Ensuring sustainability through wiki tools

The Writing Studio’s need to keep materials up-to-date and protected from a variety of threats is made easier by organizing a program archive with the ReCAP wiki. Researchers like Manoff and Yakel suggest that access is critical to the success of an archive or a digital database; therefore, preserving access and sustaining the wiki archive as an enduring research tool are equally crucial goals.

Frequent updates scale the wiki consistently. As new information becomes available or additional artifacts are located and digitized, topic articles will naturally scale to be more complete. Brief topics that at first seem to be isolated or anomalous can easily expand as more documents are incorporated, or can be merged with larger articles as their context becomes clearer. Also, updates are simple to add over time. The Writing Studio’s appointed archivist can digitize, upload, and edit artifacts and topic articles in an ongoing process that matches the availability of their time, in either longer sessions specifically dedicated to archive work, or during momentary breaks from other administrative duty. Thus, the task of archiving can fit within time that is convenient. Such ease of updating may alleviate procrastination, as archivists are under less pressure to archive a whole topic or a complete set of artifacts amidst the time constraints of administration or tutoring. Furthermore, the composing archivist is aware that the ReCAP structure enables the depth or detail of a topic article to grow over time with future updates, or as more artifacts are digitized, so the pressure to create an artificially substantive entry is lessened.

The archiving process can be shared with multiple archivists. Adding to the objectivity benefits noted above, researchers purport that the inclusion of multiple curating archivists can have a positive effect on the persistence of updating or uploading events, thereby growing the archive more consistently (Yakel “Digital Curation;” Huvila; Wei et al.). An administrating archivist can grant authorial access to a research assistant or Studio tutor to continue the process of annotating artifacts or editing topic articles. The wiki service offers page-by-page permissions as an alternative to full access, so editing privileges can even be granted for a single page to enable a junior archivist to work on one topic article’s contents. As the Writing Studio wiki becomes more updated and therefore stylistically consistent, it will be easier to model standards for trusted authors and editors, potentially accelerating the rate of the archiving process.

Past artifacts and current materials are unified. The ongoing and chronologically-neutral mode of adding artifacts as time permits not only allows the archivist to make steady progress in assembling the past, but equally supports the addition of updates from present Studio operations or projects. Because the wiki format presents materials without narrative, there is no need to assemble the contents of topic articles in chronological order. Thus, the archivist is free to include current events, policies, practices, or undertakings of their center as they occur, and return later to the same article to add more content from archived materials.

An archive wiki is always its most current iteration. Because the Writing Studio’s history is made accessible in a process of continual updating, the archive is always visible as its most current version, and currency of materials is a key researcher expectation when delving into the archive (Mortenson). While updates to the wiki’s holdings may necessitate updating research projects as new information is available, the wiki archive itself is never retreaded. As a result, the investment of time spent digitizing and uploading is never devalued by future work. A further

effect of this currency is that the archive becomes a usable source of research almost

immediately; with digitization and topic articles covering even a few dozen artifacts, valuable and research-worthy trends and history may emerge. While researchers do note the absolute essentiality of an archive’s completeness (Gold; Tirabassi; Glenn and Enoch “Drama”),

unprocessed holdings are made more visible in a digital archive. This mitigates concerns that the “invisible” archive may contain materials that would benefit or hinder a research project, and better informs researchers on what may be available physically (Graban, Ramsey-Tobienne, and Myers). Materials coded but not yet uploaded or summarized can be made visible by a single page within the wiki that inventories the physical holdings that await digitization.

The wiki protects against knowledge loss. High resolution scans provide redundancy for sensitive items contained within the archive. While it may be a preference for the archive researcher to physically interact with the actual document or artifact, the digitization of these items insures against the loss of knowledge in the event of physical misplacement or catastrophic damage, providing a tool that provides the “permanent preservation” sought by Kesner (101). Thus, the wiki Studio archive provides protects knowledge by maintaining a collection of “surrogate” digital versions of archived materials, ensuring fulfillment of the researcher’s need for enduring access (Walsh/Hollister). The benefits of duplication expand with the ability to periodically back up the component files contained within the wiki, further decentralizing artifacts from both their physical origins and a single digital existence. In the event of a chosen wiki service shutting down unexpectedly, the Writing Studio can still have a recent version of the

wiki to import to a new system2.

2 _{A diligent archivist can monitor the trends both in wiki services and file format changes.}

At the date of this writing, the PDF remains the overwhelming standard of maintaining the readability of a document across multiple platforms, but as standards inevitably change,

The wiki’s digital “surrogates” prolong the life of physical originals. One of the less tangible benefits of embracing the above strengths of a digital archive is preservation of the physical originals, an ongoing concern for curators of traditional, tangible archives (Samoulien). Each time a page is handled, an artifact moved, or a photograph shuffled, it risks degradation or damage. While many Writing Studio documents are no more sensitive to damage than a new sheet of copier paper, the value of these objects to the future must be nonetheless preserved. For casual viewers of the document, or for the researcher undertaking their first delve of the archive, the digital archive transmits the same knowledge without risking physical damage. This reduces wear on some of the Writing Studio’s more sensitive artifacts from its more distant history, such as audio tape, or deteriorating typing paper and “ditto” copies. This directly improves the

longevity during casual perusal, maintaining physical originals for future researchers who want to experience the ineffable qualities of examining sensitive Studio materials in person.

The Writing Studio can be confident in the durable protection and sustainability enabled by relocating the contents of a writing center archive to a ReCAP wiki. The contents of the archive will be safer from a variety of threats to knowledge and consistency, and the process inherently eases the work of maintaining timely updates that ensure the value of both in-process and completed archive digitization.