• No results found

opportunities (NAS/UWT,19771). It also had the effect of relieving

the secretary of some of the more routine, information processing and

planning work that he might previously have had to do himself. The

development of the sub-committees, therefore, did have some

effect on the influence of the secretary with the executive. He

used the sub-committees as an extension of his own activities and,

to a lesser extent, as an extension of the activities of other officers.

This tended to enable the secretary to be better informed on various

metters, for example on health and safety. His decisions and actions

were, therefore, less likely to be challenged on the executive, at

least until those involved in sub-committee work gained more experience

and independence.

Participation, the provision of experience, the processing of

information and the provision of support for officers were all significant

aspects of the work of the Coventry NAS/UWT sub-committee system.

The system, by providing this service, enabled officers to be better

prepared. This was especially true, as will be seen in the next chapter,

of the secretary and his casework. On the executive, however, the

assistance given to him by the sub-committee system had two important

169

assocation more legitimacy within the executive and, secondly, It

enabled him to represent the association more effectively on

committees which were external to the local association and to deal

more readily with a wide range of external issues. In spite of this,

however, the secretary could be challenged by the rank-and-file because

of the structuring of participation within the local association

over such issues.

External Relationships

The business which was passed to the sub-committees indicates

the extent to which much of the work of the Coventry NAS/UWT had

its origins outside the local association. The functioning of these

sub-committees reveals how much importance was attached to creating

situations in which the officers of the local association could respond

on behalf of the Coventry NAS/UWT to such external initiatives.

The processing of information by these sub-committees, their part in the

representative structure of the local association and the extent to

which members of the executive werebetter able to participate in the

business of the association through the sub-committee system all

helped to establish the legitimacy of those actions carried out by the

officers of the Coventry NAS/UWT.

The reactions of these officers on behalf of the local association

as a response to initiatives taken elsewhere in the education service

or by the national association serve, as has already been shown, to

highlight the major concerns of the local association itself and to

illustrate how far the Coventry NAS/UWT has developed a locally based

are illustrated even more clearly when seen against the background

of the network of external relationships with which the Coventry

NAS/UWT is involved and from which many of the situations to which

it has to respond actually emerge.

These external relationships are presented to the executive

meetings in two ways. Those which are part of a sustained, formal contact

such as CJC membership, are the subject of reports in much the same

way as were the internal sub-committees. The trend in presenting

these reports of external committee business followed that of the

presentation of sub-committee reports in that the practice was developed

of encouraging a range of officers to become involved in presenting

the reports of external committees as opposed to them being delivered

almost exclusively by the secretary as was the case initially. This

move tended to be restricted to officers and did not normally include

ordinary executive members but opportunities were certainly created

to spread participation more widely withiji the officer group.

Some important issues resulted from events in some parts of the

external environment of the Coventry NAS/UWT which were not subject

to regular reports at executive meetings. These frequently appeared

as special items on the executive meeting's agenda and were, perhaps,

even less predictable and controllable by the local association than

those emanating from the external formal meetings. This is not to argue,

however, that the external relationships with which the local NAS/UWT

found itself dealing produced events which were entirely unpredictable.

These relationships involved a limited number of groups such as the

LEA, NUPE, the Trades Council and the NUT. The NAS/UWT already had

its own perceptions about the interests of its members and how best

they should be fostered, as the previous sections in this chapter

171

helped to shape the way In which officers of the Coventry NAS/UWT

approach the issues which arise from these external relationships.

The approaches adopted by the officers, in turn, tended to reflect

the special concerns of the local association.

This was certainly true of the way in which the local

association's affiliation to the Campaign for Educational Advance,

(CEA), was handled in 1976. This group, started in Coventry by the

combined action of the NAS/UWT, NUT and NATFHE to oppose cuts in

educational expenditure, had the NUT secretary as its chairman and

the NAS/UWT secretary as its vice chairman. The NAS/UWT affiliated to

it as a result of a proposal put to an executive meeting by the local

secretary (NAS/UWT,1976g). At this meeting the secretary gave details

of a CEA meeting which, it was proposed, would take place in the

following October and at which Terry Casey would be the principal

speaker. Eventually this public meeting took place in November 1976

to coincide with the National Education Week. The local association

used its resources to publicize the meeting and members were urged to

attend. When the final details of this meeting were reported to the

executive meeting it was also reported that the Director of

Education had agreed to meet Terry Casey (NAS/UWT,1976i).

Even before the CEA meeting friction was developing between the

NAS/UWT and people described by the local secretary as left wing

members of the NUT over the NAS/UWT's approach to education cuts.

This dispute had split the CEA organizing committee. The NUT group

on that comnittee wanted Casey publicly to oppose all proposed cuts

in educational spending. The national stance of the NAS/UWT was,

typically, concerned with its members interests at the expense of

other parts of the education service. The position was based on the

view that in the current climate cuts in educational expenditure were

minimize the effects of these cuts on the membership by trying to

direct them away from key areas of education. Hence the teacher-

pupil ratio should be protected at all costs while capitation at

existing levels should be defended. Cuts in areas such as school

meals and lunch time supervision ought to be viewed acceptable if

cuts were inevitable. This was, in fact, the view that Casey put

to the CEA public meeting, albeit in fairly general terms.

This caused considerable dissention on the CEA organizing

committee. The criticism to which Casey and the Coventry NAS/UWT were

subjected by some NUT members resulted in the question of the

association's affiliation to the CEA being placed on the agenda

of the next executive meeting (NAS/UWT, 1976 j) . This had been

discussed at an officer's meeting the previous week. The president

proposed a motion to the effect that the Coventry NAS/UWT should end

its affiliation to the CEA. This was seconded by the secretary.

The president argued that the local association should no longer be

affiliated to the CEA, not because of the criticisms levelled at Casey,

but because the CEA was dominated by members of left wing political

groups with no direct interest in education but who wanted to use the

CEA to oppose all public expenditure cuts for political reasons. These

groups, he claimed, were based on the NUT and on NUPE, and were

changing the CEA from an educational organization to a political

pressure group over which the NAS/UWT could not exert any significant

influence. The president argued that the NAS/UWT was a trade union

with the sole responsibility of representing its members and

protecting their interests, and not a politically orientated group.

This view was unanimously supported by the executive whose members

expressed concern that the NAS/UWT had ever been associated with an

173

The spectre of being associated with an organization

dominated by the political left was raised again at the very meeting

at which the NAS/UWT executive voted to dis-affiliate itself from the

CEA. This came as a result of a report from the association's

representatives on the Coventry Trades Council on which both the

NAS/UWT had been represented for several years. The NUT left the

Trades Council in June 1976 but the NAS/UWT continued to be represented

by four long serving and experienced members including the secretary.

The local executive continued to the provided with reports on the

Trades Council until December when it was proposed by two of the

officers that the local association should leave the Trades Council

on the grounds that membership was of no real value to a serious

trade union. The secretary described the Trades Council as a vehicle

for trotskyites and communists to carry on interminable disputes.

Another of the NAS/UWT's representatives argued that the Trades Council

was a very left wing organization which did not support the TUC.

By remaining as members, it was argued, there was a danger that the

NAS/UWT might be thought to share the political views expressed on

the Trades Council by some people. Again the resolution to withdraw

was not opposed by any member of the executive.

These two events illustrate the extent to which the Coventry

NAS/UWT executive shares a set of common views about the appropriate

nature of trade union activity. Whether or not the claims made

about the Trades Council and the CEA being dominated by left wing groups

were actually true, clearly depends on the political standpoint of

the particular observer. What is important about the NAS/UWT's

responses to these two situations, however, was the extent to which

to be Involved with politically active left wing groups In Coventry.

'Ibis concern resulted from the wish to maintain the non-radical,

co-operative and accommodating stance which the NAS/UWT preferred to

adopt towards the LEA and to avoid this position being attacked as a

result of the local association becoming involved, even inadvertantly,

with groups which might be too far to the political left.

Such a stance was developed in order that the NAS/UWT might

be seen to be significantly different from the NUT in Coventry,

especially where relationships with the LEA were concerned. These

relationships between the NUT, LEA and the Coventry NAS/UWT were

usually reported to the executive committee meetings as part of the

CJC Reports which were a regular part of the proceedings of the

executive meetings. Again the reports of these meetings concentrated

on the particular concerns of the NAS/UWT. For example, the

secretary's reports on the discussions of the negotiations over the

proposed merger between the local college of education and polytechnic

focused on the deleterious effect that the negotiations were having

on relationships between the teachers' unions and the officers of the

LEA, (NAS/UWT,1976g), rather than on the specific content of the

merger negotiations.

The representatives of the Coventry NAS/UWT on the CJC saw the

role of that committee in a different light from the NUT and LEA

representatives on it, perhaps because the NAS/UWT was, because of its

size, in a minority on the CJC. The local secretary pointed out this

difference in two of his reports, (NAS/UWT,1977h> 1977i), arguing

that he regarded it as a consultative committee but not as a vehicle

for representing real teacher opinion throughout the city. This,

he suggested, could only be arrived at, as in the case of determining

the teacher membership of the committee which it was proposed would

oversee the college-polytechnic merger, by city wide elections. The

175 -

from which such membership should be drawn. This particular issue

eventually became irrelevant because of a change in the proposed

merger but the NAS/UWT concern about the nature of the CJC remained.

The nature of the CJC and the issues of the NAS/UWT's

representation on it came to a head with the appointment of a new

chairman of the CJC. The incoming chairman was a member of the NUT

and all three NAS/UWT representatives felt that the election had been

arranged before the meeting. Since then it was believed by those

representatives that the NUT seemed to be manipulating dates and times

of meetings to suit themselves and to place the NAS/UWT at a disadvantage.

The executive member proposed that the local association's secretary

should look closely at the role of the CJC and press for a re-alignment

of its membership and increase in NAS/UWT membership on it (NAS/UWT,

1977h; 1977m). It was felt by some members that the whole question

of representation might be resolved to the satisfaction of the NAS/UWT

by the incoming conservative administration (NAS/UWT,1977k).

Representation and the nature of the consultation process on the

CJC were both important issues for the officers and members of the

Coventry NAS/UWT. This was partly because, as was widely recognized

within the association, it started from a position of relative weakness

in all such matters because it was about a third of the size of its

rival union, the NUT. It was also significant because of the emphasis

placed by both the national and local association on providing a

service to members. As the NAS found before it gained representation

on the Burnham Committee, without appropriate representation, it was

unable to provide a service. The Coventry NAS/UWT did not always find

itself at a disadvantage over matters of representation, however. In

in the time off allowed to union officers in order that they could

attend to union business. The NAS/UWT was given 6 sessions, 3 of which

went to the secretary while the other 3, were given to the president,

treasurer and vice president. The NUT was only allocated 8 sessions

to be divided in a similar way (NAS/UWT,1977i). This agreement, like

many others, was based on the membership of the two unions and, since

the NUT was significantly larger than the NAS/UWT, the NUT was unhappy

with the terms of this particular agreement.

The CJC was part of the consultative procedure in the Coventry

education service through which teachers' representatives were involved,

however indirectly, in the processes of decision-making. If sometimes

the teachers' unions disagreed about the nature of their involvement,

there were times when they agreed that the appropriate consultative

machinery was not being used by the LEA. In June 1977 the local

executive was informed of just such a situation (NAS/UWT,19771).

The LEA, at the insistence of the DES, had incorporated the new May Day

holiday into the existing holiday pattern in Coventry. This pattern

is an unusual one in any case, because of the holiday demands of the

car industry which means that term finishes unusually early in July,

among other things. There was no official consultation over this on the

CJC. Most teachers' representatives were opposed to this new holiday,

coming as it did so soon after the Easter Holiday and so soon before

the important public examinations. The Coventry NAS/UWT were especially

opposed to it representing, as it claimed, the majority of secondary

school teachers in the city. The executive committee also reacted

strongly to what they saw as a failure to consult the teachers on

177 -

of the members of the executive reported that their members were

concerned about the effect that this holiday might have on examination

preparation. The NAS/UWT representatives were instructed to press

for consultations on the matter, although the local secretary had already

contacted NAS/UWT headquarters and had been informed that nothing could

be done about the imposition of the May Day holiday because teachers

did not have a contract which specified when they should and should

not work. Even so, headquarters advised that attempts to use this

day to save heating fuel should be resisted and that one day should

be taken off at Easter rather than, say, Christmas. After the LEA

had consulted the teachers' representatives on the CJC, the point

was eventually conceded to the LEA and the teachers accepted the

May Day holiday.

The CJC was one of the main avenues of contact between the

NAS/UWT and the LEA. The formal contacts which the secretary had as

part of his membership of other committees as well as the formal

contacts which he developed and used in his casework activities will be

examined in the next chapter. There was one other point of contact

with the LEA which the officers of the NAS/UWT were attempting to

develop as part of the external relationships of the local association

at this time. Political control of the education authority was due to

change hands and, as a result, a new Conservative administration was to

take office in May 1977. The officers of the NAS/UWT planned to take

the initiative and arrange a meeting with the new elected members of the

Conservative administration. A sum of £100 was to be spent to entertain

the Tory group on the city council (NAS/UWT,1977k). At the

Related documents