Learning Research

Country Research Model

Research Purpose Research Method Data Collection Method Context Author(s) Australia Computer Science faculty attitudes towards the use of mobile technology during programming lectures. Two factors: willingness to integrate and those that influence successful integration

Qualitative study Semi- structured interviews

Ten faculties were invited; 7 accepted from a School of Computer Science and Technology. Thirty-minute interviews; xix interviews were audio-recorded. Alsaggaf, Hamilton, & Harland (2012) Oman and UAE

UTAUT Attitudes towards the use of m- learning

Quantitative Surveys 383 students and 54 instructors from five universities

Al-Emran, Elsherif, & Shaalan (2016)

Country Research Model

Research Purpose Research Method Data Collection Method Context Author(s) Saudi Arabia

None Attitudes towards m- learning

Quantitative Survey with 37 items 362 faculty at King Saud University in 2012-2013. Alwraikat & Tokhaim (2014)

USA TAM Factors that

determine faculty adoption of student in-class use of mobile computing technologies

Mixed Methods Survey and interviews.

Survey completed during the

interview. 29 faculty participated. All were from a Business College.

Benham & Carvalho (2016)

Korea and USA

None Faculty use and perception of mobile ICT for teaching.

Mixed methods Survey and interviews. 59 participants with 44 respondents (13 US and 31 Korean) at three different institutions (2 large 4-year research universities in Korea and one large public research university in the northeast U.S.).

Biddix, Chung, & Park (2016)

Country Research Model

Research Purpose Research Method

Data Collection Method

Context Author(s)

USA None Students and

Faculty

Quantitative Survey 263 graduate and undergraduate students enrolled in 24 online courses; 74 full- and part- time faculty.

Corbeil & Corbeil (2011)

USA None Faculty Qualitative Semi-

structured interviews Three participants from a mid-size public university. Crow et al. (2010)

France None Understand use

and adoption of mobile

technologies by faculty

Mixed methods Survey and interviews

Fourteen faculties in a French Business School.

Cruz, Assar, & Boughzala (2012a)

China None Factors

influencing the use of modern instructional technology

Mixed methods Survey and interviews.

320 full-time faculty at a mid- sized North China University of Technology

Country Research Model

Research Purpose Research Method

Data Collection Method

Context Author(s)

Cyprus None Evaluate faculty readiness and feasibility of mobile technology integration

Mixed methods Survey and interviews

Three private universities. 200 faculty members were sent the survey. Twenty were interviewed.

Eteokleous & Ktoridou (2009)

USA Not available Faculty

perceptions about the role of new learning

technologies in graduate management education and how to bridge the gap.

Quantitative Survey Not available Hall (2012)

Australia None Explore academic’s perceptions about the use of mobile devices for teaching and learning

Mixed methods A survey with three open- ended questions.

177 participants. Handal, MacNish, & Petocz (2013)

Country Research Model

Research Purpose Research Method

Data Collection Method

Context Author(s)

USA None Faculty

perceptions of the use of mobile devices, student use, and perceived barriers.

Mixed methods Survey and interviews

1152 faculty from Midwestern Land- grant university were sent the survey. 594 surveys were completed. 28 faculty were

interviewed.

Hauptman (2015)

USA None Perceptions of

business educators

regarding mobile device use in the classroom. Quantitative, descriptive. Survey 642 Business educators belonging to Delta Pi Epsilon were contacted, and 195 completed the survey.

Henderson & Chapman (2012)

Country Research Model

Research Purpose Research Method

Data Collection Method

Context Author(s)

UAE None Faculty

perceptions about integration, affordances, and challenges of m- learning were investigated. Qualitative Semi- structured interviews Thirteen full-time faculty members from the colleges of Business

Administration, Education, Humanities and Social Science, Pharmacy, and Law at Al Ain

University of Science and Technology.

Ishtaiwa, Khaled, & Dukmak (2015)

India None Faculty

perception towards m- learning adoption and usage.

Quantitative Survey Three institutions, 150 were sent a survey, 120 were analyzed.

Kalyani, Pandeya, & Singh (2012)

Country Research Model

Research Purpose Research Method

Data Collection Method

Context Author(s)

India None Faculty attitude towards m- learning, motivators, and barriers towards m-learning use.

Quantitative Survey One hundred

management faculty at various

institutions, 80 questionnaires were analyzed.

Kalyani, Singh, & Pandey (2012)

Unknown TAM with three additional variables: digital literacy, ICT anxiety, and ICT teaching self- efficacy Faculty acceptance of m- learning.

Quantitative Survey 196 respondents with 175 valid responses.

Mac Callum, Jeffrey, & Kinshuk (2014) USA M-Learning Acceptance Model (extension of TAM) Faculty and Student

Quantitative Survey Online

undergraduate and graduate faculty and students at one university.

Country Research Model

Research Purpose Research Method

Data Collection Method

Context Author(s)

USA None Faculty and

Students’ attitudes, ownership, and classroom use of mobile devices

Quantitative Survey Campus-wide survey at East Tennessee State University.

Melton & Kendall (2012)

USA None Faculty

perceptions of benefits and barriers to mobile computing in higher education

Quantitative Survey 98 full-time faculty on one of two campuses at a large private university in the northeast

received the survey. Responses received from 39 faculty members.

Shim & Shim (2000-2001) Turkey Diffusion of Innovation ICT usage as an indicator of diffusion.

Quantitative Survey 814 faculty

members across 22 universities.

Usluel, Askar & Bas (2008)

Malaysia Educator

perceptions

Qualitative Lecture and tutorial sessions; interviews 12 Multimedia faculty at a private university over seven months in 2010 Zulkafly Koo, Shariman, & Zaimuddin (2011)