• No results found

Information Seeking, Problem Solving and Learning in the Workplace

4-1 Introduction

It is proposed that information seeking, problem solving, and learning in a workplace are

involved in the knowledge seeking process. These three aspects will thus be reviewed in this

chapter. Many studies have been conducted to explore information seeking behaviours,

especially since 1980s. In this chapter, some major information seeking models will be

reviewed. After that, the chapter will provide an overview of problem solving research,

followed by a discussion of problem solving models that will help us understand the process

of how a problem solver find the resolution to the problem. How people gain knowledge in the

workplace will be explored in this chapter as well. This includes a review of the major

learning theories in general, and then research concerning learning in a workplace, namely

informal learning, organizational learning, experiential learning, action learning, and situated

learning. At the end, this chapter summarizes the literature reviewed in this chapter to bring

86

learning, problem solving, and information seeking. This leads to a preliminary framework for

knowledge seeking in this research. In addition, the a priori codes for the knowledge seeking

process will be identified for later exploration in this thesis.

4-2 An overview of information seeking behaviour research

The research into information seeking behaviour has existed for many years. According to

Wilson (2000, p49), information seeking behaviour is “the purposive seeking for information as a consequence of a need to satisfy some goal”. The earliest research in this area can be traced back to the 1940s which mainly focused on the users of libraries. For example, The

Library Survey (McDiarmid, 1940, in Wilson, 2000) described many studies concerning

library use. Since then, attention has been paid to the use of information sources and systems,

document use, exploring how information sources can be more useful to us and how we can

make better use of these sources. Wilson (2000) stated that much of the earlier information

behaviour research was mainly about library use and focused on scientists and their use of

information. However, since the 1980s, most researchers have turned their focus on the user by a „person-centred approach‟ and developed information seeking models (Kuhlthau, 1993; Ellis, 1989; Wilson, 1984; Dervin, 1983). And recently, a theoretical information behaviour

framework based on cognitive science, social science, complexity theory (Mosindi & Sice,

2011). These models try to display the whole process of information seeking.

There is much research that focuses on different aspects of information seeking: information

seeking behaviour and information system design (Johnstone et al, 2004; Fidel & Pejtersen,

87

Gross, 2001); information seeking behaviour in image retrieval (Conniss et al, 2000);

information seeking behaviour on internet or other electronic environment (Enochsson, 2005;

Siatri, 1998; Marchionini, 1995); information seeking and learning (Borgatti & Cross, 2003);

culture and information seeking (Komlodi & Carlin, 2004). Furthermore, many researchers

have explored factors that influence human information seeking behaviour, such as personality

(Sonnenwald & Iivonen, 1999; Heinstrom, 2000; 2003), cognitive style (Rouse, 1984; Ford et

al, 2002; Fabritius, 1998), image and worldview (Wilson, 1984), social capital (Johnson,

2004), gender (Enochsson, 2005), and contexts and contests (Gaslikova, 1999; Choo, 2007).

4-3 Models of information seeking behaviours

According to Spink and Cole (2004), human information behaviour relates to the study of

human behaviours in relation to information seeking, foraging, retrieving, organizing and use.

Wilson (1999) argues that models of information behaviour are kinds of statement, seek to

describe, in the form of diagrams, an information activity, the causes and consequences of that

activity, or the relationships among stages in information seeking behaviour. This section will review some major models, namely Wilson‟s models of information behaviour (Wilson, 1981; 1999), Ellis‟s behaviour framework (1989), Kuhlthau‟s stage process model (1993), and Foster‟s non-linear model (Foster, 2005)

4-3-1 Wilson’s information seeking behaviour model

In order to outline the various areas covered by information behaviour, Wilson (1981) devised

88

Wilson suggested that when an „information need‟ was perceived or identified by an

information user, he tended to start his information seeking behaviour to satisfy this need. He

would make demands upon formal of informal information sources or services. The formal

sources refer to information systems such as libraries, on-line services and so on. The informal

sources refer to seeking information from other people rather than the formal systems in

organizations. Both kinds of information sources or services might have two different results:

success or failure to find useful information. If successful, the information would be used by

the user to satisfy his information need, which had been identified before. If the information

gained was not able to satisfy, or fully satisfy, the user‟s need, then the user had to reiterate this seeking process.

89

However, this kind of model just provides us with a map of this area. As criticized by Wilson

himself (1999), this model does not analyse the whole information seeking process in detail,

nor does it list out the causative or impeditive factors in such a seeking behaviour. In view of

this, Wilson (1999) devised another information-seeking model (Figure 4-2). According to

Wilson (1999), this evolved model is based on two propositions. Firstly, information need is

not a primary need but a secondary need arising from another more basic kind of need. Based

on a psychological perspective, these basic needs could be physiological, cognitive, or

affective, while the context of these needs might be personal (the person him- or herself),

social (the demands from the person‟s role in work or life), or environmental (political, economic, technological, etc.). Secondly, there are different kinds of barriers that appear for

the information enquirer during the process of discovering information to satisfy a need. Again,

these barriers could be personal, social (or role-related), or environmental.

90

This model is intended to clearly describe how information needs arise and what may prevent

the actual search for information, and many context factors, such as a person‟s environment,

social roles and individual characteristics.

Figure 4-3: Wilson‟s model of information behaviour (1999)

By 1996, Wilson had expanded his model into a new version (Figure 4-3), based on research

from different fields including information science, psychology, innovation, and decision

making. The „barriers‟ in the previous model have been replaced by „intervening variables‟, which suggest that the impact of these variables may not only be preventive as a barrier, but

also be supportive as enablers. At the same time, the information seeking behaviour has been

91

search, and ongoing search. Furthermore, „information processing and use‟ becomes a

necessary part in the model to form a feedback loop, which supports the identification of

information needs.

All in all, this new model remains one of macro-behaviour, which identifies possible

intervening variables and the possible forms of action the seeker may take. This expansion

made it a very popular source of hypotheses for further research.

4-3-2 Ellis’ information seeking model

Ellis (1989) adopted a behavioural approach to elaborate different behaviours involved in

information seeking. Based on empirical research, the information seeking patterns of

academic social scientists were identified. Rather than listing out stages in the process as most

models did, Ellis concluded that there were six characteristics of information seeking patterns:

starting, chaining, browsing, differentiating, monitoring, and extracting. According to him,

these characteristics constitute the principal generic features of the patterns and together

provide a behavioural model for information retrieval system design. These features of information seeking behaviour were then tested by Ellis‟s subsequent studies. In 1993, based on grounded theory, interviews were conducted by Ellis, Cox, and Hall (1993) to analyse the

above key features among a group of research physicists and research chemists. The results in

this research were compared with those of the social scientists in Ellis (1989). However, no

fundamental differences were identified in information seeking behaviour between the two

groups of scientists; instead, there was a little modification to the previous research: apart

92

In 1997, further research was conducted by Ellis and Haugan (1997) to explore the role of

information and information seeking in an international oil and gas company. The information

seeking patterns of engineers and research scientists were analysed and explored. Eight

categories were identified on this occasion to describe the information seeking patterns:

surveying, chaining, monitoring, browsing, distinguishing, filtering, extracting, and ending.

According to Ellis and Haugan (1997), surveying is usually initiated to generate ideas for new

projects in the beginning of a project‟s life cycle. The scientists or engineers tend to make use

of surveying to approach the new or unfamiliar subject field for a pre-study prior to the project

plan. Normally, researchers carry out surveying through personal contacts or computerised

literatures. Colleagues in their own unit are usually seen as the starting point. They tend to ask

the people whom they think are knowledgeable in a particular area to get some guidelines and

information about it.

Chaining refers to the connection or chain between the different sources. It is performed

mainly by following references in some sources, obtained through surveying normally, to

other references from other sources. According to Ellis and Haugan (1997), the decision to

stop following a chain of references is based on the time available, or in the case of the

chaining of personal contacts, it mainly depends on the knowledge the people possess, and

their willingness to give information.

Monitoring refers to activities involved in maintaining awareness of developments and

technologies in a field for keeping up-to date. Both formal and informal channels are

employed here (Ellis & Haugan, 1997). The formal channel refers to the use of scientific

93

Browsing is another important part of the information seeking process. It resides not only in

monitoring activities, but also in surveying activities by means of the scanning of journals and

browsing of references and abstracts of printouts from retrospective literature searches (Ellis

& Haugan, 1997). Browsing is used usually to scan a wide range of sources, both primary and

secondary, to find something of particular interest.

Filtering is used in the information seeking process to make the information searched as

relevant and precise as possible. It is normally fulfilled by the use of certain criteria or

mechanisms when searching for information. However, according to Ellis and Haugan (1997),

there is an apparent conflict in filtering activities, namely reducing the time for searching

versus the risk of failing to obtain important information. A wider range of searching for

information normally demands more time spent in the information seeking.

Extracting is characterised by working through sources to locate material of interest (Ellis &

Haugan, 1997). It is used when the scientists, for example, are giving different kinds of

presentation, such as a research report, review of the literature, a project summary, or an

article for publication.

Ending activities refer to those involved in actually finishing the information seeking process.

It normally happens at the end of a project by carrying out a small scale search targeted

towards some unsolved questions. It is used to check if something has appeared in the last

94

Ellis (1989) stated that the detailed interrelation or interaction of these features mainly

depends on the particular circumstances of the person at a particular time. Thus, he did not

draw a diagrammatic model to depict the interrelations of these features. Wilson (1999),

however, evaluated the meaning of these features and suggested a diagrammatic presentation

of them (see figure 4-4). As proposed by Wilson (1999), „starting‟ obviously initiates a

process and „ending‟ must end it. So they must be the first and last step respectively.

Furthermore, „browsing‟, „chaining‟, or „monitoring‟ are search procedures; „differentiating‟ is a filtering process; „extracting‟ must come after the search procedures and filtering process. As shown in figure 4-4, the model becomes a stage process version of Ellis‟s behavioural

framework.

95

4-3-3 Kuhlthau’s six stages of information search process

Information system design is mainly driven by a bibliographic paradigm, which emphasises

collecting and classifying information for their retrieval. However, this traditional pattern of

information provision is different from information users‟ natural process of information seeking. To bridge this gap, Kuhlthau (1991) attempted to explore the information search

process from the user‟s perspective and proposed a new information search process model.

According to Kuhlthau (1991), the information search process is a constructive activity to find meaning from information. This process aims to extend a users‟ knowledge on a particular problem or topic. From a cognitive perspective, people actively construct their view by means

of assimilating new information with what they know before. Based on a series of five studies

conducted in field situations with actual library users, Kuhlthau (1991) developed a six-stage

model of the information search process, including initiation, selection, exploration,

formulation, collection, and presentation. Furthermore, three realms were identified in each

stage of the process: the affective (feelings), the cognitive (thoughts), and the physical

(actions). (See Table 4-1).

At the „initiation‟ stage, a person tends to be aware of the lack of knowledge and his task is recognizing a need for information. His thoughts mainly focus on contemplating the problem,

or comprehending the task. Based on his existing knowledge or experiences, his actions will

96

Table 4-1: Six-stage model of information search process (Kuhlthau, 1991)

The „Selection‟ stage involves the identification & selection of the general topic to be investigated. The thoughts at this stage emphasise perspective topics compared to the

assignment requirements, personal interest, and information available. The actions in this stage

are mainly about conferring with others, or skimming and scanning for alternative topics.

„Exploration‟ involves exploring information in order to extend personal understanding. The major feelings at this stage are confusion, uncertainty, while the thoughts mainly centre on

how to be sufficiently informed about the topic to form a focus. The actions at this stage

include reading to locate information about and understand topics, relating new information

97

At the „Formulation‟ stage, a focused perspective of the topic will be formed from the ideas in the information. So the thoughts in this stage include identifying and selecting ideas from the

new information. The topic will thus become clearer and more personalized. As a result,

feelings of confidence will be increased, with a sense of clarity at this stage.

When the user is able to acquire information effectively and efficiently from the information

system, „Collection‟ will then occur in order to gather relevant information. The thoughts will concentrate on how to define, extend, and support the already personalized topic. The user

who has got a clearer sense of direction will be able to specify the need for relevant and

focused information at this stage. This will facilitate a comprehensive search of information

from available resources.

In „Presentation‟, the search will be completed; the findings will be presented or be used. The users will then think of culminating the search based on their synthesis of the topic. If the

information search has gone well, feelings will be a sense of satisfaction. If it has not gone

well, the feelings will be a sense of disappointment.

As we can see, this six-stage model illustrates a user‟s experiences during the information

search process, from the cause of the search, feelings, thoughts, actions during each stage, to

the completion of the search. Along with the different information searching behaviour or

activities in each stage, this model also shows us an implicit process of the gradual refinement

98 4-3-4 Foster’s non-linear model

According to Foster (2005), previous information seeking models, such as Ellis and Wilson‟s models, are normally linear processes which consist of stages and iterative activities. By

exploring the information seeking behaviour among some inter-disciplinary researchers, he

developed a new non-linear model of information seeking behaviour, which illustrates a

dynamic and inter-relationships of behaviours, activities, and context. As stated by Foster

(2005), this new model suggests a potential revision of some of the core ideas of information

science by providing an alternative explanatory framework.

Foster‟s study was based on a sample of academic and postgraduate researchers in universities whose research topic was inter-disciplinary. According to him, interdisciplinarity includes

individual research topics in which the primary knowledge domain is clearly focused on, or

related to one or more, other knowledge domains. After analysis of his in-depth interview data,

emergent activities of information seeking were grouped into three categories named core

processes: Opening, Orientation, and Consolidation.

Opening refers to the process of moving from a state of orientation to actually seeking,

exploring and revealing information. Opening implies how they open up their topics through

information seeking activities. It represents a collection of non-linear activities, namely

breadth exploration, eclecticism, networking, keyword searching, browsing, monitoring,

chaining, serendipity. Every single activity might interact with or inform other Opening

99

Orientation processes are a diverse range of activities focusing on identification and the

direction in which to look. These activities include reviewing, picture building, identifying

keywords, source identification & selection, and problem definition. During Orientation

processes, the key themes, keywords, latest opinions and recourses, and picture building can

be identified. According to Foster (2005), Orientation performs the basic problem solving

aspects identified in previous research.

The main goal of the Consolidation process is to judge and integrate the work in progress and

to decide if further information seeking is required. The activities in this process include

refining, sifting, incorporation, verifying, finishing, and knowing enough. As a main concept

in this process, knowing enough iteratively questions whether sufficient information has been

acquired for the need. According to Foster (2005), Consolidation loops and intertwines with

the Orientation and Opening processes in the context of inter-disciplinary research.

Apart from these three core processes, Foster (2005) proposed that information behaviour is

not isolated from the internal and external context in which researchers work. He outlined

many major external factors such as social and organizational, time, the project, and access to

sources. On the other hand, the internal context mainly refers to the experience and knowledge

held by the researchers, which includes feelings, thoughts, coherence, knowledge and

understanding.

According to Foster (2005), the cognitive approach is the most intimate factor in information

Related documents