10 USC 2451
Defense Supply Management 10 USC 2452
Duties of Secretary of Defense 10 USC 2453
Supply Catalog: Distribution and Use 10 USC 2454
Supply Catalog: New or Obsolete Items 10 USC 2456
Coordination with General Services Administration 10 USC 2457
Standardization of Equipment with North Atlantic Treaty Organization Members 10 USC 2464
Core Logistics Capabilities 10 USC 2466
Limitations On The Performance of Depot-Level Maintenance of Materiel 10 USC 3014
Office of the Secretary of the Army 10 USC 3022
Financial Management 32 CFR 651
Environmental Analysis of Army Actions (AR 200–2) 40 USC Subtitle III
Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 41 USC 432
Value Engineering (Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/.) 41 USC 434
Modular Contracting for Information Technology 50 USC 1522
Conduct of Chemical and Biological Defense Program Section III
Prescribed Forms
This form is available on the Army Publishing Directorate Web site (www.apd.army.mil). DA Form 5965
Basis of Issue for Clothing and Individual Equipment (CIE) (Prescribed in para 8–7d.) Section IV
Referenced Forms
DA forms are on the Army Publishing Directorate Web site (http://www.apd.army.mil). DD and SF forms are available from the OSD Web site (http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/infomgt/forms/formsprogram.htm).
DA Form 2028
Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms DD Form 2888
Critical Acquisition Position Service Agreement DD Form 2905
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (AT&L) Workforce Position Requirements or Tenure Waiver DD Form 2930
Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Standard Form 328
Appendix B
Status of Policy Statements
B–1. Incorporated and rescinded policy statements
Policy statements incorporated within this regulation and policy statements rescinded are listed below.
Table B–1
Status of incorporated and rescinded policy statements Policy statement: SARD–DO, 20 September 1996 memorandum
Subject: Modeling and Simulation Support of the Army Acquisition Process Status: Rescinded with this publication
Policy statement: SARD–PR, 29 April 1997 memorandum
Subject: Management of the Total Life Cycle for Acquisition Category (ACAT) Systems Status: Rescinded with this publication
Policy statement: SARD–ZA, 12 January 1998 memorandum
Subject: Implementation of Army Strategy for Modernization Through Spares (MTS) (co-signed by the Commander, U.S. Army Materiel
Command and the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Research, Development and Acquisition))
Status: Rescinded with this publication
Policy statement: SARD–SI, 29 January 1998 memorandum
Subject: Centralized Management Policy for Integration of Thermal Technology into Army Systems Status: Rescinded with this publication
Policy statement: SARD–SI, 29 January 1998 memorandum
Subject: Horizontal Technology Integration (HTI) Participation at the Army Systems Acquisition Review Council (ASARC) Status: Rescinded with this publication
Policy statement: SARD–SI, 29 January 1998 memorandum
Subject: Implementation of Reconnaissance, Surveillance, and Target Acquisition System and Subsystem Commonality Status: Rescinded with this publication
Policy statement: SARD–RP, 4 May 1998 memorandum Subject: Total Ownership Cost Reduction
Status: Rescinded with this publication
Policy statement: SARD–ZS, 30 September 1998 memorandum Subject: Fielding of Equipment Without Proper Training Devices Status: Rescinded with this publication
Policy statement: SARD–SI October 30, 1998 memorandum Subject: Project Managers Supporting the Fielding Process Status: Rescinded with this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–ZL, 29 July 1999 memorandum Subject: Depot Maintenance Policy
Status: Rescinded with this publication
Policy statement: SARD–RP, 7 September 1999 memorandum Subject: Support Concepts for Acquisition Category Programs Status: Rescinded with this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–RP, 30 September 1999 memorandum
Subject: Army Guidance Regarding Appropriation Sources for Continuous Technology Refreshments Spares Initiatives Status: Rescinded with this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–RP, 25 October 1999 memorandum Subject: Basis of Issue Plan Feeder Data
Status: Rescinded with this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–RP, 4 January 2000 memorandum
Subject: Development, Acquisition and Fielding of Weapon and Information Systems with Batteries Status: Rescinded with this publication
Policy statement: DAPR–FDH, 12 April 2000 memorandum Subject: Army System of Systems and Unit Set Fielding Directive. Status: Incorporated into this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–SI, 18 August 2000 memorandum Subject: Managing Acquisition Programs as Families of Systems Status: Rescinded with this publication
Table B–1
Status of incorporated and rescinded policy statements—Continued Policy statement: The Chief of Staff, 19 March 2001 memorandum Subject: Approval of Army Warfighting Requirements
Status: Incorporated into this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–RP, 10 April 2001 memorandum Subject: The New Defense Acquisition Policies and Army Positions Status: Rescinded with this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–RP, 18 July 2001 memorandum Subject: Army Joint Program Policy
Status: Rescinded with this publication
Policy statement: DAPR–FDT, 18 September 2001 memorandum Subject: Army Software Blocking Policy
Status: Rescinded with this publication
Policy statement: USD (ATL), 19 January 2002 memorandum
Subject: Cost-as-an-Independent Variable (CAIV) and Spiral Development Implementation Plans Status: Incorporated with this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–PC, 28 January 2002 memorandum Subject: Contractor Systems Support During Contingency Operations Status: Incorporated with this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–RP, 17 June 2002 memorandum
Subject: Milestone decision authority (MDA) for Acquisition Category (ACAT) II and III Programs and Upgrade to the ACAT Database Status: Rescinded with this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–PS, 11 June 2002 memorandum Subject: Contractor Support Restrictions
Status: Incorporated with this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–RP, 2 October 2002 memorandum
Subject: Fielding Systems With Complete Training and/or Unit Support Systems Status: Rescinded with this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–ZP, 20 December 2002 memorandum Subject: Army Staff Proponent for Contractors on the Battlefield (CoB). Status: Incorporated with this publication
Policy statement: USD (ATL), 7 March 2003 memorandum
Subject: Total Life Cycle Systems Management and Performance Based Logistics Status: Incorporated with this publication
Policy statement: ASA (ALT)/Deputy Under Secretary (Operations Research), 13 October 2004 memorandum Subject: Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) Approval Process Improvement
Status:Incorporated with this publication and AR 73–1 Policy Statement: SAAL–ZSA, 21 April 2005 memorandum Subject: Army Systems Acquisition Review Council (ASARC) Status:Incorporated with this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–SSI, 13 June 2005 memorandum Subject: Army Systems Engineering Policy
Status:Incorporated with this publication
Policy statement: DALO–SMM, 17 August 2005 memorandum Subject: Condition-Based Maintenance Plus (CBM+)
Status:Incorporated with AR 750–1
Policy statement: SAAL–PA, 18 April 2006 memorandum
Subject: Briefing Estimated Termination Costs During Program Milestone Reviews and Termination/Breach Army Systems Acquisition
Review Councils (ASARCs)
Status:Incorporated with this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–ZL, 12 July 2006 memorandum Subject: Impact of Warranties on Weapon Systems Status:Incorporated with this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–SSI, 11 December 2006 memorandum
Subject: U.S. Army Policy On The Acquisition Of System Training Devices Status: Incorporated with this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–ZL, 6 December 2007 memorandum Subject:Reliability of U.S. Army Materiel Systems
Table B–1
Status of incorporated and rescinded policy statements—Continued Policy statement: SAAL–SSI, 21 Dec 2007 memorandum
Subject: U.S. Army Policy for Army Geospatial Enterprise Services Status:Incorporated with this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–PA, 2 January 2008 memorandum Subject: Army Prototyping and Competition
Status:Incorporated with this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–PA, 2 January 2008 memorandum Subject: Army Configuration Steering Board (CSB)
Status:Incorporated with this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–PA, 1 April 2008 memorandum Subject: Data Management and Technical Data Rights Status:Incorporated with this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–SC4, 22 May 2008 memorandum Subject: U.S. Army Policy for Battlefield Electric Power Integration Status:Incorporated with this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–ZL, 3 October 2008 memorandum Subject: Common Logistics Operating Environment Status: Incorporated with this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–SSI, 26 May 2009 memorandum
Subject:Appointment of a Chief Software Architect (CSWA) at the Program Executive Officer (PEO) Level Status:Incorporated with this publication
Policy statement: SAAL–PA, 8 January 2010 memorandum Subject: Data Management, Technical Data Rights, and Competition Status:Incorporated with this publication
B–2. Source of statements
Policy statements listed in paragraph B–1 can be found through access to the Acquisition Business Enterprise Web site at: https://im.altess.army.mil/asso/. (Once logged in, look for the “ASAALT Digital Library” under the “Applications” tab.)
Appendix C
Program Manager’s Bill of Rights
C–1. Program manager rights Program managers have the right to—
a. A single, clear line of authority from the DAE. b. Authority commensurate with their responsibilities. c. Timely decisions by senior leadership.
d. Be candid and forthcoming without fear of personal consequences. Speak for their program and have their judgments respected.
f. The best available training and experience for the job. g. Adequate financial and personnel resources.
C–2. Post-milestone B authorities
After milestone B, authorities available to the project manager include—
a. The authority to object to the addition of new program requirements that would be inconsistent with the parameters established at milestone B and reflected in the performance agreement, unless such requirements are approved by the appropriate CSB (under para 8–2); and
b. The authority to recommend to the appropriate CSB reduced program requirements that have the potential to improve program cost or schedule in a manner consistent with program objectives.
Appendix D
Internal Control Evaluation for Non-Major Defense Acquisition Programs at Milestone Decision Reviews
D–1. Function
The function covered by this evaluation is the acquisition of non-major defense acquisition programs (ACATs II and III).
D–2. Key internal controls
The key internal controls for this function are the milestone documentation requirements specified in DODI 5000.02, as tailored and documented by the MDA.
D–3. Internal control evaluation process
These key internal controls must be evaluated using the MDR process. These internal control evaluations should be included in the PEO, DRPM, or MAT command CDR or PM’s 5-year Internal Control Plan. (See AR 11–2.) Because these internal control evaluations are conducted as part of MDRs, they will follow the schedule established by each program and not the uniform fiscal year schedule used normally in internal control plans. The Acquisition Decision Memorandum will serve as the documentation for the evaluation. All documentation required by the milestone decision authority for each MDR must be retained on file in the program office for the life of the program.
Appendix E
Internal Control Evaluation Process for Major Defense Acquisition Programs at Milestone Decision Reviews
E–1. Function
The function covered by this evaluation is the acquisition of MDAPs (ACAT I) and MAIS (ACAT IA). E–2. Key management controls
The key internal controls for this function are the milestone documentation requirements specified in DODI 5000.02. E–3. Internal control evaluation process
These key internal controls must be evaluated using the MDR process. These internal control evaluations should be included in the PEO, DRPM, or PM’s 5-year Internal Control Plan. (See AR 11–2.) Because these internal control evaluations are conducted as part of MDRs, they will follow the schedule established by each program and not the uniform fiscal year schedule used normally in internal control plans. The Acquisition Decision Memorandum will serve as the documentation for the evaluation. All documentation required by the milestone decision authority for each MDR must be retained on file in the program office for the life of the program.
Glossary
Section I