• No results found

ZIGZAG AND Y-ZIGZAG TRANSFORMERS

The shifts in phase of positive- and negative-sequence currents and

voltages in passing through a Y-zigzag transformer bank are the same

as those through a Y-A bank. The Y-zigzag bank will therefore

operate in parallel with a Y-A bank.

— VA_ ~IA aflMQflo. h- VB — .-vc_ oj b, C| C2 CJ TOT) •Vos] ^ •IF ** •Vcj let *I« H - r \ \ » (a) (b)

FIG. 18. A-zigzag and Y-zigzag transformer banks• (a) Wiring diagram of zigzag

connections with windings of A or Y indicated, but not connected. (6), (c) Normal

voltage vector diagrams of A-zigzag and Y-zigzag banks, respectively.

A-zigzag and Y-zigzag transformers will be analyzed as three-

winding transformers with exciting currents neglected. The equiva-

lent leakage impedances of any three windings ai, a2, and a3 on the

same core are the three short-circuit impedances between windings

taken two at a time with the third winding open. Let

Zi2 = leakage impedance between windings ai and a2

Zis = leakage impedance between windings ai and a3

Z2s = leakage impedance between windings a2 and 03

where all impedances are in per unit based on rated kva per phase and

rated winding voltages which are in direct proportion to the number

of turns. Base voltage in winding ai of the A is a line-to-line voltage;

170

TRANSFORMERS AND AUTOTRANSFORMERS [Ch. IV]

in the Y it is a line-to-neutral voltage; in windings a2 and a3 of the

zigzag which are assumed to have the same number of turns, it is

1/V3 times base line-to-neutral voltage at the terminals of the

zigzag.

The equivalent leakage impedances Zx, Z„, and Zt of windings a\,

a2, and 03 can be obtained from [5] for the three-winding transformer

if Zx, Zy, and Zt replace Zp, Z„ and Zt and if Zi2, Z13, and Z23 replace

Zp„ Zpt, and Z„t, respectively. Then,

Zx = \(Z12 + Zl3 - Z23) [75]

Zy = iCZu + Z23 - Z13) [76]

Z. - i(Zi8 + ZM - Z12) [77]

The identical equivalent circuit for the three phases are shown in

Figs. 19(a), (6), and (c) with the voltages and currents at their

jic-ib-lo

(a)

(b)

(c)

Fig. 19. (a), (6), (c) Identical equivalent circuits to replace each of the three-

winding transformers, with currents and voltages indicated.

terminals indicated. The notation in Fig. 19 corresponds to that of

Fig. 18(a). In Fig. 18(a), the assumed direction of voltage rise and

of current flow in the windings are indicated by arrows, and currents

and voltages are represented by symbols.

From Fig. 18(a),

Va = Vb3 - Vc2 [78]

From Figs. 19(6) and 19(c),

Vb3 - VB - (/a - Ic)ZX - IaZt [79]

Vc2 = Vc - (/» - Ia)Zx + IaZy [80]

Substitution of [79] and [80] in [78] gives

Va = VB - Vc - Ia(2Zx + Zy + Zt) + (h + Ic)ZX [81]

[CH. IV] A-ZIGZAG AND Y-ZIGZAG TRANSFORMERS 171

The transformer is symmetrical in the three phases; if it supplies a

symmetrical circuit and if VA, VB, and Vc are taken as positive-

sequence applied voltages, VB — Vc = _j^/SVjLi, Va = 7ai, /0 = /Oi»

Ib + IK — —lai, and [81] becomes

V.i = -jV3 VAl - /.i (3Z, + Zv + Z,) [82]

If the applied voltages are of zero sequence, VB _ Vc = 0,

VA = VaQ, /0 = /0o, /& + Ic = 2/oo, and [81] becomes

700= -/a0(2v + Zz) [83]

In [82] and [83], 7ai and Vao are the positive- and zero-sequence

voltages, respectively, at the zigzag terminals in per unit of a base

voltage equal to 1/V3 times rated line-to-neutral voltage; /ai and /a0

are in per unit of a base current equal to rated kva per phase divided

by 1/V3 times line-to-neutral kv.

Let V'ai and 7^o be the positive- and zero-sequence voltages at the

zigzag terminals in per unit of line-to-neutral voltage, and l'ai and I'M

the corresponding currents in per unit of rated kva per phase divided

by line-to-neutral kv. Then

01 = ;o0

If these substitutions are made in [82] and [83] and both sides of the

equations are divided by V3, there results

''^Zc + Zv + Z,

*\ rl Z™

J- -Jio-y

[85]

From [84] at no load, V'ai = — jVAi. At no load the voltage-to-

neutral at the terminals of the zigzag lags VA of the A or Y [see Figs.

18(6) and 18(c)] by 90°.

The per unit positive-sequence impedance Zi which is the same

referred to either side of the transformer bank is

Z, - Z. + ?*±^ [86]

If Zx, Zv, and Zz are replaced by their values given in [75]-[77],

Zi = J(Zla + Zls -iZM) [87]

172 TRANSFORMERS AND AUTOTRANSFORMERS [CH. IV]

The per unit zero-sequence impedance of the bank viewed from the

terminals of the zigzag, based on rated kva per phase and rated line-

to-neutral voltage at the zigzag terminals is

Z0 = [88]

o

where Z23 is the per unit leakage impedance between any two windings

of the zigzag on the same core, based on rated kva per phase and rated

winding voltage.

Zero-sequence currents flowing in opposite direction in windings of

the zigzag on the same core cause no resultant flux in the core, and

therefore induce no voltage in the windings of the A or Y. The

zero-sequence impedance viewed from the terminals of the A or un-

grounded Y is infinite; if the Y is grounded, it is the self -impedance

of the Y.

Problem 6. In a A-zigzag transformer bank, rated 7500 kva, rated voltage of the

A is 13.8 kv, that of the zigzag windings is 23 kv. Line-to-line voltages at the zigzag

terminals is 69 kv; line-to-neutral voltage is 69/V 3 kv. Per cent leakage reactance

between a A winding and each of the zigzag windings on the same core is 12% based

on 2500 kva per phase and rated winding voltages; leakage impedance between two

zigzag windings on the same core is 9% based on 1250 kva and rated winding voltages,

or 18% based on 2500 kva. Determine the impedances Zi and Zo for use in the

positive-sequence and zero-sequence networks of the system, neglecting resistance

and exciting currents.

Solution. Let A windings be ai and zigzag windings a2 and a3 as in Fig. 18 (a).

Based on 2500 kva per phase and rated winding voltages,

x12 = x13 = 12%

x23 = 18%

xi, based on 2500 kva per phase and line-to-neutral voltage at either set of terminals

of the bank, from [87], is

xi = 5 (xn + xu - ix23) = 9%

From [88], Zo viewed from the zigzag terminals based on 2500 kva per phase and a

line- to-neutral voltage of 69/V 3 is

Z*> 18

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Transformer Engineering, by L. F. BLUME, G. CAMILLI, A. BOYAJIAN, and

V. M. MONTSINGER, edited by L. F. Blume, John Wiley and Sons, 1938.

2. "An Equivalent Circuit for the Four-Winding Transformer," by F. M. STARR,

Gen. Elec. Rev., Vol. 36, No. 3, March, 1933, pp. 150-152.

[Ch. IV] BIBLIOGRAPHY 173

3. "A Useful Equivalent Circuit for a Five-Winding Transformer," by L. C. Aicher,

Jr., A.I.E.E. Trans., Vol. 62, 1943, pp. 66-70.

4. " Progress in the Study of System Stability," by I. H. Summers and J. B.

McClure, A.I.E.E. Trans., Vol. 49, 1930, pp. 132-158.

5. "Zero-Phase-Sequence Characteristics of Transformers," Parts I and II, by

A. N. Garin, Gen. Elec. Rev., Vol. 43, Nos. 3 and 4, March and April, 1940, pp.

131-136, 174-179.

CHAPTER V

TRANSFORMERS IN SYSTEM STUDIES

In the usual system study, base voltage is arbitrarily chosen in a

specified circuit; base voltages in the other circuits of the system are

then determined by transformer turn ratios. There are systems,

however, in which transformers of unequal turn ratios are operated in

parallel or — a more usual condition — a transmission circuit is sup-

plied at two or more different locations by transformers of unequal turn

ratios, or of unequal equivalent turn ratios when several circuits are

involved. For such cases, an equivalent circuit has been developed

which is applicable to two-winding transformers when the ratio of

transformation is different from the ratio of system base voltages on

the two sides of the transformer.1 This equivalent circuit is especially

useful in the determination of load division when an a-c network

analyzer is not available. Although developed for two-winding trans-

formers, it has wider application and can be extended to transformers

of more than two windings.

The usual procedure for representing such transformers on the

a-c network analyzer is to use an autotransformer to take care of the

difference in ratios between the turn ratio of the transformer and the

ratio of the system base voltages. The autotransformer used has very

low core loss and exciting current, and approximate compensation for

its leakage reactance is secured by a series capacitor. For most

problems it can be considered an ideal unit. The transformer leakage

impedance may be placed on either side of the autotransformer;

this impedance is expressed in per unit of system base ohms in the

circuit in which it is placed.

EQUIVALENT CIRCUITS FOR TRANSFORMERS WITH TURN RATIO

DIFFERENT FROM THE RATIO OF SYSTEM BASE VOLTAGES

AT THEIR TERMINALS

Equivalent circuits will be developed for two- and three-winding

transformers with exciting currents neglected. It will be assumed

that rated winding voltages are in direct proportion to the number of

turns.

174

[CH.V]

175

TWO-WINDING TRANSFORMER

Two-Winding Transformer. With exciting current neglected, there

will be no current in either winding with the other winding open.

Let the two windings be designated 1 and

2. The proposed equivalent circuit is

shown in Fig. 1 with branch impedances

Zx, Zv, and Z, to be evaluated. In Fig.

1, the voltages at 1 and 2 referred to

neutral N represent the voltages across

windings 1 and 2, respectively; the cur-

rents at 1 and 2 are the currents in wind-

ings 1 and 2, respectively, positive

direction of current being from 1 to 2.

Let ei be rated voltage of transformer

winding 1 divided by base system voltage

in winding 1. Let e2 be a similar ratio in

winding 2. The no-load voltage ratio of

the transformer is then ei/e2 based on

system base voltages.

Let Z| = transformer leakage impedance in per unit based on its

rated winding voltages and system base kva per phase.

If the no-load voltage ratios in Fig. 1 are equated to those in the

transformer based on system voltages,

NEUTRAL N

FIG. 1. Positive-sequence

equivalent circuit (resonant A)

for two-winding transformer

bank, exciting current neg-

lected, for use where trans-

former turn ratio differs from

ratio of system base voltages

at bank terminals. See [4]_[6]

for evaluation of Zx> Zv,and Z,.

l

[1]

[2]

With winding 1 short-circuited, the impedance viewed from winding

2 based on system base voltage in winding 2 is e\Zt. If this value

of impedance is equated to that in Fig. 1 viewed from 2 with 1 shorted

to neutral,

*7 rr

[3]

Simultaneous solution of [l]-[3] gives

Zx

'[4]

[5]

Z, = (eie2Z,)

From [1] and [2], or from [4]-[6],

Zx + Zv + Z, = 0

[6]

[7]

176 TRANSFORMERS IN SYSTEM STUDIES [CH. V]

From [7], Fig. 1 is a resonant A since the sum of its branch im-

pedances is zero. A resonant A could have been assumed in the first

place and [7] used instead of [1] or [2] to evaluate Zx, Zv, and Z,.

With exciting current neglected, there will be no current flowing to

neutral when a voltage is applied to one terminal with the other open.

A resonant A satisfies this condition.

It will be noted from [4]-[6] that, if ei is greater than e2, Zv will be

negative; if e2 is greater than ei, Z, will be negative. If transformer

resistance is included, the negative branch Zv or Z, will consist of a

negative resistance and a capacitive reactance. Although the res-

onant A cannot be replaced by an equivalent Y of finite impedances,

its branches can be combined with other system impedances in the

usual manner to simplify calculations. In an analytic solution,

negative resistances are as easily handled as positive.

If ei and e2 are both unity, Zv = Z, = <*> and Fig. 1 reduces

to the series impedance Zx = Zt = leakage impedance between

windings.

If ei and e2 are equal but not unity, as is the case when base voltages

are in proportion to rated voltages but not equal to them, Zv and Z,

become infinite, ei = e2 = e, and the per unit leakage impedance

Zx = e2Zt is expressed in terms of base system quantities.

If base and rated voltage are the same in one of the windings, e

in that winding is unity. In many cases, base system voltage can be

so chosen that ei or e2 is unity.

Problem 1. Determine Zx, Zv, and Zz in per cent for insertion in the equivalent

circuit of Fig. 1 for a transformer bank of three single-phase units each rated 9000 kva

121 kv/31.5 kv, with a reactance of 9% and a resistance of 0.9% based on its rating.

System base three-phase kva is 30,000 kva; system base voltages in the circuits at

the transformer bank terminals are 1 10 kv and 35 kv.

Solution. By definition,

Zt = (0.9 +J9.0) - = 1 +J10%

In per cent, based on system base quantities,

1.10 X 0.90Z, = 0.99 +J9.90 Zy = Cl -Zx = 1'™Zz = -S.SZz = -5.445 - J54.45 e2 — ei —0.20 €•> 0.90 Z, = — Zx = - — Zx = 4.SZx = 4.455 +j44.55 ei — e<i 0.20

[CH. V]

177

THREE-WINDING TRANSFORMER

Three-Winding Transformer with Base System Voltage in One

Winding Different from Rated Voltage. Let the three windings be

designated 1, 2, and 3. With a three-winding transformer, it is

reasonable to suppose that the arbitrarily chosen system base voltage

will be such that in two of the windings (windings 1 and 2) system

base voltages will be rated winding voltages. As rated voltages and

base voltages are equal, employing the notation used for the two-

winding transformer, ei = 62 = 1. Base voltage in the third winding

will be different from rated winding voltage, and 63 will not be unity.

NEUTRAL N

FIG. 2. Positive-sequence equivalent circuit for three-winding transformer bank,

exciting current neglected, for use where transformer turn ratios differ from ratios

of system base voltages at bank terminals.

Let Zi2, Zi3, and Z23 be the per unit leakage impedances between

windings indicated by the subscripts, taken two at a time with the

other winding open, based on rated winding voltages and base system

kva per phase.

To satisfy no-load conditions, there must be a resonant A in the

equivalent circuit between terminals 1 and 3, and between 2 and 3,

but not between 1 and 2. Figure 2 shows the proposed equivalent

circuit, with branch impedances Zi, Z2, Zx, Zv, and Zz to be evaluated.

It follows from the equivalent circuit of a two-winding transformer that

[8]

z,

[9]

The impedance between windings 1 and 2 with winding 3 open in

the equivalent circuit of Fig. 2 must equal that in the transformer:

Zi

[10]

178 TRANSFORMERS IN SYSTEM STUDIES [CH. V]

With terminal 3 shorted to neutral and voltage applied first at 1

with 2 open, and then at 2 with 1 open,

Z, + Z. + ^ = Z13 [11]

£iv

'

= Z23 [12]

Simultaneous solution of [8]-[12] gives

+ Z23 _ 7 _ Z,= 2(e3 - 2(1 - Z2 = 2e3 -I- Z23 — Zi3 2ft,

If e3 = 1 in [13], Ztf and Z, become infinite, and the per unit equiva-

lent circuit is reduced to that of the three-winding transformer based

on rated winding voltages and system kva. See [5], Chapter IV.

The equivalent circuits for two- and three-winding transformers

given in Figs. 1 and 2 can be used to replace a transformer bank of

identical single-phase units or a three-phase transformer in the positive-

and negative-sequence networks when ratios of system base voltages

in the windings are not the same as the corresponding turn ratios.

Zero-sequence equivalent circuits depend upon the manner in which

the windings are connected and the method of grounding; however,

they can be derived from Figs. 1 and 2 by the modifications given and

illustrated in Chapter IV for banks of single-phase units. In a trans-

former bank of single-phase units, the impedance to positive-, nega-

tive-, and zero-sequence currents is the same, provided that there is a

path for zero-sequence current. In a three-phase transformer, the

zero-sequence leakage impedances between windings may differ

appreciably from the positive. (See "Three-Phase Transformers,"

Chapter IV.)

[CH. V] OPEN CONDUCTORS IN CIRCUITS 179

OPEN CONDUCTORS IN CIRCUITS SUPPLYING UNGROUNDED

TRANSFORMERS

In the equivalent circuits of Figs. 1 and 2, and in many of those in

Chapter IV, exciting currents are neglected. This can be done when

the exciting impedance is so large relative to the other impedances

under consideration that it may be regarded as infinite within the

degree of precision required in calculations. Such is usually the case

in short-circuit calculations where there are no open phases and short-

circuit currents are large relative to transformer exciting currents.

When one or two conductors are open in circuits which supply

ungrounded transformers, the conditions may be quite different. The

transmission circuit may be a low-voltage feeder of short length and the

transformer bank of low kva rating, so that the capacitive reactances

of the circuit and the magnetizing reactances of the transformer bank

are infinite relative to the resistances and other reactances of the

system. But the capacitive reactances are negative, and the mag-

netizing reactances are positive; therefore, for certain ratios of these

reactances a current path of relatively low impedance may be provided

with resultant high voltages on the open phase or phases. If such is

the case, the resistances and other reactances of the system may be

so small relative to the capacitive reactances of the circuit and the

magnetizing reactances of the transformer bank that they can be

regarded as zero within the degree of precision required in calculations.

Under certain conditions, high sustained voltages have resulted

from the opening of one or two conductors in circuits which supply

ungrounded transformer banks. Voltages of sufficient magnitude to

damage equipment have been reported, and induction motors have

been observed to reverse their direction of rotation. Cases of the

breakage of a line conductor with resulting high sustained voltages

have been noted, and abnormal voltage conditions have occurred on

potential transformers.

Open conductors may be due to the blowing of fuses, operation of

single-pole switches, or of any interrupting device in which the in-

terval of time between the opening or closing of the first and last

phases is of sufficient length to permit ultimate steady-state voltage

conditions to be attained. Included also is the accidental breaking

of a conductor where one severed end may fall to ground.

To determine the conditions under which abnormal voltages may

occur and motors reverse their direction of rotation, with one or two

conductors open in circuits supplying ungrounded transformers, an

investigation was made by means of calculations and laboratory

tests, and the results were reported.2

180 TRANSFORMERS IN SYSTEM STUDIES [CH. V]

The phenomena encountered may be summarized as follows:

When one conductor of a three-phase circuit supplying an ungrounded,

unloaded transformer bank is open, there is a path for currents from

the closed conductors through the exciting impedance of the bank and

the capacitance between conductors to the open conductor, and

thence to ground through the capacitance-to-ground of the open

Related documents