• No results found

EXAMPLE PROBLEMS Uplift Capacity

In document HELICAL FOUNDATIONS AND ANCHORS (Page 48-61)

Soil Friction Angle (deg)

EXAMPLE PROBLEMS Uplift Capacity

Shallow Anchor in Sand

Given the situation shown in Figure EX-1. Using equation 31:

Interpolating from Table 3, Fq = 30.06.

ku = 1.3 (Figure 5).

Qu = 5164+6021 = 11,185 lbs FS = 2.5

Qallow = 11,185 = 4474 lbs = 4.5kips

If the water surface were at the ground surface, then:

k tan

Qu = 5902 lbs FS = 2.5

Qallow = 5902/2.5 = 2361 lbs = 2.4 kips

Deep Anchor in Sand

Given the situation shown in Figure EX-2. Using equation 31:

pcf

Fq* = 50 (Figure 8)

Qu = 17181+10737 = 27918 lbs FS = 2.5

Qallow = 27918/2.5 = 11,167 lbs = 11.1 kips

If the water surface were at the ground surface, then:

Qu = 14730 lbs

Shallow anchor in Clay

Given the situation shown in Figure EX-3. Using equation 38

Fc = 9

Deep anchor in Clay

Bearing Capacity of a Helical Pile in Com-pression

Anchor in Sand (Figure EX-5)

c = 0

Anchor in Clay (Figure EX-6)

16

Lateral Capacity of a laterally Loaded Helical Pile in Medium Clay Assume the situation is as shown in Figure EX-7. Also assume:

Load = 40 kN

c = 1000 psf = 48 kPa Shaft Properties:

L = 8 ft = 2.4 m

2 inch square outside dimension wall thickness = 05 inch

Check to see if buckling will be a concern.

From Table 4, soil is a medium clay.

Using Figure 13, situation plots significantly below is medium clay line, therefore, buckling is not a concern.

Lateral Capacity of a Laterally Loaded Helical Pile in Soft Clay

Assume the situation is as shown in Figure EX-7.

Also assume:

Load = 40 kN c = 400 psf = 19 kPa Shaft Properties:

L = 8 ft = 2.4 m

2 inch square outside dimension

Check to see if buckling will be a concern.

From Table 4, soil is a soft clay.

Using Figure 13, situation plots near the soft clay line, therefore, buckling is a concern.

Helical shaft properties:

Ep = 30 106 psi = 20.7 107 kPa I = π(do4 -di4)/64 = 4.8 10-7 m4 From Table 5 assume nh = 500 kN/m4

Assume u* = 15 mm = yield deflection

Using equation 6 from Table 6

Using equation 6 from Table 7

mm

Using Equation 6 from Table 7

m -kN 359 M =

M 1.09 M P =

P

cf 0.72 cf

o

max

max

Lateral Capacity of a Laterally Loaded Helical Pile in Overconsolidated Clay Assume the situation is as shown in Figure EX-7. Also assume:

Load = 40 kN

c = 2000 psf = 96 kPa Shaft Properties:

L = 8 ft = 2.4 m

2 inch square outside dimension wall thickness = 0.5 inch

Check to see if buckling will be a concern.

From Table 4, soil is a stiff clay.

Using Figure 14, situation plots to the right of the stiff clay line, therefore, buckling is not a concern.

Helical shaft properties:

Ep = 30 106 psi = 20.7 107 kPa I = π(do4 -di4)/64 = 4.8 10-7 m4

m -kN 0.519 P =

0.9271 M =

cf cmax

Assume u* = 15 mm = yield deflection

Using equation 2 from Table 6

Using equation 2 from Table 7

mm

Determine the maximum moment.

Using Equation 2 from Table 6

Since Mcmax <Mo, part of soil is yielding.

Using Equation 2 from Table 7

M

1. Stephenson, R.W., ADesign and Applications of Helical Earth Anchors,@ (1988), unpublished notes of a seminar for geotechnical engineering graduate students, University of Missouri-Rolla, Oct. 20, 1988.

1. Clemence, S.P., Thorsten, R.E., and Edwards, B., AHelical Anchors: Overview of Application and Design@ (1990), Foundation Drilling, Dec./Jan. 1990, P.P. 8-12.

1. Das, Braja M. Earth Anchors, Developments in Geotechnical Engineering, Series No. 50, Elsevier, NY 1990.

1. Udwari, J.J., Rodgers, T.E., and Singh, H., "A Rational Approach to the Design of High Capacity ;Multi-helix Screw Anchors," Proceedings, Seventh IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition, April 1-6, 1979, pp. 606-609.

1. Lutenegger, A.J., Smith, B.L., and Kabir, M.G., "Use of In Situ Tests to Predict Uplift Performance of Multihelix Anchors," Special Topics in Foundations, ASCE, pp. 93-108.

1. A.B. Chance Co. Encyclopedia of Anchoring, The A.B. chance Co., 1977.

1. Hoyt, R.M., and S.P. Clemence (1989), "Uplift Capacity of Helical Anchors in Sand,"

Proceedings of the XII International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rio De Janeiro, Aug, 1989, pp 1019-1022.

1. Kulhawy, F.H., "Uplift Behavior of Shallow Soil Anchors - An Overview", Uplift Behavior of Anchor Foundations in Soil, ASCE, New York, pp. 1-25, 1985.

1. Clemence, Samuel P., "The Uplift and Bearing Capacity of Helix Anchors in Soil," Contract Report TT112-1, 3 Volumes, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Syracuse, New York (1984).

1. Mitsch, M.P., and Clemence, S.P., AThe Uplift Capacity of Helical Anchors in Sand,@

Uplift Behavior of Anchor Foundations in Soil, ASCE, New York, pp. 26-47 (1985).

1. Mooney, J.S., Adamczak, S., and Clemence, S.P., "Uplift Capacity of Helical Anchors in Clay and Silt," Uplift Behavior of Anchor Foundations in Soil, ASCE, pp. 48-72 (1985).

1. Carville, Chester, A., P.E., and Walton, Robert W. , AFoundation Repair Using Helical Screw Anchors,@ Foundation Upgrading and Repair for Infrastructure Improvement,@

Geotechnical Special Publication, N. 50, American Society of Civil Engineering, New York, 1995.

1. Meyerhof, G.G., ABearing Capacity and Settlement of Pile foundations,@ Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 102, No. GT3, pp. 197-228, 1976.

1. Hansen, Brinch, J., AThe Ultimate Resistance of Rigid Foundation Piles Against Transveral Forces,@ Bulletin-12, Danish Geotechnical Institute, Copenhagen, 1951.

1. Meyerhof, G.G. and Ranjan, Gopal, AThe Bearing Capacity of Rigid Piles Under Inclined Load in Sand, Part I: Vertical Piles,@ Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 9, 1972,.

1. Reese, L.C., and Matlock, H., ANon-dimensional Solution for Laterally Loaded Piles with Soil Modulus Assumed Proportional to Depth,@ Proceedings of the Eighth Texas Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Austin TX, 1965.

1. Davisson, M.T. and Gill, H.L., Laterally Loaded Piles in layered Soil System,@, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, Vol. 89, No. SM3, American Society of Civil Engineers, 1963.

1. Stephenson, Richard W., and Puri, Vijay, AUltimate Capacity of A.B. Chance Helical Anchors,@ Unpublished report, prepared for the A.B. Chance Co., Centralia MO, 1981.

1. Hoyt, Robert, Seider, Gary, Reese, Lymon C., and Wang, Shin-Tower, ABuckling of Helical Anchors Used for Underpinning,@ Foundation Upgrading and Repair for Infrastructure Improvement,@ Geotechnical Special Publication, N. 50, American Society of Civil Engineering, New York, 1995.

1. Sowers, G.B. and Sowers, G.F., Introductory Soil Mechanics and Foundations, Third Edition, Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, NY, 1970.

1. Hsiuing, Yun-mei and Chen, Ya-ling, ASimplified Method for Analyzing laterally Loaded single Piles in Clay,@ Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol.

123, No. 11, November, 1997.

1. Poulos, H.G., and Davis, E.HH., Pile Foundaton Analysis and Design, John Wiley & sons, Inc., New York, 1971.

1. Bowles, J.E., Foundation Analysis and Design, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988.

In document HELICAL FOUNDATIONS AND ANCHORS (Page 48-61)

Related documents