identical
comitions. When it isremembered that the
average "waiting-time" forall New Zealand
is only55. 28
minutes ,i.e. the
average can
isstanding
stillonly one-half of'
this time , it is a questionwhether the dete
rioration of cream ismatched
bythe
increased petrol consumption. When enqui� was
made
fUrth
er, it was revealed thatthe awnings had to be removed each day after
creamwas
unloaded asthe
lorries were utilised forgeneral haulage
purposes.
The cost
to the compaqyconcerned
amounted toover £650
per annumin petrol alone , besides
othe
r runningcosts.
In addition,1 800
hours of driver ' s time was consumed. plus a heavy replaceme
ntcost in
canvas
a
wnings.
As creamdeteriorates
o� when standing still on back of lorries(during
haulage 1the current of
air is sufficient toprevent deteriora ticm
)
, it isconsidered that an
average
ofless than
half
an hour exposure tosun does
not warrantthe expense
ofincreased
haulage
costs , espeoia.llJr in daysof
vaoreation.36
The mmiber
of stoppages per mile causes a very considerable increasein all
truckrunning c oots
- especiallyrepairs
and maintenance . Whena
vehicle ceases to move , either the engine is left idling , or is turned offand
startedag
ain.The
vehicles operating in Table XXX, for example, always left theire
ngine
srunning,
even for periods
upto five minutes . They
a
veraged, a·. t o tal'!1' 433
minutesa day
in
engineUnit costs of cream collection: The New Zealand average for all factories was 0.508d.. per lb. of fat. T!le dispersion of unit costs l ies between the range of 0.300d. t o 1 .4nd. per pound. There is no obvious relationship
between unit costs and scale , but there is a general tendency for \urlt costs
to be less with increase of scale. The 27 companies \vi th output of butt.er
less than 1 1000,000 lbs . per annwn, show wide dispersion of costs. Two comp
ani·es have c osts under 0.4d. per lb. , another 1 1 companies have costs between 0.1l and
o.6d.
per lb. , five companies lie betweeno.6
and o. s. , another five lie between 0. 8 and1 .0d..
perlb.
smd four have c.osts in excess of 1 .0d. perlb.
The structure of unit costs forall
companies is shcri\'ll in the folloong table.TABIE �·
CREAM HAULAGE UNIT COSTS OF COMPANIES FOR1
SEASON.Size of No. of unit cost Truck c osts
in
lbs.)
of cream mile per lb. Up to 1 ,ooo ,ooo 27 o. 667d.)
1 ,ooo,oo1 to 2,ooo,ooo 27 o. 604d.)
$.
2,000,001 to 4,000,000 20 o. 633d. 7t
d. 4,000,001 to 6,ooo,ooo 1 3 0.51 6d. 1 1 d. *6,ooo,oo1 to a,ooo , ooo 5 0.477d.
)
a,ooo,oo1 to 1 2,000, 000 2 0.432d.
)
1 3d.Over 1 21000 1000 2 0.41 9d.
)
The data has been related to companies rather than factories, as
in
certain cases it was not possible to allocate costs exactly to individual factories.3 6
(
cont.)
less an economic expenditure than that which would be occasioned by turning off the engine cUld recommencing it again, as is done in some companies.
One comp� supplied some ver,y interesting figures. They operated a. considerable fleet of vehicles - some on
milk
and cream haulage and some on town milk deliveries. On the cream and milk haulage section, the vehicles were six-tanners , whereas on the town milk supply routes30 cwt. trucks were employed. While the petrol and oil consumption
was identical for both fleets , the repairs and maintenance on the
town supply routes were just double those of the vehicles used ex clusively f'or cream and milk haulage. It was considered that the ex cessive stopping , and starting per mile covered was the cause of the heav,y running costs. Moreover those vehicles on close� settled deliveries all had petrol costs of over
4d.
per mile.There is an apparent decrease of unit costs with scale. In the
third class-interval there is an increase over the sec ond, but in the third class-interval four compa..rrl.es have c osts in excess of 1 d. Were these deleted, the decreasing pattern would have been uniform. The truck rwm
ing
costs per mile from data presented earlier are repeated for purposes of ccmparison only. These costs refer to 50 companies only and are placed in broader classifications. Whereas truck running costs per mile tend to increase,unit costs per lb. of fat tend to decrease. This is due partly to larger bulk of cream car.ried by larger companies, and their tendency to allocate haulage costs elsewhere .
Distance of from and its relation to coats
:37
TablesXXVI
and
XXVII
show the distance of suppliers from their relative :factories. TableXXVII
shows the cumulative percentage of cream in class-intervals of 1 0 per cent together with distance from factory. This latter table will now be used to calculate the costs of cream haulage, as detennined by distance o:f' supplier from factory. Thus from TableXXVII
it is assumed that the. 2.1
first 10 per cent o:f' cream cost o:f' the total costs; that the first 6
20 per cent cost of the costs ; and so on through the table. The resulting costs are shown
in
the following table:-37
Stric� speaking, the following table refers to c ollection costs, i. e. variable costs , and assumes the " sunken" costs of capital outlay on vehicles etc. , as constant.POIN'.r INCREASES FROM FACTORY
of cream collected C1.lilD..llative cost as zone increases
classified. in zones of
1
in distance from1 0}& of the cream costs
4.4.%
of total costs2Cf%
of the cream cos·ts7.7.%
of total costs3o%
of ·the cream costs1 0. �
of total cos·�s4Q%
of the cream costs1 3 . 2%
of total cos·:;sso%
of the cream costs1 6.4%
of tot.'ll. costs6/J%
of the cream costs20. �
of total costs7afo
of the cream costs25. �
of total costs80%
of the cream costs33. �
of total - costs�&
of the cream costsso.Q%
of total costa.The table should. be read : the first
1 0,'lb
of cream in a hypothetical zone nearest t}:le factory costs4.4.%
of the total costs; the first2ff%,
of cream(
including the previous zone or zones)
nearest the faotor.r etc. , and so on.It will be. observed that the last
1 0
per cent of cream collected actualzy cos.ts one-half of total costs on an average. Moreover, one-third of the cost ·rill bring in 80 per cent of the total cream, and approximately one quarter of the cost will bring in70
per cent , ani one-fifth of the cost60
per cent , and one-sixth of the cost50
per cent.The above table refers to data which represents a carefully selected
cross-section of all types of routes for factories of different s izes. It would appear i.--t Table XXVIII where
86
factories are examined, that suppliersare further fran the factories than the suppliers of Table XXVI, from which ti1ese costs were taken. MOreover, it was assumed that the firat five miles of the route are identical with i;he last five miles of the route as far as costs are concerned. That is , it had to be assumed that the last few miles were just as easy going as the those nearest "the faotoljT - for costs were worked on the assumption that if the route were
1 0
miles long, the."'l the first two miles would cost just20
per cent of the total costs. But the first two miles from the facto1y are usually "dead miles" of flat tar-sealed roads. Further from the f�ctory , the roads become more difficult 'to traverse , narrower, often hilly, or tertiary roads. Time consttJDed at the distant endof the route was checked as being more than
40
per cent than at the beginning of the route in most cases , and running costs are probablY up to 20 per cent higher. Non-productive time increased with length of route also.With so.roo large companies, with long distant routes and bad roads towards the terminals, as DU.ch as
60
to70
per cent of total cost was in collecting the last1 0
per cent of cream. This was because most of the cream ca.roo from loop routes with off-shoots of some distance, so that long mileages were necessary for a very small percentage of cream.Smaller factories with shorter routes have a more compact cost struct ure, and can bring in
50
per cent of their cream for25
to30
per cent of the total cost. Those factories with most distant suppliers under1 0
miles have a fairly evenly distributed cost pattern. One factory was selectedas typically spaced as far as suppliers went,
(
the most distant 22 miles)
and the cost structure worked rut. Measured in 1 0 per cent of cream interval zones , the o ast pattern was :2, 5 , 1 1 , 1 8, 27
(
at50
per cent of creamreceived
)
,38, 51 , 65 , 82 arid 1 00
per cent respective�.Vehicle-running costs are
60
per cent variable , and40
pe r cent fixed. in character. Petrol c onsumption and repairs increase with the number of stops per mile(
rather than by weight carried)
. Rainfallam
wind-drag increase petrol consumption considerabzy. Backing into stands , exoessstopping , and over-speeding should be controlled or eliminated where possible. Running oosts tend to increase with the si:z:e of the COlllJ?al\V and the
mileage run. Efficiency tenis to decrease with scale 1 for larger colJi?anies
tend to go further for cream, and a1