The issue of galactic ecology has a universal ring to it. In other words, it seems the same aspects of the issue tend to be issues regardless of the galaxy in which an observer examines it. These are: galactic overpopulation, availability of habitable planetary-star systems, biokind
expansion policies, and the indiscriminate use of technologies involving electrogravity and negative energetics. In the final section of this chapter, we are going to examine the aspects of the more global issue of galactic ecology with the objective of gaining some understanding of the impacts galactic ecology may have on the human race, as we enter into the galactic community as a developing Civilization Zero (0).
Galactic Overpopulation. This aspect of present global galactic ecology is not altogether
different from the issue of overpopulation on Earth itself. Speaking on a galactic scale,
overpopulation carries a series of policy and choice-making consequences that we will have to face squarely during and following our own reconstruction period following the so-called Earth changes period we are about to face, if we continue along on the same path we presently are. Regardless of how aliens currently in TTP and other such agreements with national and transnational entities on Earth address this issue to us, there is little doubt in the minds of the members of my group
(including mine) that these are temporizing policies designed to “soften” the blow of ultimate access and control of Earth planetary resources, reserves and real estate. Time, literally, is on their side, not ours, in our collective case. No matter how we dissect the effects and consequences of current “treaties,” the results are basically the same.
There is no escaping that galactic overpopulation is an issue uppermost in the community of minds of those biokinds presently in near Earth space, on Earth, Mars, and the Moon. The latter two are mining issues of a resource/economic/trade nature which we do not control, either by the factor of inferior technological level or by the know-how on what to do with the products
1
Kaku, M. The physics of extraterrestrial civilizations. http://mkaku.org/home/?page_id=246, 2005.
28
of such mining operations in terms of trading. Regardless of what any official organ on Earth may say about them, and whatever spin in put on them, we are junior partners in the deal. As to Earth operations, the half dozen to a dozen biokind actively engaged in such TTPs and quid pro quos (as well as in direct talks with loosely constituted and selected nonofficial Earth groups, such as the Link we attend), the consensus is that the fate of the Earth and of humankind by implication hangs on the balance. Much, they say, depends on what we do (without completely specifying what it is we must do to save ourselves, if saving is the word for it). We don’t buy for a New York second the platitudes proffered that we can actually save ourselves by the mere voicing of disagreement about such interloping policy implementation as the Verdants are now known to be carrying out on behalf of several hyperversal populations from nearby galaxies. While the Verdants and their coterie of sauroid helpers from the Zeti Reticuli and other Milky Way systems constitute the best organized inroad into the planet’s leadership infrastructure, they are not the only challenge we face. The first of the others is already out in the public domain, thanks to the misleading but essentially valuable grains of accurate information rendered by Jamisson Neruda’s rendition of the so-called “Animus” problem (and subject of an entire upcom- ing chapter, Chapter 13). The other is yet not in the public domain, but we will address it at the end of chapter 13 as well.
Underlying much of the overpopulation aspect of galactic ecology is the means by which populations procreate – sexually and/or asexually. We will encounter sexual procreation means as a factor affecting other aspects of galactic ecology later, especially as a sociopolitical
byproduct of the expansionary policies of certain biokinds. Overall, we have been told that we, humans as a sexually reproducing biokind, display both cognitives and emotives other biokinds in the Link sometimes find shocking to their sensibilities. An example was an occasion, several years ago, when Dr. Jackson (one of the attendees in our party) received news of a car accident that involved his youngest son. He took a call from his wife about the news, and returned to the conference hall. Upon entering, we noticed alien attendees taking steps away from him. It was explained to us that his angst, which was obviously not understood by the aliens, was actually shocking to their sensoria. This, in turn, created a harmonic resonance in those of us who knew and were close to him. It, too, was noted, and explained to us as noxious to their sensorial apparata. The emotional centers of our central nervous system heighten not only photonic output at right angles from every square inch of our bodies, but it also appears to cause a storm of harmonic resonant wavefronts which affect most asexually, and some sexually, reproducing extraterrestrial life forms.
Availability of Habitable Planetary-star Systems. In the course of the conferences,
from the very beginning, livable real estate was an issue raised by practically all members of the Link group. In this vein, we have reasons to now believe that the presence of so many of them in our solar system is far more self-serving than other writers have expressed in printed and internet literature, in the form of opinion pieces, essays, articles, even books. Furthermore, we also have reasons to now suspect that their presence on Earth, in near Earth space and other places in the solar system is predicated on accurate knowledge on the effects that the incoming Ša.A.Me. (or Nibiru, if you prefer) will have on the four inner planets. We have broached the subject from this spin on the subject during this year’s annual conference, in open session, and received replies layered in explanatory trains of thought that were, to our sensibilities, like as if we asked what time it was, and we received a response on how time is measured, how a watch works, the different kinds of timepieces, and more. We responded with a thought train that what was
29
above as premise of what followed. In essence, the availability of habitable star-planetary
systems capable of sustaining life comes at a premium, and those willing to stake a claim will go for it. However, not all thought trains from all groups present centered around the cold
calculation of presence equating to a chance at owning, sharing, or having access to the resources of the Earth. There were those who, albeit interested in at least having access to terrestrial
resources, were also quite preoccupied with what we came to regard as the “do the right thing” track. Extraterrestrial groups in this camp were not necessarily disingenuous, as in artful deceit; while considering the straits in which we on Earth and our population find ourselves at present, they were also quite aware and cognizant of their own conditions and real estate needs for expansion of overgrowing populations. Overpopulation and real estate availability in regard to any possible relief was an integral part of their set of imperatives.
It was further expanded to include thought trains about the competition for planetary real estate in this and other neighboring galaxies. Much of this was framed quite carefully to also reflect the existence of “big players” (i.e., those we came to recognize and regard as
megapopulation groups). We retorted that we were aware of such groups, their size and spread across this and other neighboring galaxies. We also added that we were aware of other such megagroups, some of which are not entirely biologicals, but ontocyberenergetic – in other words, cyborgs. There was common awareness across the thought plane of multiple groups about these others as well. It was some time during this period that we grasped a subtle thought train we were most likely not meant to get: there is some fortean (detached, often humorous)
realexopolitiks going on concerning the issues of planetary real estate, overpopulation and planetary assets – namely ours, the Earth’s. Much more on this in Chapter 14.
Biokind Expansion Policies. As one may already suspect, biokind expansion logically
follows overpopulation and planetary real estate availability at a premium. Much like Rome’s expansionist policies during the Imperium phase, real estate is both a necessity and a buffer against real and imagined “enemies.” Present galactic realexopolitik demands that the larger fish build their territories to suit not only present needs but also future locations to which their growing population (more often than not reproducing sexually) may expand to as needed. This aspect of galactic ecology places Earth on the expansion radar once again: the fact of the matter is, extraterrestrial groups presently on and near Earth are looking at our birthplace as a
prospective expansion planet, regardless of the fluid-thought rhetoric we are getting today from them. We have been informed, much like other Track 2 sources have, that Earth’s future hangs in a rather fragile balance between ecologically responsible self-management (including the
eradication of resource-controlling elites) and our planet’s condemnation to a virtual takeover and displacement of its population by attrition (due to natural catastrophic events), wars induced by the interests of those biokind extraterrestrial groups with “client” presence here (e.g.,
Verdants and Annunaki- Ša.A.Mi.), other population-reduction policies (e.g., pandemics, , and natural planetary catastrophic events prior to the Ša.A.Me. arrival in the inner solar system. The present panorama found in the literature is spotty at best, and quite murky at worst.1
____________ 1
Track 2 venues (i.e., the likes of Frank Stranges back in the late 1950s, Alex Collier and the Andromedans, Paz Wells and Ricardo Gonzalez in South America, to mention but a few) are islands of illumination to be sure (although skeptics may hold them to quite a different light of interpretation), but that is all they are: patchworks in an intelligence quilt fraught with an increasingly dangerous paucity of valid and useful information. This, however, is not to say that Track 2 does not work; quite the contrary, what we are saying is that it must be made to work better.
30
Biokind expansion policies also come with a hyperversal aspect to them, which is yet not altogether clearly understood. It has been reported by George L. that there are hyperversal groups shepherding biokinds in this and other galaxies in the universe. We have learned the same thing through Ka’I in the last several years. Thus far, Ka’I tells us that, while hyperversals do not necessarily nor always experience overpopulation themselves, it is and has been an issue on their radar since early in the present time/space cycle. The thrust of this interest appears to have to do with two aspects of universal ecology – a kind of suprasegmental attention to the use of positive and negative energetics in the universe, wherein there are many galaxies on their radar as well as myriad biokinds to worry about, and the other being an underlying supremacist paradigm to all analysis and policymaking (mostly a self-chosen position) concerning the activities, movements, biokind population management, and cyclical positive-negative energetics in the present universe cycle. To be sure, their polyperspective grants them far wider, more fluid and more of an
omniscient consciousness that is capable of handling the computing requirements of multiple perspectives on things. If and when we become capable of utilizing the added computing capacity that functioning as an overfunction may affords us, we may begin to better understand what they are and how they operate. Thus far, we do not and most likely cannot fully appreciate their position in the evolutionary thought-chain. This is, in fact, one of the directions we, at LPG- C, have prioritized as a matter of high interest for us to further and better grasp and understand.
Indiscriminate Use of Technologies Involving Electrogravity. This is a crucial issue
which we humans must come to understand better, because we have to learn from the mistake of others. It has been reported during past conferences that an abuse of the use of electrogravity in any given star system has deleterious effects on the star and the planets it hosts. We are going to delve deeper into these mysteries on Chapter 11 and, more specifically, Chapter 12. Here, at this juncture, I am going to attempt to draw an outline on what electrogravity is and how is it that electrogravity abuse can create problems for biokinds on planets in this and other galaxies.
I am going to anchor our outline here on the same question asked at the beginning of Lawrence Ford and Thomas Roman’s article in the January 2000 issue of Scientific American: “Can a region of space contain less than nothing?” This is a notion that obviously runs counter to our common sense. But, as Ford and Roman see it, “a region of space, it turns out, can contain less than nothing. Its energy per unit volume–the energy density–can be less than zero.” The implications that follow from this statement are nothing short of high weirdness. How weird can it get? “According to…general relativity, the presence of matter and energy warps the geometric fabric of space and time. What we perceive as gravity is the space-time distortion produced by normal, positive energy or mass. But when negative energy or mass–so-called exotic matter– bends space-time, all sorts of amazing phenomena might become possible: traversable wormholes, which could act as tunnels to otherwise distant parts of the universe; warp drive, which would allow for faster-than-light travel; and time machines, which might permit journeys into the past.” Even weirder, “negative energy could even be used to make perpetual-motion machines or to destroy black holes.” All of this leads to another question, which they also ask:” Do the laws of physics that permit negative energy place any limits on its behavior?”
Fortunately, they report that it has been “discovered that nature imposes stringent constraints on the magnitude and duration of negative energy.”
The idea of negative energy has a basis on laboratory fact: some of its effects have been seen in experimental work. Their manifestation is due to “Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, which requires that the energy density of any electric, magnetic or other field fluctuate randomly. Even when the energy density is zero on average, as in a vacuum, it fluctuates. Thus, the
31
quantum vacuum can never remain empty in the classical sense of the term; it is a roiling sea of ‘virtual’ particles spontaneously popping in and out of existence.” What is the relationship of positive energy to negative energy, and how is it then that negative energy could be produced? The answers to these questions are relatively simple, even though the product is weird. There are indirect ways in which
negative energy can be produced. One method is by producing a squeezed vacuum state by means of lasers; the other involves the Casimir effect. As Ford and Roman put it, “the total energy averaged over all space remains positive; squeezing the vacuum creates negative energy in one place at the price of extra positive energy elsewhere.” Squeezing the vacuum? Well, let’s say we get laser beams to pass through nonlinear optical materials. The laser induces the material to create pairs of light quanta or photons, which alternately enhance and suppress the vacuum
fluctuations. This creates regions of positive and negative energy in the immediate vicinity of the material. The second method involves two uncharged parallel metal plates that alter the vacuum fluctuations in such a way as to attract each other. The effect was discovered by the Dutch physicist Hendrik B. G. Casimir in 1948. The energy density between the plates was later calculated to be negative. According to Ford and Roman, “in effect, the plates reduce the fluctuations in the gap between them; this creates negative energy and pressure, which pulls the plates together. The narrower the gap, the more negative the energy and pressure, and the stronger is the attractive force.” In the cases of the Casimir effect and squeezed states,
measurements have only been made of the indirect effects of negative energy. Direct detection methods, on the other hand, are much more difficult but might be possible using atomic spins. Negative energy is indeed highly weird that one might think it must violate some law of physics. Before and after the creation of equal amounts of negative and positive energy in previously empty space, the total energy is zero, so the law of conservation of energy is obeyed. But there are many phenomena that conserve energy yet never occur in the real world. Those kinds of effects are forbidden by the second law of thermodynamics. Nevertheless,
32
“Negative energy potentially conflicts with the second law. Imagine an exotic laser, which creates a steady outgoing beam of negative energy. Conservation of energy requires that a byproduct be a steady stream of positive energy. One could direct the negative energy beam off to some distant corner of the universe, while employing the positive energy to perform useful work. This seemingly
inexhaustible energy supply could be used to make a perpetual- motion machine and thereby violate the second law. If the beam were directed at a glass of water, it could cool the water while using the extracted positive energy to power a small motor–providing a refrigerator with no need for external power. These problems arise not from the existence of negative energy per se but from the unrestricted separation of negative and positive energy” (Ford and Roman 2000).
Even though quantum theory allows for negative energy, it also appears to place strong restrictions - known as quantum inequalities - on its magnitude and duration. These were initially suggested by Ford in 1978. The inequalities resemble to the uncertainty principle itself. They indicate that a beam of negative energy cannot be arbitrarily intense for an arbitrarily long time. In other words, the permissible magnitude of the negative energy has to be inversely related to its temporal or spatial extent, such that any intense pulse of negative energy can last for a short time, while a weak one can last longer. That’s not all; an initial negative energy pulse must then be followed by a larger pulse of positive energy. The larger the amount of negative energy, the nearer in time must be its positive energy counterpart.