Glossary and definition of terms
1 Introduction Research background
1.3. E-‐textile development methods
Woven textiles consist of the orthogonal interlacing of warp (vertical threads) and weft (intercepting horizontal threads) yarns, usually forming a tight stable cloth if woven at a dense sett. Woven e-‐textiles are of specific focus in this research project, as the reviewed literature in the field revealed a lack of in-‐depth structural investigation of integrated woven e-‐textiles (discussed further with examples in chapter 2).
The reviewed literature presented two main development approaches in existing woven e-‐textiles. These were classified by the researcher as ͚ĐƌĞĂƚŝǀĞ craft mĞƚŚŽĚƐ͛ and ͚ƚĞĐŚŶŝĐĂů materials approach͛͘ This section will define the two approaches. (Specific e-‐ textile examples related to these approaches will be discussed in chapter 2.)
x Creative craft methods ʹ this approach uses creative investigations of textile design and craft making processes, to develop e-‐textiles with electronic functional capability. In this approach there is conscious consideration of the textile construction form (i.e. aesthetic and textile structures). The outputs via this approach are mainly unique one-‐off pieces or small collections of statement designs, to exhibit or for particular applications by predominantly designers, researchers, artists or hobbyists. Specifically woven e-‐textiles developed via creative craft methods apply some consideration to integrate electronic function into the woven construction, i.e. utilising some of the woven architecture to integrate conductive yarns and/ or components. However, this approach does not fully exploit these structures for electronic functionality beyond basic structures, due to limited woven expertise.
x Technical materials approach ʹ this approach develops e-‐textile materials with a dominant focus on function. Empirical investigations are applied to investigate technological functions, electronic components, and/ or testing technical concepts for e-‐textiles. The dominant emphasis is on a technical objective where technical technology/ engineering expertise is involved in the development of the e-‐textile. The outputs of this approach are for scientific, engineering and technical domains and are extended for industrial manufacture. Specifically, woven e-‐textiles developed via technical material approaches are functionally driven, where structures are predominantly selected to achieve the required electrical function. Thus, the woven architecture is not usually utilised in terms of form, and compromises the aesthetics of the material due to insufficient woven knowledge.
Neither of the two approaches has fully exploited woven structures for form and function that woven e-‐textiles are able to realise. Although creative craft approaches use some woven structural integration, this is not manipulated to push the limits of weaving and its potential for e-‐textiles. Each of the described approaches have predominantly focused on form (creative craft methods), or function (technical materials approach), where this compromises other parts of the e-‐textile design. Although there are slight nuances in both approaches of some reviewed projects, i.e. where there is an overlap of approaches (further discussed in chapter 2), the projects mainly use one of the single approaches. Thus, this PhD research sought to investigate both creative craft and technical material approaches to avoid compromising aspects of form or function of woven e-‐textile designs.
An example of a technical materials approach project is by ETH Zurich, where a strip sensor was developed for integration into a woven textile (Cherenack et al., 2010; Kinkeldei et al., 2009) (Figure 1.2). The researchers who developed this project were from electronic engineering, materials science and IT backgrounds. The project was developed through a focused technical materials approach, where the textile construction was not fully utilised to support the e-‐textile. Instead the woven construction, a single cloth twill configuration (specific twill type not documented), was used as a frame to hold the electronics where the component was loosely interwoven into the warp. The warp used only two conductive yarn tracks that interconnected with
the component. The woven construction was not investigated as part of the design/objective, where it could have potentially helped to enhance the final design. For example, more conductive warp and weft tracks integration would have increased connectivity to the component. Also, a tighter weave structure would have provided securer connection between the weave and the component, potentially negating the use of glue (this example is further discussed in chapters 2 and 8). Although this project successfully achieved the intended temperature sensor function, the research did not extend the capabilities of woven structures.
Figure 1.2 d,͛Ɛ woven e-‐fibre temperature sensor (Cherenack et al., 2010)
^ƵďdĞůĂ͛Ɛ Black Wall Hanging piece is an example of creative craft methods applied to a woven e-‐textile (Figure 1.3, also discussed further in chapters 2 and 8). Barbara Layne is Director at Studio SubTela, where she works with graduates in visual arts and engineering. Layne is a textile artist who has weaving knowledge. The Black Wall Hanging piece adapted weaving processes to integrate electronic function (Layne, Studio Sub Tela and The Hexagram Institute, 2006). The wall hanging utilises the woven structure to position and place each LED in specific spaces during the weaving process on the loom. A basic 2/2 twill woven structure was applied in a single cloth. The space between each 2/2 twill structure (i.e. two threads lifted up, while the next two threads are left down), are used to interweave weft yarn and the LED components; the visible spaces between the twill structures shows the LEDs/ weft yarns. The weave structures were designed for the positioning of the LEDs, however, they could have further contributed to the electronic function by integrating conductive yarns in both the warp and weft, to support and increase the circuit interconnections. Conductive yarns would have been more suitable than hard wires because they are more durable under weaving tension due to their slight fibrous stretch quality.
Figure 1.3 LED strands being woven on the loom (Layne, Studio Sub Tela and The Hexagram Institute, 2006)
There is an opportunity to address both form and function of woven e-‐textiles, by simultaneously considering both of these areas. This can be progressed by establishing closer nuances between technical material approaches and creative craft methods, drawing on in-‐depth woven textile expertise. This would enable woven structures to be adapted and fully utilised to enhance form and function of e-‐textiles.