• No results found

2.8 Real options conventional analytical models

2.8.5 Stochastic processes

It is formally defined as a process that is described by the change of some random variable over time, which may be either discrete or continuous. During this time, events may be happening at various points along the path that may affect the ultimate value of the process (Alao & Oloni, 2015).

2.8.5.1 Brownian Motion for modelling prices

This random stochastic process generates the course of each movement which creates a probability space for all the possible outcomes. The Brownian motion, however, is a deterministic system, which means that the nodes generated can be mathematically calculated.

Let 𝛺 be a set of possible outcomes from an experiment or uncertain event (πœ”1, πœ”2, … ), and let’s take a random variable 𝛸, say the price of the commodity, which is a function from the 𝛺 of the possible outcomes, and let it be a real number ℝ from the set. An algebra𝑖𝑐 𝛸 needs to be generated from set, and all the subsets of 𝛸 are referred to as events which are the outcomes of a particular experiment where 𝛸: 𝛺 β†’ ℝ.

Therefore, the events of 𝛸 are those for which a probability can be given that they will occur. Probability is a measure on 𝛸, and it is the chance of the event occurring or not.

𝑃(βˆ…) = 0, 𝑃(𝛺) = 1 2.37

P (disjoint events) = βˆ‘π‘ƒ(each event)

The Brownian and all the other stochastics processes briefly discussed in the next subsections are conceptually probability-based risk assessment tools which quantify risk (Jablonowski et al., 2017).

LITERATURE REVIEW 32

Therefore, they cannot be independently used to value flexibility without the incorporation of the RO methodology.

2.8.5.2 Wiener process

This process is a form of the Brownian motion stochastic process Wt which is characterised by the following three facts:

W0 = 0

Wt is almost certainly continuous (in another words it has a continuous sample path)

Wt has an independent increment with a distribution Wt-Ws~N(0, t-s). Thus, the summary equation for the Wiener process is

𝑑π‘₯ = π‘Žπ‘‘π‘‘ + π‘π‘‘π‘Š(𝑑) 2.38

Where π‘Ž and 𝑏 are constants and the 𝑑π‘₯ = π‘Žπ‘‘π‘‘ can be integrated to π‘₯ = π‘₯0+ π‘Žπ‘‘, where π‘₯0 is the initial value and if the time period is 𝑇, then the variable is increased by π‘Žπ‘‘. 𝑏𝑑𝑧 accounts for the noise or variability to the path followed by π‘₯. The amount of this noise or variability is 𝑏 times the Wiener process.

2.8.5.3 Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM) and mean-reverting process (MRP)

The models used for generating realisations of the market and economic variables are the GBM and MRP models (Dimitrakopoulos & Abdelsabour, 2007; Mun, 2006).Some researchers in the past used one-factor GBM models to reduce the dimension of the problem to one. This simplification implies that there is a perfect correlation between two completely independent variables such as metal price and the grade of metal. However, such an assumption is erroneous as the grade is an internal variable which is usually project specific and the price is an external variable (Ajak & Topal, 2015; Dimitrakopoulos & Abdelsabour, 2007). Eq. (2.39)shows the GBM model.

βˆ†S

𝑆 = πœ‡βˆ†π‘‘ + πœŽπœ€βˆšβˆ†π‘‘

2.39

Where;

βˆ†π‘† is the change in the price of risky asset or stock price.

Β΅ is the expected rate of return.

Οƒβˆšβˆ†t is the stochastic component.

Ι› is the normal distribution.

LITERATURE REVIEW 33

𝑑𝑆

𝑆 = π‘˜(π‘’πœ‡ βˆ’ 𝑙𝑛𝑆)𝑑𝑑 + πœŽπ‘‘π‘§

2.40

Where k is the reversion speed at which the log of a price reverts to a long-term equilibrium log price πœ‡.

2.8.5.4 Itō’s process for computing option value

An Ito process is a generalised form of the Wiener process in which the parameters a and b are functions of the value of the underlying variable π‘₯ and 𝑑. These are both the expected drift and the volatility that can change over time. An Ito process with many dimensions is represented by:

π‘₯𝑑 = π‘₯0 + ∫ π‘Žπ‘‘ 𝑠

0

𝑑𝑠 + ∫ 𝑏𝑑 𝑠

0

π‘‘π‘Šπ‘  2.41

Where W is a m-dimensional standard Brownian motion and π‘Ž and 𝑏 are n-dimensional and π‘Ž(𝑛 βˆ— π‘š) - dimensional 𝐹𝑑 adapted processes, respectively. Eq. (2.38) and the n-dimensional stochastic differential equation forms Eq. (2.42).

𝑑𝑋𝑑 = π‘Ž(𝑋𝑑+ 𝑑)𝑑𝑑 + 𝑏(𝑋𝑑+ 𝑑)π‘‘π‘Šπ‘‘ ; 𝑋0 = π‘₯ 2.42 Thus, Eq. (2.42) can be represented as:

π‘₯𝑑 = π‘₯0 + ∫ π‘Ž(𝑋𝑠 , 𝑠) 𝑑 0 𝑑𝑠 + ∫ 𝑏(𝑋𝑠 , 𝑠) 𝑑 0 π‘‘π‘Šπ‘  2.43

If the value of a variable π‘₯ follows the ItoΜ„ process, the variable π‘₯ has a drift rate of π‘Ž with a variance rate of 𝑏2. Itō’s lemma shows that a function 𝐺 of π‘₯ and 𝑑 follows the process shown in Eq. (2.44).

𝑑𝐺 = (𝛿𝐺𝛿π‘₯π‘Ž +𝛿𝐺 𝛿𝑑 + 1 2𝛿 𝛿2𝐺 π‘₯2 𝑏2) 𝑑𝑑 + 𝛿𝐺 𝛿π‘₯𝑏𝑑𝑧 2.44

Therefore, G also follows an ItoΜ„ process with the drift rate of: 𝛿𝐺 𝛿π‘₯π‘Ž + 𝛿𝐺 𝛿𝑑 + 1 2 𝛿2𝐺 𝛿π‘₯2𝑏2 2.45

moreover, the variance of:

(𝛿𝐺 𝛿π‘₯𝑏)

2

LITERATURE REVIEW 34

A complete study of the Itō’s process is beyond the scope of this thesis. Thus, this lemma is not derived as it has been widely described in many calculus books. However, this section will only deal with its application as it will be applied to the analysis of real options later in Chapter 4.

2.8.5.5 Application of Itō’s lemma on a forward contract

The formula used in the calculation of a forward contract price is as follows:

𝐹0= 𝑆0π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘‡ 2.47

Where 𝐹 is the forward price as time passes, 𝑆 is the current stock price, 𝑑 is the time when the forward contract is being exercised before maturity and π‘Ž < 𝑇, π‘Ÿ is the rate of return and 𝑒 is the natural number which is constant. Thus,

𝐹0 = 𝑆0π‘’π‘Ÿ(π‘‡βˆ’π‘‘) 2.48

For instance, if 𝑆0 = $50, π‘Ÿ=0.05 and 𝑇= 1 year, then 𝐹0 will be equal to $52.55 2.8.5.6 Partial derivatives of forward price (F)

Assuming that Eq. (2.39)gives the process for the stock price 𝑆. The ItoΜ„ process can then be used to determine the process for 𝐹.

𝛿𝐹 𝛿𝑆= π‘’π‘Ÿ(π‘‡βˆ’π‘‘), 𝛿2𝐹 𝛿𝑆2= 0, 𝛿𝐹 𝛿𝑑= βˆ’π‘Ÿπ‘†π‘’π‘Ÿ(π‘‡βˆ’π‘‘) 2.49

Substitute 𝐺 function with 𝐹, π‘Ž with 𝑒𝑆, and b with πœŽπ‘†. The new equation will appear as follows:

𝑑𝐹 = (𝛿𝐹𝛿π‘₯Β΅S +𝛿𝐹 𝛿𝑑 + 1 2𝛿 𝛿2𝐹 π‘₯2 (ΟƒS)2) 𝑑𝑑 + 𝛿𝐹 𝛿π‘₯ΟƒS𝑑𝑧 2.50

However, it is already shown that:

𝛿𝐹 𝛿𝑆= 𝑒 π‘Ÿ(π‘‡βˆ’π‘‘), 𝛿2𝐹 𝛿𝑆2= 0, 𝛿𝐹 𝛿𝑑= βˆ’π‘Ÿπ‘†π‘’ π‘Ÿ(π‘‡βˆ’π‘‘) 2.51 Therefore substituting this derivative into the equation produces the following:

𝑑𝐹 = (π‘’π‘Ÿ(π‘‡βˆ’π‘‘)Β΅S βˆ’ π‘Ÿπ‘†π‘’π‘Ÿ(π‘‡βˆ’π‘‘)+ 0(ΟƒS)2)𝑑𝑑 + π‘’π‘Ÿ(π‘‡βˆ’π‘‘)ΟƒS𝑑𝑧 2.52

Since 𝐹0= 𝑆0π‘’π‘Ÿ(π‘‡βˆ’π‘‘), substituting F for 𝑆

0π‘’π‘Ÿ(π‘‡βˆ’π‘‘) produces

𝑑𝐹 = (𝑒 βˆ’ π‘Ÿ)𝐹𝑑𝑑 + πœŽπΉπ‘‘π‘§ 2.53

Similar to the stock price 𝑆, the forward price 𝐹 follows the GBM. This has an expected growth rate of 𝑒 βˆ’ π‘Ÿ rather than 𝑒. The growth rate of 𝐹 is the excess return of the risky asset with a risk-free rate.

LITERATURE REVIEW 35

Assuming variable 𝑆 follows an ItoΜ„ process which contains a non-stochastic and a stochastic component, then the following statement is true about any function 𝐺(𝑆, 𝑑), that is a function of 𝑆 and 𝑑.

𝑑G(S, t) = (¡𝑆𝑑 𝛿𝐺 𝛿𝑠 + 𝛿𝐺 𝛿𝑑 + 1 2𝜎2𝑆2 𝛿2𝐺 𝛿𝑆2𝑏2) 𝑑𝑑 + πœŽπ‘†π‘‘ 𝛿𝐺 π›Ώπ‘†π‘‘π‘Šπ‘‘ 2.54 2.8.5.7 Lognormal distribution

This is a continuous probability distribution of an uncertain variable such as commodity price whose logarithm of the returns is normally distributed (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2012).A variable modelled as lognormal is a multiplicative product of many independent random variables and each of which is positive with a probability density function shown in Eq. (2.55).

𝑓π‘₯(x; Β΅, Οƒ) =π‘₯𝜎√2πœ‹1 π‘’βˆ’(𝑙𝑛π‘₯βˆ’πœ‡)22𝜎2, , π‘₯ > 0 and 𝑋 = 𝑒𝑒+πœŽπ‘§ 2.55

In a lognormal distribution 𝑋, the parameters denoted by 𝑒 and 𝜎 are, respectively, the mean and standard deviation of the variable’s natural logarithm and 𝑧 is the standard normal variable (z-score). By definition, the variable’s logarithm is normally distributed.

This method used a normal distribution of the gains from the risky asset. In another words, the prices of the risky asset are lognormally distributed. Lognormal distributions are much more tailed to the right than the ordinary continuous normal distribution (bell-shaped distribution). Prices of the asset which meet this distribution usually range between zero and infinity but, never go below zero. This can be simply put as saying that stock prices will always stay above zero.

There are a few cases where the prices of the risk asset do not meet the normal distribution criteria and become common when changes are rapid and frequent. Such departures from lognormal distributions are measured by coefficients of skewness and kurtosis of the values.

2.8.5.8 Application of Itō’s lemma to lognormal process

The aim here is to produce an equation of π‘Œπ‘‘ = 𝐹(𝑆𝑑) such that π‘Œπ‘‘ will not contain any references to 𝑆𝑑. Now the equation π‘Œπ‘‘ = π‘™π‘œπ‘”(𝑆𝑑) will be used, but it should be noted that π‘Œπ‘‘ is not a function of 𝑑 but 𝑆𝑑.

π‘‘π‘Œπ‘‘ = [0 + 1 π‘†π‘‘πœ‡π‘‘π‘†π‘‘+ 1 2( 1 𝑆𝑑2) πœŽπ‘‘2𝑆𝑑2] 𝑑𝑑 + 1 π‘†π‘‘πœŽπ‘‘π‘†π‘‘π‘‘π‘Šπ‘‘ 2.56 π‘‘π‘Œπ‘‘ = (πœ‡π‘‘+ πœŽπ‘‘2 2) 𝑑𝑑 + πœŽπ‘‘π‘‘π‘Šπ‘‘ 2.57

LITERATURE REVIEW 36 π‘Œπ‘‘ = ∫ (πœ‡π‘‘+ πœŽπ‘‘2 2) 𝑑 0 𝑑𝑑 + ∫ πœŽπ‘‘ π‘‘π‘‘π‘Šπ‘‘ 0 2.58 However, it is already established that π‘Œπ‘‘ = log(𝑆𝑑 )

Therefore, π‘Œπ‘‘ = log(𝑆0 + ∫ πœ‡π‘‘ 𝑒 0 𝑆𝑒 𝑑𝑒 + ∫ πœŽπ‘‘ 𝑒 0 𝑆𝑒 𝑑𝑀𝑒 ) 2.59

and it is also true that,

𝑆𝑑 = 𝑒(π‘Œπ‘‘ ) 2.60 𝑆𝑑 = 𝑆0 𝑒(∫ (πœ‡π‘’ βˆ’ 𝜎 2 2 )𝑑𝑒 + ∫ 𝜎0𝑑 𝑒 𝑆𝑒 𝑑𝑀𝑒 𝑑 0 ) 2.61

It should be highlighted that this equation is a Geometric Brownian Motion if the 𝑒 and Οƒ are constants and the π‘Œπ‘‘ = log(𝑆𝑑 ) is normally distributed and the 𝑆𝑑 is lognormal.

As discussed previously, the application of stochastic processes alone assesses risk but, does not value flexibility. They are commonly utilised in scenario planning where alternatives are assessed, and the decision is made on the scenario with an optimal value. Therefore, there is no room for future decisions as the future is assumed to mimic the simulated path. As a consequence, these processes are backed up with RO which can create the managerial flexibility (Ajak & Topal, 2015; Santos et al., 2014; Guj, 2011).