5.7. Fault Detection Sensitivity
5.7.2. Rotor Sideband Power Factor (SBPF rotor ) Algorithm
Similarly to the previous case, based on the Durham WTCMTR experimental
results shown in Section 5.4.2, the ππ΅ππΉπππ‘ππ detection sensitivity to generator
rotor electrical asymmetry, %ππ΅ππΉπππ‘ππ, has been calculated as
%ππ΅ππΉπππ‘ππ =(ππ΅ππΉπππ‘ππ)πβ (ππ΅ππΉπππ‘ππ)β
(ππ΅ππΉπππ‘ππ)β Γ 100 (5.12)
where (ππ΅ππΉπππ‘ππ)β and (ππ΅ππΉπππ‘ππ)π are the healthy and faulty ππ΅ππΉπππ‘ππ
values, respectively, under similar operating conditions. The results are shown in Figure 5.18.
Figure 5.18: ππ΅ππΉπππ‘ππ detection sensitivity to 21% and 43% rotor asymmetry
conditions for the experimentally investigated WTCMTR power loads.
As for balanced rotor the ππ΅ππΉπππ‘ππ magnitude does not vary
significantly with the load, Figure 5.12, %ππ΅ππΉπππ‘ππ varies almost
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 %SB PF rot or [%] Power [%] 21% Rotor Asymmetry 43% Rotor Asymmetry
161
exponentially with the load for both rotor asymmetry seeded-fault datasets.
The sensitivity analysis shows that ππ΅ππΉπππ‘ππ proves successful in the
detection of both low and high stages of rotor fault level, with average detection sensitivities of 743% and 1897%, respectively. Under similar load conditions, the sensitivity function increases with the fault severity showing
the ππ΅ππΉπππ‘ππ ability to clear discriminate the fault levels and to provide an
early fault detection.
5.7.3.
Harmonic Power Factor (HPF) Algorithm
Based on the experimental results from the Manchester test rig presented in Section 5.6, the π»ππΉ detection sensitivity to generator bearing outer race fault, %π»ππΉ, has been calculated as
%π»ππΉ =π»ππΉπβ π»ππΉβ
π»ππΉβ Γ 100 (5.13)
where π»ππΉβ and π»ππΉπ are the healthy and faulty π»ππΉ values, respectively,
under similar steady-state operating speeds conditions. Table 5.1 and Table 5.2 summarise the %π»ππΉ values for the generator bearing fault conditions investigated in this research and for the data collected by the vertical and the horizontal accelerometers, respectively. As expected, the average π»ππΉ detection sensitivity, %π»ππΉ, increases with the fault level. The vertical accelerometer data provides higher detection sensitivity than the horizontal accelerometer for the lowest bearing fault severity investigated, i.e. 3 mm hole. Comparable %π»ππΉ magnitudes are obtained for the intermediate fault condition from both accelerometers, while the horizontal accelerometer data exhibits the highest %π»ππΉ magnitude for the last stage of bearing fault investigated. In both cases, the results show the π»ππΉ algorithm ability to clearly discriminate the fault severity regardless of the generator speed.
162
The successful application of the π»ππΉ algorithm to vibration signals from the two independent accelerometers strengthens the confidence in its fault detection and diagnosis capability, eventually reducing false alarms.
5.8. Summary
This chapter presents the experimental work conducted on two WT small- scale test rigs. The test rigs have been operated at constant and wind-like variable speed conditions and a number of seeded-faults have been applied and detected.
Seeded-fault tests have been performed by the Author on the Durham WTCMTR to investigate gearbox HS pinion tooth damage, through vibration signature analysis, and generator rotor electrical asymmetry, through
sensitivity for the vertical accelerometer dataset. Generator Speed
(rev/min)
Bearing Fault Severity
3 mm hole 6 mm hole 12 mm hole
1530 197% 4675% 18735%
1560 177% 2708% 12953%
1590 217% 1448% 15855%
Average %π»ππΉ 197% 2944% 15848%
Table 5.2: Generator drive-end side bearing damage average π»ππΉ detection sensitivity for the horizontal accelerometer dataset.
Generator Speed (rev/min)
Bearing Fault Severity
3 mm hole 6 mm hole 12 mm hole
1530 86% 4050% 48456%
1560 63% 1872% 27188%
1590 54% 2810% 35284%
163
electrical and vibration signature analysis. Further experimental data, relative to the investigation of rotor electrical asymmetry and generator bearing faults, through vibration signature analysis, has been provided to the Author for analysis and processing from the University of Manchester.
In each case the relevant fault frequencies of interest, introduced throughout Chapter 3, have been investigated by using conventional FFT spectra provided by commercial WT CMSs. Identifiable fault frequencies have been extracted from the rig signatures and used to reflect the health of the component. Three novel algorithms have been then designed to track the observed fault component total power for automatic WT damage detection
and diagnosis: the ππ΅ππΉππππ, the ππ΅ππΉπππ‘ππ and the π»ππΉ algorithms. The main
aim of these algorithms is to automatically analyse and interpret the large volumes of CM data usually produced by a CMS in a WF, significantly reducing the large degree of manual analysis currently required.
For gearbox HS pinion tooth damage, the proposed ππ΅ππΉππππ algorithm
has proved to be a reliable gear health indicator, successfully allowing the assessment of the fault severity by tracking the progressive tooth damage introduced on the WTCMTR during variable speed and load conditions. The proposed algorithm has successfully detected both early and final stages of tooth damage, showing a higher effectiveness at the percentage loads above 20% and average detection sensitivity of 100% and 320%, respectively.
For generator rotor asymmetry detection through electrical signature analysis, the experimental results have demonstrated the benefits of tracking
the ππ΅ππΉπππ‘ππ values as the speeds and loads vary. The algorithm has proved
capable of enabling clear fault detection, for both early and advanced stages of rotor fault, with average detection sensitivity of 743% and 1897%, respectively. In the case of the Durham WTCMTR, the analysis of generator vibration signature was shown to enable rotor asymmetry detection via the
164
observed changes in magnitude of the |2π |ππ upper SB of the supply frequency
second harmonic.
Finally, the π»ππΉ algorithm has proved to be a reliable indicator of the outer race bearing faults investigated during the seeded-fault tests. The proposed algorithm worked successfully achieving clear fault detection, from early to more severe levels of bearing fault, under the steady-state conditions investigated during the tests, with large average detection sensitivities. The work presented in this Thesis clearly demonstrates the potential of developing WT real-time tracking applications based on the π»ππΉ algorithm.
165
SBPFgear Case Study: Validation against
NREL 750kW Gearbox
6.1. Introduction
Based on the experimental evidence from the Durham WTCMTR, a novel
fault detection algorithm, the Gear Sideband Power Factor, ππ΅ππΉππππ,
specifically developed to aid in the detection of WT gear tooth damage has been presented in Section 5.4.1. By tracking the overall power of the FFT
spectra associated with the 2π₯ππππ β,π»π SB frequency window, ππ΅ππΉππππ proved
effective in detecting the presence of the gear damage introduced into the 30 kW WTCMTR gearbox, that is, damage location, and in identifying the precise damaged gear, that is, damage diagnosis. In the healthy gear mesh, SBs had small amplitude compared with the centre mesh frequency or were
missing resulting in low ππ΅ππΉππππ values. As damage developed on the pinion
tooth passing through the gear mesh, the SBs increased in amplitude, as well
as in number, as did ππ΅ππΉππππ. The proposed ππ΅ππΉππππ method successfully
allowed the assessment of the gear fault severity on the small-scale test rig by tracking the progressive tooth damage, from the early stages of development, during the variable wind-like speed and load conditions.
In this chapter, to validate the performance and the reliability of the
proposed ππ΅ππΉππππ technique on a full-size gearbox, the algorithm has been
tested on data from the National Renewable Energy Laboratoryβs (NREL) wind turbine Gearbox Condition Monitoring Round project (Sheng, 2012). These vibration signals were collected from a real WT gearbox that had sustained gear damage during its field test.
166