---
AND
RESUL.!§
Meth��J� in
the pre ent investigat i on i s re latedto
t he aimsand
pur�osea o f the study, viz , t o exam� ne :( i )
the nature of ac or�s iu fluenc
y and f1 md b i 1 i t.v of t.J-tf nk ing-
theirdi. ntri but i on , mean , and r ange w it hin
a sampl of pup i l � of h i gh abi lity i>l sc ience ;
( ii )
the ro l :lt i onahip bet we�n f luency andflc� x ibi l it y of t hink ing and mea sured .inttl l l i.gence ( t ot a l culture
samples) ;
( i i i )
th� re l&.t ion shil-) b3twee nhieh
�nd lowscorers on spe c i f i o c ogn itive and person a l ity variab
l
es( !t SD
snmp la s by c ountry)
; and( i v )
th� ra lat ion :�h ip between high .'And lowscorers for ob served anrl expected
t"requoncies
accordingto
sex , c l asaroora,74
\ihi le a general met hodologic a l p l an wa !l t!etermined
be fore stat i st i cal an a lysis was commen ced , there wa s progre ssive opportun ity
to
eva luate
re su lt s , and t o con r.;i der t he a.ppro:vriatenes a of e ach ste�1.A l l comput a t i on s
were carried out on the Ma s sey+ Univer sity IBM
1 6/20
"f ith st and e\rd prowamme s .Stati st i c a l
met hodology
incorporated t he fol l owi ncsequent ial procedure 8 t -
t . Det0rminAt ion of
mean� ,
stRn d arddeviati ons
aT� d
rar.t:-e of s<�ore s for al l c:ovnitive variable s . 2 . P latting o f frequencydistribut i on
curve sfor
th<" examinat ion of normality of
di stribution .
3 . Tran s l at i on of a l l c ogn itive score s t o n orma lizf:'ld st.andard sc ores
( T- score s ) .
4 . Examination
of the h1fJ �en cc ot age 8 8 as�1i ficant vari ab l e
within a
country eam� le by use of test
s of8i.gnifioanoe of difference
hetwenn mean s
(
t-te sts)
.5 .
C orve lat iona l studie s bet.ween all nlf:: a sur e sof
+
fluency and flexibi lity and measured
inte l l igence .
Compt.rt.er print-outs and proe;ramme s ll'lAY
be
obt a ined on request. .General
formulae employed in the study appearin
. ppendix
C • .\ppreoiation fo1� advice OGJ'lcerning st at i st i c a l pr ocedure s is ackn o'h"ledgedto
Nola Cordon ,
C omputer
Dept . , Massoy Unive rsity ;Dr G .
Arvideon , Education Dept .,Aucklan d
Univeraity ;P rofe JS:;or Adc ock , � sychology Dei>t . , Victor ia Univor aity J
Dr If .
Beree.for d ,
Education De�t . Y.asaey Univeraity J6 .
Centroid factor an alysi s , with orthogonal rotation s , of( a )
cognit ive variables and( b ) personality
Vc<lriable s involvedin
t he att itude scale , Te at. 4 Partt .
7 . A�a J y �i s of high and l ow sc or er s
( � l SD )
onspecific cogn itive and 1Jersonal ity var i ab le s
(t-tests) .
8 . Use
of eh i -square and Fi sher ' s exact probabi l ity test s in the examination ofobe;;crved an d expected frequf'ncie s for
high
awl lo"' E1Corers
( cogn itive )
acc ordi!'lg t o nex , cla ssroomcontributi on s .�
teac her and peer9 . Te ::rt-I•et(:� At r� l i abi l i ty tor,.ct her wi th
earlier
intersoorer re l iabi lity studio s .Raw SCOl'� S WO r� (".:oded Aeparat.e ly by :
( a )
Count ry :Englan d ,
u . s. .
\ . and Ne\!: Zealand ,and
( b )
Age : GroU�.l I = 1 3 . 4-
1 3 . uyears ,
Grm\p
TI = ! 4 . 0-
1 4 . 7 year s , 0rol \.t' III =1 4.8
-
1 5 . 3 years , and
( c )
Test var iabl e s ( cof!Ditive )t • Intel l i gence =
AH5
2 . Fluency 'fe �;t 1 = Fl 1
J .
Flexibi. lity Test 1 IllFx
1
4 .
F luen cyTest
'\.
= Fl 2 A6 .
Fluency Te st 2 B =F l
2B1 .
Fl
exib
il ity
Test 2 B = Fx 2 B8 .
Fluen cy Te st3.\
= Fl 3 A 9 . F lexibi lity Te st J A = Fx J A1 0 .
F l
uenc
yTe st JB
=F l
3 B1 1 .
Flexibilit
y Te stJB
= Fx JB 1 2 . Fluen cy Te st 3 C =F l
3C1 3 .