• No results found

7 Conclusion

7.1 Implications and future research

7.1.3 Policy Implications

As seen in the introduction, Norway has a documented problem with both innovation in general and cleantech entrepreneurship in particular. However, if the Norwegian Research Council or related agencies decide to develop a space which supports cleantech entrepreneurship in a manner similar to Greentown Labs, there will be some significant challenges.

A common top-down approach to Science Park design in the past has emphasized the internal resources that are provided to members. However, this study revealed that this view is one sided and fails to consider the significant role that external input streams play incubator success. It must be recognized that the success of an incubator is highly dependent on its context and have relevant and high quality resource input streams. They particularly come in

63

the form of university students and graduates, government grants and possibly other local incubators and accelerator programs which can feed into it.

Although not the focus of my thesis, it may be implicitly inferred from the results that one way to increase the quantity and quality of dealflow to current and future Norwegian incubators may be to support programs which provide similar input streams. For example, the MassCEC intern program seems to effectively support existing local startups while also creating a pipeline for future entrepreneurial talent. The Cleantech Open and Mass Challenge programs also provided significant dealflow for new Greentown companies. Investigating these or similar programs further to develop a model for a comprehensive entrepreneurial ecosystem may be worthwhile.

64

Appendix

Interview Guide

Member Company Employee Guiding Questions:

First, get basic information: number of founders and employees, founder backgrounds, date of founding, date of when they joined Greentown, main product and business model.

Then:

Why did your company join Green Town Labs?

Where were you before joining? What is different? How has Greentown effected the company?

Do you use the physical resources found here? If so, how?

Do you employ the incubator services made available by the Green Town staff and partners? If so, how?

How do you interact with the other companies here? Do you ever help each other or collaborate?

If so, how?

How do you view your fellow companies here?

What would your company be doing if you were not in Green Town?

How has the proximity to Artisan’s Asylum effected you? Do you use your institutional membership? If so, how?

Green Town Administration Guiding Questions:

What services do you offer your member companies (both formal and informal)?

How do you find member companies? If there are many applicants, what criteria do you use to select them?

Why did you recently move from Boston to Somerville?

What is your role here? How do you support member companies?

What kind of resource sharing – physical or otherwise -- among member companies have you observed?

What is your vision for the future of Green Town?

65

Other incubators near Greentown

Table 8 Business incubators within a 1 hour radius of Greentown

Name Note

Arthur M Blank Center for Entrepreneurship Associated with Babson College

BioSquare Focused on biomedical companies

Cambridge Innovation Center Currently home to over 600 companies,

mostly startups Enterprise Center at Salem State University -

Institute for Energy & Sustainability A “virtual” incubator. Offers services, but no physical space

Massachusetts Biomedical Initiatives Focused on biomedical companies.

Massachusetts Medical Device Development Center Focused on biomedical companies.

Newburyport CleanTech Center A similar mission to Greentown

North Shore InnoVentures Double focus on cleantech and biotech

Quincy Center for Innovation Associated with Eastern Nazarene College,

South Shore Innovation and the City of Quincy

Commercial Ventures and Intellectual Property Tech transfer office for the University of Massachusetts

Venture Development Center Located on University of Massachusetts Boston campus, but contains teams from many different universities.

Incubators with documented crossover with Greentown are highlighted.

66

Member benefits for New England Clean Energy Council (cleanenergycouncil.org):

Tangible Benefits

Free and/or discounted attendance at NECEC events

Discounts on tickets or tables at Green Tie Gala

Discounts on industry partner events and conferences

Discount on exhibiting at industry partner conference showcase

Marketing exposure on our website, in our newsletter, through the press and on Twitter

Coordination of meetings and communications with state and federal government officials

Group insurance rates on health and property/casualty insurance through our partners at Chubb Group and William Gallagher Associates

Lobbying dollars saved through coordination of meetings with policymakers Intangible Benefits

Network with other clean energy thought leaders and influencers

Uncover new business, investment and research opportunities

Influence, impact and educate policymakers

Enhance your organization’s profile by participating in initiatives promoting economic growth, job creation and regional clean energy cluster development

Generate innovative ideas through interaction with domain experts

Show that your organization is committed to helping to grow the region’s clean energy economy

67

Agencies with SBIR programs (sbir.gov)

Department of Agriculture

Department of Commerce - National Institute of Standards and Technology

Department of Commerce - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Department of Defense

Department of Education

Department of Energy

Department of Health and Human Services

Department of Homeland Security

Department of Transportation

Environmental Protection Agency

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

National Science Foundation

68

Funding sources for Greentown companies

I have placed an * next to the funds awarded to companies that do not fit the given definition of cleantech. Greentown has a small number of companies (six at the time of writing) that do not align with their cleantech-focused mission, in industries ranging from robotics to oil and gas. It is not clear why these companies chose to make their home at Greentown or why they were accepted. These funds are asterisked because they are not typically awarded to clean tech companies, as discussed in the section titled “The resource stream that wasn’t: Venture Capital”.

City of Boston Green Triple Decker Pilots Fraunhofer Energy Savings Study

NAVAIR NCIAA Villgro 21 Ventures Solgenix

Grayghost Ventures Invested Development CASIS Grant*

DHS ARI Grant*

TrueVentures*

Slow Venture*

Highland Capital Partners Summer@Highland*

Rough Draft Ventures*

Energy Ventures*

Chevron Technology Ventures*

Mertz Holdings*

70

References

"List of Colleges and Universities in Metropolitan Boston." Web.

Abduh, Muhamad, et al. "Investigating and Classifying Clients' Satisfaction with Business Incubator Services." Managing Service Quality 17.1 (2007): 74-91. Print.

actionnewengland.org. Web.

Aernoudt, Rudy. "Incubators: Tool for Entrepreneurship?" Small Business Economics 23.2 (2004):

127-35. Print.

Alvarez, Sharon A., and Jay B. Barney. "Discovery and Creation: Alternative Theories of Entrepreneurial Action." Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 1.1-2 (2007): 11-26. Print.

Asylum, Artisan's. "Archiveabout " 2014. Web.

Barney, Jay. "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage." Journal of Management 17.1 (1991): 99-120. Print.

---. Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. 4th ed: Pearson, 2011. Print.

Bound, Kirsten, and Paul Miller. The Startup Factories: The Rise of Accelerator Programmes to Support New Technology Ventures: NESTA, 2011. Print.

Bowman, Cliff, and Veronique Ambrosini. "How the Resource-Based and the Dynamic Capability Views of the Firm Inform Corporate-Level Strategy." British Journal of Management 14.4 (2003): 289-303. Print.

Bøllingtoft, Anne, and John P. Ulhøi. "The Networked Business Incubator—Leveraging Entrepreneurial Agency?" Journal of Business Venturing 20.2 (2005): 265-90. Print.

Capitalist, Venture. Interview by Fullmer, Sarah. March 12 2014.

cep.mit.edu. "Mit Clean Energy Prize - Categories." Web.

cleanenergycouncil.org. Print.

cleanwebhackathon.com. Print.

Cohen, Susan. "What Do Accelerators Do? Insights from Incubators and Angels." Innovations:

Technology, Governance, Globalization 8.3-4 (2013): 19-25. Print.

Colombo, Massimo G., and Marco Delmastro. "How Effective Are Technology Incubators?: Evidence from Italy." Research Policy 31.7 (2002): 1103-22. Print.

Consultant, Engineering. Interview by Fullmer, Sarah. March 3 2014.

Consultant, Startup. Interview by Fullmer, Sarah. March 8 2014.

D’Aveni, Richard. "Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Management." New York (1994). Print.

Day, Rob. "So Who’s Still Funding Early-Stage Cleantech?" 2014. Web.

DeGuzman, Genevieve, Andrew Tang, and Campbell McKellar. Working in the Unoffice: A Guide to Coworking for Indie Workers, Small Businesses and Nonprofits. 2011. Print.

Deskmag. "The Coworking Forecast 2014." (2014). Print.

---. "The History of Coworking Presented by Deskmag." 2014. Web.

Dierickx, Ingemar, and Karel Cool. "Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage." Management Science 35.12 (1989): 1504-11. Print.

Directorate, Norwegian Petroleum. "The Petroleum Sector - Norway’s Largest Industry." Facts2013.

Print.

effectuation.org. Web.

Egidi, Massimo, and Alessandro Narduzzo. "The Emergence of Path-Dependent Behaviors in Cooperative Contexts." International Journal of Industrial Organization 15.6 (1997): 677-709.

Print.

Eisenhardt, Kathleen M, and Jeffrey A Martin. "Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?" Strategic management journal 21.10-11 (2000): 1105-21. Print.

71

Etzkowitz, Henry. "The New Visible Hand: An Assisted Linear Model of Science and Innovation Policy." Science and public policy 33.5 (2006): 310-20. Print.

Farr, Nick. (2009). Print.

Field, Christopher, et al. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability2014. Print.

Fjose, Sveinung, Magnus Utne Guldbrandsen, and Rasmus Bøgh Holmen. Olje- Og Gassnæringens Betydning for Arbeidsplasser Og Skatt I Norge Og Nord-Norge: Menon Business Economics, 2013. Print.

Gorenflo, Neal. "Are Hackerspaces Going Viral." 2011. Web.

greentownlabs.org. Web.

Gunnes, Hebe, et al. Report on Science &Technology Indicators for Norway 20132013. Print.

house.gov/capuano. Web.

Itami, Hiroyuki, and Thomas W Roehl. Mobilizing Invisible Assets. Harvard University Press, 1991.

Print.

King, Adelaide Wilcox. "Disentangling Interfirm and Intrafirm Causal Ambiguity: A Conceptual Model of Causal Ambiguity and Sustainable Competitive Advantage." Academy of Management Review 32.1 (2007): 156-78. Print.

Laws, General. "Massachusetts Clean Energy Technology Center." Title II, Chapter 23J, Section 9. Ed.

Legislature, Massachusetts. Print.

Learned, Edmund Philip, et al. Business Policy: Text and Cases. RD Irwin Homewood, IL, 1969. Print.

Lennon, Mark. "The Startup Accelerator Trend Is Finally Slowing Down." 2013. Web.

Lewis, David A. National Business Incubation Association. Does Technology Incubation Work? : A Critical Review of the Evidence. Athencs (Ohio): NBIA Publications, 2002. Print.

ma.cleanenergyeducation.org. Print.

masscec.com. Web.

Mazzucato, Mariana. "The Entrepreneurial State." Soundings 49.49 (2011): 131-42. Print.

Mian, Sarfraz A. "Assessing and Managing the University Technology Business Incubator: An Integrative Framework." Journal of Business Venturing 12.4 (1997): 251-85. Print.

Mielach, David. "Business Incubators and Accelerators: Here's the Big Difference " 2013. Web.

Moilanen, Jarkko. "Emerging Hackerspaces – Peer-Production Generation." Open Source Systems:

Long-Term Sustainability. Eds. Hammouda, Imed, et al. Vol. 378. Ifip Advances in Information and Communication Technology: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. 94-111. Print.

NBIA. "Selecting Clients." 2014. Web.

---. "What Is Business Incubation?" National Business Incubation Association. Web. 2014.

nordiccleantechopen.com. Web.

northeast.cleantechopen.com. Print.

---. Web.

Oakey, Raymond P. High-Technology Entrepreneurship. Routledge, 2012. Print.

OECD. Norway Overview2014. Print.

Penrose, Edith. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1959. Print.

Peters, Lois, Mark Rice, and Malavika Sundararajan. "The Role of Incubators in the Entrepreneurial Process." The Journal of Technology Transfer 29.1 (2004): 83-91. Print.

Pettis, Bre. "The Chaos Computer Club 1981-1984." (2008). Print.

Pettis, Bre, Astera, and multiple contributors. Hackerspaces: The Beginning. 2011. Print.

Phan, Phillip H., Donald S. Siegel, and Mike Wright. "Science Parks and Incubators: Observations, Synthesis and Future Research." Journal of Business Venturing 20.2 (2005): 165-82. Print.

Pitchbook. 2013 Venture Capital Cleantech Report 2013. Print.

Ray, Gautam, Jay B. Barney, and Waleed A. Muhanna. "Capabilities, Business Processes, and Competitive Advantage: Choosing the Dependent Variable in Empirical Tests of the Resource-Based View." Strategic Management Journal 25.1 (2004): 23-37. Print.

Reichert, Emily Dr. Interview by Fullmer, Sarah. March 10 2014.

Ricardo, David. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. 1821. Print.

72

Sanford, Todd, et al. "The Climate Policy Narrative for a Dangerously Warming World." Nature Clim.

Change 4.3 (2014): 164-66. Print.

Sarasvathy, Saras D. "What Makes Entrepreneurs Entrepreneurial." Harvard Business Review 21 (2001): 2001. Print.

Sarasvathy, SarasD, and Nicholas Dew. "New Market Creation through Transformation." Journal of Evolutionary Economics 15.5 (2005): 533-65. Print.

sbir.gov. Web.

Schrock, Andrew. "A Hackerspace Primer: Makers, Hackers and Teachers." (2011). Print.

Selznick, Philip. Leadership in Administration. 1957. Print.

Siegel, Donald S, Paul Westhead, and Mike Wright. "Assessing the Impact of University Science Parks on Research Productivity: Exploratory Firm-Level Evidence from the United Kingdom."

International Journal of Industrial Organization 21.9 (2003): 1357-69. Print.

Simon, H. "The Sciences of the Artificial." (1981). Print.

Spinuzzi, Clay. "Working Alone Together: Coworking as Emergent Collaborative Activity." Journal of Business and Technical Communication 26.4 (2012): 399-441. Print.

SSB.no. "Ssb.No." Web.

Teece, David, and Gary Pisano. "The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction." Industrial and Corporate Change 3.3 (1994): 537-56. Print.

Wernerfelt, Birger. "A Resource-Based View of the Firm." Strategic Management Journal 5.2 (1984):

171-80. Print.

Westhead, P., et al. An Assessment of Firms Located on and Off Science Parks in the United Kingdom.

H.M. Stationery Office, 1994. Print.

Westhead, Paul. "R&D ‘Inputs’ and ‘Outputs’ of Technology-Based Firms Located on and Off Science Parks." R&D Management 27.1 (1997): 45-62. Print.

Wilson, Jonathan. Essentials of Business Research: A Guide to Doing Your Research Project. SAGE Publications, Inc, 2010. Print.

Yin, Robert. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Applied Social Research Methods: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2013. Print.

Zahra, Shaker A., Harry J. Sapienza, and Per Davidsson. "Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities:

A Review, Model and Research Agenda*." Journal of Management Studies 43.4 (2006): 917-55. Print.

73

Related documents