Reflecting on the Nature of ICT and the Manner by which the Learning Process has Changed One’s Worldview

CONTENT

ICT, the self, and society

LEARNING COMPETENCIES

Create a reflective piece or output using an ICT tool, platform, or application of choice on the learning experience undergone during the semester.

OBJECTIVES

At the end of the class period, the teacher should be able to:

1. assist their students in reflecting on the nature of ICTs; and

2. elicit the student’s personal insights on the basic principles underlying how ICTs are empowerment tools to pursue knowledge, creative, liberating pursuits.

ACTIVITY No. 13

Instruct the students to make a reflection paper using an ICT platform or application of their choice to explain their journey of the learning process in making use of ICTs as an empowerment tool.

Guide Questions

1. How did this subject change the way you view ICT?

2. Are they tools to be used to achieve higher goals?

3. After going through the lessons and visiting online sites, reflect on how they are currently being used. Do you agree or disagree with it?

4. Based on your reflection, do you have recommendations regarding ICT uses in the country?

Assessment

Following is an example of a Rubric⁸ that may be used for the reflection paper.

Criteria Superior (54-60 points)

Sufficient (48-53 points)

Minimal (1-47 points)

Unacceptable an in-depth reflection on, and

personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date.

Viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and well

Response demonstrates a general

reflection on, and

personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date.

Viewpoints and interpretations are supported.

Appropriate

Response demonstrates a minimal

reflection on, and

personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date.

Viewpoints and interpretations are

unsupported or

Response demonstrates a lack of

reflection on, or personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date.

Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or

8Source: web.uri.edu/assessment/files/reflection_rubric.doc

Criteria Superior (54-60 points)

Sufficient (48-53 points)

Minimal (1-47 points)

Unacceptable (0 points) supported.

Clear, detailed examples are provided, as applicable.

examples are provided, as applicable.

supported with flawed

arguments.

Examples, when

applicable, are not provided or are irrelevant to the

assignment.

unsupported.

Examples, when

applicable, are not provided.

Required includes all components and meets or exceeds all requirements indicated in the instructions.

Each question or part of the assignment is addressed thoroughly. All attachments and/or additional documents are included, as required.

Response includes all components and meets all requirements indicated in the instructions.

Each question or part of the assignment is addressed. All attachments and/or additional documents are included, as required.

Response is missing some components and/or does not fully meet the requirements indicated in the instructions.

Some questions or parts of the assignment are not addressed.

Some attachments and additional documents, if required, are missing or unsuitable for the purpose of the and/or does not address the requirements indicated in the instructions.

Many parts of the assignment are addressed minimally,

Writing is clear, concise, and well organized with excellent sentence/parag raph

construction.

Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner.

Writing is mostly clear, concise, and well organized with good sentence/parag raph

construction.

Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and

Writing is unclear and/or disorganized.

Thoughts are not expressed in a logical manner. There are more than five spelling, grammar, or syntax errors

Writing is unclear and disorganized.

Thoughts ramble and make little sense. There are numerous spelling, grammar, or syntax errors

Criteria Superior (54-60 points)

Sufficient (48-53 points)

Minimal (1-47 points)

Unacceptable (0 points) There are no

more than three spelling, grammar, or syntax errors per page of writing.

logical manner.

There are no more than five spelling, grammar, or syntax errors per page of writing.

per page of writing.

throughout the response. shows strong evidence of synthesis of ideas

presented and insights gained throughout the entire course.

The

implications of these insights for the

respondent's overall teaching practice are thoroughly detailed, as applicable.

Response shows evidence of synthesis of ideas

presented and insights gained throughout the entire course.

The

implications of these insights for the

respondent's overall teaching practice are presented, as applicable.

Response shows little evidence of synthesis of ideas

presented and insights gained throughout the entire course.

Few

implications of these insights for the

respondent's overall teaching practice are presented, as applicable.

Response shows no evidence of synthesis of ideas

presented and insights gained throughout the entire course.

No implications for the

respondent's overall teaching practice are presented, as applicable.

additional online teacher resources

…and screenshots

https://globalearlyed.wordpress.com/global-tools/teacher-tools/

https://www.commonsensemedia.org/

http://www.iste.org/standards/iste-standards/standards-for-students https://www.google.com/safetycenter/everyone/sta rt/

http://www.edutopia.org/blog/classroom-collaboration-tools-eric-brunsell
 https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/17408 4?hl=en

https://scholar.google.com/


http://lifehacker.com/the-best-collaboration-tools-for-small-groups-and-teams-1477548590

https://docs.gimp.org/en/index.html. https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Feature_Com parison:_LibreOffice_-_Microsoft_Office

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/5140437449402658 92/


https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Web_design

http://en.community.epals.com/epals/support/p/we b-tools.aspx

https://www.ted.com/speakers/howard_rheingold