• No results found

SITE SELECTION, FIELDWORK, AND RESEARCH METHODS

The initial thought process during the formation of this thesis topic was to decide

on a region where deportees belonging to the “1.5 generation” were located. Baja

California was viewed as meeting that requirement, with a special focus on Tijuana. Baja

California is located south of San Diego, California in close proximity to the San Ysidro

border, one that is “recognized as the worlds busiest land border crossing for being

responsible for 37% of the migrant flow between Mexico and the U.S.” (Brouwer,

Lozada, Cornelius, Firestone Cruz, Magis-Rodriguez, Zúñiga de Nuncio and Strathdee

2009: 1-2). With the significant activity of this border, there is a relative presence of

demonstrated in the ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations Report for the fiscal years

of 2015-2017, the removals of undocumented individuals as a result of ICE’s interior

enforcement demonstrate that 235,413 individuals were removed in 2015, 240,225 in

2016, and 226,119 in 2017 (2017: 12). It is evident that the trend comparison between

2015, 2016, and 2017 reflects a decrease in the amount of removals since the decline in

border apprehensions occurred during the year 2017. The decline in border apprehensions

however, is not an indicator that there is a halt in the deportation of the “1.5-generation”

of men. On the contrary, this group continues to be deported and continues to face the

hardships of reintegration as evidenced by the referenced statistics, deportation literature,

and fieldwork interviews.

The forced return phenomenon and its trends are demonstrative of the gendered

removal of men in the United States. As Golash-Boza and Hondagneu-Sotelo suggest,

Latino and Afro Caribbean men face disproportionately higher rates of deportation,

giving rise to the “gendered racial removal program” (Golash-Boza and Hondagneu- Sotelo 2013: 272; Rodkey 2016: 36). In the context of Tijuana, the deportation of men of

particular ethnic backgrounds and Mexican nationals has an effect on the international

metropolitan conurbation of San Diego-Tijuana since Mexico is the receiving country.

Thus, focusing on Baja California was crucial since the researcher had familiarity with

the region, there was feasibility for in person travel to the San Ysidro border, and because

of the large presence of deportees in Tijuana.

Participants that were recruited for this study were chosen because of the focus on

their “1.5-generation” status. However, the following requirements had to be met for the selection process of participants:

(2) A minimum of 1+ years living in the U.S. prior to deportation

(3) Individuals who had a minimum of 1+ year living in Tijuana including combining scattered months if re-migration and new deportation(s) occurred.

(4) Individuals who were current call center employees or had previous call center experience.

The focus on this specific type of deportee was done purposefully because of the

participant’s vast exposure to the U.S. and limited exposure to their homeland. This research study required flexibility in regards to the openness of the

participant’s experiences thus the development of a solid researcher-participant relationship was necessary. In an effort to gain trust and provide comfort for the

participants, the entirety of the month of July 2018 was spent visiting the Unified U.S.

Deported Veterans Resource Center, Madres y Familias Deportadas En Acción, and

Deportados Unidos. Participants were willing, descriptive, and raw when sharing about

life in the U.S. and deportation. The trust between researcher and participants was able to

sustain throughout the entirety of the interviews especially during the discussion of prior

encounters with law enforcement. A notable pattern when interviewing participants was

that participants with prior military experience had the tendency to shift the conversation

towards discussions about their military experience and about the U.S’s lack of action

and assistance during deportation proceedings. When this occurred successful attempts

were made to guide the conversation back to the interview questions when necessary.

The recruitment of participants was carried out via referrals from the Unified U.S.

Deported Veterans Resource Center, Madres y Familias Deportadas En Acción,

Deportados Unidos, and from previous participants. Recruitment was also successful

through the use of social media, primarily Facebook. Joining the closed private group

named “Tijuana Call Centers” was instrumental in the recruitment of participants. The moderator of the page was contacted to obtain permission to post about this research

project. The Facebook post facilitated interviewing 5 participants. The use of social

media was crucial in the recruitment of participants because of the time constraint of

employment hours of agents. The call centers that were visited in person expressed that

they did not allow researchers to interview call center agents during working hours.

Joining the Facebook group provided the direct connection to call center agents in which

it allowed the scheduling of interviews at the call center agents convenience. Employing

a two-part recruitment approach both online and in person allowed the participants to

gain a level of trust in participating in interviews because of the familiarity with the

researchers presence at the previously referenced organizations. Referrals from the

founders of each organization were notably efficacious in successfully securing future

interviews and the expressed consent of the moderator of the page included in the post

demonstrated to call center agents that the post was approved, authentic, and trustworthy.

In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 participants.

Participants were interviewed for a minimum of 50 minutes and a maximum of 1 hour

and 20 minutes. Interviews were conducted in a public setting in the location of the

participant’s choice such as cafes, outside of the Unified U.S. Deported Veterans Resource Center, outside and inside of Deportados Unidos, and inside of a gym office.

Participants were explicitly informed about the study, their rights as participants, the

themes of the research questions, and the researchers contact information. Every

participant in this study gave oral consent and all questions prior to commencing the

interviews were answered. In addition to reading the oral consent guide to participants,

participants read the oral consent guide before commencing the interview in order to

was the language preferred by all participants. The questions were structured by themes

consisting of life in the U.S., ICE detention, deportation, life in Tijuana, and call center

employment. Interviews were recorded utilizing a recording device while manually hand

writing field notes in two pocket notebooks. Field notes were recorded while conducting

interviews but also in collective spaces where deportees frequented such as the Unified

U.S. Deported Veterans Resource Center and Deportados Unidos.

Related documents