Chapter 2 Stand structural complexity and eucalypt regeneration 20
2.2 Methods 24
2.2.1 Sites 24
Research sites were located in lowland remnant woodland and forest stands across the lower Derwent Valley, Coal Valley and Midlands of Tasmania (collectively called the Midlands from here on, see figure 1-1). The study area was low altitude (below 470m), low rainfall (< 700 mm annual average), extending from latitude 41.511° to 42.622°S and longitude 146.958° to 147.984°E. In summer, maximum temperatures average 24°C, whilst in winter most days have frosts, sometimes severe. Thirty sites were studied (Table 2-1) comprising remnant woodland and forest stands which had been exposed to a variety of levels of disturbance and recent fire history. The sites were allocated a priori and equally by number to one of three ranked categories of vegetation condition namely healthy, intermediate and poor according to the following features (adapted from Keighery (1994):
healthy – all expected plant layers present and healthy, very light to moderate levels of grazing and wood collection, any disturbance confined to small areas, few or localised exotic species
intermediate – shrub and ground layer present but reduced of simplified, moderate to heavy levels of grazing and wood collection, apparent change in soil structure, exotic species cover up to 50% of area
poor – plant community severely altered, evidence of heavy to extreme grazing, predominantly paddock trees in pasture. Most poor sites were less than 500m away from other more substantial remnant patches and were usually separated from them by fencing.
Sites were rated for levels of disturbance caused by grazing as light (< 1 dry sheep equivalent (DSE)), moderate (1-2 DSE), heavy (2-4 DSE) and extreme (>4 DSE). Their recent fire history (within last 10 years) was obtained from land managers of each site (Table 2.1). Four sites were publicly owned reserves, five private reserves and the rest on privately owned unreserved land. Six sites were near Bothwell and one in Elderslie in the Derwent Valley (Eucalyptus tenuiramis woodland), eight sites were near Oatlands in the southern Midlands (E. pauciflora /E. viminalis woodland) and twelve sites were in the northern Midlands, eight near Epping Forest (E.
amygdalina/ E. viminalis woodland) and four near Fingal (E. amygdalina/ E. viminalis woodland). Three sites were in the Coal valley near Campania (E. amygdalina/ E. viminalis woodland), see Figure 1-1. The sites at Oatlands and Bothwell had all been previously established for research reported by Davidson et al (2007), two sites at each of Epping Forest, Fingal and Oatlands were measured prior to restoration treatments being undertaken as part of a trial reported in Chapter 5 of this thesis and four others were measured prior to a seedling microsite study reported in Chapter 3. The other sites were chosen to ensure a range of a priori remnant condition was sampled across a broad geographical range in the Midlands.
Table 2-1 Thirty sites with site name abbreviation, location, a priori health class, disturbance level, recent fire history, dominant eucalypt species and TASVEG
community (Harris and Kitchener 2005) that have been measured to provide base data for a structural complexity index for Tasmanian dry forests/woodlands
Site(abbreviation) Location Class Disturbance Fire history Canopy dominant TASVEG
Ellis Private Reserve (BOTH) Bothwell Healthy Light burnt 2005 E. tenuiramis DTO Humbie Hill Private Reserve (HH) Bothwell Healthy Moderate burnt 2002 E. tenuiramis DPD Elderslie Nature Reserve (ELD) Elderslie Healthy Light burnt 2006 E.tenuriamis DTO Gravelly Ridge Conservation Area (GR) Campania Healthy Light burnt 2002 E. tenuiramis DTO
Lowdina Regrowth (LR) Campania Healthy Moderate unburnt E.amygdalina DAS
Western Tom Gibson Reserve (WTG) Epping Forest Healthy Light unburnt E.amygdalina DAZ Tom Gibson Reserve Burnt (TG) Epping Forest Healthy Light burnt 2003 E.amygdalina DAZ Barton Farm Private Reserve (B) Epping Forest Healthy Moderate burnt 2004 E.amygdalina DAZ
Evercreech coupe (EC) Fingal Healthy Light unburnt E.amygdalina DAM
Radio Mast Hill, Plot 1Weedings (W1) Oatlands Healthy Light unburnt E.pauciflora DPO Meaburn Peratta Tip Reserve , (MPT) Oatlands Intermediate Moderate unburnt E.pauciflora DPO Humbie Intermediate (HI) Bothwell Intermediate Moderate unburnt E. tenuiramis DPD Campbell Intermediate (CI) Bothwell Intermediate Heavy burnt 2005 E. tenuiramis DTO
Lowdina Simple (LS) Campania Intermediate Heavy unburnt E.amygdalina DAS
Downey Valleyfield remnant (DD) Epping Forest Intermediate Heavy partially burnt E.amygdalina DAZ Osbourne remnant (O) Epping Forest Intermediate Moderate unburnt E.amygdalina DAZ Evercreech plantation remnant (ED) Fingal Intermediate Heavy unburnt E.amygdalina DAM Meaburn Liliesleaf remnant (M) Oatlands Intermediate Heavy unburnt E.pauciflora DPO Weedings Plot 2 Bald Hill (BH) Oatlands Intermediate Heavy unburnt E.pauciflora DPO
Weedings Plot 3 (W3) Oatlands Intermediate Heavy unburnt E.pauciflora DPO
Campbell Paddock Tree (CPT) Bothwell Poor Extreme burnt 2005 E. tenuiramis DTO
Humbie Paddock Tree (HPT) Bothwell Poor Extreme unburnt E. tenuiramis DPD
Downey Paddock Tree 1 (DPT1) Epping Forest Poor Extreme unburnt E.amygdalina DAZ Downey Paddock Tree 2 (DPT2) Epping Forest Poor Extreme unburnt E.amygdalina DAZ Downey Paddock Tree 3 (DPT3) Epping Forest Poor Extreme unburnt E.amygdalina DAZ Evercreech Paddock Tree 1 (EPT1) Fingal Poor Extreme unburnt E.amygdalina DAM Evercreech Paddock Tree 2 (EPT2) Fingal Poor Extreme unburnt E.amygdalina DAM Oatlands Paddock Tree 1 (PT1O) Oatlands Poor Extreme unburnt E.pauciflora DPO Oatlands Paddock Tree 2 (PT2O) Oatlands Poor Extreme unburnt E.pauciflora DPO Oatlands Paddock Tree 3 (PT3O) Oatlands Poor Extreme unburnt E.pauciflora DPO
The remnants measured in this study fell into six TASVEG vegetation communities (Table 2-1) all within the same vegetation type called “Dry Eucalypt Forest & Woodland Vegetation” (Harris and Kitchener 2005). The TASVEG benchmarks for the six vegetation communities were very similar in their structural components with the main differences being in their expected species complements. All the
communities measured were therefore combined in the same structural complexity index. The effectiveness of this decision was tested through statistical analyses (see section 2.2.5).
Stands of paddock trees were included in this study, and thus incorporated into the Tasmanian index, because they are important biological legacies in the landscape and they account for a substantial amount of remnant woody vegetation cover in lowland areas that have been significantly cleared for agriculture (Gibbons and Boak 2002; Gibbons et al. 2008b; Manning and Fischer 2010). Scattered paddock trees provide ecosystem functions such as habitat at the local and landscape scale and may be foci for restoration efforts in the future (Reid and Landsberg 2000; Manning et al. 2006).