CRED defines a disaster as “a situation or event, which overwhelms local capacity, necessitating a request to national or international level for external assistance (defini-tion considered in EM-DAT); an unforeseen and often sudden event that causes great damage, destruction and human suffering”.
For a disaster to be entered into the database, at least one of the following criteria must be fulfilled:
n
nTen or more people reported killed n
n100 people or more reported affected n
nDeclaration of a state of emergency n
nCall for international assistance.
The number of people killed includes people confirmed as dead and people missing and presumed dead. People affected are those requiring immediate assistance during a period of emergency (i.e., requiring basic survival needs such as food, water, shelter, sanitation and immediate medical assistance). People reported injured or homeless are aggregated with those reported affected to produce a ‘total number of people affected’.
The economic impact of a disaster usually consists of direct consequences on the local economy (e.g., damage to infrastructure, crops, housing) and indirect consequences (e.g., loss of revenues, unemployment, market destabilization). In EM-DAT, the reg-istered figure corresponds to the damage value at the moment of the event and usually only to direct damage, expressed in US dollars (2010 prices).
In 2007, a new natural disaster category classification was introduced in EM-DAT.
This new classification was initiated by CRED and Munich Re and brought together CRED, Munich Re, Swiss Re, the Asian Disaster Reduction Center (ADRC) and the UN Development Programme (UNDP). The goals were to create and agree on a com-mon hierarchy and terminology for all global and regional databases on natural disas-ters and to establish a common and agreed definition of sub-events that is simple and self-explanatory.
This classification is a first step in the development of a standardized international clas-sification of disasters. It distinguishes two generic categories for disasters: natural and technological.
The natural disasters category is into five sub-groups, which in turn cover 12 disaster types and more than 32 sub-types. The five sub-groups and 12 types are as follows:
n
nBiological disasters: Insect infestations, epidemics and animal attacks (the two last categories are not included in the World Disasters Report)
Since 1988, with the sponsorship of the United States Agency for International Devel-opment’s Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA), CRED has maintained EM-DAT, a worldwide database on disasters. It contains essential core data on the occurrence and effects of more than 18,000 disasters in the world from 1900 to the present. The database is compiled from various sources, including United Nations (UN) agencies, non-governmental organizations, insurance companies, research insti-tutes and press agencies.
Priority is given to data from UN agencies, followed by OFDA, governments and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. This prioritization is not a reflection of the quality or value of the data but the recognition that most report-ing sources do not cover all disasters or may have political limitations that could affect the figures. The entries are constantly reviewed for redundancies, inconsistencies and the completion of missing data. CRED consolidates and updates data on a daily basis.
A further check is made at monthly intervals. Revisions are made annually at the end of the calendar year.
The database’s main objectives are to assist humanitarian action at both national and international levels; to rationalize decision-making for disaster preparedness; and to provide an objective basis for vulnerability assessment and priority setting.
A woman in Thaba Patsoa, Leribe District, Lesotho is growing
vegetables in her backyard. She is supported by staff from the Food Facility
Support project for people living with HIV and AIDS, who need a healthy diet to strengthen their
immune systems.
© Monika Mayer/
Lesotho Red Cross
A N N EX
A N N EX
n
nWith regard to the number of people reported affected, the total number is recorded for both the start year and the end year.
n
nFor the number of people reported to be killed, CRED distinguishes between sudden-onset disasters (earthquakes, flash floods, landslides, etc.) and slow-onset disasters (wildfires, some floods, extreme temperatures, etc.) as follows:
n
nSudden-onset disasters – all those killed are registered according to start year of the disaster
n
nSlow-onset disasters – the total of all those killed is divided by two, and a half is attributed to each year of persistence.
n
nReported economic damages are always attributed to the end year of the disaster.
This is because damage is related to both the strength of a disaster and its duration.
By using these rules, some data bias correction is attempted. However, they are far from perfect and CRED will try to improve them, as well as the database as a whole, in the future.
Caveats
Key problems with disaster data include the lack of standardized collection methodolo-gies and definitions. The original information, collected from a variety of public sources, is not specifically gathered for statistical purposes. So, even when the compilation applies strict definitions for disaster events and parameters, the original suppliers of information may not. Moreover, data are not always complete for each disaster. The quality of com-pletion may vary according to the type of disaster (for example, the number of people affected by transport accidents is rarely reported) or its country of occurrence.
Data on deaths are usually available because they are an immediate proxy for the sever-ity of the disaster. However, the numbers put forward immediately after a disaster may sometimes be seriously revised, occasionally several months later.
Data on the numbers of people affected by a disaster can provide some of the most potentially useful figures, for planning both disaster preparedness and response, but they are sometimes poorly reported. Moreover, the definition of people affected remains open to interpretation, political or otherwise. Even in the absence of manipu-lation, data may be extrapolated from old census information, with assumptions being made about percentages of an area’s population affected.
Data can also be skewed because of the rationale behind data gathering. Reinsurance companies, for instance, systematically gather data on disaster occurrence in order to assess insurance risk, but with a priority in areas of the world where disaster insurance is widespread. Their data may therefore miss out poor, disaster-affected regions where insurance is unaffordable or unavailable.
n
nGeophysical disasters: Earthquakes and tsunamis, volcanic eruptions, dry mass movements (avalanches, landslides, rockfalls and subsidence of geophysical origin) n
nClimatological disasters: Droughts (with associated food insecurities), extreme temperatures and wildfires
n
nHydrological disasters: Floods (including waves and surges), wet mass move-ments (avalanches, landslides, rockfalls and subsidence of hydrological origin) n
nMeteorological disasters: Storms (divided into nine sub-categories).
The technological disasters remain unchanged and comprise three groups:
n
nIndustrial accidents: Chemical spills, collapse of industrial infrastructure, explo-sions, fires, gas leaks, poisoning, radiation
n
nTransport accidents: Transportation by air, rail, road or water n
nMiscellaneous accidents: Collapse of domestic/non-industrial structures, explo-sions, fires.
In Tables 1–13, ‘disasters’ refer to disasters with a natural and technological trigger only, and do not include wars, conflict-related famines, diseases or epidemics.
The classification of countries as ‘very high, ‘high’, ‘medium’ or ‘low human develop-ment’ is based on UNDP’s 2010 Human Development Index (HDI). For a small number of countries, which do not appear in the HDI, the World Bank’s classification of economies by the countries’ level of income is used as reference (‘high’, ‘upper mid-dle’ ‘lower midmid-dle’ and ‘low’).
In both EM-DAT and the tables in this annex, data are considered at country level for many reasons, including the fact that it is at this level that they are reported most of the time and also due to issues regarding possible aggregation and disaggregation of data.
For droughts or food insecurities, which are often multi-year events, their impact over time is taken into account.
Bearing in mind that data on deaths and economic damage from drought are infre-quently reported, CRED has adopted the following rules regarding data for droughts:
n
nThe total number of deaths reported for a drought is divided by the number of years for which the drought persists. The resulting number is registered for each year of the drought’s duration.
n
nThe same calculation is done for the reported economic damages.
n
nFor the total number of people reported to be affected, CRED considers that the same number is affected each year that the disaster persists.
Some disasters begin at the end of a year and may last some weeks or months into the following year. In such case, CRED has adopted the following rules:
A N N EX
A N N EX
Please note that in the following tables, some totals may not correspond due to rounding.
Philippe Hoyois, senior research fellow with CRED, Regina Below, manager of CRED’s EM-DAT disaster database, and Debarati Guha-Sapir, director of CRED, prepared the statistics annex. For further information, please contact: Centre for Research on the Epi-demiology of Disasters (CRED), School of Public Health, Catholic University of Louvain, 30.15, Clos Chapelle-aux-Champs, 1200 Brussels, Belgium, tel.: +32 2 764 3327, fax:
+32 2 764 3441, e-mail: [email protected], web site: www.emdat.be.
For natural disasters over the last decade, data on deaths are missing for around one-tenth of reported disasters; data on people affected are missing for about one-fifth of disasters; and data on economic damages are missing for 76 per cent of disasters. The figures should therefore be regarded as indicative. Relative changes and trends are more useful to look at than absolute, isolated figures.
Dates can be a source of ambiguity. For example, a declared date for a famine is both necessary and meaningless – a famine does not occur on a single day. In such cases, the date the appropriate body declares an official emergency has been used. Changes in national boundaries cause ambiguities in the data and may make long-term trend analysis more complicated.
However, in some cases, available data may differ greatly according to sources, be more or less documented estimations and/or subject to controversies. In these cases, CRED always compiles all available data or analysis to try to make its own documented esti-mation, which can be revised when more accurate data are provided.
Information systems have improved vastly in the last 25 years and statistical data are now more easily available, intensified by an increasing sensitivity to disaster occurrence and consequences. Nevertheless, there are still discrepancies. An analysis of quality and accuracy of disaster data, performed by CRED in 2002, showed that occasionally, for the same disaster, differences of more than 20 per cent may exist between the quantita-tive data reported by the three major databases – EM-DAT (CRED), NatCat (Munich Re) and Sigma (Swiss Re).
Despite efforts to verify and review data, the quality of disaster databases can only be as good as the reporting system. This, combined with the different aims of the three major disaster databases (risk and economic risk analysis for reinsurance companies, development agenda for CRED) may explain differences between data provided for some disasters. However, in spite of these differences, the overall trends indicated by the three databases remain similar.
The lack of systematization and standardization of data collection is a major weak-ness when it comes to long-term planning. Fortunately, due to increased pressures for accountability from various sources, many donors and development agencies have started giving attention to data collection and its methodologies.
Part of the solution to this data problem lies in retrospective analysis. Data are most often publicly quoted and reported during a disaster event, but it is only long after the event, once the relief operation is over, that estimates of damage and death can be veri-fied. Some data gatherers, like CRED, revisit the data; this accounts for retrospective annual disaster figures changing one, two and sometimes even three years after the event.
A N N EX A N N EX
Table 2 Total number of people reported killed, by continent, by year and by level of human development1 (2001 to 2010) 2001200220032004200520062007200820092010Total Africa4,5197,6396,1604,2463,1935,7803,8213,0273,1803,04544,610 Americas3,0772,1082,0808,4395,4341,5632,9212,7372,245226,616257,220 Asia105,99089,33639,030238,36090,85320,62315,816235,6229,99517,654863,279 Europe2,3381,82173,3731,2591,0265,8371,6657871,35257,048146,506 Oceania99164354624273258881131,568 Very high human development 1,8191,65272,9401,0613,1044,4851,5289632,3261,25391,131 High human development4,3503,70933,0613,5463,0053,6723,0452,0623,26560,029119,744 Medium human development28,7899,9698,845236,91389,29019,9988,92496,2128,44416,541523,925 Low human development80,97585,6655,86110,8195,1535,67210,999142,9613,625226,653578,383 Total115,933100,995120,707252,339100,55233,82724,496242,19817,660304,4761,313,183 Source: EM-DAT, CRED, University of Louvain, Belgium 1 See note on UNDP’s Human Development Index country status in the section on disaster definitions in the introduction to this annex. In 2010 the number of people reported killed was by far the highest of the decade, greater than in 2004 and 2008. In the Americas, the number of people reported killed was the highest of the decade, almost ten times higher than the decade’s average. In Europe the number of people reported killed was the second highest of the decade and in Oceania, the third highest. In Asia and Africa, however, the number of people killed was respectively the third lowest and second lowest of the decade. In 2010, 74 per cent of people killed by disasters lived in the Americas and 19 per cent in Europe, far above their decade’s average of 20 and 11 per cent respectively. Inversely the proportions of people killed in Asia (6 per cent),Africa (1 per cent) and Oceania (0.04 per cent) were significantly lower than the decade’s average (66, 3 and 0.1 per cent, respectively). The number of people reported dead was the highest of the decade in countries of high and low human development, but below the decade’s average in very high and medium human development countries. The high number of people reported killed in 2010 is attributable to the earthquake in Haiti, which lead to the deaths of 222,570 people and a heatwave in Russia (55,736 deaths). The other major disasters of the decade were the Indian Ocean tsunami in 2004 (226,408 deaths), Cyclone Nargis in Myanmar in 2008 (138,375), the 2008 Sichuan earthquake in China (87,476), the Kashmir earthquake in 2005 (74,648), the 2003 heatwave in Western Europe (72,210) and major earthquakes in Bam, Iran in 2003 (26,796) and in Gujarat, India in 2001 (20,017).
Table 1 Total number of reported disasters,1 by continent, by year and by level of human development2 (2001 to 2010) 2001200220032004200520062007200820092010Total3 Africa1841971701641702021841721551311,729 Americas1341561261381391051331441151421,332 Asia2953112943213603062612402332512,872 Europe96115969812598104577598962 Oceania18202022161811131918175 Very high human development119140120110124114998987941,096 High human development 1521821591881711211551241251551,532 Medium human development2702952552873122842512512192322,656 Low human development1861821721582032101881621661591,786 Total7277997067438107296936265976407,070 Source: EM-DAT, CRED, University of Louvain, Belgium 1 In Tables 1–13, disasters, refer to those with a natural and or technological trigger only, and do not include wars, conflict-related famines, diseases or epidemics. 2 See note on UNDP’s Human Development Index country status in the section on disaster definitions in the introduction to this annex. 3 Since slow-onset disasters can affect the same country for a number of years, it is best to use figures on total numbers to calculate annual averages over a decade rather than as absolute totals (see the methodology chapter of this annex). With 640 disasters reported, 2010 is the year with the third lowest number of disasters of the decade, far below the peaks of 2002 and 2005. Among continents, the number of disasters was the third highest of the decade in the Americas. In Europe and in Oceania, the number of disasters was near the decade’s average. In Asia, this number was the third lowest of the decade and, in Africa, the lowest for the second consecutive year. Numbers of disasters were at their second lowest level, in 2010, in countries with medium and low human development, and at their third lowest level in countries with very high human development. In countries with high human development, the number of disasters was near the average for the decade. With 39 per cent of all disasters, Asia remains the most frequently hit continent and is, in 2010, near its decade’s average of 40 per cent.
A N N EX A N N EX
Table 4Total amount of disaster estimated damage, by continent, by year and by level of human development1 (2001 to 2010) in millions of US dollars (2010 prices) 2001200220032004200520062007200820092010Total Africa8184436,5611,939382486899281765911,899 Americas16,20415,63725,31476,056192,1747,72016,64065,22815,07556,981487,029 Asia15,94116,10228,07376,55330,86325,43036,344119,88617,97536,621403,788 Europe2,43340,94021,7652,10517,5522,62823,1774,72212,30317,696145,320 Oceania5962,7527036382451,3911,5122,5481,75411,94424,083 Very high human development17,11261,46652,088124,490195,15712,30947,34365,29626,67536,198638,134 High human development5,5724,2479,0878,86814,7902,15413,0697,8583,70042,155111,500 Medium human development13,23210,10020,60419,16730,85522,95014,449115,56216,39136,861300,171 Low human development76636364,7667033,5024,5965168,08722,314 Total35,99275,87582,415157,290240,87237,41778,363193,31247,282123,3021,072,120 Source: EM-DAT, CRED, University of Louvain, Belgium 1 See note on UNDP’s Human Development Index country status in the section on disaster definitions in the introduction to this annex. As mentioned in the introduction, damage assessment is frequently unreliable. Even for the existing data, the methodologies are not standardized and the financial coverage can vary significantly. Depending on where the disaster occurred occurs and who reports it, estimations may vary from zero to billions of US dollars. The total amount of damage reported in 2010 was the fourth highest of the decade. In Oceania, the amount of damages was the highest of the decade. It was the third highest in Asia, and the fourth highest in the Americas and in Europe. Inversely, in Africa, the amount of reported damages was the second lowest of the decade. In 2010, Oceania accounted for almost 10 per cent of damage, far greater than its average of 2 per cent for the decade. The contribution of high human development countries to the total amount of damages climbed to 34 per cent (decade average: 10 per cent). However, very high human development countries contributed 28 per cent of damage in 2010, far below their decade’s average of 59 per cent. The earthquake which occurred in February in Chile was the costliest disaster in 2010 (US$ 30 billion reported damages). The damages associated with the floods in China amounted to US$ 18 billion.
Table 3 Total number of people reported affected, by continent, by year and by level of human development1 (2001 to 2010), in thousands 2001200220032004200520062007200820092010Total2 Africa44,81743,87428,53936,17422,85626,66512,53021,93341,91634,812314,116 Americas10,7672,3713,8499,5578,3081,4559,11920,3147,04612,17384,959 Asia186,203660,811235,689132,860129,717119,101190,885182,754174,056255,9952,268,070 Europe7871,4931,5465385252601,6512681418348,043 Oceania3146381192838172105775741,228 Very high human development1,2631,0125755,5721,1801831,17613,4902,5001,23228,184 High human development47,4233,0925,2024,4137,0271,6998,2665,7564,0537,76194,692 Medium human development137,982648,626235,382110,036129,041116,074167,562180,117170,010255,4902,150,321 Low human development55,93855,86528,50159,22724,18629,56337,35126,01146,67339,904403,220 Total242,606708,595269,660179,248161,435147,519214,356225,374223,236304,3882,676,416 Source: EM-DAT, CRED, University of Louvain, Belgium 1 See note on UNDP’s Human Development Index country status in the section on disaster definitions in the introduction to this annex 2 Since slow-onset disasters can affect the same people for a number of years, it is best to use figures on total numbers affected to calculate annual averages over a decade rather than as absolute totals. In 2010, the number of 304 million people affected by disasters was the second highest of the decade, although it is much lower than the peak of almost 709 million of 2002. In Oceania, the number of people reported affected was the highest of the decade. It was the second highest in the Americas and in Asia. In Europe and Africa, the number of people affected was near their decade’s average.
In 2010, the number of people affected living in countries of high and of medium human development was the second highest of the decade. In countries of very high and of low human development, the number of people affected was far below their decade’s average. In 2010, two major disasters occurred in China: floods, from May to August, affected a total of 134 million people and droughts, which began in 2009, affected around 60 million people. The Indus river basin flood in Pakistan affected more than 20 million people.
A N N EX A N N EX
1 Since slow-onset disasters can affect the same country for a number of years, it is best to use figures on total numbers to calculate annual averages over a decade rather than as absolute totals (see the methodology chapter of this annex). 2 Includes waves and surges. 3 Landslides, rockfalls, subsidence, etc. of geophysical origin. 4 Landslides, avalanches, subsidence, etc. of hydrological origin. Note: ‘n.d.r.’ signifies ‘no disaster reported’. In 2010, the number of natural disasters was near the average for the decade. The number of technological disasters was the second lowest of the decade, far below the peak of 2005.Among natural disasters, the most frequent disasters were floods (47 per cent), in a proportion close to their average of 45 per cent for the decade. The number of disasters caused by both extreme temperatures and mass movements of hydrological origin were the highest of the decade. All other natural disasters were below their respective average for the decade. Among technological disasters, transport accidents were the most frequent, although the number of such accidents was the lowest of the decade. The number of industrial accidents was also the lowest of the decade.
Table 5 Total number of reported disasters, by type of phenomenon and by year (2001 to 2010) 2001200220032004200520062007200820092010Total1 Droughts/food insecurity43402319282013203024260 Earthquakes/tsunamis25374042252421232225284 Extreme temperatures23152619293225112634240 Floods2 1571731601351932322191751591891,792 Forest/scrub fires1423148131018597121 Insect infestation2n.d.r.n.d.r.12n.d.r.1n.d.r.n.d.r.1n.d.r.16 Mass movement: dry3 n.d.r.1n.d.r.1n.d.r.1n.d.r.31n.d.r.7 Mass movement: wet4 24202116122010122932196 Volcanic eruptions6725812673662 Windstorms108123861271317710511187891,044 Subtotal climato-, hydro- and meteorological disasters3713943303364063923903343413753,669 Subtotal geophysical disasters31454248333727332631353 Total natural disasters 4024393723844394294173673674064,022 Industrial accidents54485281766252384336542 Miscellaneous accidents50524562663343302747455 Transport accidents2212602372162292051811911601512,051 Total technological disasters 3253603343593713002762592302343,048 Total7277997067438107296936265976407,070 Source : EM-DAT, CRED, University of Louvain, Belgium
A N N EX
A N N EX
1 Includes waves and surges. 2 Landslides, rockfalls, subsidence, etc. of geophysical origin. 3 Landslides, avalanches, subsidence, etc. of hydrological origin. Note: ‘n.a.’ denotes ‘no data available’; ‘n.d.r.’ signifies ‘no disaster reported’. For more information, see section on caveats in introductory text. In 2010, the number of deaths caused by natural disaster was the highest of the entire decade, while the number of deaths caused by technological disasters was the lowest of the decade.Among natural disasters, the number of deaths from volcanic eruptions and from mass movements of hydrological origin was the highest of the decade. The number of deaths from earthquakes and tsunamis was the second highest of the decade, as was the number of deaths caused by floods and extreme temperatures. Forest and scrub fires caused the death of 135 people, the third highest figure of the decade. Deaths from transport accidents were the lowest of the decade and deaths from industrial accidents, the second lowest. Most reported deaths caused by droughts and food insecurity during the decade were attributable to the famine in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, although the estimates provided are disputed.
Table 6 Total number of people reported killed, by type of phenomenon and by year (2001 to 2010) 2001200220032004200520062007200820092010Total Droughts/food insecurity76,47576,903388088208n.a.622153,802 Earthquakes/tsunamis21,3481,63629,617227,29076,2416,69278087,9181,888226,735680,145 Extreme temperatures1,7873,01974,7485568145,1041,0441,6081,21257,268147,160 Floods1 5,0444,2363,7707,1025,7675,8458,5654,0293,5348,40856,300 Forest/scrub fires3364714471615086190135724 Insect infestationn.a.n.d.r.n.d.r.n.a.n.d.r.n.a.n.d.r.n.d.r.n.a.n.d.r.n.a. Mass movement: dry2 n.d.r.60n.d.r.44n.d.r.11n.d.r.12036n.d.r.271 Mass movement: wet3 7861,1007073136461,6382715046573,40210,024 Volcanic eruptionsn.a.200n.a.2351116n.a.323560 Windstorms1,9141,3841,0306,6095,2944,3296,035140,9853,2871,479172,346 Subtotal climato-, hydro- & meteorological disasters86,03986,64880,34014,67412,65617,14016,065147,2188,88270,694540,356 Subtotal geophysical disasters21,3481,89629,617227,33676,2446,70879188,0541,924227,058680,976 Total natural disasters 107,38788,544109,957242,01088,90023,84816,856235,27210,806297,7521,221,332 Industrial accidents1,2791,1121,4441,7972,2811,8321,6567769331,06114,171 Miscellaneous accidents1,3412,0131,4382,1152,6691,1269098959111,51214,929 Transport accidents5,9269,3267,8686,4176,7027,0215,0755,2555,0104,15162,751 Total technological disasters 8,54612,45110,75010,32911,6529,9797,6406,9266,8546,72491,851 Total115,933100,995120,707252,339100,55233,82724,496242,19817,660304,4761,313,183 Source : EM-DAT, CRED, University of Louvain, Belgium