• No results found

D Private information and maximum delay

Consider again the path (i0, i1, i2, ..., ik, ik+1) that connects seller s (player i0) to buyer b (player ik+1). Players negotiate how to split the surplus via successive bilateral bargaining sessions in the following order: (ik, ik+1), (ik1, ik), (ik2, ik1), ..., (i1, i2), (i0, i1). Suppose now that the players have private information. They are uncertain about each others’ discount factors. Player i’s discount factor lies in the range [Ii, Pi], where 0 < Ii  Pi < 1. The types are independently drawn from the interval [Pi , Ii] according to the probability distribution pi, i  N.

Lemma 6. Consider the sequence (ik, ik+1), (ik1, ik), (ik2, ik1), ..., (i1, i2), (i0, i1) of k +1 bilateral bargaining sessions with private information in which the probability distributions are common knowledge and in which the period length shrinks to zero.

For any perfect Bayesian equilibria, the payo of player ik+1l in each bilateral bargaining session (ikl, ik+1l) belongs to

This lemma follows from Watson (1998) Theorem 1. Whether or not all payos within the intervals given in Lemma 6 are possible depends on the distributions over types. As Watson (1998) stated ”each player will be no worse than he would be in equilibrium if it were common knowledge that he were his least patient type and the opponent were his most patient type. Furthermore, each player will be no better than he would be in equilibrium with the roles reversed”. Since we allow for general probability distributions over discount factors, multiplicity of perfect Bayesian equilibria (PBE) is not an exception (even when the game is almost with complete information).

The maximum number of bargaining periods player ik+1l would spend nego-tiating in the bilateral bargaining session (ikl, ik+1l), I (m(ikl, ik+1l)), is given

Notice that I (m(ikl, ik+1l)) is simply the integer part of m(ikl, ik+1l). It is cus-tomary to express the players’ discount factors in terms of discount rates, ri > 0, and the length of the bargaining period, , according to the formula i = exp (ri).

With this interpretation, player i’s type is identified with the discount rate ri, where ri  [rPi , riI]. We thus have that Ii = exp(riI) and Pi = exp(rPi). Note that riI  riP since greater patience implies a lower discount rate. As  approaches zero, using l’Hopital’s rule we obtain that

D(ikl, ik+1l) = lim

0(m(ikl, ik+1l)· ) =  1 rk+1lP ·log

 rklP

rk+1lI · rklI + rk+1lP rklP + rk+1lI

 , which is a positive, finite number. Notice that D(ikl, ik+1l) converges to zero as riP and riI become close. Given the equilibrium trading path (s, i1, i2, ..., ik, b), the maximum real delay time in reaching a global agreement is D(s, i1, i2, ..., ik, b) = D(s, i1) + D(i1, i2) + ... + D(ik, b).

References

[1] Abreu, D. and M. Manea, 2012. Bargaining and eciency in networks. Forth-coming in Journal of Economic Theory.

[2] Babus, A., 2012. Endogenous intermediation in over-the-counter markets.

Mimeo, Imperial College London, UK.

[3] Blume, L.E., D. Easley, J. Kleinberg and E. Tardos, 2009. Trading networks with price-setting agents. Games and Economic Behavior 67, 36-50.

[4] Cai, H., 2003. Inecient markov perfect equilibria in multilateral bargaining.

Economic Theory 22, 583-606.

[5] Calvo-Armengol, A., 2003. A decentralized market with trading links. Mathe-matical Social Sciences 45, 83-103.

[6] Condorelli, D. and A. Galeotti, 2012a. Bilateral trading in networks. Mimeo, University of Essex, UK.

[7] Condorelli, D. and A. Galeotti, 2012b. Endogenous trading networks. Mimeo, University of Essex, UK.

[8] Corominas-Bosch, M., 2004. Bargaining in a network of buyers and sellers.

Journal of Economic Theory 115, 35-77.

[9] Craig, B. and G. von Peter, 2010. Interbank tiering and money center banks.

BIS Working Papers 322, Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzer-land.

[10] Cramton, P.C., 1992., Strategic delay in bargaining with two-sided uncertainty.

Review of Economic Studies 59, 205-225.

[11] Dutta, B., S. Ghosal and D. Ray, 2005. Farsighted network formation. Journal of Economic Theory 122, 143-164.

[12] Dutta, B. and S. Mutuswami, 1997. Stable networks. Journal of Economic The-ory 76, 322-344.

[13] Easley, D. and J. Kleinberg, 2010. Networks, crowds and markets: reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA.

[14] Elliott, M., 2012. Ineciencies in networked markets. Mimeo, Caltech, USA.

[15] Gale, D.M. and S. Kariv, 2009. Trading in networks: a normal form game experiment. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 1, 114-132.

[16] Gofman, M., 2011. A network-based analysis of over-the-counter markets.

Mimeo, University of Wisconsin, USA.

[17] Goyal, S., 2007. Connections: an introduction to the economics of networks.

Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA.

[18] Goyal, S., and F. Vega-Redondo, 2007. Structural holes in social networks.

Journal of Economic Theory 137, 460-492.

[19] Granovetter, M., 1983. The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited.

Sociological Theory 1, 201-233.

[20] Herings, P.J.-J., A. Mauleon and V. Vannetelbosch, 2009. Farsightedly stable networks. Games and Economic Behavior 67, 526-541.

[21] Hojman, D.A. and A. Szeidl, 2008. Core and periphery in networks. Journal of Economic Theory 139, 295-309.

[22] Jackson, M.O., 2008. Social and economic networks. Princeton University Press:

Princeton, NJ, USA.

[23] Jackson, M.O. and A. Wolinsky, 1996. A strategic model of social and economic networks. Journal of Economic Theory 71, 44-74.

[24] Jackson, M.O. and A. van den Nouweland, 2005. Strongly stable networks.

Games and Economic Behavior 51, 420-444.

[25] Kranton, R.E. and D.F. Minehart, 2001. A theory of buyer-seller networks.

American Economic Review 91, 485-508.

[26] Manea, M., 2011. Bargaining in stationary networks. American Economic Re-view 101, 2042-2080.

[27] Mauleon, A., J.J. Sempere-Monerris and V. Vannetelbosch, 2011. Networks of manufacturers and retailers. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 77, 351-367.

[28] Page, F.H., Jr. and M. Wooders, 2009. Strategic basins of attraction, the path dominance core, and network formation games. Games and Economic Behavior 66, 462—487.

[29] Polanski, A., 2007. Bilateral bargaining in networks. Journal of Economic The-ory 134, 557-565.

[30] Rubinstein, A., 1982. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50, 97-109.

[31] Siedlarek, J.P., 2012. Intermediation in networks. Nota di Lavoro 42/2012, Eu-ropean University Institute, Florence, Italy.

[32] Suh, S.-C. and Q. Wen, 2009. A multi-agent bilateral bargaining model with endogenous protocol. Economic Theory 40, 203-226.

[33] Wang, P. and A. Watts, 2006. Formation of buyer—seller trade networks in a quality-dierentiated product market. Canadian Journal of Economics 39, 971-1004.

[34] Watson, J., 1998. Alternating-oer bargaining with two-sided incomplete infor-mation. Review of Economic Studies 65, 573-594.

Recent titles CORE Discussion Papers

2012/8. Kirill BORISSOV, Thierry BRECHET and Stéphane LAMBRECHT. Environmental maintenance in a dynamic model with heterogenous agents.

2012/9. Ken-Ichi SHIMOMURA and Jacques-François THISSE. Competition among the big and the small.

2012/10. Pierre PESTIEAU and Grégory PONTHIERE. Optimal lifecycle fertility in a Barro-Becker economy.

2012/11. Catherine KRIER, Michel MOUCHART and Abderrahim OULHAJ. Neural modelling of ranking data with an application to stated preference data.

2012/12. Matthew O. JACKSON and Dunia LOPEZ-PINTADO. Diffusion and contagion in networks with heterogeneous agents and homophily.

2012/13. Claude D'ASPREMONT, Rodolphe DOS SANTOS FERREIRA and Jacques THEPOT. Hawks and doves in segmented markets: A formal approach to competitive aggressiveness.

2012/14. Claude D'ASPREMONT and Rodolphe DOS SANTOS FERREIRA. Household behavior and individual autonomy: An extended Lindahl mechanism.

2012/15. Dirk VAN DE GAER, Joost VANDENBOSSCHE and José Luis FIGUEROA. Children's health opportunities and project evaluation: Mexico's Oportunidades program.

2012/16. Giacomo VALLETTA. Health, fairness and taxation.

2012/17. Chiara CANTA and Pierre PESTIEAU. Long term care insurance and family norms.

2012/18. David DE LA CROIX and Fabio MARIANI. From polygyny to serial monogamy: a unified theory of marriage institutions.

2012/19. Carl GAIGNE, Stéphane RIOU and Jacques-François THISSE. Are compact cities environmentally friendly?

2012/20. Jean-François CARPANTIER and Besik SAMKHARADZE. The asymmetric commodity inventory effect on the optimal hedge ratio.

2012/21. Concetta MENDOLICCHIO, Dimitri PAOLINI and Tito PIETRA. Asymmetric information and overeducation.

2012/22. Tom TRUYTS. Stochastic signaling: Information substitutes and complements.

2012/23. Pierre DEHEZ and Samuel FEREY. How to share joint liability: A cooperative game approach.

2012/24. Pilar GARCIA-GOMEZ, Erik SCHOKKAERT, Tom VAN OURTI and Teresa BAGO D'UVA.

Inequity in the face of death.

2012/25. Christian HAEDO and Michel MOUCHART. A stochastic independence approach for different measures of concentration and specialization.

2012/26. Xavier RAMOS and Dirk VAN DE GAER. Empirical approaches to inequality of opportunity:

principles, measures, and evidence.

2012/27. Jacques H. DRÈZE and Erik SCHOKKAERT. Arrow's theorem of the deductible : moral hazard and stop-loss in health insurance.

2012/28 Luc BAUWENS and Giuseppe STORTI. Computationally efficient inference procedures for vast dimensional realized covariance models.

2012/29. Pierre DEHEZ. Incomplete-markets economies: The seminar work of Diamond, Drèze and Radner.

2012/30 Helmuth CREMER, Pierre PESTIEAU and Grégory PONTHIÈRE. The economics of long-term care: a survey.

2012/31 Mathieu VAN VYVE, Laurence A. WOLSEY and Hande YAMAN. Relaxations for two-level multi-item lot-sizing problem.

2012/32 Jean-François MERTENS and Anna RUBINCHIK. Equilibria in an overlapping generations model with transfer policies and exogenous growth.

2012/33 Jean-François MERTENS and Anna RUBINCHIK. Pareto optimality of the golden rule equilibrium in an overlapping generations model with production and transfers.

2012/34 Hélène LATZER and Florian MAYNERIS. Income distribution and vertical comparative advantage. Theory and evidence.

2012/35 Pascal MOSSAY and Takatoshi TABUCHI. Preferential trade agreements harm third countries.

Recent titles

CORE Discussion Papers - continued

2012/36 Aitor CALO-BLANCO. The compensation problem with fresh starts.

2012/37 Jean-François CARPANTIER and Arnaud DUFAYS. Commodities volatility and the theory of storage.

2012/38 Jean-François CARPANTIER and Christelle SAPATA. Unfair inequalities in France: A regional comparison.

2012/39 Shui-Ki WAN, Shin-Huei WANG and Chi-Keung WOO. Total tourist arrival forecast:

aggregation vs. disaggregation.

2012/40 Thierry BRECHET, Yann MENIERE and Pierre M. PICARD. The clean development mechanism in a global carbon market.

2012/41 Nikolaos GEORGANTZIS, Rafael MONER-COLONQUES, Vicente ORTS and José J.

SEMPERE-MONERRIS. Theoretical and experimental insights on firms' internationalization decisions under uncertainty.

2012/42 Berardino CESI and Dimitri PAOLINI. Peer group and distance: when widening university participation is better.

2012/43 Arnaud DUFAYS. Infinite-state Markov-switching for dynamic volatility and correlation models.

2012/44 Miguel JARA, Dimitri PAOLINI and J.D. TENA. Management efficiency in football: An empirical analysis of two extreme cases.

2012/45 Guillaume ROELS, Philippe CHEVALIER and Ying WEI. United we stand? Coordinating capacity investment and allocation in joint ventures.

2012/46 Mikel BEDAYO, Ana MAULEON and Vincent VANNETELBOSCH. Bargaining and delay in trading networks.

Books

G. DURANTON, Ph. MARTIN, Th. MAYER and F. MAYNERIS (2010), The economics of clusters – Lessons from the French experience. Oxford University Press.

J. HINDRIKS and I. VAN DE CLOOT (2011), Notre pension en heritage. Itinera Institute.

M. FLEURBAEY and F. MANIQUET (2011), A theory of fairness and social welfare. Cambridge University Press.

V. GINSBURGH and S. WEBER (2011), How many languages make sense? The economics of linguistic diversity. Princeton University Press.

I. THOMAS, D. VANNESTE and X. QUERRIAU (2011), Atlas de Belgique – Tome 4 Habitat. Academia Press.

W. GAERTNER and E. SCHOKKAERT (2012), Empirical social choice. Cambridge University Press.

L. BAUWENS, Ch. HAFNER and S. LAURENT (2012), Handbook of volatility models and their applications. Wiley.

J-C. PRAGER and J. THISSE (2012), Economic geography and the unequal development of regions.

Routledge.

M. FLEURBAEY and F. MANIQUET (2012), Equality of opportunity: the economics of responsibility.

World Scientific.

J. HINDRIKS (2012), Gestion publique. De Boeck.

CORE Lecture Series R. AMIR (2002), Supermodularity and complementarity in economics.

R. WEISMANTEL (2006), Lectures on mixed nonlinear programming.

A. SHAPIRO (2010), Stochastic programming: modeling and theory.

Related documents