5.5 Space segment equipment test programme implementation requirements
5.5.2 Mechanical tests
5.5.2.1
Physical properties measurements
a. The following physical properties of space segment equipment shall be determined using tools and techniques that conform to the required accuracy:
1. Dimensions and interfaces;
2. Mass;
3. Centre of gravity with respect to a given coordinate system for three mutually perpendicular axes;
4. Momentum of inertia with respect to the given coordinate system. NOTE For space segment equipment with simple shapes,
the centre of gravity location and momenta of inertia can be determined by calculation.
b. The space segment equipment shall be in launch configuration, unless this configuration cannot be reproduced on ground.
5.5.2.2
Acceleration test (static, spin or transient)
a. The space segment equipment shall be mounted to a test fixture through its normal mounting points.
b. When a centrifuge is used, it shall be ensured that the length of the arm (measured to the geometric centre of the space segment equipment) is at least five times the dimension of the space segment equipment measured along the arm.
NOTE This is to ensure uniform force distribution on the space segment equipment.
5.5.2.3
Random vibration test
a. Random vibration tests shall be conducted in launch configuration for all axes.
b. The induced cross axis accelerations at the attachment points shall be limited to the maximum test levels specified for the cross axis.
c. In order to evaluate the space segment equipment integrity a resonance search shall be performed before and after the random vibration test.
d. The success criteria for the resonance search shall be:
1. less than 5 % in frequency shift, for modes with an effective mass greater than 10 %;
2. less than 20 % in amplitude shift, for modes with an effective mass greater than 10 %.
e. Detailed visual checks shall be carried out when functional tests are not performed.
f. For space segment equipment which is designed to be re‐flown, the qualification test duration per axis shall be in conformance with Table 5‐2 plus 50 seconds per additional flight.
5.5.2.4
Acoustic test
a. Acoustic tests shall be conducted in a reverberating chamber, with the space segment equipment in launch configuration mounted on a test fixture simulating the dynamic flight mounting conditions.
NOTE Acoustic tests are often but not always conducted on space segment equipment with large surfaces which are likely to be susceptible to acoustic noise excitations, e.g. solar arrays, antennas; for this type of space segment equipment random vibration testing is not performed.
b. The space segment equipment and the test fixture shall be decoupled from chamber floor and wall structure born vibration.
c. In order to evaluate the space segment equipment integrity a low level acoustic run (‐8 dB the qualification level) shall be performed before and after the acoustic qualification run by determining resonant frequencies.
d. The success criteria for the resonance search shall be:
1. less than 5 % in frequency shift, for modes with an effective mass greater than 10 %;
2. less than 40 % in amplitude shift, for modes with an effective mass greater than 10 %.
e. For space segment equipment which is designed to be re‐flown, the qualification test duration shall be in conformance with Table 5‐2 plus 50 seconds per additional flight.
5.5.2.5
Sinusoidal vibration test
a. Sinusoidal tests shall be conducted in the launch configurations for all axes. b. A resonance search shall be performed before and after the sinusoidal
vibration test to determine resonance frequencies to evaluate the space segment equipment integrity.
c. The success criteria for the resonance search shall be:
1. less than 5 % in frequency shift, for modes with an effective mass greater than 10 %;
2. less than 20 % in amplitude shift, for modes with an effective mass greater than 10 %.
d. Detailed visual checks shall be carried out prior and after test to check for visual damage.
e. The induced cross axis excitation shall be monitored to check that the response in the cross axis does not exceed the specification.
5.5.2.6
Shock test
a. Shock tests shall be conducted in the item under test configuration relevant to the event where the shock is produced.
NOTE The shock tests demonstrate the ability of the space segment equipment to withstand the shocks encountered during the lifetime, e.g.: fairing separation, space segment equipment separation, booster burn out, apogee boost motor ignition, solar arrays and antennas deployment, shocks from landing of reusable elements.
b. Equipment powered during the event where the shock is produced, shall be powered during the test.
c. The equipment shall be mounted to a fixture using its normal mounting points.
d. The selected test method shall achieve the specified Shock Response Spectrum with a representative transient, comparable in shape and duration to the expected in‐flight shock.
e. To reduce the number of shock activations, axes and directions may be combined, provided the required environment is created.
f. Detailed visual checks shall be carried out. g. Hardware integrity shall be verified after the test.
NOTE This is performed through several ways, like performance test, low level sinusoidal vibration pre and post test, modal survey, alignment.
h. The induced cross axis excitation shall be monitored to check that the response in the cross axis do not exceed the specification.
i. The homogeneity of the shock around the equipment under test shall be monitored by at least one pair of sensors mounted at opposite corners of the equipment.
5.5.2.7
Micro-vibration generated environment test
a. The measurements of the space segment equipment interface dynamic forces and torques shall be performed.
b. The space segment equipment shall be in its nominal operational configuration similar to the on‐orbit operational conditions.
5.5.2.8
Micro-vibration susceptibility test
a. The performance parameters shall be measured when subjected to the maximum predicted micro‐vibration environment.
b. The space segment shall be in its nominal operational configuration similar to the on‐orbit operational conditions.