Chapter IV International Legal Standards in the area of Bioethics and their legal
2. Contemporary Instruments in the Area of Bioethics
2.2. UNESCO Instruments in the Field of Bioethics
2.2.3. International Declaration on Human Genetic Data
In view of the complexity and scale of research in genetics, the Director-General of UNESCO in 2001 asked the IBC to examine the possibility of drafting an international instrument on human
495 Ibid., Article 12. 496 Ibid., Article 13. 497 Ibid., Article 14. 498 Ibid., Article 15. 499 Ibid., Articles 16-17. 500
Ibid., Article 18 para 1.
501 Ibid., Article 18 para 2. 502 Ibid., Article 19. 503 Ibid., Article 21. 504
H. ten Have, "The Activities of UNESCO in the Area of Ethics", 16 Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 2006, 331, 339, and, similarly, A. Asai/S. Oe, "A Valuable Up-to-Date Compendium of Bioethical Knowledge", 5 Developing World Bioethics, 2005, 216 et seq.
genetic data.505 In 2002 a first draft was sent to Member States of UNESCO, intergovernmental
organizations, non-governmental organizations, specialists, professional research associations and many other organizations. As part of this consultation, a Public Hearings Day was held on 28 February 2003 in Monaco, and associations and institutions representing aboriginal groups, the handicapped, doctors and the private sector expressed their views.506 A revised version was
subsequently adopted unanimously and by acclamation as the International Declaration on Human Genetic Data at UNESCO's 32nd General Conference on 16 October 2003.507 The adoption of the
Declaration by UNESCO by acclamation should, however, not be confused with universal acceptance. States, such as the United States of America which in 2001 were not a member of UNESCO, have hence also not adopted and are not bound, morally or politically, by the provisions of the Declaration. As the other UNESCO standards the Declaration is legally non-binding and non-enforceable.508
The Declaration has 5 parts. In the first section, entitled general provisions, it specifies the
Declaration's aims, which are in particular “to ensure the respect of human dignity and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the collection, processing, use and storage of human genetic data, human proteomic data and of the biological samples from which they are
derived…[]…in keeping with the requirements of equality, justice and solidarity, while giving due consideration to freedom of thought and expression, including freedom of research.509 It thereby
undertakes to define the principles that should guide States in formulating their legislation and their policies on these issues.510
Building on the premise that human genetic data are special and that such data deserves to be treated special,511 the Declaration sets forth a number of limitations and obligations for the
collection, processing, use and storage of such data. Art 5 defines that such data may be collected, treated, used and stored for various purposes, including diagnosis and health care, research,
505
UNESCO, Webpage of the International Declaration on Human Genetic Data, note 4, at:
http://portal.unesco.org/shs/en/ev.php-URL_ID=1882&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html (last visisted 16.10.10).
506 See IBC Report on the Public Hearings Day of 28 February, SHS/EST/CIB-Gred5/03/01, 2003. On public
deliberations in bioethical processes see E. Blacksher/A. Diebel/P. Forest/S. Dorr Goold/J. Abelson, "What Is Public Deliberation?", 42 Hastings Center Report, 2012, 14 et seq. and K. O'Doherty/F. Gauvin/C. Grogan/W. Friedman, "Implementing a Public Deliberative Forum", 42 Hastings Center Report, 2012, 20 et seq.
507 Declaration on Human Genetic Data, note 4. 508
See discussion under Chapter V 1.2. and 2.
509 Article 1 of the Declaration on Human Genetic Data, note 4.
510 See UNESCO Press Release No. 2003-81, October 2003.
511 Ibid., Article 3, defining human genetic data as "information about heritable characteristics of individuals
obtained by analysis of nucleic acids or by other scientific analysis." According to the declaration, "each individual has a characteristic genetic makeup. Nevertheless, a person's identity should not be reduced to genetic characteristics, since it involves complex educational, environmental and personal factors and emotional, social, spiritual and cultural bonds with others and implies a dimension of freedom."
forensic medicine and criminal proceedings or “any other purpose consistent with Human Rights principles.”512
With regard to procedures the Declaration calls for collecting, treating, using and storing data on the basis of transparent and ethically acceptable procedures.513 It proposes that independent,
multidisciplinary and pluralist ethics committees should be promoted and established at national, regional, local or institutional levels.514 It also recommends that states should endeavour to foster
all forms of ethics education and training as well as encourage information and knowledge dissemination programmes about human genetic data.515 Every effort should be made to ensure
that human genetic data are not used in any discriminate way or in any way that infringes human rights of the individual.516
In section B the Declaration sets forth more specific limitations and obligations for the collection of genetic data. Informed and free consent should be obtained for the collection of such data.517 A
person not able to consent should as far as possible take part in the authorization procedure of the collection of such data. Persons concerned have the right to decide whether or not to be informed of results.518 Appropriate genetic counselling should be provided.519
Part C defines limits of the admissible processing of such data. The privacy and confidentiality of individuals and their genetic data should thereby be protected.520 They, for example, should not be
disclosed to third parties, in particular, employers, insurance companies, educational institutions and the family.521 The accuracy, reliability, quality and security of these data should also be
ensured.522
The permissible uses of human genetic data is regulated in section D. It limits the purposes of use to those stipulated for in Article 5. Any changes to that should be compatible with the prior, free, informed and express consent of the person concerned or must correspond to an important public
512 Ibid., specifying that human genetic data and human proteomic data may be collected, processed, used and stored
only for the purposes of: (i) diagnosis and health care, including screening and predictive testing; (ii) medical and other scientific research, including epidemiological, especially population-based genetic studies, as well as anthropological or archaeological studies, collectively referred to hereinafter as "medical and scientific research"; (iii) forensic medicine and civil, criminal and other legal proceedings...; (iv) or any other purpose consistent with the Universal Declaration on the Human Genome, note 4, and the international law of human rights. On ethical analysis of some of these topics see Irrgang, note 131, 539.
513 Ibid., Article 6 clause a. 514 Ibid., Article 6 clause b. 515 Ibid., Article 6 clause c. 516 Ibid., Article 7. 517 Ibid., Article 8. 518 Ibid., Article 10. 519 Ibid., Article 11. 520
Ibid., Article 14 clause a.
521 Ibid., Article 14 clause b. 522 Ibid., Article 14 clause c.
interest reason and be consistent with the international human rights law.523 The cross-border
flow of human genetic data should be supported to foster international medical and scientific cooperation and to ensure fair access to these data.524 Scientific and cultural cooperation, in
particularly between industrialized and developing countries.525
Section E deals with the storage of human genetic data. Such data should be monitored and stored within a framework that is based on the principles of independence, multidisciplinarity, pluralism, non-discrimination, and transparency as well as the other principles set out in the Declaration.526
In the final sections the Declaration recommends that states should endeavour to provide ethics education, training and information.527 Again it relies on UNESCO, the IBC and the IGBC to
contribute to the implementation of the Declaration and the dissemination of the principles set out therein.528
Overall the Declaration is important as it provides one of the few international points of reference in the area of collection and use of human genetic data.529 However, it has also been noted that the
subject of genetics has regularly been subject to dramatic changes instigated by new findings in the natural sciences.530 As such the Declaration will be in need of frequent adaptations to
accommodate the new realities.