Rochester Institute of Technology
RIT Scholar Works
Theses
Thesis/Dissertation Collections
2-15-1987
Tableware
Rebecca Rupp
Follow this and additional works at:
http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion
in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact
Recommended Citation
ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
A Thesis Submitted to the
Faculty
ofThe College
ofFine
andApplied Arts
in
Candidacy
for
the
Degree
ofMASTER OF FINE ARTS
TABLEWARE
by
Rebecca
Rupp
APPROVALS
Adviser: Graham Marks/
Graham Marks
---Date: _ _ _ _
----'-
7--"':;
~
"L_h--4..
,-;>""""---
--=
2-
"__/_
/
~
;y
~?=---SChm':'tZ/
/
Robert D. Schmitz
Associate Adviser: Robert
Date:
~,/)-I, ~
-=f
--~---~---Associate Adviser: Dougla
s
Coffey
/
Douglas Coffey
Date
:
b/?ft7
---~/~~/
---Special Assistant to the
Dean for Graduate Affairs: Philip Bornarth/
Philip Bornarth
Date:
---5'
7~; /3
~~~---It
?
Dean
,
College of
Robert H. Johnston Ph.D.
Fine
&
Applied Art
s
: Dr. Robert H. John
ston
/
Date
:
.r~)l~
-I,
Rebecca Ru pp
,
hereby grant per
mission to the
Wallace Memorial Library, of R.I.T. to reproduce my thesis in whole or
in part. Any reproduction will not be for commercial use or pr
ofit .
.,,--,
f~~/~/1ft-TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST
OF
PLATES
iv
THESIS PROPOSAL
vINTRODUCTION
1
PART
I
3
PART
II
9
PART
III
10
PART
IV
12
CONCLUSION
30
APPENDIX
31
BIBLIOGRAPHY
33
LIST
OF
PLATES
1
Cup
andSaucer
5
2
Tea Set
6
3
Construction
7
4
Construction
8
5
Pitcher
17
6
Pitcher
withDouble
Handle
18
7
Pitcher
withSmall
Spout
19
8
Pitcher
withShort Spout
20
9
Pitcher
21
10
Watering
Pitcher
22
11
Watering
Pitcher
23
12
Vase
24
13
Vase
25
14
Black Vase
withCameos
26
15
Fruit
andStem Vase
27
16
Vase
withPockets
28
17
Purple
Twisted Stem Vase
29
THESIS PROPOSAL
I
intend to
produce a series oftableware
including
cups andsaucers,
teapots,
and other objects usedin
serving
anddrinking.
Groups
of asymmetricaltableware
may be
presented on geometricbases.
The function
ofthe
base
ortray
willbe
to
clarify
and provide afocus for the
objects.A
wide palette of glazes and variousfiring
techniques
at conefive
willbe
exploredto
produce a range ofINTRODUCTION
The
thesis
proposal statedmy
intentions
to
producetableware,
cups,
saucers,
andteapots.
What
I
exhibited asthesis
work was agroup
offlower
pots.I
wantto
explainthe
reasonsfor
the
dis
crepancy between my
writtenintentions
andthe
workthat
I
actually
produced,
by
examining my
experiments withtableware
andthe
develop
ments
that
followed.
My
interest
in
tableware
andfunctional
objects canbe
traced,
I
think,
to
growing
up
in
a religious and ethnocentric culture whichrewarded
hard
work andtolerated
materialluxuries only if
they
couldbe
used.Objects
were appreciated morein
terms
ofefficiency
andfunction
than
for quality
ofcraftsmanship
or aestheticinterest.
In
our
household,
ahigh
degree
ofimportance
was placed uponthe
preparation and presentation of
the
meal;the tableware
wasimportant
and mealtimes were occasions not
to
be
missed.My
appreciationfor functional
objects,
in
additionto their
utility,
extendsto the
purely
physical satisfaction oftouching
apot and
responding
to the
surfacemy fingers
are scanning.I
can alsobe free
to
enjoy
the
visual and sensualmemory
associationsthat
anobject
may draw up for
me.These
experiences and associationsclearly
reveal
the
powerfulintimacy
afunctional
object can provoke and makepossible.
Not only do
these
piecesfunction
as objects with a personal,
intimate
status,
but
they
alsofunction
asimportant
elementsin the
larger
ritual of communal participation and celebration.In promoting
an atmosphere more conduciveto
communication andhuman
warmth,
an objectloses
its
self-importance and acquires anidentity
whichdepends
uponits relationship to
everything
elsein
that
larger,
specific environment.This
seems an enormous mandatefor
anobject,
but
I
think
that
since on occasionit
becomes
a realPART
I
Before
beginning
the
work outlinedin my
thesis
proposal,I
willingly
embarked on an experiment withclay slip
which wasintended
to
inject
newlife
into my
wheelthrowing.
My
wheel workhad become
proc essdominated,
and was characterizedby
asymmetricalforms
seemingly
devoid
of aninternal
sense of structure.This
sense ofform
wasfur
ther
emphasizedby
the
use ofintense,
colored glazes.(Plates
1,2).
I
neededto
temporarily
distance
myselffrom
this
intensely
personal approach.
By
working
with whiteclay
slip,
I
wasforced to
approach
form
as a constructed volume.I
poured outthe
individual
parts onto plaster
bats,
nevercutting
ortrimming
them,
but
peeling
them
offthe
bat
to
constructskeletal,
grid-like units.These
layers
of gridsbecame
modules which couldbe
stacked one ontop
ofthe
otherin many different
ways.The
modules wereskeletal,
dry,
open,
and revealedtheir
interiors.
Colored highlights
were appliedwith a
brush
to
certain areasby
using
a mixture of sulfates and water.The
sulfates permeatedthe
bisqued clay
and afterbeing
fired
to
conefive,
became
adry,
integral
part ofthe clay,
further
expressing
aparched,
thin-skinned
framework.
(Plates
3,4).
When
confronted withthis completely
newway
ofworking,
I
had
to
ask myselfwhy
I
responded withthese
grid-likeforms.
I
find
it helpful
to
clarify
andtrace
my
organizational sense.Perhaps
4
thought
processes ofthe
women around me as a child.For
example,all of
the
womenthat
I
knew
were quilt makers.I
developed
a respectfor the way in
whichthey
approachedtheir
work.They
collectedfabrics,
sortedthem
according to
color andpattern,
andthey
allmade quilts of
varying degrees
ofcraftsmanship
and quality.I
wasa participant
in
anactivity
whichHoward
S.
Becker
describes
as onein
which women"develope
private sequences of problems and solutionswithin
the
framework
oftraditional
quilt designs." (1:251).*Be
cause
their
work was not consideredart,
these
women werefree
ofany
preconceived constraints anddid
whateverthey
wantedto;
they
produced
political,
personal,
abstract,
and religious work whichbecame
objects ofdaily
necessity
and were a part oftheir
life.
(2:4)
The
best
quilt makerscasually
made sense ofthe
seemingly
endless
varieties of waysto
make allover
patternsfrom
basic
modules orgrids.
Added to
these
possibilitiesfor
abstraction,
werethe
endlessways
in
whichcolors,
hues,
and print patterns wereincorporated
into
their
arrangements.*
Numbers
in
parentheses refer
to
numbered referencesin the
C\J
cu +-> CD
ro CD
i 03
TD
lo
CM
CO
CO
+-> CD
03 CD
LO
co CD
+-> CD n3 CD
PART
II
The
experiment withthe
slip
allowed meto
question anddeter
mine
why the
use of color was soimportant to
me.I
cameto recog
nize
that my intuitive
approachto using
andexperimenting
with colorwas
influenced from very early
onby
the
quilt maker's sensibilitiesof
juxtaposing
both very dark
colors,
andunlikely
combinations ofpastels and prints.
Also
important for
me wasexperiencing her
freedom to
choose whatever combinations shepleased,
then
watching
her further
arrange and rearrangethe
paletteto her
satisfaction.Sewing
andpatternmaking have
afforded me a similarfreedom
to
experiment and
become
more aware of color andtexture.
I
alsoap
proached
the
use of glazesin this
manner as a naturalway to devel
ope a personal sense of color
for clay
surface andform.
In
looking
back,
certain paintershave
provided sources ofinfluence regarding
color.One
ofthese
is Milton
Avery,
an artistnot
easily
labeled.
I
was attractedto the
ideology
ofthis
inde
pendent
thinker
whocontinually
pursuedhis
own aestheticinterests
despite prevailing
stylistic winds.I
found his ability
to
handle
color spectacular.
His
use ofdelicate
tonalities,
chromaticsubtleties,
and sophisticated placement of planes of paledry
colors,
PART
III
After
a period ofworking
withslip,
skeletalunits,
structuralgrids,
anddry
mutedcolor,
these techniques
and piecesbecame simply
repetitive
to
me.I
realizedthat
this
wasthe
casebecause
whatreally
interested
me wasto
returnto
wheelthrowing,
functional
form,
and
the
use ofbrighter
color again.I
began
withthe
teapots
ofmy
proposal.As
abasis for
starting,
I
decided
to
incorporate,
asthe
teapot
body,
a coveredjar form
that
I
had
worked on earlier and wasinterested
in
pursuing.I
establisheda rythmn of
working
whichlended
itself
wellto
the
idea
ofthe
studioprocess as a continuum of experimentation.
I
workedin
groups,
eachgroup
consisting
of sixto
eightpieces,
andcompletely
assembledthe
pieces of eachgroup before
starting
the
next.In this
way,
ideas
couldbe
explored morecohesively
and certainaspects of
form
andtypes
ofinformation
couldbe
reconsidered orelaborated on
in the
next group.This
approach was carried overinto
glazing
andfiring
as well.My
earlierthrown
functional
forms
in
porcelaindepended
heavily
upon color.
Working
in the
conefive
range,
I
had
developed
a widerange of colors and
textures.
I
used glazesin
layers
whichdepended
on
the
whiteclay
underneathfor
their
luminosity
andbrilliance.
The
surface colordid
nothide the
evidence ofprocess,
asin the
throwing
lines,
but
it did
completely
cover and concealthe clay body.
11
I
did
not wantthe
rawclay
body
to
be
exposedbecause
I
felt
it
wastoo
white,
chalky,
and unpleasantto
the
touch.
So,
by
changing
to
an earthenware
clay,
I
couldexpressly leave
areas ofclay
unglazedand
these
areas couldbecome
important
elements ofthe
piece.By
firing
atypical
cone04
earthenwarebody
to
conefive,
it
acquired apatina with a softness and richness of surface and color
that
I
liked
very
much.This
patina was anindication that
the
body
wasbeginning
to
vitrify
to the
point ofcollapsing
and melting.As
long
asI
continued
to
usethis clay
body,
I
had many
technical
difficulties,
including dunting
and shivering.Another
difficulty
stemmedfrom
adesire for bright
color.I
quickly discovered that
conefive
glazes werenearly dissolved
anddevoured
by
the
earthenwareclay
during
firing.
Iron from the
body
permeated
the
glazes,
darkening
them
andmaking
them
very dry.
Gases
which
formed from the high
organic contentin
the
body,
bubbled
through
the
glazesduring
firing,
resulting
in
an uneven and pinholed surfacewhen cool.
To remedy
this
problem and arrive atthe
colorpalette,
variety,
andintensity
possible atthis
range,
I
sprayedthe
areasthat
I
wantedto
glaze with a white slip.But
this
resultedin
anincom
patibility between
the
slip
andthe
body
as well asbetween the slip
and
the
glazes.Solutions to
these technical
problems willbe
PART
IV
The
first
seriesin
earthenwareclay
consisted of eighttea
pots,
each constructed offive
separateparts;
athrown
alteredbody,
a
thrown
base,
spout,
andlid,
and an extrudedhandle.
When
assembled,
these
reapots were aninventory
ofideas;
they
expressed a miscellany,and emphasized
the
disparity
ofthe
parts.I
did
not glazethe
handles,
the
feet,
orthe
insides
ofthese pieces;
the remaining
areas were glazed
in
one ortwo
flat,
opaque colors.In
spite ofthe
ambiguous qualities of
the pieces, this
first
series providedthe basis
for
a gradual andlogical
evolution.It
wasthe
beginning
ofmy
private sequence of problems and solutions
taking
place withinthe
established parameters of utilitarian
form.
In
the
secondgroup
ofpieces,
the teapot
bodies
were alteredin
a similarbut bolder
manner,
the
lids
andthe
bases
were more refined,
and more attention was paidin
joining
the
different
parts andto
details
in
general.The resulting forms
weredefinitely
morecohesive
than those
ofthe
first
group;nevertheless,
they
werebland
and
lacking
in energy
and movement.As
in the
first
group,
I
did
not glaze
the
handles, feet,
orinsides,
using
the
different
partsremaining
aslogical
areasfor
colorboundaries,
matte and opaque.I
disregarded
the
bases
andthe
lids
altogetherin
the
third
group,
asI
could notjustify
their
necessity
orform
in the
secondgroup.
The
body
wasthrown
moreforcefully
withdefinite,
spiraling
13
throwing
lines
metby
anabrupt,
smoothly
ribbedhorizontal
shoulder.After the
body
wasleather hard
andtrimmed,
I
relocatedthe
base
by throwing
a cylinder ontothe
shoulder.Out
ofthis
neck,
I
stretched a spout
instead
ofadding
oneseparately
thrown.
A
pulled,
attached
handle
served as alink between the
body
andthe neck; the
negative space which
it
outlined,
reinforcedthe
curves ofthe
spoutand
the
body.
In making
the
changesin this group
ofpieces,
I
essentially
made pitchersinstead
ofteapots.
I
did
not returnto
a
lidded form
or afoot,
but
I
continued with an evolution ofthe
pitcher.
(Plates
5,6).
During
this
time,
I
wasvery unhappy
withmy
workin
general.The
forming
at wetclay
stages andthe
technical
aspects presenteda maze of
difficulties.
I
was somewhat encouragedthough,
withthe
development
which wasoccuring
from
one series of piecesto the
next.In the fourth group
ofpieces,
I
experimentedmainly
withthe
placement and
form
ofthe
handle
and ashort,
tiny
spout onthe
shoulder
and neck.The
body
ofthe
potbecame
moredelineated
with eachseries.
Meant
to
be
unglazed,
it had
arounded,
softbottom
pushedin
sharply
onfour
sides with pronouncedthrowing
lines
spiraling
up to
the sharp
edge which markedthe
beginning
ofthe
sloping
shoulder.When
leather
hard,
I
threw
a cylindrical neck ontothe
smoothly
ribbedsymmetrical shoulder.
Very
small spouts andhandles
werethrown
separately.
The
handles,
wide,
withthrowing
lines,
and sometimesundulating,
were attachedto
spanthe
top
edge ofthe
neckto
the
shoulder.
On
otherpieces,
they
were attachedhorizontally,
from
opposite14
While
stillleather
hard,
the
area meantto
be
unglazed,
the
body,
wasprotected with plastic and
the
upper area was sprayed with white slip.Dry,
matte glazes nextto
fluid,
transparent
color were appliedin
varying thicknesses
to
the
bisque
piece onthe
upper area.This
loose
ly
geometric application ofcontrasting
colors andtextures
wasbanded
by
avery
light,
orvery dark
ground.(Plates
7,8).
The
next seriesis
markedby
long,
attenuatedspouts,
whichoriginated
inside
the neck,
altering
its
symmetry.From
this
pointon
I
began to
alterthe
shoulder area aswell,
whilethe
clay
wasstill
very
soft.The forms
werebeginning
to
increase noticeably in
scale.
As
in the
previousgroup,
the
shoulder and upper areas weresprayed with white
slip
and glazes were applied with abrush
on awhite ground.
The
ground wasthen
sprayed with afluid
transparent.
I
used glazes which gave a widevariety
ofsurface;
fluid, dry,
bright,
intense,
and saturated colors were placed nextto
each other.(Plate
9).
The
piecesin
the
sixth series arewatering
pots.The
spoutshave become extremely
long,
andthe
pieceslarger.
The
shoulderwas
noticeably
altered and whiteslip
was applied withmy hand
after spraying.
(Plates
10,11).
At this
pointI
wasextremely
interested
in the
ideas
andanalogies
presenting
themselves
in
these
pieces.I
began
by
emphasizing
adefinite
upper andlower
area.The
lower
area,
ofraw,
dark brown
clay,
was characterizedby
a softvolume,
the
rounded
indented
bottom,
suggesting
an earthboundpresence,
the
soil,
15
more complex and active on
the
surface.With both
sprayed and applied whiteslip,
and appliedglazes,
the
upper areabegan alluding to
anoutcropping
of vegetation andfoliage.
These
pieces cameto
representfor
me a complex of paradoxesreflecting
my
emotionalmake-up
andthe
academic environment.
I
wantedto
continue with pieces which would emphasizethese
analogies.
In
the
nextseries,
instead
ofthe
long
spouts,
the
pieces were givensymmetrically
placedhandles
andbecame flower
pots.I
applied
thick slip to
them
in
an uncontrolled manner.The
glazes,
appliedrandomly,
weredark,
somber,
morose,
suggesting
the
macabre.This
approach seemedto
weighdown
andvisually
crushthe
soft,
supporting
base
which wasactually
meantto
buoy
it
up.(Plates
12,13).
I
personally
was nothappy.
I
was notworking
to
my
capacity,
but did
notprecisely
understand why.I
felt that
academia wasundermining my
creativebase,
motivation,
andindependence
of spirit.I
recognizedthe
false
pressures andtensions that
were createdby
the
environment.My
response wasto
produce workthat
wasstrongly
emotive,
clearly revealing
the
inflexible
positionI
felt
myselfto
be trapped
in.
I
had
to
make aconscious,
determined
effortto
pullfrom these
pieces whatI
thought
was mostvalid,
and push ahead witha
concertedly
more positive approach.The final
groups of pieces wereless horizontal
in feeling.
They
still retainedthe
unglazedlower
area.The
shoulder was smoothas
before,
but greatly
alteredfrom
the
inside
as well asout,
usually
16
thrown
as concave or convexstrips,
twisted
and attachedto
connectan
undulating
rimto the
implied
fruits,
or a sideto
an edge.Some
times
additional pocket-like parts werethrown,
attached,
andincor
porated as part of
the
pushed outfruit forms.
After
whiteslip
wassprayed onto
the
entire upperarea,
thick
heavy
slip
was appliedto
selected
protruding
areas.Sometimes
the
appliedslip
and protrusionsdipped down
ontothe
lower
areamaking
the
line between
glazed andunglazed areas
less distinct.
I
alsobegan
to
use sgraffito aroundthe
protrusions,
stemhandles,
andlip
rims.These
incised
lines
emphasized
the
three-dimensionality
ofthe
pushed outareas,
whilethe
addedenergy
and rythmnbrought
a cohesivenessto the
form
as awhole.
Color
was appliedto
specific areas against alight
transparent
aqua or white
background,
or ablack
ordark
redbackground.
Copper
green,
purple,
and pink were used againstblack
or white grounds.When
juxtaposed,
these
dense
and opaque colors were suggestive ofthick,
tropical
vegetation or of swampish, overripe colors.The
handles
suggested a vine-likereaching
out,
grasping
andtwisting.
n
LO r\
t
CD
-f->
T3
co
LO
o
coco
^ CD
+-> CD
ro CD
s
^
o
<X>
^
3
LO
.
r\
-C
LO
co
coo C\J
CD
+j CD
03 CD
-'
v\
N
"OCTi
s
^1-^~ _c
o
r-CO CM
CD
+-> CD
03 CD
-.
'
'
"";
*^U
Ictisis
c-V^
LO
o
CM
^
^d-CM CD
+-> CD
03 CD
r i 03
W0h
flQ
I4>*
I
oo
CO
r-LO CM CD
-l->CD 03 CD
<-CD CM CD
+-> CD
03 CD
A
V
CM
^^99
LO
<*
LO
1
T IV CM j CD
+J cu 03 CD ;
1 1 03 Q_
en
- CTi
CM
CD
+-> CD
03 CD
CONCLUSION
I
feel that this
process of explorationhas brought
about anincreased
awareness ofthe many facets
ofmy
inner framework
as anartist.
I
felt
a satisfactionin
solving
some persistenttechnical
problems as well as
reaching
clearerformal
solutions withthis
final
group
ofpieces;
they
represent a complex evolution andinter
action of
meaning
and emotion.As
ameeting
pointfor
these
paradoxes,
these
pieces are a source ofinformation
and a composite ofsolutions and research which will provide a wealth of
inspiration
for
new work.APPENDIX
CLAY
BODY
The clay
body
whichI
startedthe
first
thrown
series with wasa
low fire
earthenwarebody.
EARTHENWARE THROWING
BODY
Red
art96
Frit 3124
100
Fine
Grog
5-6%
When
fired to
conefive,
this clay
body
provedto
be far too
vitreous,
which resultedin
excessive shrinkage and aporosity
of.05%.
I
needed a more openthrowing
body
with a1.5-2.0%
absorptionwhich would
have
avery
deep
orangebrown
color at conefive.
After
a series oftesting,
I
arrived atthe
following
body
which satisfiedthese
requirements:CONE FIVE THROWING BODY
Redart
55
Calvert
25
Hawthorne Fire
Clay
10
Pyrax
100
Bentonite
2
Fine
Grog
2
SLIP
Initially,
I
had
difficulty finding
aslip that
was compatiblewith
the Cone
Five
Throwing
Body,
but
after along
series oftesting,
I
arrived at onethat
did
notflake
offin the
bone
dry
state,
or shiver offin the fired
state.32
SLIP
cont.This
newslip
was plasticin the
wetstate,
and even whenapplied
very
thickly
to the
leather
hard clay
would adhereto
andshrink with
the
body
in the
drying
stages.When fired
it
was whitein
color,
vitreous,
andformed
atight
bond
to the
body
as well asto
the
surfacelayer
of glaze.CONE FIVE WHITE SLIP
Grolleg
25
Georgia Kaolin
5
0M4 Ball
Clay
30
Custer Feldspar
20
Frit 3124
10
Flint
10
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.
Howard S.
Becker.
Art Worlds.
California:
University
ofCalifornia
Press,
1982.
2.
Patricia Mainardi.
Quilts,
The Great American Art.
San
Pedro:
Miles
andWeir,
Ltd.,
1978