• No results found

Data extraction coding forms

Page 1, Table 1 — Article identification details

Field Details

Article review number ...

number studies ... project number ... number of duplicate ... Authors ... Title ... Journal details ...

Included/excluded included excluded

(reasons exclude) ...

Database MEDLINE PsycLIT BIDS handsearch

Date downloaded ______ /______

Date sent to reviewer ______ /______

Date returned reviewer ______ /______

Initials reviewer MA HB JC JH JM MM SM AP MR JT

Page 2, Table 1 – Describing health decision and quality study Summary health decision (free text)

Location research: Participants: The nature of the decision is:

unknown UK North America unknown adult well A) real intended hypothetical

S. Africa Australia/NZ pregnant physically impaired B) implicit explicit

other (write ... elderly (> 65) mentally impaired C) affects – participant other

...) child (< 17) non-English speaking D) made at – time intervention later

Domain of health care: Defining type of health decision: Authors awareness theory:

Write type of illness or health domain Write type of health decision (e.g. Decision making theory:

research located (e.g. cervical/breast screening, diagnostic testing, medication/ 0 = no theory referred to

cancer, asthma, health promotion, drug therapy, surgical treatment, Write in the name of theory referred to in

cardiovascular risk factors, HIV/condom behavioural therapy, willingness to pay, the introduction or methods section ...

use, smoking cessation, drug use, research, cessation, etc.)

tuberculoses, malaria, etc.)

... ... ...

... ... ...

Quality of study: Quality of study continued... Quality of study continued...

Design of study: Level of intervention: Sample size:

randomised (RCT) a b c patient level other level not rec. total number available _____ not rec.

non-randomised concurrent Sample invited to participate: total number invited _____ not rec.

before/after different sample total ‘population’ available number participated _____ not rec.

before/after same sample stratified/systematic sample number excluded _____ not rec.

Other (e.g. matched case-controlled) volunteer/non-systematic sample number in final analysis _____ not rec.

... not adequately described

Quality of study continued... Quality of study continued... Reference to be accessed ...

Causes for concern: Development intervention materials:

no/not obvious causes for concern piloted intervention: no yes in part

yes (please write any concerns) piloted measures: no yes in part

... readability score: no yes in part

Appendix 4

42

Page 3, Table 1 – Description of intervention groups

Nature of intervention: explicit information change in service other

Comparative group Description of intervention (write ...) Code Number in group (n) Group 1 ... [ ] [ ] ... [ ] [ ] Group 2 ... [ ] [ ] ... [ ] [ ] Group 3 ... [ ] [ ] ... [ ] [ ] Group 4 ... [ ] [ ] ... [ ] [ ] Group 5 ... [ ] [ ] ... [ ] [ ]

Page 3, Table 2 – Variables described within article

Variable Code Descriptives Main effect analysis Interaction analysis Write variables described within the study

(e.g. age, gender, attitudes, social support) Alongside each variable, tick whether the analysis of the variable was descriptive, main effect or interaction.

Page 4, Table 1 – Description health decision outcome

Description (write...) Continuous/categorical Validated, piloted, study specific Description validated measure (write): val pil study

val pil study

Page 4, Table 2 – Results evaluating the association of the intervention and decision outcome

Variable Categorical Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 level/group not available or not available or not available or not available or not available or

e.g. adhere 1 ‘n’ or ‘n’ or ‘n’ or ‘n’ or ‘n’ or

not adhere 2 mean (sd) n mean (sd) n mean (sd) n mean (sd) n mean (sd) n

sd = standard deviation

Page 4, Table 3 –Text box summarising the results of the intervention

43

1 - 1

Lindholm LH, Ekbom T, Dash C, Isacsson A,

Schersten B. Changes in cardiovascular risk

factors by combined pharmacological and

nonpharmacological strategies: the main results

of the CELL Study. Journal of Internal Medicine

1996;240(1):13–22.

3 - 1

Davies-Adetugbo AA. Promotion of breast

feeding in the community: impact of health

education programme in rural communities in

Nigeria. Journal of Diarrhoeal Diseases Research

1996;14(1):5–11.

4 - 1

Hoffman JA, Caudill BD, Koman JJ 3rd, Luckey

JW, Flynn PM, Mayo DW. Psychosocial treatments

for cocaine abuse. 12-month treatment

outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

1996;13(1):3–11.

6 - 1

El-Chaar GM, Mardy G, Wehlou K, Rubin LG.

Randomized, double blind comparison of brand

and generic antibiotic suspensions: II. A study of

taste and compliance in children. Pediatric

Infectious Disease Journal 1996;15(1):18–22.

6 - 2

El-Chaar GM, Mardy G, Wehlou K, Rubin LG.

Randomized, double blind comparison of brand

and generic antibiotic suspensions: II. A study of

taste and compliance in children. Pediatric

Infectious Disease Journal 1996;15(1):18–22.

6 - 3

El-Chaar GM, Mardy G, Wehlou K, Rubin LG.

Randomized, double blind comparison of brand

and generic antibiotic suspensions: II. A study

of taste and compliance in children. Pediatric

Infectious Disease Journal 1996;15(1):18–22.

10 - 1

Toseland RW, O’Donnell JC, Engelhardt JB,

Hendler SA, Richie JT, Jue D. Outpatient

geriatric evaluation and management.

Results of a randomized trial. Medical Care

1996;34(6):624–40.

17 - 1

Smith MU, Katner HP. Quasi-experimental

evaluation of three AIDS prevention activities

for maintaining knowledge, improving attitudes,

and changing risk behaviors of high school

seniors. AIDS Education and Prevention

1995;7(5):391–402.

18 - 1

Goldberg L, Elliot DL, Clarke GN, MacKinnon

DP, Zoref L, Moe E, Green C, Wolf SL. The

Adolescents Training and Learning to Avoid

Steroids (ATLAS) prevention program.

Background and results of a model intervention.

Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine

1996;150(7):713–21.

19 - 1

Mazur DJ, Hickam DH. Five-year survival curves:

how much data are enough for patient–physician

decision making in general surgery? European

Journal of Surgery 1996;162(2):101–4.

20 - 1

Gil KM, Wilson JJ, Edens JL, Webster DA, Abrams

MA, Orringer E, Grant M, Clark WC, Janal MN.

Effects of cognitive coping skills training on

coping strategies and experimental pain

sensitivity in African American adults with sickle

cell disease. Health Psychology 1996;15(1):3–10.

22 - 1

Pauw J, Ferrie J, Rivera Villegas R, Medrano

Martinez J, Gorter A, Egger M. A controlled

HIV/AIDS-related health education programme

in Managua, Nicaragua. AIDS 1996;10(5):537–44.

23 - 1

Hagopian GA. The effects of informational

audiotapes on knowledge and self-care behaviors

of patients undergoing radiation therapy.

Oncology Nursing Forum 1996;23(4):697–700.

24 - 1

Gordon CM, Carey MP. Alcohol’s effects on

requisites for sexual risk reduction in men: an

initial experimental investigation. Health

Psychology 1996;15(1):56–60.

26 - 1

Hartley BM, O’Connor ME. Evaluation of the

‘Best Start’ breast-feeding education program.

Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine

1996;150(8):868–71.

27 - 1

Maisiak R, Austin J, Heck L. Health outcomes

of two telephone interventions for patients with

rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis. Arthritis

and Rheumatism 1996;39(8):1391–9.

28 - 1

Mercer BS. A randomized study of the efficacy

of the PROPATH Program for patients with

Parkinson disease. Archives of Neurology

1996;53(9):881–4.

32 - 1

Agras WS, Berkowitz RI, Arnow BA, Telch CF,

Marnell M, Henderson J, Morris Y, Wilfley DE.

Maintenance following a very-low-calorie diet.

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

1996;64(3):610–3.

34 - 1

Foley EC, D’Amico F, Merenstein JH. Five-year

follow-up of a nurse-initiated intervention to

improve mammography recommendation.

Journal of the American Board of Family Practice

1995;8(6):452–6.

35 - 1

O’Hara P, Messick BJ, Fichtner RR, Parris D. A

peer-led AIDS prevention program for students

in an alternative school. Journal of School Health

1996;66(5):176–82.

Related documents