Chapter 6: Conclusion and Recommendations
6.1 Recommendations
The following recommendations have been identified for the City of Arroyo Grande to pursue based upon the work done to complete this project. They have been separated into two categories. The first is administrative, which provides recommendations related to how the City should administer the Planned Developments and their regulations. The second is legislative, which provides recommendations on how the City should handle these developments long-term.
6.1.1 Administrative Recommendations
1. The City should maintain permanent copies of this project at City Hall. This will allow staff to call upon these resources when needed.
2. The City should keep a bound copy of the Planned Development Guidebook at the front counter of City Hall. This will allow City staff to lookup information when requested by the public and more quickly answer questions as they arise. This will also help to ensure consistent information is provided.
3. The City should allow time for staff to review this project and its products. This will allow staff to better acquaint themselves with the Planned Developments in the City.
4. The City should provide its new planners with copies of this project. This will help new employees to better understand these areas of development and prepare for when inquiries are received regarding further development.
6.1.2 Legislative Recommendations
1. The City should further investigate the rezoning of properties within the Planned Development districts. This will inform staff and decision makers the overall political feasibility of undertaking a task like this. 2. The City should conduct appropriate public outreach to property
owners and Homeowner’s Associations in these districts to advise them that a rezoning is being undertaken to gain their input on the process. If the idea is well received, this will help staff and decision makers to determine if new zoning districts should be created or if the existing districts are satisfactory to be applied to the Planned
Developments.
3. The City should refrain from rezoning additional property into any of the five Planned Development districts. If additional properties are zoned into one of the Planned Developments, the regulations set at the time of approval should be codified into the appropriate Section of the Arroyo Grande Municipal Code.
4. The City should refrain from the creation of new Planned
Developments, as stated in Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Subsection 16.44.010.B. If new Planned Developments are created, they should resemble a Specific Plan for better long-term tracking or have their regulations codified as part of the approval process.
References
Associated Home Builders of the Greater Eastbay, Inc. (1972). The planned unit development handbook: A complete guide to planning, processing and developing the successful p.u.d. Berkeley, CA.
City of Arroyo Grande. (1994). Los Robles de Rancho Grande Design Manual.
City of Arroyo Grande. (1997). Los Jollas de Rancho Grande Design Manual.
City of Arroyo Grande. (1999). The Highlands at Rancho Grande Design Manual.
City of Arroyo Grande. (2001). Development Code, as amended. Retrieved from
http://library.municode.com/HTML/16194/level1/TIT16DECO.html#TO PTITLE
City of Arroyo Grande. (2010). Zoning map. Retrieved from http://www.arroyogrande.org/static/uploads/pdfs/document- center/maps/zoning.pdf
City of Belmont. (1970). Zoning Ordinance, as amended. Retrieved from http://www.belmont.gov/SubContent.asp?CatId=240000327&C_ID=24 0000531
City of Brentwood. (2008). Zoning Code, as amended. Retrieved from http://qcode.us/codes/brentwood/view.php?topic=17&frames=off City of Hollister. (2008). Zoning Code, as amended. Retrieved from
http://qcode.us/codes/hollister/view.php?topic=17&frames=off Craig, D. W. (1965). Planned unit development as seen from city hall.
University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 114(1). 127-135.
Elliott, D. L. (2008). A better way to zone: Ten principles to create more livable cities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Fulton, W. & Shigley, P. (2005). Guide to California planning. Point Arena, CA: Solano Press Books.
Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. (2012). Planning, zoning, and development laws: 2012 edition. Sacramento, CA.
Hanke, B. R. (1965). Planned unit development and land use intensity.
Knaap, G., Talen, E., Olshansky, R., & Forrest, C. (n.d.). Zoning, subdivision regulations, and urban development in Illinois. Springfield, IL: Illinois Department of Natural Resources.
Longtin, J. (1987). Longtin’s California land use: Planning, zoning, building, subdivision, environmental law (2nd ed.). Malibu, CA: Local
Government Publications.
Ma, C. (2012). Form-based codes, design guidelines and placemaking: The case of Hayward, CA. Master’s Thesis.
Mandelker. D. R. (1966). Controlling planned residential developments.
American Society of Planning Officials, 14(8).
Mandelker, D. R. (2007a). Planned unit developments: Planning advisory service report number 545. Washington, DC: American Planning Association.
Mandelker, D. R. (2007b). Land use law (4th ed.). Charlottesville, VA: Lexis Law Publishing.
Mandelker, D.R., Brown, C.N., Meck, S., Merriam, S., Salsich, Jr. P.W., Stroud, N.E., & Tappendorf, J.A. (2011). Planning and Control of Land
Development: Cases and Materials. Danvers, Mass: Matthew Bender
& Company, Inc.
Mandelker, D. R. (2012). The design problem in planned communities. Legal Studies Research Paper Series. St. Louis, MO: Washington University in St. Louis School of Law.
Meck, S. (1996). Model planning and zoning enabling legislation: A short history. In Modernizing state planning statutes: The growing smart working papers. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association. Meck, S. (2002). Growing smart legislative guidebook: Model statutes for
planning and the management of change. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.
Moore, C. G. & Siskin, C. (1985). PUDs in practice. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
Moravec, A. C. (2009). An analysis of planned unit development (pud) regulations and processes in Washington, DC: A development risk management case study. (Unpublished master’s project). University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Murphy, M. & Stinson, J. (1996). Planned unit development. New York, NY: Pace University School of Law.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2009). Essential smart growth fixes for urban and suburban zoning codes. Washington, DC: Kevin Nelson.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010a). Profile of general population and housing characteristics: Arroyo Grande, 2010. Retrieved from
http://factfinder2.census.gov/bkmk/table/1.0/en/DEC/10_SF1/SF1DP1/ 1600000US0602868
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010b). Profile of general population and housing characteristics: Belmont, 2010. Retrieved from
http://factfinder2.census.gov/bkmk/table/1.0/en/DEC/10_SF1/SF1DP1/ 1600000US0605108
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010c). Profile of general population and housing characteristics: Brentwood, 2010. Retrieved from
http://factfinder2.census.gov/bkmk/table/1.0/en/DEC/10_SF1/SF1DP1/ 1600000US0608142
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010d). Profile of general population and housing characteristics: Hollister, 2010. Retrieved from
http://factfinder2.census.gov/bkmk/table/1.0/en/DEC/10_SF1/SF1DP1/ 1600000US0634120
Van Hemert, J. (2007). Sustainable zoning: A new imperative. Rocky Mountain Land Use Institute. Denver, CO: University of Denver.