If we want to make use of our method in the innite-dimensional case, our assumptions require amongst others that all reference measures are absolutely continuous with respect to each other. This forces us to impose severe restric-tions on the time-dependent drift part of our Ornstein-Uhlenbeck equation. The following proposition gives a feasible choice where the drift is minus identity up to a (time-dependent) trace class operator.
Proposition 7.5.1 In our setting let (en)n be an orthonormal basis of H di-agonalizing the covariance matrix R of our Brownian noise. Let us denote its Eigenvalues by rn. Let then −A(t) be diagonalizable in the same basis with Eigenvalues λn(t) = 1 + fn(t)rn where the real-valued functions fn are smooth and bounded away from zero and innity, that is we have a positive constant C such that:
• 0 < C1 ≤ fn(t) ≤ C < ∞for all n ∈ N, t ∈ R,
• supn,t
dtdfn(t) ≤ C.
Then Assumption 7.1.4 is fullled for the reference measures (νt).
Proof Let us denote by Rt the covariance operator of νt. We have Rt = R∞
0 esA(t)ResA∗(t)ds. Since all operators are diagonal in the same basis we obtain the Eigenvalues rn(t) of Rt as one-dimensional integrals, in a simple calculation:
Rten= Z ∞
0
esA(t)ResA∗(t)ends = rn
Z ∞ 0
e2sλn(s)ends = 1 2
rn
1 + fn(t)rn
en.
Thus we have rn(t) = 121+frn
n(t)rn.
For the calculation of the Entropy, note that we have the well-known property for product measures:
Ent⊗N
n=1µn(⊗Nn=1νn) =
N
X
n=1
Entµn(νn).
By Lemma 7.5.3 this is still true in our innite-dimensional setting so that we have:
Entνs(νt) =
∞
X
n=1
EntN (0,rn(s))(N (0, rn(t))).
So we obtain, using Lemma 7.5.2 for the calculation of the one-dimensional
7.5. EXAMPLE 85
where we have used boundedness and positivity of the fn and the mean value theorem for the logarithm. Thus, Assumption 7.1.4 (i) is fullled.
In this setting we can also calculate the Radon-Nikodym derivatives dνdνts accord-ing to Lemma 7.5.3.
Denoting xn = hx, eni, we obtain:
where we used the mean value theorem and the uniform bound on the deriva-tives of the functions fn.
Hence, Assumption 7.1.4 (ii) is fullled, since f(s, t) := Q∞n=1 rn(s)
rn(t) is multi-plicative as required and convergence of the innite product is seen easily.
Assumption 7.1.4 (iii) follows easily since the relevant operators commute and Assumption 7.1.4 (iv) holds since we have rn(t) ≤ rn for all n ∈ N. Lemma 7.5.2 Let ν1 := νΣ1 and ν2 := νΣ2 be centered Gaussian measures on Rn with covariance matrices Σ1 and Σ2 respectively. Let µ be any measure absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure and admitting a second moment. Then we have
(i) Entν1(ν2) =1
86 CHAPTER 7. A VARIATIONAL INTERPRETATION and the result follows along the preceding calculations.
Lemma 7.5.3 (Radon-Nikodym derivative) For i = 1, 2, let µi= N (0, Σi) be Gaussian measures on H with covariance operators Σi. We assume that both Σ1 and Σ2 have the same eigenbasis (en)n∈N and we denote the eigenvectors by σni respectively. Set µin := N (0, σni), a normal distribution on R, so that we have formally: µi = ⊗n∈Nµin. If µ1 and µ2 are equivalent, then we can write the Radon-Nikodym derivative as a tensor product:
dµ1
dµ2(x) = Y
n∈N
dµ1n
dµ2n(hx, eni) x ∈ H Proof Let us denote
µ0(dx) := Y
n∈N
dµ1n
dµ2n(hx, eni)µ2(dx), then we have to show that
Z
holds for any measurable and bounded function F . By a monotone class argu-ment it is sucient to show it for functions F of the form
F (x) = f (hx, e1i, ..., hx, eNi), (∗)
7.5. EXAMPLE 87
where N ∈ N is arbitrary and f : RN → R is a smooth function. The sys-tem formed by these functions is multiplicative and since its countable subset (hx, eNi)N ∈N separates the points of H the system also generates σ(H).
Thus, let us take a function F as in (∗) and check (7.9):
Z
H
F (x)µ1(dx) = Z
H
f (hx, e1i, ..., hx, eNi)µ1(dx)
= Z
RN
f (x) (P]Nµ1) (dx)
= Z
RN
f (x) (⊗Nn=1µ1n) (dx)
= Z
RN
f (x1, ..., xN)
N
Y
n=1
dµ1n dµ2n(xn)
µ21(dx1)...µ2N(dxN)
= Z
RN
f (x) (P]Nµ0) (dx) = Z
H
F (x)µ0(dx),
where PN : H → RN, x 7→ (hx, e1i, ..., hx, eNi).
88 CHAPTER 7. A VARIATIONAL INTERPRETATION
Bibliography
[1] Adams, S. ; Dirr, N. ; Peletier, M. and Zimmer, J. : Large deviations and gradient ows - arXiv:1201.4601 [math.AP] 2012.
[2] Albeverio, S. and Rüdiger, B. : Stochastic Integrals and the Lévy-Ito Decomposition Theorem on Separable Banach Spaces - Stochastic Analyis and Applications 23 p. 217-253, 2005.
[3] Ambrosio, L. Gigli, N. and Savaré, G. : Gradient Flows in Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures - Lectures in Mathematics ETH Zürich, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2005.
[4] Applebaum, D. : Lévy processes and stochastic calculus - Cambridge Uni-versity Press, 2004.
[5] Applebaum, D. : Martingale-valued measures, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck pro-cesses with jumps and operator self-decomposability in Hilbert space - Sémi-naire de Probabilités 39 p. 171-196, 2006.
[6] Arendt, W. in: One-parameter Semigroups of Positive Operators - Hei-delberg : Springer, 1986.
[7] Bogachev, V. ; Röckner, M. and Schumland, B. : Generalized Mehler semigroups and applications - Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 105 p.193-225, 1996.
[8] Brezis, H. : Operateurs maximaux monotones et semi-groupes de contrac-tions dans les espaces de Hilbert - North-Holland Publishing Co., Amster-dam, 1973.
[9] McCann, R.J. : A convexity principle for interacting gases - Advances in Mathematics 128 p. 153-179, 1997.
[10] Chicone, C. and Latushkin, Y. : Evolution Semigroups in Dynamical Systems and Dierential Equations - Providence : American Mathematical Society , 1999.
[11] Chojnowska-Michalik, A. : On processes of Ornstein-Uhlenbeck type in Hilbert space - Stochastics 21 p. 251-286, 1987.
90 BIBLIOGRAPHY
[12] Clement, P. : Introduction to Gradient Flows in Metric Spaces (II) -https://igk.nath.uni-bielefeld.de/study-materials/notes-clement-part2.pdf, 2010.
[13] Daleckii, Ju. L. and Krein, M. G. : Stability of solutions of dierential equations in Banach space - Providence : American Mathematical Society, 1974.
[14] Da Prato, G. and Lunardi A. : Ornstein-Uhlenbeck operators with time periodic coecients - Journal of Evolution Equations 7 p. 587-614, 2007.
[15] Da Prato, G. : Kolmogorov Equations for Stochastic PDEs - Birkhäuser, 2004.
[16] Da Prato, G. and Zabczyk, J. : Ergodicity for innite dimensional systems - Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[17] Da Prato, G and Röckner, M : A Note on Evolution Systems of Mea-sures for Time-Dependent Stochastic Dierential Equations -Seminar on Stochastic Analysis, Random Fields and Applications V Progress in Prob-ability 59, Part 1, p.115-122, 2008.
[18] Da Prato, G; Röckner, M. and Wang, F. :Singular stochastic equa-tions on Hilbert spaces: Harnack inequalities for their transition semigroups Journal of Functinal Analysis 257 p. 9921017, 2009.
[19] Da Prato, G. and Zabczyk, J. : Stochastic Equations in Innite Di-mensions - Cambridge University Press, 2008.
[20] Dynkin, E : Sucient Statistics and Extreme Points - Ann. Probab. 5 p.705-730, 1978.
[21] Dudley, R. : Real Analysis and Probability - Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole, 1989.
[22] Fang, S. ; Shao, J. and Sturm, K.T. : Wasserstein space over the Wiener space - Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 146 p.535-565, 2010.
[23] Feyel, D and Üstünel, A.S. : Monge-Kantorovitch Measure Trans-portation and Monge-Ampère Equation on Wiener Space - Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 128 p.347-385, 2004.
[24] Friedman, A. : Partial Dierential Equations - Holt, Reinhart and Win-ston, 1969.
[25] Fuhrmann, M. and Röckner, M. : Generalized Mehler Semigroups:
The Non-Gaussian Case - Potential Analysis 12 p. 1-47, 2000.
[26] Geissert, M. and Lunardi, A. : Invariant measures and maximal L2 regularity for nonautonomous OrnsteinUhlenbeck equations - J. London Math. Soc. 77 p. 719-740, 2008.
BIBLIOGRAPHY 91
[27] Jordan, R. ; Kinderlehrer, D. and Otto, F. : The Variational For-mulation of the Fokker-Planck Equation - SIAM J. Math. Anal 29 p. 1-17, 1999.
[28] Knäble, F. : Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Equations with time-dependent coe-cients and Lévy Noise in nite and innite dimensions - Journal of Evolu-tion EquaEvolu-tions 11 p. 959-993, 2011.
[29] Lescot, P. and Röckner, M. : Generators of Mehler-Type Semigroups as Pseudo-Dierential Operators - Innite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics 5 p. 297-316, 2002.
[30] Lescot, P. and Röckner, M. : Perturbations of Generalized Mehler Semigroups and Applications to Stochastic Heat Equations with Lévy Noise and Singular Drift - Potential Analysis 20 p. 317-344, 2004.
[31] Linde, W. : Innitely Divisible and Stable Measures on Banach Spaces -Leipzig : Teubner, 1983.
[32] Maas, J. : Analysis of Innite Dimensional Diusions - University of Delft, Ph.D.-Thesis , 2009.
[33] Ma, Z. and Röckner, M. : Introduction to the Theory of (Non-Symmetric) Dirichlet Forms - Heidelberg : Springer, 1992.
[34] Neidhardt, H. and Zagrebnov, V. : Linear non-autonomous Cauchy problems and evolution semigroups - arXiv:0711.0284v1 [math-ph] 2007.
[35] Nickel, G. : On evolution semigroups and wellposedness of nonau-tonomous Cauchy problems - Ph.D. thesis, Tübingen: Univ. Tübingen, 1996.
[36] Ornstein, L. and Uhlenbeck, G. : On the theory of Brownian Motion - Physical Review. 36 p.823-841, 1930.
[37] Ouyang, S. : Harnack inequalities and applications for stochastic equa-tions - Ph.D. thesis, Bielefeld University, 2009.
[38] Ouyang, S. and Röckner, M. : Non-homogeneous generalized Mehler semigroups and applications - arXiv:1009.5314v2 [math.PR], 2010.
[39] Pazy, A. : Semi-groups of linear operators and applications to partial dierential equations - College Park Maryland, 1974
[40] Peszat, S. and Zabczyk, J. : Stochastic Partial Dierential Equations with Lévy Noise - Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[41] Prevot, C. and Röckner, M. : A Concise Course on Stochastic Partial Dierential Equations - Heidelberg : Springer, 2007.
92 BIBLIOGRAPHY
[42] Röckner, M. and Wang, F. : Harnack and functional inequalities for generalized Mehler semigroups - Journal of Functional Analysis 203 p. 237-261, 2003.
[43] Sato, K. : Lévy processes and innitely divisible distributions - Cambridge University Press , 1999.
[44] Schwartz, L. : Radon measures on arbitrary topological spaces and cylin-drical measures - Oxford University Press , 1973.
[45] Veraar, M. : Non-autonomous stochastic evolution equations and ap-plications to stochastic partial dierential equations Journal of Evolution Equations 10 p. 85127, 2010.
[46] Villani, C. : Optimal Transport, Old and New - Springer, 2009.
[47] Wooster, R. : Evolution Systems of Measures for Non-autonomous Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Processes with Lévy noise - Communications on Stochastic Analysis 5 p.353-370, 2011.