Chapter 6: Conclusion and Discussion
6.2 Design for the Developing World
The spectrum of potential benefits for infrastructure projects in developing countries
ranges from improved beneficiary access, for example improved educational standard
allowed from year-round access to schools, to the introduction of construction
technology transfer. Despite the benefits of any type of international aid work,
ethical dilemmas of accountability and safe practice are pertinent. The process of
design simplification presents a number of technical and logistical challenges.
Furthermore, professional ethics must be considered when detailing the operations,
maintenance and project lifespan accountability. A general discussion of transferring
a technology from the developed to developing world is also considered from a
lessons-learned context.
6.2.1 Design Simplification
Great care must be taken not to reduce the quality of a design when simplifying.
Many technologies needed in the developing world have well-documented design
approaches for use in developed countries. To make these technologies appropriate
for rural applications, modifications for material availability, low cost and limited
tools and equipment must be accounted for. The process of simplification requires
the engineer to make many of the same design decisions as in an industrialized
78 infrastructure projects, a designer in The United States may be willing to sacrifice an
increase in budget to reduce the construction time. In the developing world, most
often time and labor are least expensive and thus lowering the cost of a project would
be prioritized. Finding the balance between cost, and construction time is of
paramount importance.
Standardizing designs and design processes specifically for development work
provides a greater level of comfort in a design, reducing this likelihood of project
design failure. But, modulated designs require a number of assumptions: a design
code to be followed, material availability and project objectives by the beneficiaries.
Local engineering design codes and community usage requests must be taken when
simplifying a design from the original context in the developed world to that of the
developing. As such, even a simplified and modulated design must have the
flexibility to be modified. Design manuals are often created for use in the developing
world as was the case of the Helvetas manual. It is the suggestion of the author that
development projects may have the greatest impact when a modulated design also is
supplied with a detailed explanation of the design process and assumptions used.
This allows for a more general use of the work as secondary contributors are able to
modify to better suit their local community and national standards.
6.2.2 Ethics of Accountability
Accountability for humanitarian-aid projects requires one to consider the professional
79 industry work, the engineering profession has a very high level of professional
accountability but design codes and regulations allow an engineer a level of
confidence in his or her work. Abroad, the same codes and regulations are
applicable, but the designs often are impractical and thus additional individual
consideration must be given to each project. Furthermore, as developing world
construction techniques and quality control are often inferior to those considered
standard in the developed world, making standardized quality assurance and control
documents for each type of project further ensures project reliability and safety.
The inadequacy of the legal framework in many developing countries measures
reduces the liability of contractors to ensure quality control by their own measures
(Leisninger, 2009). If a developing country has no regulation or has one but does not
enforce it, it is likely that additional margin of safety should be included in the design
as well. A complete best-practice design guide includes the assumed factors of
safety, but an additional document improving the quality control would allow a
designer to fully understand the areas of concern and more assign appropriate factors
of safety considering local capacity for local accountability.
Additionally, project engineers and implementing organizations need to take the
initiative to be personally accountable for each project. A plan of how to avoid
failure as well as what happens in the case of failure is essential. Insurance
companies in the developed world play an essential role in the guarantee of an
80 assurance. Attention in all humanitarian projects should address the issue of ethical
responsibility and how to address a failure situation.
Bridges to Prosperity takes great lengths to ensure quality control throughout each
project. A document is currently being created that would be inclusive of all critical
quality control and maintenance issues. Ultimately, it is the engineer’s responsibility
to take personal accountability for a project’s enduring success and thus operation and
maintenance instructions and training should be included as a required component of
every project. Returning to assist with maintenance also helps to reduce the risk of a
failure.
6.2.3 Transferring Best Practices to Developing Nations
Many lessons were learned in the attempt to transfer a technology fairly well-
understood under typical engineering conditions into a setting for development work.
Perhaps the greatest lesson learned was not attempt to reinvent the wheel. Many
military and emergency engineering documents exist. An academic understanding of
the design issue is necessary but the most pertinent and useful reference materials are
those which consider the lack complexity in simple design.
In the case of footbridge design, the first step was to identify the intended audience
for the report. Ideally a document would be produced that could be used as a field
manual in the developing world. This particular document targeted a more academic
audience. With the vocabulary of choice more technical, further steps were taken to
81 number of input parameters exceeded the feasible ability of in-situ testing, the model
was used for parametric studies to compare possible material assumptions. As the
intended audience was identified as having a working knowledge of geotechnical
engineering, a greater focus was placed on justifying assumptions. Documents with a
more general intended audience may chose to include technical assumptions and
models in an appendix.
Constructability is another critical issue. Many of the design references for soil
anchors for power-lines assumed that changing the depth of embankment would be
the easiest control variable. In the case of rural construction, each meter of added
excavation could add weeks to a project as only man-powered excavation is possible.
This additional construction time may be preferred over additional cost, but the
balance between design cost and time is vastly different from the original design
intent outlined in academic sources. A considerable amount of effort should be taken
to consider both the theoretical and practical sides of a testing program or design.
Designers interested in creating a best-practices guide to design for developing
applications are suggested to limit the amount of theoretical information gathered and
to focus on what is already being done. This report is primarily concerned with
existing academic literature applicable to a somewhat specific product. In future
research and publication, a lesser focus would be placed on academia and a greater
emphasis would be placed on constructability and cost issues, as these are of
82