Chapter 5: Discussion
6.2 Implications and Future Research
As detailed in the previous Discussion chapter, this study’s findings substantiate that AAT serves a therapeutic benefit, promoting positive psychological, physiological, and
psychosocial health outcomes for an elder population. This has implications for long-‐term residential settings. Firstly, findings support Knox’s philosophy of care to provide easily accessible contact with animals as a way of enriching elder residents’ quality of life. Findings also provide possible incentives for other New Zealand residential settings to employ a similar AAT initiative, with the additional understanding that having a permanently placed and certified canine is particularly advantageous.
Recommended future pathways for AAT research in New Zealand are specific focuses on the impact of an AAT programme from commencement, leading to the possibility of comparing before and after effects of AAT. Also, a focus on specific AAT interventions towards achieving goal directed objectives, such as improvements in mobility, speech and language, or social engagement, would contribute further understanding to AAT
therapeutic capabilities.
The identification of particular canine characteristics influencing AAT experiences
initiated an additional significant implication to this study. The findings suggest that AAT is not simply about interacting with a canine, because it is cute or playful, but many complexities associated with biological, emotional, and social responses systematically influence the connection participants feel with Olive. These findings fill a gap in AAT literature as during this process, no research was found that specifically focused on the influence of specific canine characteristics on AAT therapeutic abilities, from the
perspective of the participants. Future research may focus on the effect different canine breeds may have on AAT experiences, in relation to their divergent visual characteristics,
sizes, and behaviours. It’s also recommended that further research compare canine AAA and canine AAT, to further clarify whether a certified canine is more advantageous for a long-‐term residential setting.
An increased and broader participant sample size is recommended, such as 10
participants instead of five. The inclusion of persons who have not participated in AAT, have a dislike of canines, or who may disapprove of AAT within a residential setting, would also be beneficial as this would increase the potential sample size and allow for a more in depth and balanced analysis regarding canine AAT experiences. Interviewing family members may also be appropriate to supplement the capturing of residents’ experiences and offer an alternative perspective to the effects of canine AAT on elder residents’ wellbeing. Additionally, interviewing staff and volunteers regarding their experiences of AAT within the residential setting is recommended as this will allow for the triangulation of data and opportunity to gain a greater overall picture of how canine AAT affects the whole residential setting environment.
Following interpretation of participants’ experiences, AAT appears to have served a therapeutic purpose, however the study identified that participants did not necessarily consider AAT experiences as being therapeutic. This has significant implications on the inherent ambiguities of language use (Atieno, 2009) and the importance of terminology use with an elder population. Therapy is still a stigmatised term and for the study’s particular cohort of participants, who grew up in a time in society when therapy was perhaps more associated with persons who were severely unwell, the term ‘therapy’ may not be relatable. This implication also highlights the differing constructions of meaning making and the importance of understanding and interpreting these differences. For example, without the opportunity to explore participants’ meaning of therapy, their lack of
therapeutic terminology use may have been interpreted as AAT having no therapeutic effect. Instead analysis inferred that participants constructed the meaning of “therapeutic” as being a combination of emotional and social responses that lead to beneficial health related outcomes. Recommendations for future AAT with an elder population would be to take time considering the terminology used for participant recruitment and data collection tools, while allowing participants the opportunity to articulate their own understandings. Further research may also directly query what an elder population’s definition of therapy means, relating the meaning back to their interpretation of AAT.
Practicalities need to be taken into consideration when working with an elder population residing within a long-‐term residential setting. A flexible research design is recommended to allow for challenges associated with participant recruitment and data collection.
Patience is required due to the likelihood of appointments being interrupted by staff, visitors, or having been forgotten (Kaiser et al., 2002). Full immersion into the research setting is recommended to build relationships with potential participants and interest in the study, reduce the effect of researcher presence during data collection, and gain insight into the culture of the environment. An additional recommendation is to involve a
communicative and supportive “insider” from the research setting. Kristen was the “insider” for this study and played a pivotal role in the formation and progression of the research. As volunteer coordinator and Olive’s handler, her relationship with residents aided the study’s participant recruitment and data collection phase. Kristen also acted as an advocate for the research. Knox is a busy place with many people entering and exiting, and due to its uniqueness as an Eden Alternative Home, it is the setting for numerous research studies. As a staff member who was a familiar acquaintance to residents, Kristen also facilitated introductions, which eased the effect of a stranger entering into the residents’ home and private rooms.