GReAT BRiTAin. Pipelines Safety Regulations 1996. london: [1]
hmSo.
GReAT BRiTAin. health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. [2]
london: hmSo.
GReAT BRiTAin. management of health & Safety at Work [3]
Regulations 1992, amended 1999. london: hmSo. coRDeR, i.
[4] The application of risk techniques to the design and operation of pipelines. Proceedings of international conference
on Pressure Systems: operation and Risk management, october 1995, Paper no. c502/016/95, PP. 113-125. london: institution of mechanical engineers.
coRDeR, i., FeARnehouGh, G.D. and KnoTT, R.n.
[5] Pipeline
design using risk based criteria. communication 1492. institute
of Gas engineers 129th Annual General meeting and Spring conference, eastbourne, uK, may 1992.
lYonS, c., hASWell, J.V., hoPKinS, P., elliS, R. and JAcKSon, n. [6]
A methodology for the prediction of pipeline failure frequency due to external interference. international Pipeline conference,
calgary, canada, 30 September – 3 october 2008.4)
AcTon, m., BAlDWin, T., and JAGeR, e.R.
[7] Recent developments
in the design and application of the PIPESAFE risk assessment package for gas transmission pipelines. international Pipeline
conference, calgary, canada, 29 September – 3 october 2002. lYonS, D.
[8] Western European cross country oil pipelines 30 year performance statistics. Report 1/02. Brussels: concAWe, February
2002.5)
ARunAKumAR, G. uKoPA PiPeline FAulT DATABASe.
[9] Pipeline
product loss incidents 1962‑2006 – 5th report of the UKOPA Fault Data Management Group. Advantica Report 6957.
loughborough: Advantica, August 2007.6)
4) Available from uKoPA.
5) Available for downloading at http://www.concawe.org.
6) Available for downloading at http://www.ukopa.co.uk/publications.
euRoPeAn GAS PiPeline inciDenT DATA GRouP.
[10] Gas pipeline
incidents – 6th report of the European Gas Pipeline Incident Data Group 1970‑2004. eGiG 05 R.0002. european member States:
eGiG, December 2005.7)
SPenceR, h. and ReW, P.J.
[11] Ignition probability of flammable gases. contract Research Report cRR146/1997. london: W.S.
Atkins for the hSe, 1997.7)
SPenceR, h., DAYcocK, J. and ReW, P.J.
[12] A model for ignition
probability of flammable gases. contract Research Report
cRR203/1997. london: W.S. Atkins for the hSe, 1997. leeS, F.P.
[13] Loss prevention in the process industries. Second edition.
london: Butterworths-heinemann, 1996. iSBn 0 7506 1547 8. Bilo, m. and KinSmAn, P. miShAP – hSe’s pipeline risk [14]
assessment methodology. Pipes and Pipelines International, July-August 1997.
Bilo, m. and KinSmAn, P. Risk calculation for pipelines applied [15]
within the miShAP hSe computer program. Pipes and Pipelines
International, march-April 1998.
mAhGeReFTeh, h.
[16] PipeTech – Pipeline rupture computational fluid dynamics simulator. london: university college.8)
heAlTh AnD SAFeTY eXecuTiVe.
[17] Reducing risks, protecting
people – HSE’s decision‑making process. london: hSe Books,
2001. iSBn 0 7176 2151 0.
heAlTh AnD SAFeTY eXecuTiVe, hAZARDouS inSTAllATionS [18]
DiRecToRATe. HID’s approach to ‘As Low As Reasonably
Practicable’ (ALARP) decisions. london: health and Safety
executive, 2007.9)
GReAT BRiTAin. control of major Accident hazards Regulations [19]
1999. london: The Stationery office. lYonS, c. and hASWell, J.V.
[20] The influence of pipe design factor and geometry on the failure of pipelines subject to 3rd party damage. Pie/2005/R104, issue 1.0, october 2005.10)
hASWell, J.V.
[21] Failure frequency reduction factors for design factor and wall thickness. Pie/07/Tn051 V0, 14 September 2007.10)
coShAm, A., hASWell, J. and JAcKSon, n.
[22] Reduction factors
for estimating the probability of failure of mechanical damage due to external interference. international Pipeline conference,
calgary, canada, 30 September – 3 october 2008.10)
RooVeRS, P., BooD, R., GAlli, m., mAReWSKi, u., STeineR, m. [23]
and ZARÉA, m. ePRG methods for assessing the tolerance and resistance of pipelines to external damage. Pipeline technology, Volume ii, Proceedings of the Third international Pipeline Technology conference (ed. R. Denys), Brugge, Belgium, 2000, PP. 405-425.
7) Available for downloading at http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrhtm/. 8) Details at http://www.homepages.ucl.ac.uk/~ucecm01/pipe-tech.html. 9) Available for downloading at
http://www.hse.gov.uk/comah/circular/perm09.htm.
hoPKinS, P.
[24] The application of fitness for purpose methods to defects detected in offshore transmission pipelines. conference
on Welding and Weld Performance in the Process industry, london, 1992.
coRDeR, i. and chATAin, P.
[25] EPRG recommendations for the
assessment of the resistance of pipelines to external damage.
Proceeding of the ePRG/PRc 10th Biennial Joint Technical meeting on line Pipe Research, cambridge, uK, April 1995. mATheR, J., BlAcKmoRe, c., PeTRie, A., and TReVeS, c.
[26] An
assessment of measures in use for gas pipelines to mitigate against damage caused by third party activity. contract Research
Report 372/2001. london: W.S. Atkins for the hSe, 2001. mcconnell, R.
[27] Effect of surveillance frequency on 3rd party excavation rate. Briefing paper to uKoPA RAWG. october
2005.11)
ToeS, G.
[28] The effectiveness of slabbing in preventing pipeline damage due to third party interference. Advantica Report 8904.
march 2006.11)
GReAT BRiTAin. notification of installations handling hazardous [29]
Substances Regulations 1982 and subsequent amendments. london: hmSo.
GReAT BRiTAin. Town and country Planning Act 1990. london: [30]
hmSo.
heAlTh AnD SAFeTY eXecuTiVe.
[31] Planning advice for
developments near hazardous installations (PADHI+). london:
health and Safety executive.12)
Bilo, m. and KinSmAn, P. Thermal radiation criteria used in [32]
pipeline risk assessment. Pipes and Pipelines International, november-December 1997.
cARTeR, D.A. Aspects of risk assessment for hazardous pipelines [33]
containing flammable substances. Journal of Loss Prevention in
the Process Industries, January 1991, Volume 4.
BAum, m. and BuTTeRFielD, J.m. Studies of the depressurisation [34]
of gas pressurised pipes during rupture. Journal of Mechanical
Engineering Science, Volume 21, no. 4, 1979. london: institution
of mechanical engineers. lYonS, c. and hASWell, J.V.
[35] UK pipeline failure frequencies.
Pie/06/R0131, issue 1.0, February 2007.11)
11) Available from uKoPA.
12) This document does not carry a publication date. it is available for downloading at http://www.hse.gov.uk/landuseplanning/index.htm.