Calculation statement
SMALL BUSINESS ENTITIES
■balancing adjustment amounts
■
■deduction for decline in value of depreciating assets
■
■deduction for environmental protection expenses
■
■deduction for project pool
■
■electricity connections and telephone lines
■
■hire-purchase agreements
■
■landcare operations and decline in value of water facility
■
■loss on the sale of a depreciating asset
■
■luxury car leases
■
■profit on the sale of a depreciating asset
■
■section 40-880 deduction
■
■the TOFA rules and UCA.
For more information on any of these topics, see the Guide to depreciating assets 2015.
SMALL BUSINESS ENTITIES
Eligible small business entities that choose to use the simplified depreciation rules calculate deductions for most of their depreciating assets under the specific small business entity depreciation rules, see page 32.
Balancing adjustment amounts
If the company ceases to hold or to use a depreciating asset, a balancing adjustment event occurs. Calculate a balancing adjustment amount to include in the company’s assessable income or to claim as a deduction.
Include the assessable balancing adjustment amount for all assets at B Other assessable income item 7.
(Assessable balancing adjustment amounts for assets used in R&D activities are required to be uplifted prior to being included at B Other assessable income item 7. For more information, see the instructions to B Other assessable income item 7 on page 40.)
Include the deductible balancing adjustment amount for non-R&D assets at X Other deductible expenses item 7.
Balancing adjustment loss amounts for assets used only for R&D activities subject to the R&D tax incentive are taken into account in part A of the Research and development tax incentive schedule 2015 and also as part of calculating an R&D tax offset amount at item 21.
Balancing adjustment losses for assets used on R&D and non-R&D activities are uplifted under sections 40-292 or 40-293 of the ITAA 1997 and included at
X Other deductible expenses item 7, if the company is otherwise eligible for an R&D tax offset under section 355-100 of the ITAA 1997. If the company is not otherwise eligible for an R&D tax offset under section 355-100 of the ITAA 1997, the balancing adjustment losses for assets used on R&D and non-R&D activities, as calculated under section 40-285 of the ITAA 1997, is included at X Other deductible expenses item 7 and claimed at 100%.
If the asset was used for both taxable and non-taxable purposes, reduce the balancing adjustment amount by the amount attributable to the non-taxable use. A capital gain or capital loss may arise for the amount attributable to that non-taxable use. This capital gain or capital loss is included in calculating the net capital gain or net capital loss for the income year.
Include any profit or loss on the sale of a depreciating asset that has been included in the accounts of the company at either R Other gross income item 6 or S All other expenses item 6. See Profit on the sale of a depreciating asset or Loss on the sale of a depreciating asset on page 98.
If you have elected to use the hedging tax-timing method provided for in the TOFA rules and you have a gain or loss from a hedging financial arrangement used to hedge risks for a depreciating asset, work out separately:
■
■the balancing adjustment assessable or deductible amount (include this at either B Other assessable income item 7 or X Other deductible expenses item 7 as appropriate), and
■
■the gain or loss on the hedging financial arrangement under the TOFA rules that has not yet been assessed or deducted (include this at E TOFA income from financial arrangements not included in item 6 item 7 or W TOFA deductions from financial arrangements not included in item 6 item 7 as appropriate).
If a balancing adjustment event occurred to a depreciating asset of the company during the income year, you may also need to include an amount at H Termination value of intangible depreciating assets item 9 or at I Termination value of other depreciating assets item 9.
Deduction for decline in value of depreciating assets
The decline in value of a depreciating asset is generally worked out using either the prime cost or diminishing value method. Both methods are based on the effective life of an asset. For most depreciating assets, the company can choose whether to self-assess the effective life or adopt the Commissioner’s determination that can be found in Taxation Ruling TR 2014/4 – Income tax: effective life of depreciating assets (applicable from 1 July 2014).
The company can deduct an amount equal to the decline in value for an income year of a depreciating asset for the period that it holds the asset during that year. However, the deduction is reduced to the extent the company uses the asset or has it installed ready for use other than for a taxable purpose.
The decline in value of a depreciating asset costing
$300 or less is its cost (but only to the extent the asset is used for a taxable purpose) if the asset satisfies all of the following requirements:
■
■It is used predominantly for the purpose of producing assessable income that is not income from carrying on a business.
■
■It is not part of a set of assets acquired in the same income year that costs more than $300.
■
■It is not one of any number of substantially identical items acquired in the same income year that together cost more than $300.
Certain assets that cost less than $1,000 or that have an opening adjustable value of less than $1,000 can be allocated to a low-value pool to calculate the decline in value. Assets eligible for the immediate deduction cannot be allocated to a low-value pool.
To work out the deduction for decline in value of most depreciating assets use worksheets 1 and 2 in the Guide to depreciating assets 2015.
Deduction for environmental protection expenses The company can deduct expenditure to the extent that it incurs it for the sole or dominant purpose of carrying on environmental protection activities (EPA). EPA are activities undertaken to prevent, fight or remedy pollution or to treat, clean up, remove or store waste from the company’s earning activity. The company’s earning activity is one it carried on, carries on or proposes to carry on for the purpose of:
■
■producing assessable income (other than a net capital gain)
■
■exploration or prospecting, or
■
■mining site rehabilitation.
The company may also claim a deduction for cleaning up a site on which a predecessor carried on substantially the same business activity.
The deduction is not available for:
■
■EPA bonds and security deposits
■
■expenditure for acquiring land
■
■expenditure for constructing or altering buildings, structures or structural improvements
■
■expenditure to the extent that the company can deduct an amount for it under another provision.
Expenditure that forms part of the cost of a depreciating asset is not expenditure on EPA.
Expenditure incurred on or after 19 August 1992 on certain earthworks constructed as a result of carrying out EPA can be written off at the rate of 2.5% a year under the provisions for capital works expenditure.
Expenditure on an environmental impact assessment of a project of the company is not deductible as expenditure on EPA. If it is capital expenditure directly connected with a project, it could be a project amount for which a deduction would be available over the life of the project;
see Deduction for project pools.
If the deduction arises from a non-arm’s length transaction and the expenditure is more than the market value of what it was for, the amount of the expenditure is taken instead to be that market value.
Any recoupment of the expenditure is assessable income.
Deduction for project pools
Certain capital expenditure incurred after 30 June 2001 that is directly connected with a project carried on or proposed to be carried on for a taxable purpose can be allocated to a project pool and written off over the project life. Each project has a separate project pool.
The project must be of sufficient substance and be sufficiently identified that it can be shown that the capital expenditure said to be a ‘project amount’ is directly connected with the project.
A project is carried on if it involves a continuity of activity and active participation. Merely holding a passive investment such as a rental property would not be regarded as carrying on a project.
For more information, see Taxation Ruling TR 2005/4 – Income tax: capital allowances – project pools – core issues.
The capital expenditure, known as a project amount, must be expenditure incurred:
■
■to create or upgrade community infrastructure for a community associated with the project, this expenditure must be paid (not just incurred) to be regarded as a project amount
■
■for site preparation for depreciating assets (other than in draining swamp or low-lying land or in clearing land for horticultural plants including grapevines)
■
■for feasibility studies for the project
■
■for environmental assessments for the project
■
■to obtain information associated with the project
■
■in seeking to obtain a right to intellectual property
■
■for ornamental trees or shrubs.
Project amounts also include mining capital expenditure and transport capital expenditure.
The expenditure must not otherwise be deductible or form part of the cost of a depreciating asset.
If the expenditure incurred arises from a non-arm’s length dealing and is more than the market value of what it was for, the amount of the expenditure is taken to be that market value.
The deduction for project amounts allocated to a project pool commences when the project starts to operate.
If your project pool contains only project amounts incurred on or after 10 May 2006 and the project starts to operate on or after that date, your deduction is calculated as follows:
pool value × 200%
DV project pool life
In some circumstances, a post 9 May 2006 project may be taken to have started to operate before 10 May 2006. This would occur, for example, if the company abandoned a project and then restarted it on or after 10 May 2006 in an attempt to enable it to claim deductions in accordance with the above formula.
For other project pools, the deduction is calculated using the following formula:
pool value × 150%
DV project pool life
The ‘DV project pool life’ is the project life or, if that life has been recalculated, the most recently recalculated project life. The project life is determined by estimating how long (in years and fractions of years) it will be from when the project starts to operate until it stops operating.
Generally, a project starts to operate when the activities that will produce assessable income start. The project life is estimated from the company’s perspective, having regard to factors which are outside the company’s control. For more information, see Taxation Ruling TR 2005/4.
The ‘pool value’ for an income year at a particular time is broadly the sum of the project amounts allocated to the pool up to the end of that year less the sum of the deductions the company has claimed for the project pool in previous years or could have claimed had the project operated wholly for a taxable purpose.
The pool value can be subject to adjustments.
If the company is or becomes entitled to a GST input tax credit for expenditure allocated to a project pool, the pool value is reduced by the amount of the credit. Certain increasing or decreasing adjustments for expenditure allocated to a project pool will also require an adjustment to the pool value.
If during any income year commencing after 30 June 2003 the company ceased to have an obligation to pay foreign currency and the obligation was incurred as a project amount allocated to a project pool, a foreign currency gain or loss (referred to as a forex realisation gain or loss) may have arisen under the forex provisions. If the amount was incurred after 30 June 2003 (or earlier, if so elected) and became due for payment within 12 months after it was incurred, then (unless elected otherwise, see below) the pool value for the income year in which the amount was incurred is increased by any forex realisation loss and decreased by any forex realisation gain. However, if a forex realisation gain exceeds the pool value, the pool value is reduced to zero and the excess gain is assessable income.
If the company elected that this treatment should not apply, any forex realisation gain will be assessable and any forex realisation loss will be deductible.
The deduction for a project pool cannot be more than the amount of the pool value for that income year.
There is no need to apportion the deduction if the project starts to operate during the income year or for project amounts incurred during the year. However, the deduction is reduced to the extent to which the project is operated for other than a taxable purpose during the income year.
If the project is abandoned, sold or otherwise disposed of, the company can deduct the sum of the closing pool value of the prior income year (if any) plus any project amounts allocated to the pool during the income year, after allowing
for any necessary pool value adjustments. A project is abandoned if it stops operating and will not operate again.
Any amount received for the abandonment, sale or other disposal of a project is assessable.
If an amount of expenditure allocated to a project pool is recouped or if the company derives a capital amount for a project amount or something on which a project amount was expended, the amount must be included in assessable income.
If any receipt arises from a non-arm’s length dealing and the amount is less than the market value of what it was for, the amount received is taken to be that market value.
Electricity connections and telephone lines A deduction can be claimed by the company over 10 years for capital expenditure incurred in connecting:
■
■mains electricity to land on which a business is carried on or in upgrading an existing connection to that land, or
■
■a telephone line to land being used to carry on a primary production business.
Include the deduction at X Other deductible expenses item 7. If you have included the expenditure as an expense at item 6 Calculation of total profit or loss, also include the expenditure at W Non-deductible expenses item 7.
Include any recoupment of the expenditure in assessable income at B Other assessable income item 7 if you have not included it at R Other gross income item 6.
Hire-purchase agreements
Hire-purchase and instalment sale agreements of goods are treated as a sale of the property by the financier (or hire-purchase company) to the hirer (or instalment purchaser).
The sale is treated as being financed by a loan from the financier to the hirer at a sale price of either their agreed cost or value or the property’s arm’s length value. The periodic hire-purchase (or instalment) payments are treated as payments of principal and interest under the notional loan. The hirer can deduct the interest component subject to any reduction required under the thin capitalisation rules.
In relation to the notional sale, the hirer of a depreciating asset is treated as the holder of the asset and is entitled to claim a deduction for the decline in value. The cost of the asset for this purpose is generally taken to be the agreed cost or value, or the arm’s length value if the dealing is not at arm’s length.
If the company has included hire-purchase charges at any label at item 6 Calculation of total profit or loss, include the amount at W Non-deductible expenses item 7.
Include the deduction for the decline in value of the goods at F Deduction for decline in value of depreciating assets item 7. Include the interest component at
X Other deductible expenses item 7.
Landcare operations and decline in value of water facility
Landcare operations
The company can claim a deduction in the year it incurs capital expenditure on a landcare operation for land in Australia.
Unless the company is a rural land irrigation water provider, the deduction is available to the extent the company uses the land for either:
■
■a primary production business, or
■
■in the case of rural land, carrying on a business for a taxable purpose from the use of that land, except a business of mining or quarrying.
The company may claim the deduction even if it is only a lessee of the land.
The deduction is also available to rural land irrigation water providers, that is, to entities whose business is primarily and principally the supply of water (other than by using a motor vehicle) to entities for use in primary production businesses on land in Australia or to businesses (other than mining or quarrying businesses) using rural land in Australia.
If the company is a rural land irrigation water provider, it can claim a deduction for capital expenditure it incurs on a landcare operation for:
■
■land in Australia that other entities (being entities supplied with water by the company) use at the time for carrying on primary production businesses, or
■
■rural land in Australia that other entities (being entities supplied with water by the company) use at the time for carrying on businesses for a taxable purpose from the use of that land (except a business of mining or quarrying).
A rural land irrigation water provider’s deduction is reduced by a reasonable amount to reflect an entity’s use of the land for other than a taxable purpose after the water provider incurred the expenditure.
A landcare operation is one of the following operations:
■
■eradicating or exterminating animal pests from the land
■
■eradicating, exterminating or destroying plant growth detrimental to the land
■
■preventing or combating land degradation other than by erecting fences
■
■erecting fences to keep out animals from areas affected by land degradation to prevent or limit further damage and to help reclaim the areas
■
■erecting fences to separate different land classes in accordance with an approved land management plan
■
■constructing a levee or similar improvement
■
■constructing drainage works (other than the draining of swamps or low-lying areas) to control salinity or assist in drainage control
■
■an alteration, addition, extension, or repair of a capital nature to an asset described in the fourth to seventh dot points, or an extension of an operation described in the first three dot points
■
■a structural improvement, or an alteration, addition, extension or repair of a capital nature to a structural improvement, that is reasonably incidental to levees or drainage works deductible under a landcare operation.
You cannot claim a deduction if the capital expenditure is on plant unless it is on certain fences, dams or other structural improvements.
In each case, apart from the construction of a levee, the operation must be carried out primarily and principally for the purpose stated. This is to ensure that the deduction for landcare operation expenditure and the three-year write-off for facilities to conserve or convey water cannot both be claimed for the same item of expenditure. If a levee is constructed primarily and principally for water conservation, it would be a water facility and not deductible under the rules for landcare operations. The decline in value would need to be worked out under the water conservation provisions; see Water facilities below.
Any recoupment of the expenditure would be assessable income.
Water facilities
In the 2015 budget, the government announced its intention to allow primary producers to immediately deduct
In the 2015 budget, the government announced its intention to allow primary producers to immediately deduct