,

J. (2004) The Face of Human Rights,

Baden: Lars Mueller Publishers. Khan, I. (2006) Education as a Foundation for Human Rights Practice, in Kirchschlaeger, P.G., & Kirchschlaeger, T. et al. (Eds.)

Menschenrechte und Bildung,

Internationales Menschenrechtsforum Luzern (IHRF), Band. III,

pp.35-41. Bern: Stämpfli Verlag. Kirchschlaeger, P.G. (2013a), Menschenrechte und Politik, in H.

R. Yousefi (Ed.), Menschenrechte im

Weltkontext. Geschichten – Erschein ungsformen – Neuere Entwicklungen,

pp.255-260. Heidelberg: Springer.

Kirchschlaeger, P.G. (2013b) Wie

können Menschenrechte begründet werden? Ein für religiöse und säkulare Menschenrechtskonzeption anschluss- fähiger Ansatz, Münster: LIT Verlag.

Kirchschlaeger, P.G. (2011) Study Visits of Human Rights Institutions as Innovative Instrument and Method of Human Rights

Education, Journal of Human Rights

Education, 3 (2/2011) pp.24-31.

Kirchschlaeger, P.G. (2011) Human Rights Education in Schools: Enhancing Curriculum Relevance, in: D. Potolea, L. Ciolan, I. Neacsu, I. Rusenescus

(Eds.) Enhancing Curriculum

Relevance, pp.155-173. Bukarest:

Editura Universitară Bucureşti.

Kirchschlaeger, P.G. & Kirchschlaeger, T. (2010) Neue Formen der

Partizipation aufgrund des Artikels 12 der UNO-Kinderrechtskonvention von 1989, in O. Dangl & T.

Schrei (Eds.). …gefeiert – ver-

achtet – umstritten. Menschenrechte und Menschenrechtsbildung,

pp.183-188. Wien: LIT.

Kirchschlaeger, P.G. & Kirchschlaeger, T. (2009) Answering the ‘What’, the ‘When’, the ‘Why’ and the ‘How’: Philosophy-Based and Law-Based

Human Rights Education, Journal

of Human Rights Education,

1 (1/2009), pp.26-36.

Kirchschlaeger, P.G. (2007) Brauchen Menschenrechte eine (moralische) Begründung?, in Kirchschlaeger, P.G., & Kirchschlaeger, T. et al.

(Eds.) Menschenrechte und Kinder,

Internationales Menschenrechtsforum Luzern (IHRF), Bandd. IV, pp.55- 63. Bern: Stämpfli Verlag. Lohmann, G. (2004)

Menschenrechte in Theorie und Praxis, in Kirchschlaeger, P.G., & Kirchschlaeger, T. et al. (Eds.)

Menschenrechte und Terrorismus,

Internationales Menschenrechtsforum Luzern (IHRF), Band. I, pp.305- 309. Bern: Stämpfli Verlag.

Lohrenscheit, C. (2006) A

Human Rights Based Approach to Education, in Kirchschlaeger, P.G., & Kirchschlaeger, T. (Eds.)

Menschenrechte und Bildung,

pp.141-150. Bern: Stämpfli Verlag. Morsink, J. (2010) The Universal Declaration and the Conscience of Humanity, in: R. Huhle (Ed.)

Human Rights and History: A Challenge for Education, pp.25-

36. Berlin: Stiftung Erinnerung, Verantwortung, Zukunft (EVZ). Ashoka Innovators for the Public

(2013) What is a Social Entrepreneur?,

www.ashoka.org/social_entrepreneur accessed 20 June 2013.

Council of Europe (2005) Compass.

A Manual on Human Rights Education with Young People,

Strasbourg: Council of Europe. De Mello Vieira, S. (2004)

Foreword, in: UN, ABC-Teaching

Human Rights, New York: UN.

OECD Working Party on SMEs and Entrepreneurship (WPSMEE)

(2010) Issues Paper 1: Innovative

SMEs and Entrepreneurship for Job Creation and Growth,

www.oecd.org/cfe/ smesandentrepreneurship/ 46404350.pdf

accessed 20 June 2013. EU Skills Panorama (2012)

Entrepreneurial Initiative Analytical Highlight, prepared by ICF GHK

for the European Commission. Flowers, N. (2004) How to Define Human Rights Education? A Complex Answer to a Simple Question, in V. B. Georgi and M.Seberich

(Ed.) International Perspectives in

Human Rights Education, pp.105-

127. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann.

Freire, P. (1970) Pedagogy of the

Oppressed, New York: Continuum.

53

See also OECD WPSMEE 2010.

54

There are several international initiatives which try to make the private sector a a subject or at least a complicit of the realization of human rights, not of human rights viola- tions, e.g. the UN Global Compact www.unglobalcompact.org The Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework www.business-humanrights.org/ media/documents/ruggie/ruggie- guiding-principles--21-mar--2011.pdf The OECD Guidelines for

Multinational Enterprises www.oecd.org

The IFC’s Sustainability Framework www.ifc.org/policyreview

55

The author has contributed as a consultative expert to the development of the UN Declaration on Human Rights Education and Training 2011 during the entire prepara- tion process of the Declaration.

56

See as a ‘good practice’ of a com- bined social entrepreneurial- and human rights educational-process: www.wasserfuerwasser.ch

The non-profit enterprise ‘Wasser fuer Wasser’ coordinates the sale of tap water in restaurants not for the profit of the restaurants but for the benefit of sustainable and entrepreneurial water-projects world-wide. ‘Wasser fuer Wasser’ has won already several awards, among others the Young Caritas Award and the IHRF-Award.

254

Po

lic

y a

PPr

oac

hes i

n en

tre

Pren

eu

ria

l l

ear

nin

g

If one important focus of working with young people and training entrepre- neurs is about developing competencies, then surely, ‘business competency’ should include guiding ethics and values that support the sustainability of the particular enterprise. This essay examines the contribution of youth work in helping young people to become self-employed and to encourage responsible business. With reference to the enterprise development and youth work scene across the UK, it highlights the supportive features of an evolving arena and raises the following questions: Are skills and knowledge all that are needed to support sustainable youth enterprise? Are there any benefits in providing space for business ethics and values education, within a fuller spectrum of support for young entrepreneurs? Essentially, the writer presents business ethics and values as tactical priorities for achieving sustainable business development – including entrepreneurs.