Chapter 3: Women’s Work and Private Cord Blood Banking
I: And the parents are supposed to do all that?
N1: Well they are, yeah. And some nurses will say, “Oh I don’t know anything
about that. That’s yours.” And just kinda leave it at that, even though they do because we’ve done so many of them. But it becomes a hassle because you’re kinda doing so many other things once the delivery has happened. You’re trying to clean up the mom, you’re checking on the baby, they’re usually really interested in breast feeding right away so you’re trying to get all these other things done, trying to, um, catch up on your charting a little bit if you weren’t able to chart those last fetal heart rates at the end, um, you’re trying to check on her, check her blood pressure, check her fundus, make sure the, er, oxy-‐, oxytocin is infusing afterwards. Um, so there’s a bunch of different things you’re trying to do and they’re trying to get this cord blood together and you’re kinda saying, “That’s your job.” But the dads are always kinda look-‐, scratching their head, ‘cause they know it’s an expensive thing for them to purchase and I know that they don’t want to screw it up, um, so I normally help them, but I know a lot of other nurses don’t. They say, “That’s yours. Read the instructions.”
The nurse’s quote paints a compelling picture of the collection and post-‐collection activities in a hospital birthing room and the work that many nurses do to ensure a successful cord blood collection and transport. She describes the unrecognized, but crucial work of informing the doctor that there is a cord blood collection, of
arranging the materials in the kit on the sterile delivery tray for the physician, and of assisting partners with labeling and packing up the cord blood unit. Nurses who assist with the post-‐collection work do so in addition to their clinical work of
managing women’s recovery post-‐birth and managing the third phase of delivery in which a woman’s uterus must be monitored for hemorrhaging. Clearly, successful cord blood collections by physicians in hospitals depend on the work of nurses, extra work that private banks and hospitals do not recognize or remunerate. Another important step in cord blood collection is the proper packing and labeling of the cord blood unit for transport to the private bank. The labels require identifying information such as the names of the woman and physician, the date and time of birth and cord blood collection. Nurses often assist partners with these labels since s/he may miss details such as the name of the attending physician and/or the specific time of birth given the excitement and circumstances of the
birthing experience. Packing the cord blood collection involves placing the cord blood in specific biohazard bags and sealing them for transport. Each private bank has its own specific labeling and packing instructions requiring partners and nurses to follow instructions specific to each bank. N1 described one collection for a bank that required the cord blood collection tube be flushed prior to packing and sealing. She explained that the partner who was charged with this responsibility was
confused with this technical requirement and so she assisted with flushing the tube. Nurses straddle both clinical practice and the commercial requirements of the private banks and do much of the unrecognized, yet necessary work required for a successful cord blood collection.
Once the cord blood is labeled and packaged, most often with the assistance of a nurse or midwife, partners often called a courier or a family member, to pick up the cord blood unit and take it to the private bank’s laboratory. Some private banks require women and couples to use specific medical couriers to transport the cord blood, while other banks allow women to choose their mode of transport. In the case of one private bank, the medical courier they require transports the cord blood in a bag that contains a computer chip that monitors the temperature of the bag from the time it picks up the cord blood unit to the moment it drops it off at the laboratory. The information on this computer chip is downloaded onto a computer and the bank maintains a record of the specific temperature and temperature variation of the cord blood from the moment of pick up. Thus begins the highly technical process of transforming the cord blood unit to a bankable product.
Conclusion
In her book, More Work for Mother, Ruth Cowan (1983) shows how
industrialization of the home and the introduction of new “time saving” appliances, such as the microwave, actually increased, not decreased, women’s domestic work. Private banks market cord blood banking as requiring very little, if any, work by women. However, unlike the marketing rhetoric of private banks that erase
women’s work in banking, I show in this chapter how women are crucial to the successful collection of a cord blood unit. Moreover, I argue that women actively engage in coordinating work between the clinical practices and logics of the hospital and the commercial practices and logics of the private bank. I show how the
insertion of commercial practices into a clinical space produces tensions and potential confusion among the various social actors and most often women and nurses step in to do the work needed to collect cord blood. I also suggest that private cord blood banking is another example of the domestication of health technologies or tools (Childerhose & MacDonald 2013) in which the work and responsibility for the use, or production, of the health tool is shifted from clinicians to laypeople and from exclusively inside the clinic to outside or multiple sites. Ironically, at the most crucial point of cord blood collection post-‐birth, women feel the height of responsibility and yet are least able to intervene physically. In spite of this physical challenge, they were actively engaged in ensuring the cord blood had been collected. Even when women were lying on a hospital bed, many having had their bodies surgically opened up to deliver their child, they spoke about asking about the cord blood and worrying about whether or not enough had been collected. Science and technology scholars have studied the production of biological materials as research tools or objects for scientific research. Scholars have examined the cultural and scientific production of specific cell lines, such as the HeLa cell line, as scientific tools to study specific diseases (Landecker 2007), the procurement and use of female reproductive tissues for use in stem cell science (Waldby & Cooper 2008), and the transformation and standardization of entire organisms, such as the OncoMouseTM, into research tools (Haraway 1997). In this
Chapter, I have foregrounded the experiences of women to analyze their work in banking cord blood. In addition to the work of experts and technicians, I argue that women are key actors in transforming biological materials into valuable objects that are implicated in contemporary bioeconomies. In the next chapter, I follow the cord blood unit once it has been received at the private bank’s laboratory and turn to a
detailed analysis of the socio-‐technical process of transforming the collected cord blood to blood stem cells that are cryopreserved for future use. I focus my analysis on the production, and loss, of value in the cord blood stem cells as it is produced into a potential therapeutic object.
Chapter 4: From “Waste” to (Fool’s) “Gold”: The Unstable Biovalue of