• No results found

5.2 UDP Analysis

5.2.1 UDP Throughput

The following line chart shows the UDP throughput of five Windows operating systems with different packet sizes in both IPv4 and IPv6 networks.

Figure 5-7: UDP Throughput of Five Microsoft Windows

From above line chart, the following c

1. From packet sizes of 64 bytes to 256 bytes, five Windows operating systems have similar UDP throughput in both IPv4 and IPv6 networks.

2. From packet sizes of 1152 bytes to 1536 bytes, five Windows operating systems have similar UDP throughput in both IPv4 and IPv6 networks.

3. From packet sizes of 384 bytes to 1024 bytes, Windows Server 2003 has lower UDP throughput than other Windows operating systems in both IPv4 and IPv6 networks.

This section analyses UDP performance in five Microsoft Windows operating systems which includes throughput, round trip time and jitter.

The following line chart shows the UDP throughput of five Windows operating systems with different packet sizes in both IPv4 and IPv6 networks.

7: UDP Throughput of Five Microsoft Windows

From above line chart, the following conclusions can be made:

From packet sizes of 64 bytes to 256 bytes, five Windows operating systems have similar UDP throughput in both IPv4 and IPv6 networks.

From packet sizes of 1152 bytes to 1536 bytes, five Windows operating systems roughput in both IPv4 and IPv6 networks.

From packet sizes of 384 bytes to 1024 bytes, Windows Server 2003 has lower UDP throughput than other Windows operating systems in both IPv4 and IPv6

49 This section analyses UDP performance in five Microsoft Windows operating

The following line chart shows the UDP throughput of five Windows operating

7: UDP Throughput of Five Microsoft Windows

From packet sizes of 64 bytes to 256 bytes, five Windows operating systems

From packet sizes of 1152 bytes to 1536 bytes, five Windows operating systems

From packet sizes of 384 bytes to 1024 bytes, Windows Server 2003 has lower UDP throughput than other Windows operating systems in both IPv4 and IPv6

The following line chart is the enlargement of

three Windows client operating systems with packet sizes of 384 bytes to 1536 bytes in both IPv4 and IPv6 networks.

Figure 5-8: UDP Throughput of Three Microsoft Windows (XP, Vista, 7)

From above line chart, the follo

1. Windows XP has little higher UDP throughput than other Windows operating systems in IPv4.

2. From packet sizes of 768 bytes to 1024 bytes, Windows 7 has higher UDP throughput than Windows Vista, but lower than Windows XP in IPv4

3. These three Windows operating systems have similar UDP throughput in IPv6 network.

4. The majority of systems using IPv4 network have higher UDP throughput than those using IPv6 network.

The following line chart is the enlargement of figure 5-7, shows UDP throughput of three Windows client operating systems with packet sizes of 384 bytes to 1536 bytes in both IPv4 and IPv6 networks.

8: UDP Throughput of Three Microsoft Windows (XP, Vista, 7)

From above line chart, the following conclusions can be made:

Windows XP has little higher UDP throughput than other Windows operating

From packet sizes of 768 bytes to 1024 bytes, Windows 7 has higher UDP throughput than Windows Vista, but lower than Windows XP in IPv4

These three Windows operating systems have similar UDP throughput in IPv6

The majority of systems using IPv4 network have higher UDP throughput than those using IPv6 network.

50 7, shows UDP throughput of three Windows client operating systems with packet sizes of 384 bytes to 1536 bytes

8: UDP Throughput of Three Microsoft Windows (XP, Vista, 7)

Windows XP has little higher UDP throughput than other Windows operating

From packet sizes of 768 bytes to 1024 bytes, Windows 7 has higher UDP throughput than Windows Vista, but lower than Windows XP in IPv4 network.

These three Windows operating systems have similar UDP throughput in IPv6

The majority of systems using IPv4 network have higher UDP throughput than

The following line chart shows UDP throughput of two Windows systems with different packet sizes in both IPv4 and IPv6 networks.

Figure 5-9: UDP Throughput of Two Microsoft Windows Server (2003, 2008)

From above line chart, the following conclusions can be made:

1. From packet sizes of 64 bytes to

UDP throughput than Windows Server 2003 in both IPv4 and IPv6 networks.

2. From packet sizes of 1152 bytes to 1536 bytes, two Windows Server operating systems have similar UDP throughput in both IPv4 and IPv6 networ

3. From packet sizes of 384 bytes to 1024 bytes, Windows Server 2008 has on average 36% more UDP throughput than Windows Server 2003 in both IPv4 and IPv6 networks.

The following line chart shows UDP throughput of two Windows systems with different packet sizes in both IPv4 and IPv6 networks.

9: UDP Throughput of Two Microsoft Windows Server (2003, 2008)

From above line chart, the following conclusions can be made:

From packet sizes of 64 bytes to 1024 bytes, Windows Server 2008 has higher UDP throughput than Windows Server 2003 in both IPv4 and IPv6 networks.

From packet sizes of 1152 bytes to 1536 bytes, two Windows Server operating systems have similar UDP throughput in both IPv4 and IPv6 networ

From packet sizes of 384 bytes to 1024 bytes, Windows Server 2008 has on average 36% more UDP throughput than Windows Server 2003 in both IPv4 and

51 Server operating systems with different packet sizes in both IPv4 and IPv6 networks.

9: UDP Throughput of Two Microsoft Windows Server (2003, 2008)

1024 bytes, Windows Server 2008 has higher UDP throughput than Windows Server 2003 in both IPv4 and IPv6 networks.

From packet sizes of 1152 bytes to 1536 bytes, two Windows Server operating systems have similar UDP throughput in both IPv4 and IPv6 networks.

From packet sizes of 384 bytes to 1024 bytes, Windows Server 2008 has on average 36% more UDP throughput than Windows Server 2003 in both IPv4 and

Related documents