• No results found

units

The summary table (Table 10.2) suggests that:

ƒ Some (SiS) components were met in a majority of classes across all units, namely:

à Students are encouraged to actively engage with ideas and evidence. à Students are challenged to develop meaningful understandings.

ƒ Some components were met in a majority of classes across most units, namely: à Assessment is embedded within the science learning strategy.

ƒ Some components were met in a majority of classes in a majority of units, namely:

à Science is linked with students’ lives and interests.

ƒ Some components were met in a majority of classes, usually in a significant minority of units, namely:

à Students’ individual learning needs and preferences are catered for. à NoS (how science works) is represented in its different aspects. à The classroom is linked with the broader community.

à Learning technologies are exploited for their learning potentialities.

71

Also, where appropriate, analyses in earlier chapters were drawn upon, and additional searches of teachers’ comments for SiS conditions. The ‘degree of likelihood’ that the SIS criteria were present in a majority of classes that trialled the 16 units was an informed decision based on these analyses.

145

SiS components for effective

science learning SiS criterion Present for a majority of classes (1) Comment

Students are encouraged to actively engage with ideas and evidence

Yes (ideas) & Probably Yes (evidence)

ƒ Interaction with ‘ideas’ in all phases

ƒ ‘Evidence’ not as apparent but present for some teachers

Students are challenged to develop meaningful understandings

Yes ƒ Meaningful understandings implied by several teachers ƒ Occurred in most phases ƒ Push-pull concepts explicit at

times Science is linked with students’

lives and interests

Probably No

ƒ Rare to discern in comments Students’ individual learning

needs and preferences are catered for

Possibly No ƒ Rarely mentioned but ‘class level’ and ‘high achievers’ mentioned

Assessment is embedded within the science learning strategy

Probably Yes

ƒ Present in several phases ƒ Diagnostic only in a few cases ƒ Formative more obvious

(Explore; Explain) The NoS (how science works)

is represented in its different aspects

No ƒ Direct reference to the NoS rare (e.g., test-retest) The classroom is linked with the

broader community

Possibly Yes ƒ Parents the focus in one lesson

Learning technologies are exploited for their learning potentialities

No ƒ Only mentioned by 3 teachers on 3 separate occasions (and only digital photos and video) (Similar tables were prepared for each of the 16 analysed units)

INTERPRETATION OF THESE TABLES

1 The titles are those used in the trial Primary Connections units.

2 The ‘degree of likelihood’ that the SiS criteria were present in a majority of classes that trialled the analysed Primary Connections units was an informed impression based on the 5E analyses (e.g., see appendices 5.1 and 5.2) and additional searching of teacher comments for SiS conditions. The inferences are made on the basis of feedback comments made across a range of lessons in various phases.

3 The terms ‘probably’ and ‘possibly’ are used as exact numerical data is not available; ‘probably’ implies that the criteria are more than likely present in a majority of classes and ‘possibly’ implies that the criteria may still be present in a majority of classes, but it is less likely. Where ‘yes’ and ‘no’ are the descriptors, it does not mean that all or no teachers referred to these criteria, but that they were regularly or rarely mentioned.

Table 10.1: Degree of likelihood that SiS criteria indicating conditions for effective primary science learning were present in a

majority of classes that trialled the analysed Primary Connections Push-Pull S1 unit

SiS criterion Weather in my world

Water

works Spinning in space

Earth’s place in space

Staying

alive School- yard zoo

Year 06 06 06 11 09 08

Students are encouraged to actively engage with ideas and evidence

Probably Yes Yes Probably Yes Probably Yes Yes Yes Students are challenged to develop meaningful understandings Possibly Yes Yes Probably Yes Probably Yes Probably Yes Yes

Science is linked with students’ lives and interests

Possibly

Yes Yes Probably No Probably No Possibly Yes Yes

Students’ individual learning needs and preferences are catered for* Possibly No Possibly Yes Possibly No Possibly No Possibly No Possibly No Assessment is embedded within the science learning strategy

Possibly

No Possibly No Probably Yes Probably Yes Possibly Yes Probably Yes

The NoS (how science works) is represented in its different aspects

No Possibly

No Probably No Probably No No No

The classroom is linked with the broader community

No Yes Probably

No No No Probably Yes

Learning technologies are exploited for their learning potentialities

No Possibly

Yes Probably No Probably Yes Possibly No Probably Yes

Table 10.2: Degree of likelihood that SiS criteria indicating conditions for effective primary science learning were present in a majority of

classes that trialled the analysed Primary Connections units

*

It would not be expected that teachers would include comments on this SiS component (see section 10.7).

147

SiS components for effective

science learning Plants in action Marvellous micro- organisms On the

move Push-pull Smooth moves Electric circuits What’s it made of? Material matters All sorts of stuff Change detectives

06 06 06 06 09 07 08 09 08 08

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Probably

Yes Probably Yes Yes Yes

Probably

Yes Probably Yes Yes Yes Probably Yes Yes Probably Yes Possibly Yes Yes Yes

Probably

Yes Yes Possibly Yes Probably No Possibly No NoPossibly Probably No Probably No Probably Yes Probably Yes

Possibly No Possibly Yes Possibly No Possibly No Possibly No Possibly No Probably No No Possibly Yes Possibly No Probably

Yes Yes Possibly Yes Probably Yes Probably Yes Yes Possibly Yes Possibly No Yes Yes

Probably

No Possibly No No No No Possibly Yes Probably No No Probably Yes Probably Yes

Probably

Yes Possibly Yes No Possibly Yes No Possibly No Probably No No No No

No Probably

In drawing these inferences it must be reiterated that teachers were not asked to indicate what happened in their classes that related to these components. The inferences are based on the content of the statements made by teachers (as described in section 3.3). Of all the components, the one that is most likely underestimated is ‘Students’ individual learning needs and preferences are catered for’, as it is unlikely that teachers would comment on this condition within the context of the feedback pro forma. However, even meeting this component was mentioned by a number of teachers, as detailed in section 10.7.

Even though four components were not identified in a majority of units, it is still a positive finding that evidence of all components was found in statements by some teachers in a variety of units. This is because of the nature of the data collected. Having an appreciation of this background, the above findings (and the detail in this section) provide a set of different lens for those providing professional development for teachers implementing Primary Connections. Further, the examples within the various sections in this chapter could become the basis for professional development tasks as well as suggestions for teachers using Primary Connections units.

Analyses related to each of the components presented next. Assessment is not included as it was the focus of Chapter 9.