• No results found

1.4 Methods to analyse colloid dynamics

1.4.2 Trajectory analysis

Once particle tracking has been performed we must analyse and quantify the motional be- haviour of our little particles. The universal approach to quantifying the average movements of particles is in the computation of the mean squared displacement (MSD) of each particle. This quantity describes the average distance squared, ∆x2, a particle travels as a function of lag time, t, and it is often expressed as an ensemble average, h∆x2i, to represent the behaviour of the system as a whole. The MSD is calculated using all pairs of displacements with their associated lag time. For N particles, with position at a certain lag time xn(t)

and reference position xn(0):

∆x2(t) = 1 N N X n=1 xn(t)−xn(0)2. (1.15)

An implication of calculating the MSD in this way is that larger lag times are sampled far less than shorter lag times. This leads to a scaling of the standard deviation with hx2i and as such the data at larger lag times should be regarded cautiously. In fact Saxton suggests cutting off the data at 25% of n90 and Ernst and K¨ohler suggest that any fitting should be applied to the first 4 fitting points.91,92 This is dependent on the sampling rate

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION

and the total aqusition time however – for longer time intervals between frames and shorter videos more fitting points may be required.

The dependence of the MSD on time is indicative of the type of motion that the particles are subject to. For a particle moving in a random walk following Brownian motion we have already shown the MSD scales linearly with diffusion coefficient, D, and time, t– equation (1.2). When the motion is transported or hindered however the form of the time dependence and hence scaling of the MSD can change. This has been known by biophysicists for years90,93 and has lead to the modelling of so-called ‘anomalous’ diffusion by a power law:

∆x2(t)

= Γtα, (1.16)

where Γ represents the generalized diffusion coefficient and α is the anomalous exponent. For sub-diffusive, hindered motion α < 1 whereas for super-diffusive, transported motion

α > 1. In the biological world hindered motion is common due to obstacles and traps in the crowded environment that particles inhabit.94Super-diffusive motion occurs for actively transported processes for instance cargo transport by motor proteins.95This analysis is also relevant to artificial colloidal systems where particles may be hindered or trapped due to obstacles and barriers or adhesion to surfaces. There are also numerous transport processes (some of which are outlined in section 1.2.1.1) that can be modelled with a super-diffusive exponent. In some active transport cases this model will struggle to fit the data and so one can attempt to characterize the motion by a ballistic term:

∆x2(t)

= 4Dt+v2t2, (1.17)

where v is the propulsive velocity. The motion of molecular motors on microtubules is found to fit this type of directed motion96 along with other processes such as convection and sedimentation.97

An alternative and often complementary quantity of motional analysis is contained within the velocity autocorrelation function (VACF), briefly described in the next section – equation (3.4).

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION

Figure 1.7. Dependence of mean squared displacement with lag time, tlag, for differ- ent types of transport processes in 2D. Brownian diffusion is purely linear according to equation (1.2). Anomalous diffusion has power law dependency dependent on whether the motion is super- or sub-diffusive – equation (1.16). Directed or propulsive motion has quadratic scaling according to a propelled velocity – equation (1.17). Confined motion due to trapping shows a plateau in the MSD which is related to the confinement area.70 Reprinted with permission from Manzo et al.; A review of progress in single particle track- ing: from methods to biophysical insights,Rep. Prog. Phys., 78, 124601,2015. Copyright IOP Publishing.

1.4.2.1 Auto/Self-phoretic Colloids

In order to effectively determine whether a colloid is in motion due to an auto/self-phoretic mechanism we must first determine the order of magnitude of its propulsive velocity. If this is in accordance with previous data and that expected for a phoretic mechanism (i.e. 1–20 µm s−1) then we can be confident that we are on the right track. The propulsive velocity, v, can be extracted by fitting of the MSD with equation (1.17). A simpler method is to divide the displacement over a certain short time period to give an ‘instantaneous’ velocity, however this only works v D. Both of these methods are only valid when motion from other transport mechanisms are negligible which may not be the case as convection, sedimentation and other advective processes are usually present to some degree.97

Fortunately there is a characteristic of auto/self-phoretic colloids that allows us to distinguish phoretic propulsion from other types of transported processes. To understand

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION

this we consider the simple case of a spherical colloid with one half of the sphere containing a catalytic surface that drives propulsion. The particle propels in a direction relative to the flow field being established due to the reaction at the catalytic surface. This provides persistent directional force (towards or away from the catalytic cap depending on electroki- netic effects52,55) driving the particle forward. All colloids are also subject to Brownian rotation on top of this however which, over time, randomizes the propelled direction of the particle. The rotational diffusion coefficient,Dr, is related to the radius,r, of the spherical

colloid according to:

Dr =

kBT

8πηr3, (1.18)

with units expressed in s−1. A characteristic rotation time,τ

R, for the sphere to perform a

full rotation is found from the inverse of equation (1.18). The consequence of these random rotations is that the form of the MSD begins parabolic withv and decays back to a linear form with τR46: ∆x2(t) = 4Dt+v 2τ2 R 2 2t τR +e−2t/τR −1 . (1.19)

As such we can distinguish between advective processes, which will not see a decay in the parabola of the MSD back to linear unlike self-propulsive processes. This is presented graphically in figure 1.8 from the works of Howseet al.46 and is fitted with the two limiting forms of equation (1.19), ∆x2(t) =      4Dt+v2t2 whentτ R, 4Dt+v2 R whent≫τR. (1.20)

Another useful analytical tool is the velocity autocorrelation function (VACF). This is commonly used in the field of molecular dynamics to interrogate the structural dynamics of a system. The normalized VACF was used by Ke et al. to aid in the characterization of the motion of self-propelled Pt-Silica particles.98We can apply it here to clearly distinguish between propulsion and advection (from a uniform flow field). The velocity,v, is compared

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION

Figure 1.8. Depiction of a catalytic half-coated self-propelling colloid and its trajectory when dispersed in a fuel mixture a). Their characteristic MSD behaviour which is parabolic at short times,tτR, and linear at long times,t≫τRb)46Reprinted with permission from

Howse et al., Self-Motile Colloidal Particles: From Directed Propulsion to Random Walk,

Phys. Rev. Lett., 99, 048102, 2007. Copyright 2007 by the American Physical Society. A comparison between the normalized velocity autocorrelation function of self-propelling PS-Pt particles (black) and those experiencing a uniform convection field (red) c).

at each time point with the initial velocity according to:

hvi(0)·vi(t)i= 1 N N X i=1 [vi(0)·vi(t0+n∆t)]. (1.21)

In the presence of a uniform flow field (i.e. convection) where velocity is persistent in one direction we see a non-zero VACF where particles are transported in this flow field. When a particle is exhibiting auto/self-phoresis, the velocity comes from the particle itself and thus its direction can be randomized leading to a decorrelation and zero VACF after time has been allowed for it to fully rotate (figure 1.8c). With these tools the experimenter should be well equipped to study the active motion of colloidal particles.

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION