• No results found

The Failures of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs): Australia as a case study

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "The Failures of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs): Australia as a case study"

Copied!
40
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Plenary Keynote Address

X International Agriculture Symposium

 

"AGROSYM 2019"

3-6 October 2019,

Jahorina, Bosnia and Herzegovina

The

Failures

of

Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs):

Australia as a case study

John Paull

(2)

John Paull

University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia

[email protected]

[email protected]

The

Failures

:

*Social

*Political

*Legal

*Economic

*Agronomic

*Ecologic

Plenary Keynote Address

X International Agriculture Symposium

 

"AGROSYM 2019"

(3)

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

GMO

Non-GMO

96.2%

3.8%

World Agriculture (ha)

data source: ISAAA, 2018

(4)

data: ISAAA, 2018

Rest

11%

India

6%

Canada

6%

Argentina

13%

Brazil

26%

USA

38%

World total = 189.8 m ha

5 countries account for 89% of GMOs

(5)

North & South America = 83% of World GMOs

(6)

www.gmo-free-regions.org

European GMO-Free Regions

(7)

Vladimir Putin, image: rt.com

(8)

Rest

1%

Canola

5%

Cotton

13%

Corn

31%

Soy

50%

data: ISAAA, 2018

4 GMO crops account for 99% of GMOs

(9)

The lie that underpins the GMO industry:

Regulators

same

Patent Office

“novel, unique,

different

, a real invention”

‘Substantial Equivalence’

Paull, 2008

(10)

GM-free is important

0%

15%

30%

45%

60%

Netherlands

UK

Belgium

Australia

Japan

Canada

USA

Argentina

Germany

South Korea

Brazil

France

Russia

Spain

Italy

Mexico

China

60%

49%

49%

45%

45%

45%

45%

43%

43%

41%

37%

37%

36%

33%

32%

31%

28%

data source: GfK, 2017; n=23,000

Food shoppers don’t want GMOs

(11)

google.com

(12)

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

GMO Ag

Organic Ag

Rest Ag

91%

8.8%

0.2%

Australian Agriculture (ha)

data sources: ABCA, 2019, ABS, 2018, Cotton Australia, 2019, Paull, 2019a, Willer & Lernoud, 2019

(13)

Australia: 0.4% of World GMO Agriculture (ha)

(14)

Australia: 51% of World Organic Agriculture (ha)

(15)

Withdrawn

Rejected

Approved

0

40

80

120

160

155

0

12

Office of the Gene Technology Regulator

167 Applications (2001-2019)

data source: OGTR, 2019

(16)

Price per tonne

A$450

A$475

A$500

A$525

A$550

A$575

2014/15

2015/16

2016/17

2017/18

2018/19

Non GM canola (Albany)

Non GM canola (Kwinana)

GM canola (Albany)

GM canola (Kwinana)

data: CBH,2019; Taylor, 2019; graph: Paull, 2019b

7.2%

Price penalty for GM Canola = 7.2%

(17)

Community

Attitudes %

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Safe

Don't Know

Not safe

68%

22%

10%

Australian consumers, data source: Cormick & Mercer, 2017; n=1225

(18)

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

GMO Food

Non-GMO Food

100%

0%

Failure: Supermarkets = No GMO food

(19)
(20)

Number of GM trial sites with rogue canola plants

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Apr 2001

Feb 2002

Oct 2002

Jun 2003

Feb 2004

Oct 2004

Oct/Nov 2005

May 2006

Jan/Feb 2007

Oct 2007

May 2008

Feb/Mar 2009

Nov 2009

May 2010

Feb 201

1

Nov 201

1

May 2012

March 2013

Nov 2013

May 2014

May 2015

Feb/Mar 2016

44

28

19

23

17

13

18

22

29

28

24

29

5

12

15

9

1212

13

8

10

12

10

8

13

9

19

10

6

7 7

9

4 4

3

4 4

16

3

1

6 6

8

6

GMO Trials in Tasmania, 1990s

data source: DPIPWE, 2016 et al

(21)

Canola

Grade

Marketing

Description

Specified Characteristics

Fair

Description

CAN

“Non GM

Canola”

“Certified GM free to Maximum adventitious

presence of 0.9% GMO. Suitable for Human

Consumption and Biodiesel production. ISCC EU

Certified”.

Canola with

GM

contaminatio

n

0.9%

CAG

“Canola”

“Suitable for Human Consumption and Biodiesel

production. ISCC EU Certified”.

GM Canola

Ghost GMOs in WA

after: Paull, 2019b

(22)

Ghost GMOs in WA canola

Paull, 2019c

Failure: to segregate

- ‘acceptable contamination’

“Non GM canola”

GM free canola

0.9% GMO contamination for food & biofuel

(23)

GM Canola W

A

%

10%

15%

20%

25%

2014

2015

2016

2017

19%

24%

23%

18%

GM canola in WA %

data source: Bucat, 2019

(24)

Cotton (Hectares)

0 ha

100,000 ha

200,000 ha

300,000 ha

400,000 ha

500,000 ha

600,000 ha

1996/97

1997/98

1998/99

1999/00

2000/01

2001/02

2002/03

2003/04

2004/05

2005/06

2006/07

2007/08

2008/09

2009/10

2010/1

1

201

1/12

2012/13

2013/14

2014/15

2015/16

2016/17

2017/18

2018/19

GMO cotton - Australia

data source: Cotton Australia, 2019

(25)

WA Organic farmers: Steve & Sue Marsh

(26)

google.com

Australia

Marsh v Baxter

(27)

Baxter

GMO

900 ha

Marsh

Organic

477 ha

Common boundary

GM

canola

GM canola

Author’s graphic after Supreme Court WA, 2015, Marsh v Baxter

non-GM

canola

2010 @ Kojonup, WA

Failure to contain on farm

(28)

image: J Paull

Marsh v Baxter

(29)

GM contamination

Marsh v Baxter

Damages=52,000

Legal costs=1,200,000

Paull, 2015; Martin, 2014; image: J Paull

(30)

Failure: No mechanism to compensate

for GMO contamination

Paull, 2019c; EPAC, 2018, Swinbourn, 2019

(31)

Daily Mail, 2019; Davis, 2019; Bellon, 2018; Bender 2018

• 3 recent cases lost by Bayer

• 20,000 more plaintiffs

(32)

Failure: Food as multinational patents

versus

Food as commonwealth

Bayer

Monsanto

Syngenta

Dupont

(33)

Parliament of Australia, 2019

These regulations:

*

water down the definition of GMOs

*

have Australia

out of harmony with the world

* risk damaging Australian food and agriculture

The push to deregulate some GMOs

Failure: Push to deregulate new GMOs

& techniques

(34)

* non native

* ability to spread

* can do harm:

•environment

•economy

•health

•“the way we live”

Failure: GMOs as invasive species

(35)

www.rightlivelihoodaward.org

for thousands of years … You can’t

control it. You can’t put a fence around it

and say that’s where it stops”

Percy Schmeiser

(36)

*Social

*Political

*Legal

*Economic

*Agronomic

*Ecologic

John Paull

University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia

[email protected]

[email protected]

The

Failures

:

Plenary Keynote Address

X International Agriculture Symposium

 

"AGROSYM 2019"

(37)

Questions…

John Paull

University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia

[email protected]

[email protected]

Plenary Keynote Address

X International Agriculture Symposium

 

"AGROSYM 2019"

(38)

Abstract

(39)

ABS. (2018). 4627.0 - Land Management and Farming in Australia, 2016-17. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 26 June. Bellon, T. (2018). Monsanto ordered to pay $289 million in world's first Roundup cancer trial. Reuters, August 11.

Bender, R. (2018). Bayer hit by more lawsuits over safety of Roundup weedkiller. The Wall Street Journal, November 13.

Bucat, J. (2018). 2019 Canola Variety Sowing Guide for Western Australia. Perth: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD), Governmnet of Western Australia.

CBC News. (2004). Percy Schmeiser's battle. Toronto: CBC News. 21 May. CBH. (2019). Commodities & Products. Perth: CBH Group.

Cormick, C., & Mercer, R. (2017). Community Attitudes to Gene Technology. Prepared for The Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, Canberra, (OGTR). Sydney: Instinct and Reason.

Cotton Australia. (2019). Cotton to Market: Statistics. Sydney: Cotton Australia.

Davis, J. (2019). Monsanto ordered to pay $2 billion to couple who say they contracted cancer after using the weedkiller Roundup. 14 May. Sydney: ABC Rural <abc.net.au>. DPIPWE. (2019). Tasmanian Gene Technology Policy 2014-2019. Hobart: Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (DPIPWE).

Daily Mail. (2019). California couople who developed the same cancer after using Roundup weed killer on their property for 30 years are awarded $2 BILLION in Monsanto trial. Daily Mail, 18 May.

DPIPWE. (2016). Audit Report - May 2016 - Former Genetically Modified Canola Trial Sites. Hobart: Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment(DPIPWE).

EPAC. (2018). Inquiry into mechanisms for compensation for economic loss to farmers in Western Australia caused by contamination by genetically modified material: Submissions & Hearings. Perth: Environment and Public Affairs Committee (EPAC), Parliament of Western Australia.

GfK. (2017). Decision Factors on What to Eat or Drink: Global GfK Survey (October 2017). London: GfK (Growth from Knowledge).

ISAAA. (2018). Pocket K No.16: Biotech Crop Highlights in 2017. Manila: International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). Martin, K. (2014). Judgment: MARSH -v- BAXTER [2014] - WASC 187BC201302729; CIV 1561/2012. Perth: Supreme Court of Western Australia.

OGTR. (2019). Table of applications and authorisations for Dealings involving Intentional Release (DIR) into the environment. Canberra: Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR). <www.ogtr.gov.au>.

Parliament of Australia. (2019). Gene Technology Amendment (2019) Measures No. 1) Regulations 2019. Canberra: Parliament of Australia. Paull, J. (2008). Beyond equal: from same but different to the doctrine of substantial equivalence. M/C Journal of Media and Culture, 11(26). Paull, J. (2015). The threat of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) to organic agriculture: A case study update. Agriculture & Food, 3, 56-63.

Paull, J. (2018). Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) as Invasive Species. Journal of Environment Protection and Sustainable Development, 4(3), 31-37. Paull, J. (2019c). Contamination of farms by genetically modified organisms (GMOs): Mechanisms for compensation. Journal of Organics, in press.

Paull, J. (2019b). Genetically modified (GM) canola: Price penalties and contaminations. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, 17(2), 1-4.

Paull, J. (2019a). Organic Agriculture in Australia: Attaining the global majority (51%). Journal of Environment Protection and Sustainable Development, 5(2), 70-74. Paull, J., & Hennig, B. (2019). World Maps of GMOs and Organic Agriculture. International Sustainable Development Research Society (ISDRS) Newsletter, 2019(3), 6-8. Supreme Court WA. (2015). Marsh v Baxter. Perth: Supreme Court of Western Australia. Appeal, Court bundle.

Swinbourn, M. (2019). Mechanisms for compensation for economic loss to farmers in Western Australia caused by contamination by genetically modified material; Report 49. Perth: Standing Committee on Environment and Public Affairs, Parliament of Western Australia; February 14.

Taylor, L. (2019). Average cash price for Can1 and Cag1 for each port zone (figures supplied). Perth: Daily Grain.

(40)

Termag Hotel

Jahorina

Bosnia and Herzegovina

References

Related documents

In section 2.2, cooperatives’ definition, values and principles are discussed; section 2.3 provides an overview of the nature of agricultural co-ops; section 2.4 discusses

Civil society participation was purposively woven into Colombia ’ s Constitution of 1991, which obligates the government to foster the sector, respect its autonomy, and set aside

After this meeting in Vienna (March 2009) Erste Bank, Raiffeisen International, Eurobank, EFG National Bank of Greece, Unicredit, Societe Generale, Alpha Bank and Piraeus Bank

Print and scan both page 1 (Work Order) and page 2 (Contractor Invoice) of the signed document and save it for email attachment.. Open the ‘Invoice Approval Form’ that is in

Figure  4 compares the five products considered in this work in terms of environmental impact score from endpoint assessment, product weight, and number of construction

Hospital administration plays a key role in creating the necessary conditions at the institutional level to prevent spread of health care associated pathogens. The physical

Venter: Color shiny, dark reddish brown overlain with enamel-like, grey or light to dark brown (Fig. 2); abdominal sternites 1 – 5 completely smokey grey or light brown with moderate

The number of synapses was reduced in IHCs located in the apical and mid regions, but not in the basal region, in the cochlea from MCMV-infected mice with increased ABR thresholds