i is to put a heavy engine and shafting length, in perfect this indeterminate influence gives a realisation of how difficult it
REED'S GENERAL ENGINEERING KNOWLEDGE SHAFTING
Stiffening of tank tops and engine seating supports, together with the use of rigid bedplates, can reduce central deflection to a maximum of about 13 mm over the engine room length and less,
to about 2 mm maximum over the from the no load
to the full load condition. Invariably the has asag form when light ship of say 1 mm and a hog form when fully loaded of say 1 mm. The average ship is rarely sagged as can be shown by drawing load and buoyancy curves for average conditions. An engine crankshaft set true at light ship could when hogged 2 mm introduce static bending stresses of say 90 MN/m2. Most
engine builders have their own records and experiences for dealing with this problem (see Fig. 6.4).
It is often suggested that the engine main bearings in the above case should be lined down in a deflection curve, of 1 mm maximum in the centre of length, for the new engine. This means the shafting is true at load and maximum static bending stresses are on each side of this, 45 MN/m2 instead of true at
light ship giving all bending on one side, 90 MN/m2.
The figures quoted are intended for illustration only, using high values, in many cases lining in a curve may only require a deliberate offset of about one tenth of the quoted figures, 0.1 mm. The degree of offset depends on the type of ship and engine, stiffness, variations due to loading, etc. These factors can only be established correctly by experience before the builder can decide on the best method of lining up to suit the requirements of these variables. In the following alignment description this offset will not be considered (but see Fig. 6.4). Older alignment methods used piano wires and micrometers, feelers between coupling faces, etc., whereas modern methods utilise optical telescopes and targets giving accuracies of 2pm per 1 m length. To fully describe the methods it will be assumed that the shafting and engine are first lined up by the older method, being checked at each stage by the modern method, although in practice such duplication may not be considered due to time factors, that is not to say that it would not be advisable. Increased power, size and cost of modern vessels and engines make it essential to ensure correct initial alignment so as to avoid continuous trouble later.
athwartships) forward. These two datums are taken from the ship drawings.
The rough bore of the stern frame is fitted with a plate flange, this flange has a small hole (say 1 mm) drilled at the correct height above the keel. With this centre the reference circle can be drawn for the setting up of the exact boring of the frame. Similarly at the engine room forward bulkhead a small in the bulkhead has the small hole drilled at the correct engine height above the keel and at the point athwartships.
An electric light is sighted behind the hole in the forward machinery space bulkhead and by looking from outside stern frame this light can be seen through the two sight holes. Now at the aft peak bulkhead and the aft machinery space bulkhead and any water-tight bulkhead through which the shaft passes, sighting plates are used. At these points the horizontal plate is moved vertically up until the light line of sight is masked, a horizontal reference mark is now made across the bulkhead. The plate is moved vertically down until the light is masked and another horizontal reference mark made, bisection of these two lines gives the horizontal centre (see Fig. 6.1).
holes say 8 0 0 max error 1 6 mm e lmrn per say length
room stern f r a m e bulkhead forward bulkhead
I
bulkhead
Shafting Alignment in Ship
Reference datums here are the height of the shaft above the keel aft, and the height of the crankshaft centre above the keel extended to the forward machinery space bulkhead (also centre
hole
plate
end plan
SIGHTING BY LIGHT Fig. 6.1
214 REED'S SHAFTING 215 a l l equal shaft ,target line of sight journals couplings s h a f t
bearings No.6 No. No. No 3 No 2 No.
scale 5 0 0 . 0 5 0 0 . 0 1 - 0 8 - 2.0 - 2 1 - 0 . 9 0
I
crankshaftI
t a r g e t telescopetelescope rnlcrometers allow of 0 0 rnm on
but the on the telescope are graduated up to 25 rnrn allow much greater to be read
from target rnlcrometers a t
SIGHTING BY OPTICAL TELESCOPE Fig. 6.2
The same procedure is now repeated using vertical boards, moved horizontally port to starboard, bisection of these two lines gives the vertical centre. Rough bores are now bridged, the centre is fixed temporarily with a tin plate and a small hole is centred. Now from aft to forward a continuous light should be
visible through all bulkheads, the reference circles can now be drawn for exact boring. The exact borings are now made and the ship is ready for the optical telescope checking (see Fig. 6.2).
The optical telescope with eyepiece and cross lines, focus, vertical-horizontal micrometer adjustments, etc., is set up in a spherical mounting on a base with adjustment bracket (magnification about 30 times). The assembly is mounted on a spigoted plate and bolted into the aft end of the stern frame, being an exact fit. The target which has circular, vertical and horizontal markings is fitted into a n adjustable spherical mounting with a light. This assembly is fitted to a flange bracket and set at the correct height and athwartships position on the forward machinery space bulkhead.
I The telescope is now adjusted vertically and horizontally until
the target is perfectly centred, this is now the line of sight. Targets are now fitted into adaptor plates and placed with a tight fit into all intermediate bores. The telescope is focused on each in turn so giving any vertical or horizontal error, the telescope should be refocused on to the line of sight datum after each intermediate bore checking. Mirror targets can be used if it is thought desirable to check squareness. Now a check is available on the initial lining up which should indicate a close degree of accuracy.
At this stage the sterntube, tail end shaft and propeller would be fitted and the ship launched and taken to the fitting out berth, or the stern frame may be blanked and these fittings made after the launching. The intermediate shaft is now fitted right up to the engine by using feelers at four points between the coupling faces and chocking the tunnel bearings with hard wood blocks on to the stools. The intermediate shaft is now ready for checking with the telescope.
The line of sight for telescope and target is fixed at the extreme ends, positioned at equal distances from the two journal diameters by cups mounted on matched stands which are in blocks strapped to the shaft. The target is usually mounted on the first bearing in the tunnel and the telescope on the last bearing before the tail end shaft, and so the line of sight is established. Readings can now be taken for all intermediate bearings by focusing on a lighted graduated scale held vertically on each bearing in turn. A graph can now be plotted of any misalignment and the chocking adjusted until a true line is effected. It is also advisable to check all journal diameters for equality and also to take a horizontal alignment to ensure correct port and starboard line. All tunnel bearings are now
216 REED'S GENERAL ENGINEERING SHAFTING 217
permanently chocked and bolted down, coupling bolts fitted and thrust block (if separate) fitted and bolted to place. The ship is now ready for the engine fitting.
Crankshaft and Alignment in Sbops
The is first levelled up on the shop floor, usually in two parts, the whole assembly having been surface planed and the main bearing gaps machined. The is now lined up and rough chocked by the use of spirit levels. Piano wires are mounted along the full length of the bedplate, one port and one starboard, passing over end pulleys and loaded. Micrometer readings between wire and the machined top edge of are taken at say 1 m intervals, standard allowance being made for the wire sag, and the chocked up until a true horizontal reading is achieved. The is now ready for optical checking.
The telescope is mounted vertically, standing on adjustable tripod feet, the reference plane being obtained by mounting a pentagonal prism under the telescope (with a micrometer adjustment) and rotating it about an axis concentric with the telescope, this prism deviates the line of sight by The flat plane, being independent of gravity, is adjusted to pass through three definite height targets on the and a travelling target enables all other points on the surface to be adjusted to bring the whole area into that common plane. The lining up is completed by a set of readings through the bearing bores by piano wire or light method, being checked by optical telescope in a similar manner to the method previously described prior to fitting sterntube and tail end shaft (see Fig. 6.2).
A dummy shaft is now used to bed into the lower halves of the
main bearing bushes, after which the crankshaft is bedded to , place. A set of readings would be taken on the shaft, as I
described for the intermediate shaft, by optical telescope, the engine would then be assembled, crankshaft deflections taken and the test bed trial carried out. Before the engine is dismantled a set of piano wire readings, port and starboard, would be taken
from the together with a recheck of crankshaft
deflections. If the telescope was used then optical readings along the bedplate, port and starboard, would replace piano wire readings and in addition a set of readings on the crankshaft through the running gear would be taken, using the oil holes through the bearing caps for the scales. The engine is now dismantled to an extent whereby it can be easily transported and lifted into place on board ship.
The description given is somewhat elaborate, due mainly to the two method description given, but it should be remembered that if the engine setting in the shops is correct and a reference is taken, then ship alignment is much simplified by simply setting back to this correct reference alignment.
Engine to Shafting in Ship
The aft engine coupling is lined up to the forward thrust shaft face coupling with feelers. Screw jacks to place and temporary chocking between and tank top right the engine into position. The engine is now chocked to the final test bed readings taken before dismantling and the crankshaft deflections taken. The holding down bolts or studs are either fitted from a template set to the forward thrust block face or fitted with the in place. As a complete check on the whole integral setting of crankshaft and intermediate shaft the use of the optical telescope is most advantageous. This also allows a spot check on alignment without disturbing the shafting at any time.
Unfortunately a complete sight from shaft to forward end of the crankshaft is usually impossible due to the ship construction, as the height of sight required above the crankshaft causes the line to foul the tunnel roof a few feet aft of the aft engine room bulkhead.
Therefore the two lines of sight intermediate shaft and crankshaft sights respectively, have to be used. These lines of sight are extended to give as much overlap as possible. The measurement differences at No. 1 bearing and at thrust journal should be identical, indicating parallel lines. Divergence from each other indicates a gradient, length. To give maximum overlap a tube may be welded into the hold above the tunnel roof with a down tube to a bearing further along the intermediate shafting. Fouling of lines of sight may occur at the turning wheel, this can be overcome by slackening the halves and reclining the wheel over whilst still exerting its load on shaft.
This completes ship and engine alignment. A typical set of readings would be as plotted in Fig. 6.3 (opposed piston four cylinder oil engine and shafting).
Aft End Installations
Such engined vessels do not suffer the same misalignment effects due to the short rigid shaft length. There should be no need to line the engine down for load variations, the engine being lined exactly true, light ship, in the standard way. The
218 REED'S GENERAL ENGINEERING KNOWLEDGE
SHAFTING 219
main problem with these vessels is that the large tailshaft weardowns allowed (8 mm plus) in say a 5 m shaft connection to the engine, throws a heavy load on the aft end of the crankshaft. These vessels are somewhat more prone to tail shaft and aft end crankshaft failure. Very great care is advised in investigating torsional vibration characteristics. To offset the load it is advisable to fit the tunnel and thrust bearings with fitted top halves and it would be advantageous to limit very strictly. The alignment method is a more simple form of that described (due to shorter shafting) but it should be mentioned that even though the shaft length is small, alignment errors have caused serious trouble in such a short rigid length. Slew effects as much as 6 mm aft (crankshaft) to 18 mm forward (crankshaft) with an engine hogged vertically 3 mm have occurred in the past. Optical telescopes here allow a continuous sight forward to aft over extreme ends which is most advantageous.
Turbine Engined Vessels
The alignment of shafting is as described but the problem here, from the engine aspect, is virtually one of two or three turbine wheel shafts through pinions lined on to a large gear wheel thence to the thrust block. In the past, alignment errors have commonly reflected back through the gearing to cause excessive pitting, scuffing, heavy wear, etc., on the second reduction pinions. The turbine-gearing alignment was somewhat complex involving long inside micrometers, much cross siting to turbine stools and later to turbine wheel shafts, which with piano wires and light methods made the process highly detailed. In modern practice use of the optical telescope, together with the pentagonal prism for line of sight deviation, allows cross siting from a fixed standard flat reference plane (say horizontal gearcase-turbine joint) to any number of points including height checks of all bearings, making the gearwheel-turbines alignment much easier. The gearwheel will have been. lined to the thrust block face having previously checked by telescope through main wheel bearings. The following points are worthy of consideration:
(1) The lift of the shafts due to the oil film should be taken into account.
(2) Due to the high rotational speeds of the turbines there are precessional torque effects.
(3) The flexible coupling copes with a considerable degree of misalignment.
REED'S GENERAL ENGINEERING KNOWLEDGE ,
,
(4) Turbine troubles, when they do occur, seem to persist andinvariably stem from initial mis-alignment or vibration characteristic errors.
Pilgrim Wire Method
Reference has already been made to the use of taut (piano) wires and some elaboration of this method is relevant. This technique produces fairly accurate results especially in a vibration free situation. For crankshaft aligment with five cylinder engines and above, using telescope or wire methods, it is usually necessary to remove one connecting rod to allow the sight (or wire) to pass over the full shaft length. The alternative is to take readings with an overlap across two central main bearings, possibly at two different heights, and then adjust to a common datum. Allowance for wire sag varies with wire diameter and tension, an empirical formula is generally used. For a wire of 0.5 mm diameter, tension N, an approximate expression is sag= where sag is in mm and L (half length of wire) is in m. Interpretation of readings, and variation with ship loading conditions, are as described for telescope methods (Fig. 6.3).
A light method can be used in calibration. One pole of battery
I
is earthed and the other, in series with an indicator lamp, is connected to dial indicator touch stylus. As wire is earthed the slightest touch of stylus on wire causes indicator lamp to light.CRANKSHAFT DEFLECTIONS I
Excessive deflection of this form, in main or auxiliary reciprocating machinery, variation of distance between crankwebs during a full engine turn, causes dangerous bending stresses in web and fillet between and web. This deflection is indicative of true deflection, vertical hog or sag measurement, thus the value of these deflections can be assumed to be then dependent on two main factors for a given mass per unit length rods, pistons, etc.).
I (1) Distance between supports of shaft main bearing
inner faces), as the further apart the supports the greater the sag
, effect.
(2) Distance out from shaft centre line the measurement is taken. This is usually close to the extreme edge of the web. For a
I
in a shaft the further one moves from the shaft centre thegreater the The web's extreme distance dnd size of section is
SHAFTING 5 \ \ 3 3 No \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\
No 2 \ \ \i
\ \ \ \ \\ 3,
bulkhead scale 2 5 3 3 3SHAFTING ALIGNMENT VARIATION FOR DIFFERENT SHIP LOAD CONDITIONS
REED'S GENERAL ENGINEERING KNOWLEDGE SHAFTING 223 Note:
Vertical deflection = 5 for a simply supported
uniformly distributed loaded beam.
Thus as a generalisation it may be said that crankshaft deflection is proportional to total engine stroke and distance between main bearing faces. On this assumption Fig. 6.5 has been prepared. To illustrate its use:
Consider an engine of 1.5 m stroke and 1.5 m between main bearing faces. From Fig. 6.5 allowable test bed deflections (maximum) based on 1 m between bearing faces is 167 therefore for this engine (1.5 m between bearing faces) maximum initial deflection allowed is 250 Based on Fig. 6.5
as a rough approximation: Correct 70 m m face
distance (max. 118). Realign m m face
distance 330). A set of typical figures for a six cylinder IC engine and the method of taking deflections is as illustrated (Fig. 6.6 and Table 6.1).
ALLOWABLE DEFLECTIONS Fig. 6.5
crank for readings
effect of
cranks
t=b
cranks a t 'b'
DEFLECTION READINGS AND BEARING HEIGHTS Fig. 6.6
Stresses caused by static deflection are difficult to assess but
as a rough guide, each deflection (which may be
somewhere about 1 pm central vertical deflection) could cause a bending stress of about 33
It must be pointed out that specific must always be treated with extreme caution are only used for a general picture and guidance. Some engine manufacturers fix maximum deflection difference at (smaller single acting types) but opposed piston designs generally-cannot fix like such close limits. A scale ratio for the latter is over 3: 1.
224 REED'S GENERAL ENGINEERING KNOWLEDGE