i 1-- --
JFuture energy reuirements
/
SResultsN\
No< onsistent - I> i /
(2)?
; _____|
~Yeas
'__I ii
1\l ' I
| Electricity | Other energy forms |
M---I Electricity[
\ ---- ' i f This information may be used
by other government agencies _____ I ,____.i for analysis of the resulting Best expansion requirements of primary energy
plan for electric
|
supply system
Balance of primary energy,
development of domestic energy resources, cost of imported
~Technically~
No energy, investments required feasible c - for: expansion of port handlingeail\ (5) / capacity, conversion plants, distribution network, etc.
! | Yes Yes
No onsistent sonsistent No
-- < with scenario , < with scenario
>----\Y
(3) ? / , \ (3) ?
Yes Yes
Optimal Energy
Expansion ~ Master
Plan Plan
... \.C__ . _r :C aA i Q A - - - --- - - - --- -- --- - ---- I
I Ilee 3ecT-n 0.14. 1.
2 See Section 8.4 3 See Section 8.5
- 173
-8.6 Report of the MAED Study
Once all major stages of the MAED analysis have been completed, it is necessary to produce a report summarizing the principal findings of the study.
The findings of the study should concentrate on analysis of the major results obtained by means of the scenarios. At this level, it is important to remember that the results of MAED do not have a meaning of their own but only in relation to the original scenario which they quantify. In other words, the MAED results presented alone will not have any proper meaning without mentioning the context of the corresponding scenario.
In addition to the above, it should be kept in mind that the results of MAED (or any other model based on the same approach) do not have a value of precision in the traditional sense of deterministic prevision.
They are always conditional and do not have a meaning but in relation to the question:
" What would happen if... ? "
Consequently, the major findings of the study should also be accompanied by the major hypotheses combined with the study.
These hypotheses should cover not only those related to the construction of the scenarios of development but also approximations that were necessary to be made for the reconstruction of the country's energy structure for the base year of analysis, mentioning also their importance in terms of their influence on the results.
Within the framework of an ENPP study, inclusion of the above information in the report of the study is considered very important in order to permit a complete reproduction of the study by other specialists in the country. This is particularly important in many developing countries owing to the greater mobility of specialists among government bodies and also the private sector.
Combined with these hypotheses, the report should include proposals and recommendations for follow up studies and actions in the energy
field. These should go from the mere proposal of actions to improve the knowledge of the energy consumption pattern of the country to the actual recommendations on energy policies.
Proposals on actions to improve the knowledge of the pattern of energy consumption of the country should include a detailed listing of the type of surveys and/or studies that should be carried out before other planning studies are executed, with the view of establishing a comprehensive and coherent data base for the use of MAED or other models.
Emphasis should be given to those scenario parameters for which greater uncertainty is recognized, as well as those having a greater impact on energy demand.
- 174
-The recommendations on future energy policies should be established within the framework of the MAED (MEDEE) approach. This means that
beforehand a complete interpretation of the MAED results should be made by the planner (or the working team in the case of an ENPP study).
In this respect, the MAED user is referred to the literature on the MEDEE approach listed in Section 1 and Appendix E, as well as the paper by B. Chateau mentioned in Section 8.1, from which the following ideas have been extracted.
The interpretation of the scenario results is needed owing to the non-deterministic and often relative characteristic of the results.
It consists of describing the mechanisms that have led to the results on energy demand for a given scenario and to place them in the light of historical tendencies and in relation to other scenarios.
This means that for each scenario, it is necessary to complete the whole quantification of the results, by a qualitative analysis of the chain of events and of evolutions. This will involve describing the role played by the various hypotheses made, and the degree of reliability that can be accorded to the different results. This last point emphasizes the recommendation to conduct sensitivity analysis on the exogenous scenario variables for which data is less known or its development is more uncertain.
The comparative interpretation of the results from different scenarios is a very good learning process particularly with MAED and similar models where the gross results alone are difficult to interpret separately. Here, emphasis is made to the analysis of the consequences in energy terms of important changes in the condition of socioeconomic development and, if it is the case, in the definition of energy
policies. It is not the absolute values of the results that need to be interpreted but the divergencies (absolute or relative) of the results between different scenarios. Thus, the interpretation consists of
linking these divergencies to the differences in the hypotheses behind the scenarios.
A final point concerning the recommendations on energy policies to be made in the report of the study should be emphasized. Obviously, such recommendations can only be prepared with the participation of senior government officials such as those integrating the Steering Committee for an ENPP study. Thus, the need for this group to avail the report of the study as discussed in Section 8.1.1.
In the case of ENPP studies conducted by the Agency, the actual contents of the particular study will obviously be dependent on the main objectives of the study. One example of such reports is given in the IAEA publication in Ref. 10 listed in Section 1. Similar reports are expected to be published in the future for the different countries
for which ENPP studies are being conducted (Ref. 11 of Section 1).
LIST OF APPENDICES
____________________
APPENDIX A.
APPENDIX B.
APPENDIX C.
APPENDIX D.
APPENDIX E.
RUNNING MAED-1 AT THE I.A.E.A.
LIST OF OUTPUT AND INTERNAL VARIABLES OF MAED-1
LIST OF PRINCIPAL EQUATIONS USED BY MAED-1
SUBROUTINES AND FLOW-CHARTS OF THE MAED-1 PROGRAM
EXAMPLES OF INPUT DATA FOR SOME STUDIES CARRIED OUT USING THE MEDEE METHODOLOGY
A.1
APPENDIX A
RUNNING MAED-1 AT THE I.A.E.A.
A.O Introduction
The execution of the various MAED-1 modules is described in the main sections of the manual based on a sample problem (CASENA) specially developed to demonstrate the capabilities of the modules to handle input information; to perform internal calculations; and to produce printed outputs according to the instructions given by the user and other input information provided by the output files generated by preceding modules.
It was mentioned in Section 3 that for the benefit of all potential recipients of the program, execution of the steps required for allocating the various files as well as for running the various MAED modules had been all based on an IBM-BSAM operating system.
Furthermore, the discussions about the control cards needed in order to carry out the MAED-1 study for CASENA assumed that all runs for this case were executed using the respective control cards shown in Figures 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4. Such an approach was followed with the view of providing the user with a better understanding of which
files are used as input, output, or working (scratch) file(s) by each MAED-1 module.
In this Appendix we will describe first, the main differences in running the MAED program at the IAEA's computer installations (see Section 3 of the manual for description of these facilities) and the additional capabilities provided by the utility programs available. The next section is used to summarize how the actual execution of a MAED module is done at IAEA in terms of the data deck required and the output produced. This is done for the same runs of the sample problem as they were carried out at the IAEA. Finally, the last section describes the printouts of the various modules for the runs of CASENA.
Due to the special computer terminology used in this appendix, the discussion which follows is directed towards computer-oriented specialists, who may eventually take advantage of this information for implementing the program in the computer installations of his or her organization, provided that the necessary facilities are also available.
A.2
A.1 Execution of a Case Study at IAEA
The control cards in Figures 3.1 through 3.4, together with the respective input data described in Sections 4-7 of the manual are adequate for running our sample problem (CASENA) on an IBM 370/145 with card reader. As already mentioned in Section 3, the computer
installations at IAEA correspond to an IBM 3081/3032 MVS-SE system (Multiple Virtual Storage-System Extended) using teleprocessing instead of a card reader.
Figures A.1 to A.5 illustrate the Job Control Language (JCL) used for carrying out a case study (CASENA) on such a system and computer facilities: Figure A.1 shows the JCL for the catalogued procedure for the subprogram which allocates the various MAED files, and Figures A.2 through A.5 the catalogued procedures for executing modules 1 to 4, respectively. Further, all figures are card images
of the listings included in the MAED magnetic tape which is provided by the Agency to the recipients of the code. Hence the need of the
column numbers on the right of each "card" in the figures in order to provide easy reference when reading the MAED-1 tape.
The differences observed in Figures A.1 to A.5 when compared to the set up discussed for CASENA problem while describing the various MAED-1 modules (see Figs. 3.1 to 3.4 of the manual) are the following:
a. Use of procedures;
b. New data sets and allocation; and
c. Printing of the input data sets used in the run.
Procedures have been created and stored (i.e. catalogued) in a procedure library for execution of each of the MAED modules at IAEA.
These procedures are identified as XBIPM11, XBIPM12, XBIPM13 and XBIPM14 for modules 1 to 4, respectively, and catalogued in the procedure library USER.PROCLIB. An additional procedure (XBIPINI1), also catalogued in the same procedure library, is used for execution of the run required for allocating all MAED files for a given case.
The use of catalogued procedures for the MAED modules is
advantageous because it reduces drastically the JCL information needed for executing the module. Moreover, by means of symbolic parameters (i.e. &SYSCOD, &CASE) which are either set to default (i.e. SYSCOD=XBIM) or forced as input information (i.e. CASE=) the procedures can be defined as flexible as required. All user specified input information or changes in the default values concerning the symbolic parameters should be included in the EXEC card. If some other changes, such as altering program output files, are to be introduced to the instructions of the procedure, this can be done by using //GO. cards.
The catalogued procedures for the MAED modules 1 - 4 (XBIPMll, XBIPM12, XBIPM13 and XBIPM14) are shown in Figures A.1 through A.4
in the same order. The main features of each procedure, along with the rest of the control and data cards required for executing each module will be described in detail in the respective sections. In addition, Figure A.5 shows the catalogued procedure XBIPINI1 for the initial run under the user's case name.
A.3
In general, the procedures use certain system utilities and software products for handling and/or printing of data sets. This will be described with respect to the procedure XBIPM11 for module 1 as shown in Figure A.1. The first card in this figure (card 0010)
identifies symbolic parameters as discussed above (i.e. CASE, LISTCLS, etc.), and its continuation card (card 0020) the program to be run (member XBIMMll stored in the load library USER.LOADLIB).
Before the execution of the module starts, all input data used are listed. Thus, the next steps (STEP1 through STEP3 in this case) correspond to the instructions required for storing and printing the data sets needed by this module (3 in this case).
Cards 0150 to 0270 show the instructions for STEP1. First, a utility (IEBGENER) is used to store and input data set (specified by DDNAME=INPSD) on a temporary file (DSN=&&INSD, see cards 0150-0190).
This file is listed by another utility (IEBPTCH) which uses some control cards for editing purposes. These control cards are stored in another library (USER.CONTROL) and identified as member XBICM1SD.
Although these cards are not included in the catalogued procedures, in each case an example has been added at the end of the respective figure for the sake of completeness. For module 1, for example, this is illustrated by the cards inserted at the end of Figure A.1 (see cards 0930 to 0980) which are followed by the control cards for member XBICM1SD on the library USER.CONTROL.
STEP2 and STEP3 contain similar instructions to the ones above explained for STEP1. That is, they use the same utilities and some other control cards for storing and printing data set files (INPCP) and (INPTP) for the run (see cards 0280 through 0590).
STEP4 follows to give the required instructions for executing the LIBRARIAN software (see cards 0650 to 0730). This is required in order to retrieve the member of the Librarian which is used for producing the output tables with the results of the analysis. This LIBRARIAN member (XBICMll) replaces the data set "TABLES" discussed in Section 4 of the Manual. Again, this information is stored in a temporary file (&&INTB) for later use by the program.
The last step (i.e., the GO step in cards 0790 to 0920) corresponds to the actual execution of the program, starting with the name of the program and its location. The rest of the cards in this step identify in each case the files to be used by the module during execution. Files FT01 through FT04 correspond to input data information, each one using the temporary files created by steps 1 through 4, respectively. Specification of the printer output files follows. In this case, two files are used (i.e., FT06 and FT08) and they are defined by symbolic parameters (&LISTCLS, &DEST) to permit variation of output classes (i.e., different forms or different queues) and of output printer location (i.e., DEST=CENTRAL,LOCAL).
The file FTll defined in the next three cards is the working file used for temporarily storing output information. Finally, the last instruction (in card 0920) defines the data file (FT12) created by module 1, the LOADSCEN file, which is to be used by module 2.
A.4
Figure A.1 (Page 1) Catalogued Procedure for execution of Module 1
//XBIPM11 PROC CASE=,LISTCLS=A,DEST=,SYSCOD=XBIM,BLKSIZE=1729, // N=XBIMM11,STEPLIB='USER.LOADLIB'
//* ECONOMIC STUDIES SECTION
~~//* ~
1985/08/20//*
//* STORE INPUT DATA (SCENARIO DEFINITION)
//*
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=IEBGENER //SYSPRINT DD DUMMY
//SYSIN DD DUMMY
//SYSUT1 DD DDNAME=INPSD
//SYSUT2 DD DSN=&&INSD,DISP=(,PASS),UNIT=SYSDA,
// SPACE=(TRK,(1,1)),DCB=(RECFM=FB,LRECL=80,BLKSIZE=3200)
LIST INPUT DATA (SCENARIO DEFINITION) EXEC PGM=IEBPTPCH
DD DUMMY
DD DSN=&&INSD,DISP=(OLD,PASS) DD SYSOUT=(&LISTCLS)&DEST
DD DSN=USER.CONTROL(XBICM1SD),DISP=SHR
STORE AND LIST INPUT DATA (CONSTANT PARAMETERS)
00000010 //STEP2 EXEC PGM=IEBGENER
//SYSPRINT DD DUMMY //SYSIN DD DUMMY
//SYSUT1 DD DDNAME=INPCP
//SYSUT2 DD DSN=&&INCP,DISP=(,PASS),UNIT=SYSDA,
// SPACE=(TRK,(1,1)),DCB=(RECFM=FB,LRECL=80,BLKSIZE=3200) //LISTCARD EXEC PGM=IEBPTPCH
//SYSPRINT DD DUMMY
//SYSUT1 DD DSN=&&INCP,DISP=(OLD,PASS) //SYSUT2 DD SYSOUT=(&LISTCLS)&DEST
//SYSIN DD DSN=USER.CONTROL(XBICM1CP),DISP=SHR //*
//*
//* STORE AND LIST INPUT DATA (TECHNICAL PARAMETERS) //*
//STEP3 EXEC PGM=IEBGENER //SYSPRINT DD DUMMY
//SYSIN DD DUMMY
//SYSUT1 DD DDNAME=INPTP
//SYSUT2 DD DSN=&&INTP,DISP=(,PASS),UNIT=SYSDA,
// SPACE=(TRK,(1,1)),DCB=(RECFM=FB,LRECL=80,BLKSIZE=3200)
A.5
STORE AND LIST TABLE FORMAT (FROM LIBRARIAN)
//LIB EXEC
EXECUTE SCENARIO MODULE
EXEC PGM=&N
//* FOLLOWING CARDS LIST MEMBERS USED BY UTILITY IEBPTPCH //* FOR EDITING THE VARIOUS DATA SET USED IN THE RUN
A.6
Figure A.2 (Page 1) Catalogued Procedure for execution of Module 2
//XBIPM12 PROC CASE=,LISTCLS=A,DEST=,SYSCOD=XBIM,BLKSIZE=1729, 00000010
// N=XBIMM12,STEPLIB='USER.LOADLIB' 00000020
//* 00000030
//* *** HOURLY LOADS CALCULATION *** 00000040
//* *** MAED-1 VERSION 85-8*** 00000050
//* 00000060
//* WRITTEN BY: PABLO MOLINA 00000070
//* IAEA / NENP 00000080
~//*
ECONOMIC STUDIES SECTION 00000090//* 1985/08/20 00000100
//* 00000110
//* STORE INPUT DATA (LOAD COEFFICIENTS SECTOR 1) 00000120
//* 00000130
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=IEBGENER 00000140
//SYSPRINT DD DUMMY 00000150
//SYSIN DD DUMMY 00000160
//SYSUT1 DD DDNAME=INPS1 00000170
//SYSUT2 DD DSN=&&INS1,DISP=(,PASS),UNIT=SYSDA, 00000180 // SPACE=(TRK,(1,1)),DCB=(RECFM=FB,LRECL=80,BLKSIZE=3200) 00000190
~~~~~~~~//*~~~~ ~~~00000200
//* LIST INPUT DATA (LOAD COEFFICIENTS SECTOR 1) 00000210
//* 00000220
//LISTCARD EXEC PGM=IEBPTPCH 00000230
//SYSPRINT DD DUMMY 00000240
//SYSUT1 DD DSN=&&INS1,DISP=(OLD,PASS) 00000250
//SYSUT2 DD SYSOUT=(&LISTCLS)&DEST 00000260
//SYSIN DD DSN=USER.CONTROL(XBICM1S1),DISP=SHR 00000270
//* 00000280
//* 00000290
//* STORE AND LIST INPUT DATA (COEFFICIENTS SECTOR 2) 00000300
//* 00000310
//* 00000320
//STEP2 EXEC PGM=IEBGENER 00000330
//SYSPRINT DD DUMMY 00000340
//SYSIN DD DUMMY 00000350
//SYSUT1 DD DDNAME=INPS2 00000360
//SYSUT2 DD DSN=&&INS2,DISP=(,PASS),UNIT=SYSDA, 00000370 // SPACE=(TRK,(1,1)),DCB=(RECFM=FB,LRECL=80,BLKSIZE=3200) 00000380
//LISTCARD EXEC PGM=IEBPTPCH 00000390
//SYSPRINT DD DUMMY 00000400
//SYSUT1 DD DSN=&&INS2,DISP=(OLD,PASS) 00000410
//SYSUT2 DD SYSOUT=(&LISTCLS)&DEST 00000420
//SYSIN DD DSN=USER.CONTROL(XBICM1S2),DISP=SHR 00000430
A.7
Figure A.2 (Page 2) ..cont..
//*
//*
//*
//*
STORE AND LIST INPUT DATA (CONTROL OF EXECUTION) //*
//STEP3 EXEC PGM=IEBGENER //SYSPRINT DD DUMMY
//SYSIN DD DUMMY
//SYSUT1 DD DDNAME=INPUT
//SYSUT2 DD DSN=&&INPT,DISP=(,PASS),UNIT=SYSDA,
// SPACE=(TRK,(1,1)),DCB=(RECFM=FB,LRECL=80,BLKSIZE=3200) //LISTCARD EXEC PGM=IEBPTPCH
//SYSPRINT DD DUMMY
//SYSUT1 DD DSN=&&INPT,DISP=(OLD,PASS) //SYSUT2 DD SYSOUT=(&LISTCLS)&DEST
//SYSIN DD DSN=USER.CONTROL(XBICM1I2),DISP=SHR //*
//*
//*
//*
//*
//GO E
//STEPLIB //FT01F001 //FT02F001 //FT05F001 //FT06F001
//
//FT12F001 //FT13F001
E}
;XEC
IECUTE MODULE 2
00000440 0000450 00000460 00000470 00000480 00000490 00000500 00000510 00000520 00000530 00000540 00000550 00000560 00000570 00000580 00000590 00000600 00000610 00000620 00000630 00000640 00000650 00000660 00000670 00000680 00000690 00000700 00000710 00000720 00000730 00000740 00000750 00000760 00000770 00000780 00000790 00000010 C00000020 00000030 C00000040 00000050 00000060 C PGM=&N
DD DSN=&STEPLIB,DISP=SHR
DD DSN=&&INS1,DISP=(OLD,DELETE) DD DSN=&&INS2,DISP=(OLD,DELETE) DD DSN=&&INPT,DISP=(OLD,DELETE) DD SYSOUT=(&LISTCLS)&DEST,
DCB=(LRECL=133,RECFM=FBA,BLKSIZE=&BLKSIZE) DD DSN=&SYSCOD..&CASE..LOADSCEN,DISP=SHR DD DSN=&SYSCOD..&CASE..LOADYEAR,DISP=OLD
//* FOLLOWING CARDS LIST MEMBERS USED BY UTILITY IEBPTPCH //* FOR EDITING THE VARIOUS DATA SET USED IN THE RUN
//* ******* ****** **** ******** ********** ****** A * * * * ***** *
//* USER.CONTROL(XBICM1S1)
//*** ****** ****************** ** ******* ************ ************ ****** *
PRINT CNTRL=2,MAXFLDS=1
INPFSD TITLE ITEM=('FILE S1 1 2 3 4',01),
ITEM=(' 5 6 7 8',41)
TITLE ITEM=('1234567890123456789012345678901234567890',01), ITEM=('1234567890123456789012345678901234567890',41) RECORD FIELD=(80)
A.8
Figure A.3 Catalogued Procedure for execution of Module 3
//XBIPM13 PROC CASE=,LISTCLS=A,DEST=,SYSCOD=XBIM,BLKSIZE=1729, // N=XBIMM13,STEPLIB='USER.LOADLIB'
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=IEBGENER //SYSPRINT DD DUMMY
//SYSIN DD DUMMY
//SYSUT1 DD DDNAME=INPUT
//SYSUT2 DD DSN=&&INPT,DISP=(,PASS),UNIT=SYSDA,
// SPACE=(TRK,(1,1)),DCB=(RECFM=FB,LRECL=80,BLKSIZE=3200) //*
//* LIST INPUT DATA //*
//LISTCARD EXEC PGM=IEBPTPCH //SYSPRINT DD DUMMY
//SYSUT1 DD DSN=&&INPT,DISP=(OLD,PASS) //SYSUT2 DD SYSOUT=(&LISTCLS)&DEST
//SYSIN DD DSN=USER.CONTROL(XBICM1I3),DISP=SHR //*
//* FOLLOWING CARDS LIST MEMBER USED BY UTILITY IEBPTPCH //* FOR EDITING THE INPUT DATA SET USED IN THE RUN
A.9
*** LOAD COEFFICIENTS CALCULATION
*** MAED-1 VERSION 85-8 WRITTEN BY: PABLO MOLINA
IAEA / NENP
ECONOMIC STUDIES SECTION 1985/08/20
STORE INPUT DATA (CONTROL OF EXECUTION)
//*
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=IEBGENER //SYSPRINT DD DUMMY
//SYSIN DD DUMMY
//SYSUT1 DD DDNAME=INPUT
//SYSUT2 DD DSN=&&INPT,DISP=(,PASS),UNIT=SYSDA,
// SPACE=(TRK,(1,1)),DCB=(RECFM=FB,LRECL=80,BLKSIZE=3200)
//GO EXEC PGM=&N
//STEPLIB DD DSN=&STEPLIB,DISP=SHR
//FT05F001 DD DSN=&&INPT,DISP=(OLD,DELETE) //FT06F001 DD SYSOUT=(&LISTCLS)&DEST,
// DCB=(LRECL=133,RECFM=FBA,BLKSIZE=&BLKSIZE) //FT17F001 DD DSN=&SYSCOD..&CASE..LOADCHRO,DISP=SHR
//***** ****************** *** ******** ************ *********************
//* FOLLOWING CARDS LIST MEMBER USED BY UTILITY IEBPTPCH //* FOR EDITING THE INPUT DATA SET USED IN THE RUN
A. 10
Figure A.5 Catalogued Procedure for execution of the File Allocation Step
//XBIPINI1 PROC CASE=,UNIT=SYSDA,SYSCOD==XBIM 00000010
//* 00000020
//* *** ALLOCATE & CATALOG MAED FILES *** 00000030
//* *** MAED-1 VERSION 85--8 *** 00000040
//* 00000050
//* WRITTEN BY: PABLO MOLINA 00000060
//* IAEA / NENP 00000070
~//* ~ECONOMIC
STUDIES SECTION 00000080//* 1985/08/20 00000090
//* 00000100
//ALLOCATE EXEC PGM=IEFBR14 00000110
//FT12F001 DD DSN=&SYSCOD..&CASE..LOADSCEN, 00000120 // SPACE=(TRK,(1,2)),DCB=(RECFM=FB,BLKSIZE=1600,LRECL=80), 00000130
// UNIT=&UNIT,DISP=(NEW,CATLG,DELETE) 00000140
//FT13F001 DD DSN=&SYSCOD..&CASE..LOADYEAR, 00000150 // SPACE=(TRK,(1,5)),DCB=(RECFM=FB,BLKSIZE=1600,LRECL=80), 00000160
// UNIT=&UNIT,DISP=(NEW,CATLG,DELETE) 00000170
//FT14F001 DD DSN=&SYSCOD..&CASE..LOADWASP, 00000180 // SPACE=(TRK,(1,2)),DCB=(RECFM=FB,BLKSIZE=1600,LRECL=80), 00000190
// UNIT=&UNIT,DISP=(NEW,CATLG,DELETE) 00000200
//FT15F001 DD DSN=&SYSCOD..&CASE..LOADPLOT, 00000210 // SPACE=(TRK,(1,2)),DCB=(RECFM=FB,BLKSIZE=1600,LRECL=80), 00000220
// UNIT=&UNIT,DISP=(NEW,CATLG,DELETE) 00000230
//FT17F001 DD DSN=&SYSCOD..&CASE..LOADCHRO, 00000240 // SPACE=(TRK,(1,5)),DCB=(RECFM=FB,BLKSIZE=1600,LRECL=80), 00000250
// UNIT=&UNIT,DISP=(NEW,CATLG,DELETE) 00000260
Figure A.6 Card deck required for a Run of Module 1 for CASENA at IAEA
//NEMMAED1 JOB (BI,P),ROOM#-PROGRAMMER,CLASS=I,TIME=(,25), // MSGCLSS=A
//STEPO EXEC XBIPM11,CASE=CASENA,STEPLIB='USER.LOADLIB' //STEP1.INPSD DD DSN=XBIM.MAED.PROG(M1INPSD),DISP=SHR //STEP2.INPCP DD DSN=XBIM.MAED.PROG(M1INPCP),DISP=SHR //STEP3.INPTP DD DSN=XBIM.MAED.PROG(M1INPTP),DISP=SHR
//STEPO EXEC XBIPM11,CASE=CASENA,STEPLIB='USER.LOADLIB' //STEP1.INPSD DD DSN=XBIM.MAED.PROG(M1INPSD),DISP=SHR //STEP2.INPCP DD DSN=XBIM.MAED.PROG(M1INPCP),DISP=SHR //STEP3.INPTP DD DSN=XBIM.MAED.PROG(M1INPTP),DISP=SHR