• No results found

3. Construction and analysis of a database of MAST fishbone events

3.4 Fishbone Selection Process

The first step in selecting fishbone events to be included in the database is finding an accepted definition for the observed magnetic signatures of fishbones on MAST. On MAST, these events typically have a fundamental harmonic ([𝑛𝑛,𝑚𝑚] = (1,1)) sweeping through an experimentally observed frequency range around 35 kHz (±5 kHz) downwards to 20 kHz (±5 kHz), followed by a short period of relative quiet in the magnetics signal (the cycle can repeat if conditions are

appropriate [54]). This definition for fishbones was chosen as it requires few assumptions, has been used in existing research [32], and identifies many events.

Selected fishbone events need to be isolated from other events (such as edge-localised modes, toroidal Alfvén eigenmodes, sawtooth events, etc.) to attempt to limit observed changes in confinement represented by changes in 〈Γ〉 to only fishbone events. We chose not to include the presence (or absence) and the relative strength of higher harmonics of [𝑛𝑛,𝑚𝑚] = (1,1) as a selection factor. The experimental measure of confinement for this study, the neutron fission chamber signal, was not a selection factor to avoid biasing results.

Applying these selection criteria identified 198 fishbone candidates from the 48 discharges listed in Table 3-3. This wide selection of fishbone events allows for an investigation of a much wider range of plasma conditions and parameters than in previous studies during fishbone events on MAST.

15 To clarify: ‘Reactivity’ is average of the cross section over a velocity distribution, and ‘fusion rate’ is the

number of fusion reactions occurring in a unit of volume per time, which is inferred experimentally using the neutrons released from D-D and D-T fusion reactions.

16 A feat possible through the careful control of current profiles and plasma heating. 17 Available on CCFE Intranet

18 Such as non-operational diagnostics, mistimed processes, equipment failure, or aborted discharges. 19 Discharges classified as successful in experimental logs were included in the survey, aborted or failed

discharges were removed prior to analysis.

21

Examples of two types of fishbone activity are shown in Figure 3-3 and Figure 3-4, and a full list of these fishbone discharges is provided in Appendix A.

Table 3-3: MAST discharges selected for fishbone analysis

Discharge Date Programme Reference Discharge

26586 12/07/2011 M8-MHD-002 M8-IPS-001/002 RMPs in SND 26517

26789 9/09/2011 M8-SOL-006 RFEA experiments 26788

26855 28/09/2011 M8-IPS-004 Fast Ion Diffusion Experiment 26854

26857 28/09/2011 M8-IPS-004 Fast Ion Diffusion Experiment 26856

26859 28/09/2011 M8-IPS-004 Fast Ion Diffusion Experiment 26857

26863 28/09/2011 M8-IPS-004 Fast Ion Diffusion Experiment 26857

26864 28/09/2011 M8-IPS-004 Fast Ion Diffusion Experiment 26857

26884 29/09/2011 Fast Ion Diffusion Experiment 26864

26885 29/09/2011 Fast Ion Diffusion Experiment 26884

26886 29/09/2011 Fast Ion Diffusion Experiment 26885

26887 29/09/2011 Fast Ion Diffusion Experiment 26886

26888 29/09/2011 Fast Ion Diffusion Experiment 26887

26889 29/09/2011 Fast Ion Diffusion Experiment 26888

26970 4/10/2011 M8-T&C-004 M8-T&C-005 Low k turbulence 26968

27182 20/10/2011 Effect of relation processes on non-linear evolution of beam-driven modes 26976

27525 15/11/2011 M8-T&C-004 Low k turbulence in H-mode 26500

27526 15/11/2011 M8-T&C-004 Low k turbulence in H-mode 26500

27527 15/11/2011 M8-T&C-004 Low k turbulence in H-mode 26500

27528 15/11/2011 M8-T&C-004 Low k turbulence in H-mode 26500

27672 1/12/2011 M8-T&C-010 27671

27917 15/12/2011 M8-FPP-006 Fast Ion redistribution 26789

27918 15/12/2011 M8-FPP-006 Fast Ion redistribution 26789

27919 15/12/2011 M8-FPP-006 Fast Ion redistribution 26789

27920 15/12/2011 M8-FPP-006 Fast Ion redistribution 26789

27922 15/12/2011 M8-FPP-006 Fast Ion redistribution 27921

27924 15/12/2011 M8-FPP-006 Fast Ion redistribution 27922

27928 15/12/2011 M8-FPP-006 Fast Ion redistribution 27924

28186 20/01/2012 M8-T&C-012 L-H threshold 28182

28268 25/01/2012 M8-FPP-006: quantify fast ion redistribution due to chirping modes 28267

28982 10/06/2013 CP3S charger testing 28787

29113 20/06/2013 M9-SOL-005 M9-IPS-001 M9-MHD-006 Spark gap injector, scenario development and the effect of beta on edge stability 28787

29114 20/06/2013 M9-SOL-005 M9-IPS-001 M9-MHD-006 Spark gap injector, scenario development and the effect of beta on edge stability 29113

29115 20/06/2013 M9-SOL-005 M9-IPS-001 M9-MHD-006 Spark gap injector, scenario development and the effect of beta on edge stability 29114

29125 20/06/2013 M9-SOL-005 M9-IPS-001 M9-MHD-006 Spark gap injector, scenario development and the effect of beta on edge stability 29114

29126 20/06/2013 M9-SOL-005 M9-IPS-001 M9-MHD-006 Spark gap injector, scenario development and the effect of beta on edge stability 29114

29128 20/06/2013 M9-SOL-005 M9-IPS-001 M9-MHD-006 Spark gap injector, scenario development and the effect of beta on edge stability 29126

29130 20/06/2013 M9-SOL-005 M9-IPS-001 M9-MHD-006 Spark gap injector, scenario development and the effect of beta on edge stability 28982

29131 20/06/2013 M9-SOL-005 M9-IPS-001 M9-MHD-006 Spark gap injector, scenario development and the effect of beta on edge stability 28982

29132 20/06/2013 M9-SOL-005 M9-IPS-001 M9-MHD-006 Spark gap injector, scenario development and the effect of beta on edge stability 28982

29181 24/06/2013 M9-IPS-001 Scenario development 28982

29182 24/06/2013 M9-IPS-001 Scenario development 28982

29196 25/06/2013 M9-IPS-002 Fast Ion Redistribution 29176

29201 25/06/2013 M9-IPS-002 Fast Ion Redistribution 29200

29207 25/06/2013 M9-IPS-002 Fast Ion Redistribution 29182

29208 25/06/2013 M9-IPS-002 Fast Ion Redistribution 29207

29209 25/06/2013 M9-IPS-002 Fast Ion Redistribution 29208

29210 25/06/2013 M9-IPS-002 Fast Ion Redistribution 29209

29219 25/06/2013 M9-IPS-002 Fast Ion Redistribution 29215

29222 25/06/2013 M9-IPS-002 Fast Ion Redistribution 29221

29245 26/06/2013 M9-FPP-002 M9-IPS-002 Supression of Alfven Eigenmodes/ Fast ion redistribution 29194

29246 26/06/2013 M9-FPP-002 M9-IPS-002 Supression of Alfven Eigenmodes/ Fast ion redistribution 29031

29247 26/06/2013 M9-FPP-002 M9-IPS-002 Supression of Alfven Eigenmodes/ Fast ion redistribution 29246

29248 26/06/2013 M9-FPP-002 M9-IPS-002 Supression of Alfven Eigenmodes/ Fast ion redistribution 29246

29249 26/06/2013 M9-FPP-002 M9-IPS-002 Supression of Alfven Eigenmodes/ Fast ion redistribution 29248

29250 26/06/2013 M9-FPP-002 M9-IPS-002 Supression of Alfven Eigenmodes/ Fast ion redistribution 29249

Figure 3-3: An example of a fishbone with labelled features: #27527 @ 209-214

ms. Convolution window length is 1ms. The [n,m]=(1,1) harmonic is the

prominent feature in the spectrogram.

Figure 3-4: An example of a fishbone with labelled features: #29207 @ 241.5-

246 ms. Convolution window length is 1ms. The [n,m]=(1,1) harmonic is the

prominent feature in the spectrogram.

Related documents