• No results found

Chapter 3 Methodology and Method

6.4. Unique contribution to the discipline

This research aimed to address an identified gap within the literature in relation to TA SE in relation to ASD. Previous research addressed the SE of teachers of children with autism (Dimopoulou, 2012; Ruble et al., 2013), or

TAs (Higgins & Gulliford, 2014); however, the TA who is often at the heart of the task had not been the focus of any published studies.

On the basis of extant research and the TA voice via focus group interview, a preliminary TA SE questionnaire was created. This merits further

development. As a standardised scale, the TASCA could be utilised to assess links between SE and measures such as impact of training, job satisfaction and support.

The four sources of SE proposed by Bandura (1997) were considered in relation to the qualitative data gained, with the theory felt to provide a valuable framework for analysis and future planning.

The small scale findings of the current study add knowledge and insight to the scarce research in relation to the self-efficacy of teaching assistants who support children with autism spectrum needs. The researcher thus believes that the assertion that: “the primary goal of research is, and must remain, the production of knowledge” (Hammersley & Atkinson, 1995, p.17) has been met.

References

Abbott, L. (2007). Northern Ireland Special Educational Needs Coordinators creating inclusive environments: an epic struggle. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22(4), 391-407.

Abbott, L., McConkey, R., & Dobbins, M. (2011). Key players in inclusion: are we meeting the professional needs of learning support assistants for pupils with complex needs?. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 26(2), 215-231.

Ahmed, D. A. A., Hundt, G. L., & Blackburn, C. (2011). Issues of gender, reflexivity and positionality in the field of disability researching visual impairment in an Arab society. Qualitative Social Work, 10(4), 467-484.

Ainscow, M. (2000). The Ron Gulliford Lecture: The Next Step for Special Education: Supporting the Development of Inclusive Practices. British Journal of Special Education, 27(2), 76-80.

Ainscow, M. (2005). Developing inclusive education systems: what are the levers for change? Journal of Educational Change, 6(2), 109-124.

Alborz, A., Pearson, D., Farrell, P., & Howes, A. (2009). The impact of adult support staff on pupils and mainstream schools. Technical Report. In

Research evidence in education library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.

Alsaawi, A. (2014). A critical review of qualitative interviews. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 3(4), 149-156.

American Psychological Association (2010). http://www.apastyle.org/manual/ Armor, D., Conroy-Oseguera, P., Cox, M., King, N., McDonnell, L., Pascal, A., Pauly, E., & Zellman, G. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading programs in selected Los An- geles minority schools. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 130 243).

Artino, A.R. Jr, La Rochelle, J.S., Dezee, K.J., & Gehlbach, H. (2014). Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87. Medical Teacher, 36(6), 463-474.

ATL, D., GMB, N., NASUWT, N., PAT, S., & TGWU, U. (2003). Raising Standards and tackling workload: a national agreement. Time For Standards.

Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1, 385-405.

Austin, K. (2013). Training needs of paraprofessionals supporting students with autism spectrum disorders. Unpublished thesis. Retrieved from

http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4055&context=et d

Autism Strategy for Children and Young People in Hampshire 2014-2017. Retrived from http://documents.hants.gov.uk/childrens-

services/20150609CWDSIDSMKLHampshireChildrensAutismStrategy- v11April2015.pdf

Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(4), 441-462.

Awa, W. L., Plaumann, M., & Walter, U. (2010). Burnout prevention: A review of intervention programs. Patient Education and Counseling, 78(2), 184-190.

Babbie, E. R. (1990). Survey research methods. Co Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth.

Bach, S., Kessler, I., & Heron, P. (2004). Support roles and changing jobs boundaries in the public services: The case of teaching assistants in British primary schools. In 22nd annual International Labour Process Conference,

Amsterdam. Retrieved from

http://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Research_Areas/Health_Care/Doc s/ILPC_2004.pdf.

Balchin, R. (2007). Commission on Special Needs in Education. The Second Report. Retrieved from

http://conservativehome.blogs.com/torydiary/files/special_needs_in_educatio n.pdf

Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall Inc.

Bandura, A. (1983). Self-efficacy determinants of anticipated fears and calamities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 464.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359–373.

Bandura A (1989) Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26.

Bandura, A. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior, 31(2), 143-164.

Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 5. 307-337.

Barbour, R. (2007). Doing focus groups. London: Sage.

Barbour, R., & Kitzinger, J. (Eds.). (1998). Developing focus group research: politics, theory and practice. London: Sage.

Barnard, J., Broach, S., Potter, D., & Prior, A. (2002). Autism in Scotland’s

schools crisis or challenge? London: The National Autistic Society.

Barnhill, G. P., Polloway, E. A., & Sumutka, B. M. (2011) A survey of personnel practices in autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 26(2), 75-86.

Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219-234. Billingsley, B. S., & Cross, L. H. (1992). Predictors of commitment, job satisfaction, and intent to stay in teaching: A comparison of general and special educators. The Journal of Special Education, 25(4), 453-471.

Billingsley, B., Carlson, E., & Klein, S. (2004). The working conditions and induction support of early career special educators. Exceptional Children, 70(3), 333-347.

Bird, B., & Schjoedt, L. (2009). Entrepreneurial behavior: Its nature, scope, recent research, and agenda for future research. In Understanding the

entrepreneurial mind. 327-358. New York: Springer.

Birbeck, J., Cartwright, E., Ferguson, N., Satariano, S., Fukkink, R., Pease, T., ... & Webster, C. (2015). Video Enhanced Reflective Practice:

Professional Development through Attuned Interactions. Jessica Kingsley

Publishers.

Blacher, J., Howell, E., Lauderdale-Littin, S., Reed, F. D. D., & Laugeson, E. A. (2014). Autism spectrum disorder and the student teacher relationship: A comparison study with peers with intellectual disability and typical

development. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(3), 324-333. Black-Hawkins, K., Florian, L., Rouse, M., & Rouse, M. (2007). Achievement and inclusion in schools. London: Routledge.

Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., Brown, P., Martin, C., & Russell, A. (2004).

Effects of Class Size on Attainment and Classroom Processes in English Primary Schools (Years 4 to 6) 2000-2003: Research Brief.