• No results found

General. Unless otherwise noted, all starting materials were obtained from commercial

suppliers and were used without further purification.

Bacterial Growth and Crude Nucleic Acid Isolation. E. coli TOP10 (Invitrogen) was cultured

to OD600 = 0.7-0.8 at 37ºC in 2 L LB broth Miller (EMD Bioscience). S. venezuelae ATCC

#10595 was cultured to OD600 = 0.7-0.8 at 30 ºC in 2 L MYME media (100 g/L sucrose, 10 g/L

maltose, 5 g/L peptone, 3 g/L yeast extract, 3 g/L malt extract).140 All subsequent manipulations of cells were carried out on ice or at 4 °C. The bacteria were centrifuged (10 min at 6,750 x g), resuspended in lysis buffer (1% SDS, 2 mM EDTA, 32 mM NaOAc, pH 4.5), and vortexed vigorously. After incubation on ice for 15 min, the lysate was cleared by centrifugation (10 min at 10,000 x g), extracted with acid-phenol chloroform (Ambion) until the organic-aqueous interface was clear, and the aqueous layer was washed once with chloroform. An equal volume of isopropanol was added to the resulting aqueous extract and the mixture was incubated on crushed dry ice 20-30 min prior to centrifugation (20 min, 15,000 x g). The resulting pellet was dissolved in 50 mM NH4OAc, pH 4.5, and subjected to size-exclusion chromatography using

NAP5 columns (GE Healthcare). The macromolecular fraction was treated with 0.04 U/µL TURBO DNase (Ambion) at 25 ºC for 30 min and then with 0.06 U/µL proteinase K (New England Biolabs) at 25 °C for 30 min. The resulting solution was extracted with acid-phenol chloroform (Ambion) twice, washed with chloroform, and again subjected to size-exclusion

chromatography using NAP5 columns. The macromolecular fraction was divided into aliquots, lyophilized, and stored as a dry powder at -80 ºC.

Nuclease Digestion. The cleavage condition sample was prepared by incubating 500 µg of E.

coli RNA or 500 µg of S. venezuelae RNA with 10 U nuclease P1 (Sigma-Aldrich) in 200 µL of 50 mM NH4OAc, pH 4.5 at 37 ºC for 40 min. The control condition samples was prepared by

incubating 500 µg aliquot of E. coli RNA or S. venezuelae RNA with 10 U heat-inactivated nuclease P1 (95 ºC for one hour) in 200 µL of 50 mM NH4OAc, pH 4.5 at 37 ºC for 40 min. The

digestion products were purified by size-exclusion chromatography (NAP5) and the small- molecule fraction was retained. The nuclease P1 digestion with H218O (Cambridge Isotope

Laboratories) was performed as described above except in buffer with a final composition containing 86% H218O and 14% H216O.

LC/MS Data Collection and Analysis. LC/MS was performed using a Waters Aquity UPLC

Q-TOF Premier instrument with an Aquity UPLC BEH C18 column (1.7 µm, 2.1 mm x 100 mm, Waters). Mobile phase A was 0.1% aqueous ammonium formate, and mobile phase B was 100% methanol. The flow rate was a constant 0.300 mL/min and the mobile phase composition was as follows: 0% B for 3 min; linear increase over 17 min to 100% B; maintain at 100% B for 2 min before returning linearly to 0 % B over 1 min. Electrospray ionization (ESI) was used, with a capillary voltage of 3.5 kV, sampling cone voltage of 40.0 kV, and collision voltage of 1.0 eV. The drying gas temperature was 300 ºC, the drying gas flow rate was 800 L/hour, the source temperature was 150 ºC, and the detector was operated in negative ion mode. To observe the NAD parent ion ([M-H]- m/z = 662.1018), the capillary voltage was 2.75 kV and the sampling cone voltage was 20.0 kV. For each sample, 15 µL of the redissolved lyophilized material was

61   injected. Ions with cleavage condition average integrated ion intensities below 50 ion counts were not considered for further analysis. The XCMS program109 quantified the area under detected ion abundance peaks as it stepped through each ion chromatogram; the step size was set to 0.050 Da. Integrated ion abundances were averaged among replicates, and the enrichment values reported were the ratios of these average ion intensities between active nuclease conditions and heat-inactivated nuclease (control) conditions.

MS/MS Fragmentation Analysis. MS/MS experiments were performed using the same

instrument, LC gradient, and MS parameters described above. The collision voltage was varied empirically from 20.0-30.0 2V.

Isotope Labeling of S. venezuelae RNA. S. venezuelae ATCC #10595 was cultured to OD600 =

0.7-0.8 at 30 °C in minimal media (4.3 g/L NaH2PO4, 6.1 g/L K2HPO4, 2.0 g/L NaCl, 2.0 mg/L

FeSO4·7H2O, 2.0 mg/L MnCl2·4H2O, 2.0 mg/L ZnSO4·7H2O, 2.0 mg/L CaCl2, 0.6 g/L

MgSO4·7H2O, 10.0 g/L glucose, and 2.0 g/L (NH4)2SO4)140. For 13C labeling, 13C-glucose (99% 13C, Cambridge Isotope Laboratories) was used as the sole carbon source. For 15N labeling, 15N-

ammonium sulfate (99% 15N, Cambridge Isotope Laboratories) was used as the sole nitrogen source. RNA isolation, nuclease P1 digestion, and LC/MS analysis was performed as described above.

NAD Spiking Into Cell Lysate. E. coli TOP10 cell lysate was prepared as described above and

divided into three equal aliquots. NAD and NADH (Sigma-Aldrich) were added to the cell lysate as follows: aliquot 1: no added NAD or NADH; aliquot 2: 500 nmol of NAD; aliquot 3:

500 nmol of NADH. Based on our standard curve analysis 500 nmol of NADH or 500 nmol of NAD theoretically represents 4,000,000 ion counts; in practice, this amount of NAD or NADH saturates the detector. Cell lysates were processed and analyzed as described above.

RNase A Digestion. Total RNA prepared as described above was subjected to digestion with 1

µg RNase A (Ambion) in 200 µL of 50 mM NH4OAc, pH 4.5, at 37 ºC for 20 min). After

digestion, the sample was subjected to size-exclusion chromatography (NAP5, GE Healthcare) and the small-molecule fraction was lyophilized. The lyophilized product was redissolved in 20 µL of 0.1 % aqueous ammonium formate and analyzed by LC/MS as described above.

Number of NAD-RNA(s) per E. coli cell. To establish a standard curve of MS ion counts per

pmol NAD, 5, 25, 50 and 100 pmols of authentic NAD (Sigma-Aldrich) were analyzed by initial and mild ionization conditions as described above. The NAD signal from 500 µg of total E. coli RNA was compared to the standard curves to determine the number of pmols of cellular NAD per µg RNA. The molecules of NAD-RNA per cell was then calculated based on 59x10-15 g

RNA per E. coli cell.141

Authentic NAD and NADH Carried Through Mock RNA Isolation. To determine if cellular

NADH-RNA could be detected by our nuclease based method, 50 pmol of NAD and NADH (Sigma-Aldrich) in 500 µL of 50 mM NH4OAc, pH 4.5 were incubated on ice for 15 min, and

then at 4 °C for 10 min. The samples were moved back to ice for 5 min and then placed at 4 °C for 10 min. This procedure was repeated three times, corresponding to the number of acid- phenol chloroform and chloroform extractions during the crude nucleic acid isolation. The NAD

63   and NADH samples were then placed on crushed dry ice for 20-30 min prior to incubation at 4 °C for 20 min, mimicking the isopropanol precipitation of cellular RNA. While the crude nucleic acids were subjected to size-exclusion chromatography, the NAD and NADH samples were exposed to air and incubated at 25 °C for 10-15 min. The samples were then incubated at 25 °C for 1 h, and lyophilized. The dry powder was redissolved in 200 µL of 50 mM NH4OAc,

pH 4.5 and incubated at 37 ºC for 40 min. The NAD and NADH samples were exposed to air and incubated at 25 ºC for 15-20 min. The samples were lyophilized and stored as a dry powder at -20 ºC.

Preparation of Authentic 5’-NAD-RNA. 5’-NAD-RNA was prepared as previously

described.135 A DNA template containing the T7 class II promoter (Φ2.5) and encoding a 228- base RNA was prepared by PCR. Transcription was carried out in 1x New England Biolabs (NEB) RNA pol buffer supplemented with 1 mM each NTP, 1 mM NADH (Aldrich), 0.01% Triton X-100, 5 mM DTT, 0.2 U/µl RNase inhibitor (NEB), 0.2 µM DNA template, and 5 U/µL T7 RNA polymerase (NEB). The reactions were incubated at 37 °C for 2 hrs before the product was isolated by precipitation with ethanol, dissolved in TURBO-DNase buffer (Ambion), and treated with TURBO-DNase (0.04 U/µL final concentration, 37 °C, 30 min). The DNase-treated RNA was precipitated with ethanol, redissolved in water, and purified by size-exclusion

chromatography (NAP5, GE Healthcare). The precipitated NAD-RNA product following DNase treatment was dissolved in water, purified by silica column (Qiagen RNeasy), quantified by A260,

digested with nuclease P1, and analyzed by LC/MS as described above in order to estimate the fraction of the resulting RNA strands that contained the NAD modification. We observed that ~3% of the transcripts generated by this procedure were linked to NAD.

In Vitro Transcription. In vitro transcription reactions contained E. coli RNA polymerase (Epicentre Biotechnologies) in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 150 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.01%

Triton X-100 supplemented with NTPs (0.5 mM each), DTT (10 mM), and NADH (0.5 mM or 5.0 mM). The plasmid or genomic DNA template was added to a final concentration of 0.02 µg/µL and E. coli RNA polymerase was added to a final concentration of 0.04 U/µL. The

reactions were incubated at 37 °C for 22 hrs before the product was isolated by precipitation with ethanol, dissolved in TURBO-DNase buffer (Ambion), and treated with TURBO-DNase

(Ambion) at a final concentration of 0.04 U/µL for 30 minutes at 37 °C. The RNA was purified by RNeasy spin-column (Qiagen) to remove free NTPs and NADH. The resulting RNA was digested with nuclease P1 and analyzed by LC/MS as described above.

The first template was a modified pUC19 plasmid, which encoded an adenosine at the +1 position of each of its four predicted transcripts. An in vitro transcription reaction containing 0.5 mM of each NTP and either 0.5 mM or 5 mM of NADH yielded 222 µg or 174 µg of RNA, respectively. The second template used was E. coli genomic DNA. In vitro transcription in the presence of either 0.5 mM or 5 mM of NADH yielded 78 µg or 70 µg of RNA. Once again, this material contained no detectable NAD or NADH after nuclease P1 digestion.

2.15 References

1 Kowtoniuk, W. E., Shen, Y., Heemstra, J. M., Agarwal, I. & Liu, D. R. A chemical screen for biological small molecule-RNA conjugates reveals CoA-linked RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106, 7768-7773, doi:0900528106 [pii]10.1073/pnas.0900528106 (2009).

2 Crain, P. F. & James, A. M. in Methods in Enzymology Vol. Volume 193 782-790 (Academic Press, 1990).

3 Crain, P. F. Mass spectrometric techniques in nucleic acid research. Mass Spectrometry Reviews 9, 505-554 (1990).

65   4 Romier, C., Dominguez, R., Lahm, A., Dahl, O. & Suck, D. Recognition of single-

stranded DNA by nuclease P1: high resolution crystal structures of complexes with substrate analogs. Proteins 32, 414-424, doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-

0134(19980901)32:4<414::AID-PROT2>3.0.CO;2-G [pii] (1998).

5 Smith, C. A., Want, E. J., O'Maille, G., Abagyan, R. & Siuzdak, G. XCMS: processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using nonlinear peak alignment, matching, and identification. Anal Chem 78, 779-787, doi:10.1021/ac051437y (2006). 6 Woese, C. R. Bacterial evolution. Microbiol Rev 51, 221-271 (1987).

7 Woese, C. R., Gutell, R., Gupta, R. & Noller, H. F. Detailed analysis of the higher-order structure of 16S-like ribosomal ribonucleic acids. Microbiol Rev 47, 621-669 (1983). 8 Woese, C. R., Kandler, O. & Wheelis, M. L. Towards a natural system of organisms:

proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87, 4576-4579 (1990).

9 Limbach, P. A., Crain, P. F. & McCloskey, J. A. Summary: the modified nucleosides of RNA. Nucleic Acids Res 22, 2183-2196 (1994).

10 Edmonds, C. G. et al. Posttranscriptional modification of tRNA in thermophilic archaea (Archaebacteria). J Bacteriol 173, 3138-3148 (1991).

11 Dunin-Horkawicz, S. et al. MODOMICS: a database of RNA modification pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 34, D145-149, doi:34/suppl_1/D145 [pii]10.1093/nar/gkj084 (2006). 12 Ng, W. V. et al. Genome sequence of Halobacterium species NRC-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci

U S A 97, 12176-12181, doi:10.1073/pnas.190337797 [pii] (2000).

13 Deamer, D. W. Light transducing membranes, structure, function, and evolution. (Academic Press, 1978).

14 I.E.D, D. in Advances in Microbial Physiology Vol. Volume 15 eds A. H. Rose & D. W. Tempest) 85-120 (Academic Press, 1977).

15 Soppa, J. From genomes to function: haloarchaea as model organisms. Microbiology 152, 585-590, doi:152/3/585 [pii]10.1099/mic.0.28504-0 (2006).

16 Wang, G., Kennedy, S. P., Fasiludeen, S., Rensing, C. & DasSarma, S. Arsenic resistance in Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1 examined by using an improved gene knockout system. J Bacteriol 186, 3187-3194 (2004).

17 Peck, R. F., DasSarma, S. & Krebs, M. P. Homologous gene knockout in the archaeon Halobacterium salinarum with ura3 as a counterselectable marker. Mol Microbiol 35, 667-676, doi:1739 [pii] (2000).

18 Zaigler, A., Schuster, S. C. & Soppa, J. Construction and usage of a onefold-coverage shotgun DNA microarray to characterize the metabolism of the archaeon Haloferax volcanii. Mol Microbiol 48, 1089-1105, doi:3497 [pii] (2003).

19 Muller, J. A. & DasSarma, S. Genomic analysis of anaerobic respiration in the archaeon Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1: dimethyl sulfoxide and trimethylamine N-oxide as terminal electron acceptors. J Bacteriol 187, 1659-1667, doi:187/5/1659

[pii]10.1128/JB.187.5.1659-1667.2005 (2005).

20 Klein, C. et al. The membrane proteome of Halobacterium salinarum. Proteomics 5, 180- 197, doi:10.1002/pmic.200400943 (2005).

21 Robb, F. T., Place, A. R., DasSarma, S. & Fleischmann, E. M. Archaea: a laboratory manual. Halophiles. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1995).

22 Wood, V. et al. The genome sequence of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nature 415, 871- 880 (2002).

23 Christie, K. R. et al. Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) provides tools to identify and analyze sequences from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and related sequences from other organisms. Nucleic Acids Res 32, D311-314, doi:10.1093/nar/gkh03332/suppl_1/D311 [pii] (2004).

24 Mewes, H. W. et al. Overview of the yeast genome. Nature 387, 7-65, doi:10.1038/42755 (1997).

25 Goffeau, A. et al. Life with 6000 genes. Science 274, 546, 563-547 (1996).

26 Bokar, J. in Fine-Tuning of RNA Functions by Modification and Editing 141-177 (2005).

27 Blount, K. F. & Breaker, R. R. Riboswitches as antibacterial drug targets. Nat Biotechnol 24, 1558-1564, doi:nbt1268 [pii]10.1038/nbt1268 (2006).

28 Pollak, N., Dolle, C. & Ziegler, M. The power to reduce: pyridine nucleotides--small molecules with a multitude of functions. Biochem J 402, 205-218, doi:BJ20061638 [pii]10.1042/BJ20061638 (2007).

29 Roberts, G. C., Dennis, E. A., Meadows, D. H., Cohen, J. S. & Jardetzky, O. The mechanism of action of ribonuclease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 62, 1151-1158 (1969). 30 Usher, D. A. On the mechanism of ribonuclease action. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 62,

661-667 (1969).

31 Usher, D. A., Richardson, D. I., Jr. & Eckstein, F. Absolute stereochemistry of the second step of ribonuclease action. Nature 228, 663-665 (1970).

32 Grosjean, H. B. R. Modification and editing of RNA. (ASM Press, 1998). 33 Huang, F. Efficient incorporation of CoA, NAD and FAD into RNA by in vitro

transcription. Nucleic Acids Res 31, e8 (2003).

34 Jakubowski, H. & Goldman, E. Quantities of individual aminoacyl-tRNA families and their turnover in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 158, 769-776 (1984).

35 Moore, S. D. & Sauer, R. T. Ribosome rescue: tmRNA tagging activity and capacity in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 58, 456-466, doi:MMI4832 [pii]10.1111/j.1365- 2958.2005.04832.x (2005).

36 Frick, D. N. & Richardson, C. C. DNA primases. Annu Rev Biochem 70, 39-80, doi:70/1/39 [pii]10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.39 (2001).

37 Ogawa, T., Hirose, S., Okazaki, T. & Okazaki, R. Mechanism of DNA chain growth XVI. Analyses of RNA-linked DNA pieces in Escherichia coli with polynucleotide kinase. J Mol Biol 112, 121-140 (1977).

38 Tsukiji, S., Pattnaik, S. B. & Suga, H. Reduction of an aldehyde by a NADH/Zn2+ - dependent redox active ribozyme. J Am Chem Soc 126, 5044-5045,

doi:10.1021/ja0495213 (2004).

39 Li, N. & Huang, F. Ribozyme-catalyzed aminoacylation from CoA thioesters. Biochemistry 44, 4582-4590, doi:10.1021/bi047576b (2005).

40 Furuichi, Y. & Miura, K. A blocked structure at the 5' terminus of mRNA from cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus. Nature 253, 374-375 (1975).

41 Wei, C. M. & Moss, B. Methylated nucleotides block 5'-terminus of vaccinia virus messenger RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 72, 318-322 (1975).

42 Mandal, M. & Breaker, R. R. Gene regulation by riboswitches. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5, 451-463, doi:10.1038/nrm1403nrm1403 [pii] (2004).

67   43 Celesnik, H., Deana, A. & Belasco, J. G. Initiation of RNA decay in Escherichia coli by

5' pyrophosphate removal. Mol Cell 27, 79-90, doi:S1097-2765(07)00364-4 [pii]10.1016/j.molcel.2007.05.038 (2007).

44 Hopwood, D. A. Genetic manipulation of Streptomyces: a laboratory manual. (John Innes Foundation, 1985).

45 Neidhardt, F. C. I. J. L. S. M. Physiology of the bacterial cell : a molecular approach. (Sinauer Associates, 1990).

Chapter Three:

The Characterization of NAD-Linked RNA

Ye Grace Chen, Matt Edwards, David R Liu

Matt Edwards performed the alternate computational processing of Illumina Hi-Seq results. Ye Grace Chen conducted and analyzed all of the other experiments described.

69  

3.1 Introduction

We previously described the development of a nuclease-based screen that revealed NAD- linked RNA. Further characterization of NAD-linked RNA, including the size distribution and sequence, may elucidate its biological function. A more comprehensive understanding can add to the known functional diversity of RNA and contribute to a greater insight of the RNA world. In this chapter, we will describe the progress toward the characterization of NAD-linked RNA.