• No results found

As mentioned in the introduction to this report, the frictional contact/impact problem itself is very complicated and involves lots of theoretical, technical, and computational efforts.

Some issues still remain. The most important issues include the follows:

1. The virtual work equation for node-to-node contact algorithm is applicable to both planar and 3D problems. The finite element applications discussed in this report focus on planar problems and the algorithm was implemented with the bilinear quadrilateral element. While straightforward, expanding the node-to-node contact algorithm to three dimensional contact problems involves more computational ef- forts of prediction of contact positions. The mesh smoothing strategy in three di- mensions presents additional challenges.

2. Higher order elements have advantages over linear elements in some situation and the incorporation of higher order elements into the node-to-node contact algorithm would be useful. Implementation of other structural elements such as beams or plates may also be of interest.

3. Error analysis is very important for numerical methods and deserves further re- search. The node-to-node algorithm simplifies the integration in the contact inter- face, but frequent interpolation of the kinematic variables, such as displacement or velocity fields, may introduce new deficiencies. Algorithmic stability is another concern. The influence of the ALE algorithm on the stability performance needs additional research.

4. Efficiency still remains an issue because mesh smoothing, no matter how small, changes the mesh and requires regeneration of the system tangent stiffness matrix and the mass matrix. Thus, more computational efforts are needed in the new ap- proach compared with the traditional node-to-segment method. Improving the effi- ciency is urgent if the node-to-node contact method is to be a real competitor with the traditional methods. Developing highly efficient strategies to predict the contact positions and reducing the regeneration times of system matrixes might be achiev- able. Parallel computation in super computers is another opportunity to accelerate the solving procedure.

References

[1] Getting started with ABAQUS/keyword version, 2000.

[2] Armero, F. and Petocz, E., “Formulation and analysis of conserving algorithms for frictionless dynamic contact/impact problems,” Computer Methods in Applied Me-

chanics and Engineering, 158:269–300, 1998.

[3] Armero, F. and Petocz, E., “A new dissipative time-stepping algorithm for frictional contact problems: formulation and analysis,” Computer Methods in Applied Me-

chanics and Engineering, 179:151–178, 1999.

[4] Bank, R. E. and Smith, R. K., “Mesh smoothing using a posterior error estimates,”

SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 34:979–997, 1997.

[5] Bathe, K.-J. and Chaudhary, A., “A solution method for planar and axisymmetric contact problems,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 21:65–88, 1985.

[6] Belytschko, T., Liu, W. K., and Moran, B., Nonlinear finite elements for continua

and structures, Wiley, 2000.

[7] Benson, D. J., “An efficient, accurate, simple ALE method for nonlinear finite element programs,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 72:305–350, 1989.

[8] Blacker, T. D. and Stephenson, M. B., “Paving: A new approach to automated quadrilateral mesh generation,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in En-

gineering, 32:811–847, 1991.

[9] Bonet, J. and Wood, R., Nonlinear continuum mechanics for finite element analysis, Cambridge University Press, first edition, 1997.

[10] Cananna, S. A., Stephensona, M. B., and Blacker, T., “Optismoothing: an optimization-driven approach to mesh smoothing,” Finite Elements in Analysis and

Design, 13:185–190, 1993.

[11] Chawla, V. and Laursen, T., “Energy consistent algorithms for frictional contact problems,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 42:799– 827, 1998.

[12] Chen, Z., Tristano, J., and Kwok, W., “Combined Laplacian and optimization-based smoothing for quadratic mixed surface meshes,” in Proceedings of the 12 Interna-

tional Meshing Roundtable, pages 361–370, Sandia National Laboratories, Santa

Fe, New Mexico, 2003.

[13] Cirak, F. and West, M., “Decomposition contact response (dcr) for explicit finite element dynamics,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 64:1078–1100, 2005.

[14] Conry, T. and Seireg, A., “A mathematical programming method for design of elastic bodies in contact,” Transactions of the ASME. Series E, Journal of Applied Mechan-

ics, 38:387–392, 1971.

[15] Cook, R. D., Malkus, D. S., Plesha, M. E., and Witt, R. J., Concepts and Applica-

tions of Finite Element Analysis, Wiley, fourth edition, 2001.

[16] Crisfield, M. A., “Re-visiting the contact patch test,” International Journal for Nu-

merical Methods in Engineering, 48:435–449, 2000.

[17] Donea, J., Guiliani, S., and Halleux, J. P., “An Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian fi- nite element method for transient fluid-structure interactions.” Computer Methods

in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 33:689–723, 1982.

[18] El-Abbasi, N. and Bathe, K.-J., “Stability and patch test performance of contact discretizations and a new solution algorithm,” Computers and Structures, 79:1473– 1486, 2001.

[19] Fichera, G., “Boundary value problems of elasticity with unilateral constraints,”

Solid-state mechanics 2, 2:391–424, 1972.

[20] Field, D., “Laplacian smoothing and delaunay triangulation,” Communications in

Applied Numerical Methods, 4:709–712, 1988.

[21] Francavilla, A. and Zienkiewicz, O., “Note on numerical computation of elastic contact problems,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 9:913–924, 1975.

[22] Freitag, L., “On combining Laplacian and optimization-based mesh smoothing tech- niques,” AMD Trends in Unstructured Mesh Generation, 220:37–43, 1997.

[23] Gadala, M. S., “Recent trends in ALE formulation and its applications in solid me- chanics,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 193:4247– 4275, 2004.

[24] Gadala, M. S. and Wang, J., “ALE formulation and its application in solid mechan- ics,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 167:33–55, 1998.

[26] Ghosh, S. and Kikuchi, N., “An Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element method for large deformation analysis of elastic-viscoplastic solids,” Computer

Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 86:127–262, 1991.

[27] Goldsmith, W., Impact, The Theory and Physical Behaviour of Colliding Solids, Edward Arnold LTD., 1960.

[28] Haber, R. B., “A mixed Eulerian-Lagrangian displacement model for large- deformation analysis in solid mechanics,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics

and Engineering, 43:277–292, 1984.

[29] Haber, R. B. and Abel, J. F., “Contact-slip analysis using mixed displacements,”

ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 109:411–429, 1983.

[30] Haber, R. B. and Koh, H., “Explicit expressions for release rates using virtual crack extension,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 21:301– 315, 1985.

[31] Haikal, G. and Hjelmstad, K.-D., “A finite element formulation of non-smooth con- tact based on oriented volumes for quadrilateral and hexahedral elements,” Com-

puter Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 196:4690–4711, 2007.

[32] Hansbo, P., “Generalized Laplacian smoothing of unstructured grids,” Communica-

tions in Numerical Methods in Engineering, 11:455–464, 1995.

[33] Heegaard, J. and Curnier, A., “Geometric properties of 2d and 3d unilateral large slip contact operators,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 131:263–286, 1996.

[34] Hestenes, M., “Multiplier and gradient methods,” Journal of Optimization Theory

and Applications, 4:302–320, 1969.

[35] Huerta, A. and Liu, W. K., “Viscous flow with large free surface motion,” Computer

Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 69:277–324, 1988.

[36] Hu´etink, J. and Vreede, P. T., “Progress in mixed Eulerian-Lagrangian finite element simulation of forming progress,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in

Engineering, 30:1441–1457, 1990.

[37] Hughes, T. J. R., Taylor, R. L., and Sackman, J. L., “A finite element method for a class of contact-impact problems,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and

Engineering, 8:249–276, 1976.

[38] Kane, C., Repetto, E., Ortiz, M., and Marsden, J., “Finite element analysis of nons- mooth contact,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 180:1– 26, 1999.

[39] Kikuchi, K. and Oden, J. T., Contact problems in elasticity:A study of variational

inequalities and finite element methods, Society for Industry and Applied Mathe-

matics, Philadelphia, 1988.

[40] Laursen, T. and Chawla, V., “Design of energy conservation algorithms for friction- less dynamic contact problems,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in

Engineering, 40:863–886, 1997.

[41] Laursen, T. and Love, G., “Improved implicit integrators for transient impact problems-geometric admissibility within the conserving framework,” International

Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 53:245–274, 2002.

[42] Laursen, T. A., Formulations and Treatment of Frictional Contact Problems Using

Finite Element, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, 1992.

[43] Laursen, T. A., Computational contact-impact mechanics, Springer, 2002.

[44] Lens, A. V., Cardona, A., and Geradin, M., “Energy preserving time integration for constrained multibody systems,” Multybody System Dynamics, 11:41–61, 2004. [45] Liu, W. K., “Finite element procedures for fluid-structure interaction with applica-

tion to liquid storage tanks,” Nuclear Engineering Design, 65:221–238, 1981. [46] Liu, W. K., Belytschko, T., and Chang, H., “An Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian fi-

nite element method for path dependent materials,” Computer Methods in Applied

Mechanics and Engineering, 58:227–245, 1986.

[47] Liu, W. K. and Chang, H., “A method of computation for fluid structure interaction,”

Computers and Structures, 20:311–320, 1985.

[48] Liu, W. K. and Gvildys, J., “Fluid-structure interaction of tanks with an eccentric core barrel,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 58:51–77, 1986.

[49] Liu, W. K. and Ma, D., “Computer implementation aspects for fluid-structure in- teraction problems,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 31:129–148, 1982.

[50] Liu, W. K., shyan Chen, J., Belytschko, T., and Zhang, Y.-F., “Adaptive ALE fi- nite elements with particular reference to external work rate on frictional interface,”

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 93:189–216, 1991.

[51] McDevitt, T. W. and Laursen, T. A., “A mortar-finite element formulation for fric- tional contact problems,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineer-

ing, 48:1525–1547, 2000.

[53] Oden, J. T. and Pires, E. B., “Algorithms and numerical results for finite element approximations of contact problems with non-classical friction laws,” Computers

and Structures, 19:137–147, 1984.

[54] Pandolfi, A., Kane, C., Marsden, J. E., and Ortiz, M., “Time-discretized variational formulation of non-smooth frictional contact,” International Journal for Numerical

Methods in Engineering, 53:1801–1829, 2002.

[55] Powell, M., Optimization, Academic Press, 1969.

[56] Sarrate, J. and Huerta, A., “An improved algorithm to smooth graded quadrilateral meshes preserving the prescribed element size,” Computer Methods in Applied Me-

chanics and Engineering, 17:89–99, 2001.

[57] Schreurs, P. J. G., Veldpaus, F. E., and Brekelmans, W. A. M., “Simulation of forming processes, using the Arbitrary Eulerian-Lagrangian formulation,” Com-

puter Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 58:19–36, 1986.

[58] Simo, J. C. and Laursen, T., “An augmented Lagrangian treatment of contact prob- lems involving friction,” Computers and Structures, 42:97–116, 1992.

[59] Simo, J. C., Tarnow, N., and Wong, K., “Exact energy-momentum conserving al- gorithms and symplectic schemes for nonlinear dynamics,” Computer Methods in

Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 100:63–116, 1992.

[60] Simo, J. C. and Taylor, R. L., “Quasi-incompressible finite elasticity in principal stretches. continuum basis and numerical algorithms,” Computer Methods in Ap-

plied Mechanics and Engineering, 85:273–310, 1991.

[61] Simo, J. C., Wriggers, P., and Taylor, R. L., “A perturbed Lagrangian formulation for the finite element solution of contact problems,” Computer Methods in Applied

Mechanics and Engineering, 50:163–180, 1985.

[62] Taylor, R. L. and Papadopoulos, P., “On a patch test for contact problems in two dimensions,” in Computational methods in nonlinear mechanics, edited by P. Wrig- gers and W. Wagner, pages 690–702, Springer, Berlin, 1991.

[63] Tessler, A., Riggs, H., and Dambach, M., “A novel four-node quadrilateral smooth- ing element for stress enhancement and error estimation,” International Journal for

Numerical Methods in Engineering, 44:1527–1543, 1999.

[64] van Haaren, M., Stoker, H. C., van den Boogaard, A., and Hu´etink, J., “The ALE- method with triangular elements:direct convection of integration point values,” In-

ternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 49:697–720, 2000.

[65] Wang, J. and Gadala, M., “Formulation and survey of ALE method in nonlinear solid mechanics,” Finite Element in Analysis and Design, 24:253–269, 1997.

[66] Wriggers, P., Krstulovic-Opara, L., and Korelc, J., “Smooth c1 interpolations for two-dimensional frictional contact problems,” International Journal for Numerical

Methods in Engineering, 51:1469–1495, 2001.

[67] Wriggers, P., Simo, J., and Taylor, R., “Penalty and augmented Lagrangian formula- tions for contact problems,” in Proceedings of the NUMETA 85 conference, Elsevier, 1985.

[68] Wriggers, P., Van, T. V., and Stein, E., “Finite element formulation of large defor- mation impact-contact problems,” Computer s and Stryctures, 37:319–331, 1990. [69] Yamada, T. and Kikuchi, F., “An Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element

method for incompressible hyperelasticity,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechan-

ics and Engineering, 102:149–177, 1993.

[70] Yang, B., Laursen, T., and Meng, X., “Two dimensional mortar contact methods for large deformation frictional sliding,” International Journal for Numerical Methods

in Engineering, 62:1183–1225, 2005.

[71] Zhou, T. and Shimada, K., “An angle-based approach to two-dimensional mesh smoothing,” in Proceedings of Ninth International Meshing Roundtable, pages 373– 384, Sandia National Laboratories, New Orleans, 2000.

[72] Zhu, J. Z., Zienkiewicz, O. C., Hinton, E., and Wu, J., “A new approach to the development of automatic quadrilateral mesh generation,” International Journal for

List of Recent NSEL Reports

No. Authors Title Date

001 Nagayama, T. and Structural Health Monitoring Using Smart Sensors Nov. 2007 Spencer, B.F.

002 Sun, S. and Shear Behavior and Capacity of Large-Scale Prestressed Nov. 2007 Kuchma, D.A. High-Strength Concrete Bulb-Tee Girders

003 Nagle, T.J. and Nontraditional Limitations on the Shear Capacity of Prestressed, Dec. 2007 Kuchma, D.A. Concrete Girders

004 Kwon, O-S. and Probabilistic Seismic Assessment of Structure, Foundation, Dec. 2007 Elnashai, A.S. and Soil Interacting Systems

005 Nakata, N., Multi-dimensional Mixed-mode Hybrid Simulation: Dec. 2007 Spencer, B.F., and Control and Applications

Elnashai, A.S.

006 Carrion, J. and Model-based Strategies for Real-time Hybrid Testing Dec. 2007 Spencer, B.F.

007 Kim, Y.S., Seismic Loss Assessment and Mitigation for Critical Urban Jan. 2008 Spencer, B.F., and Infrastructure Systems

Elnashai, A.S.

008 Gourley, B.C., Tort, C., A Synopsis of Studies of the Monotonic and Cyclic Behavior of April 2008 Denavit, M.D., Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Members, Connections, and Frames

Schiller, P.H., and Hajjar, J.F.

009 Xu, D. and A New Node-to-node Approach to Contact/Impact Problems for May 2008 Hjelmstad, K.D. Two Dimensional Elastic Solids Subject to Finite Deformation

010 Zhu, J. and Non-contact NDT of Concrete Structures Using Air Coupled Sensors May 2008 Popovics, J.S.

Related documents