our
West
Coast has not,I think,been donejusticeto. Itisstated that the rainfall at MacquarieHarbour
exceeds lOOin.* It averaged 67in. on theHampshire
Hills, 1837-9,tand
inone year exceeded 80in.How
much
of this is duetothe vast forests which still clothe thatregion, covering5000or 6000 square miles,and
how much
to2)ermanentjDhysicalconditions, cannotnow
be guessed, butitis of considerable importance to ascertain the factsbeforeany materialchange is effected in the aspectof the country by settlement.With
regard to these instruments which only require attention once a day, such as registering thermometersand
rain-gauges, I cannot imagine that there would be any difficulty in multii^lying them. Insome
colonies, as, for example,Canada,use ismade
of themasters ofthe
common
schools,who
arehighlyintelli-gent men,very stationary,
and
can allbe instructed;and
Iam
disposed torecommend,
asa beginning, the provisionof instruments for instructionalpurposes atthe Central School. Attention waspointedlycalled, asyou
areaware,atthe Inter-colonial Meteorological Conference, held atSydney
in November, 1879,to the importance of this colony in relation to weathertelegrams. Ihavereasontobelieve thatwe
shall shortly be invited to take part in a general planof inter-colonial observation,receivingand
interchanging them,and
otherwise contributing our share to a species of Australian confederation,which can alarm
no
susceptibilitiesand
arouse nojealousies.Gentlemen, I feelthatIhave taken
up
a great dealofyour time,and
have saidverylittle; I haveonlynow
tothankyou
for the kindness
and
attentionwithwhichyou havelistened tome.NOTES
SHOWING
THAT THE ESTUARY
OF
THE
DERWENT
WAS
OCCUPIED
BY A
FRESH-
WATER
LAKE DURING THE TERTIARY
PERIOD.
By
R.M.
Johnston, F.L.S., etc. [Bead12thApril, 1881.]Apart fromthe circumstance that the extensive tertiary
fluviatile
and
lacustrine formationsofAustraliahave beenthe principal sources from whichwe
have derived our rich treasures ofgoldand
tininthefree state,their study from a naturalist'spointofviewis also peculiarly interesting from thenearness oftheirdepositiontoourown
time.The
greater opportunities to examine the immediate featuresof one'sown
neighbourhood, tosome
extent,deter-mine
thedirectionof our studies in any branch of natural history,and
thus, perhaps,my
residence for ten years in Launceston—
itself cradled in the undulations of an old tertiarymudbank
—
may
havehad
somethingto do withmy
choice ofa subjectfor this evening.Many
presentmay
havenoticed along the shores of the Derwent,particularly in the neighbourhood ofSandy
Bay,One
TreePoint,and
Cornelian Bay, a series of sandyand
clayeybeds sometimes ofconsiderablethickness
and
extent.They
frequently dipirregularly at various angles,and
in various directions, asiftheyhad
beenmuch
disturbed sub-sequentto theirdeposition, butthey are never found at an altitude ofmuch
more
than 40 feet above the existing sealevel.
The
sandyportions, insome
places,may
readily be mis-takenformembers
ofthe older or primary rocks, but they areinvariably closelyassociated with thinly-bedded clays --white, yellow,and
grey,—
and
they are coarsely granularand
irregularlybedded.The
clays, onthe contrary, are generallymost
regularlyand
thinlybedded
likethe sheets ofahuge
volume.Now
ifwe
examine any oneofthesebeds a littlemore
closely,we
may
discernthatitis inturncomposed
ofinnumerable filmy leaves, finerthanthemost
delicately prepared paper, all in theplane ofthelinesofbedding. I have purposelydrawn
the parallelwitha book, for,likeit, each of the clayeypages are crowded with characters
—
Nature'sown
handwriting, telHngmany
an interesting story of the timeswhen
they were impressedand
deposited beneath the waters of this ancient lake; while the rifts, contortions, crinklings,over-lying rocks
and
drifts,and
the waste ofthe ever encroachingsea, tellofthevicissitudes towhichthe bedshave been sub-jectedsubsequently. Since
my
recent arrival here, I have spentmuch
time in studying their characters,and
I have carefully traced their extentby
inspecting every foot of coast line, watercourse, railwayand
road cuttings,and
naturalfacesexposed, within a seven mile radius of this City.
My
acquaintance with the "solitary patch of lime-stone" at Geilston,which is still quarriedby
Mr. Albury,and
ofthe old limestone quarryat thehead
ofBurnett-street, towhichI wasatone time guidedby
Mr. Ltgrand, enabledme
to deciphertheir signsmore
readily.discussedmostfully before the
members
of this Society,*and
which have subsequently received additionalillustration in theinteresting j^aperby
Dr. Barnard, in respect of the vegetable drifts ofGulgong. Inorder that Imay
establish thecharacters, relations,and
positionof this interesting for-mation, whichindeed lieswithin as well asaround the faircity ofHobart, Ishallperhaps be enabled to do so
more
effectually if, in thefirstplace, I confinemyselftoa descrip-tion of the principal sections as they occur at particular places,some
ofwhichIhave already referred to, viz:—
One
Tree Point,
Sandy
Bay, Cornelian Bay, Pipe Clay Bluff, PrinceofWales' Bay, Beauty Bay,LindisfarneBay, Geilston Bay,and
the neighbourhood of Burnet-street, Hobart. Itwillbe seen
upon
theMap
whichhas been kindly prepared forme
by Mr.Frank
Lovett that, on the one hand, all the pointsliewithin the basin,and
are subject to the wasting advanceofthe waters ofthe existing estuary; while, on theother hand, they abut against the older rocks,
and
the eruptivediabase representedby
Mount
Nelson, Knocklofty, theDomain,
Mount
Direction, theloftyridge terminating in PointRosny,and
themore
distant but majestic crest ofMount
Wellington.These latterdiabasic rocksconstitute the chief characters, and have rendered
famous
the featuresofour neighbourhood,and
they surround both cityand
the formation being described, aswith a great encirclingarm.The
formation atOne
Tree Point lies at the base ofMount
Nelson. Itforms a gentleeminence of a triangular shape, whose base,washed
by the Derwent, stretchesfrom
opposite
Sandy
Bay
Point to a creek which runs into theDerwent
nearly oppositeTrywork
Point, while its apex liesbetweentwo hollows whichradiate
from
that elevated saddle which formsso conspicuous a featurebeyond
the Flagstaff Station, atMount
Nelson.A
sectionunderneaththenew
defenceworks ontheBrown's Eiver road presents the following appearance, which, with someoftheleaf figures,have beengraphically sketchedforme
ona larger scaleby
my
friendMr.F.Salier. (See Platel.JThe
bedsmarked
a.h. dip at a considerable angle to the south-eastinthe direction oftheexistingchannel.Were
it not that the laminae in the plane of bedding are rich in certainwell-knowntertiary leafimpressions, the appearance ofsome
ofthelowermembers
of the group,A\4iichinclude a motley assortment of coarseand huge
angularblocks, princi-pally ofthefossiliferousmudstone of Palaeozoic age, would be apttomislead,and
perhapsmay
havehitherto misled the casualobserver.10
The
latterincludedblocks, huge, irregular,and
tilted atall angles, so as to obscure,if not conceal,the true lines of bedding,arevery puzzling; but, if
we
accept a conclusion which isforcedupon
usfrom
independentconsiderations,we
can easily conceivehow
the otherwise regularlinesofbedding with the true sedimentarylaminaemay
be harmonised with theincludedangularblocksofapreviousage.Ihave already observedthat oneofthelimits of the base oftheformation wasopposite
Sandy
Bay
Point. There, on theBrown's Riverroad, asectionexists, clearly showing the oldermudstone
rock in situ, against which the uppermembers
ofthetertiary lacustrineformationmay
be seen to abut. (See Plate2.)Now
allwho
have travelled along theHuon
Eoad, orwho
have sailedunderthe cliffs at
Bedlam
Walls,must
at times have been struckwiththe regularityofthe bedsof the oldermudstone
seriesasthey lie over each other in verticalsec-tions,
and quarrymen
at thenew
battery atKangaroo
Point will tellyou how
easilyone ofthe layersmay
be separatedfrom
the adjoining one.Some
of the layers,however, are ofsoftertexturethantherest,and
consequently a wallofsuch rockmust
wearaway
unequally.The
rockycliffsbelowtheShotTower
are good illustrationsofthisunequal waste of certain beds.At
this spot theremay
beseen the rapid destruction ofa softerlayer at the sea level, which,when
farenough
advanced, will cause, as it has already done, the fall of
immense
faces of the superincumbent mass, which,by
degrees will, by wind-driven waves of terrific force, be strewed as angular blocks
among
the finer sands of the advancing sea.Now,
ifwe assume
that the ancienttertiarylakeherespoken ofhad
an extensive surface, of which,from
other sources, there are proofs almostamounting
to demonstration,we
can readily conceive
how
the strewn angular blocks of fossiliferousmudstone
ata, fig. 1,came
tobeincludedamong
the
more
regularly stratified claysand
sands,and
associated with thefruitand
leaf impressions of a later age. Nay, more, the assumption thus forcedupon
us will enable the observer,as it enabled me, to anticij^ate in great measurewhat
otherobservations in the neighbourhood can verifyand
amplify.Letnot the over-cautious,therefore,frown
upon
exposedat
One
Tree Point.The
overlying basaltmarked
c, is essentially a dark, close-grained, feldspar basalt, with abundant grainsand
crystals of olivine. Itis full of small fragments, scarcely altered, of the surrounding stratifiedrocks.
The
rock itselfis in every respect very similar to thebasalts atDeloraine, Breadalbane, TableCape, Geilston, CaniiDbellTown,
Eingarooma, Latrobe, Fingal,and
various placesin Victoria, in nearly all of which j^laces it overliesfluviatile
and
lacustrine formations similar to that atOne
TreePoint.Towards
the south the basalt seems to have flowed inrepeated layers at different times. Thismay
be inferred alsofromthemarked
difference in theform
and
densityofthe varioussheets.
The
flows of basalt to the south,whichI assumetobethemore
recent, arevery unlike themassive beds atthe northern pointof junction with the underlying clays.At
certain points towards the creek southward, they arehighlyvesicular,and
presentverymuch
theappearance ofpumice stone, although of amore
dense character. Thisalso isthe character ofthe soft underlying feldspar basalts of Beauty Bay, Lindisfarne Bay,and
Cornelian Bay, good sectionsofwhich
may
be seen at low waterallroundtheseamargin.The
feldspar basaltonthenorthernand
western shores of PrinceofWales'Bay
isidentical with thatat CornelianBay, butthe cavitiesarefilledwith lime,and
is thus convertedinto a true amygdaloid. It is very curious that all the greatbasalticsheetsof
Tasmania
and
Australia of tertiary age should be so closely associated with the great fresh-water systems of the period;and
it is also worthy ofnotethat the
mode
by
whichthey were ejected was probablyby
fissure-eruption,and
notby
themore
familiar type of conical volcano.The immense
levelsheets of basalt in theMidland and
Northerndistricts of Tasmania, together with the vast plainscomposed
of similar basaltic sheets in Victoria,support the views recently advanced by Professor Geikie,*who
states positivelyupon
the subject, that the volcanismof earlierperiodsas exhibitedin the great sheets of theWestern
States of America,Abyssinia, India,and
elsewhere, can with difficultybeexplained by reference to any
modern
volcanicphenomena.The
persistent horizontality of the tertiary basalts inTasmania
andVictoria, also offerstrong reasonsin favourof thefissure-eruption theory.With
respect to the flows atOne
Tree Point there is another interesting feature, which, if correctly inter2)reted, proves that there wererepeated flows of basalt also at the12
point where the rocks aremost crystalline
and homogeneous
in character. This evidence consists ofthe discoveryofbone brecciainwhat
Ibelieve tobe the coolingjoints ofan older sheet of basalt.From
close personal examination of the bonesin situ,and
from
rei^liesmade
by Mr. Moore, the intelligent overseer of defence works,—
who
first, through Mr. Roblin,drew
my
attention to the "bone discovery"—
I
feelassured that thebone breccia was
washed
into the cool-ingjoints ofan older sheetof basalt,and
was subsequently overlaidby
anotherflow.Unfortunatelythe bones are so broken
up
that they are of little service in determining the exact nature of the animals towhichthey belonged. Mr. Eoblin, however,by
careful pulverization ofsome
of the fragments of breccia,among
other undetermined matter, obtained a small well-preservedtooth, which undoubtedly belongedto a marsupial ofthe genus Hypsiprymnus, orKangaroo
Rat
family. I also succeededin obtaining one or two bones of interest,among
which is the well-preserved incisor of a marsupial alliedtothe existingWombat.
I have
made
enlarged drawings of themore
imj^ortant fragments, which probably atsome
future timemay
be serviceable at least incorrelating the existence of thesame
animalelsewhere, evenif of little value in determining itsexactspecificrank.
The
bones obtainedby
the late Mr.Morton AUport from
the Geilstontravertinaremost probably theremainsofthesame
species.It
would
be interesting tomake
comj^arisons with the collections referred to, but I fear they have not been preserved. It will beremembered by some
that Mr. Allportand
othersatfirst inclinedto the oj^inionthatthe fragments ofbonespreservedatGeilston belonged to existing species, butthis opinion wasformed
at a timewhen
the relative position ofthetravertinbeds was notveryclearlyunderstood. Itis probable that thebone remains could only be identified with existing genera,and
that there isnot sufficient evidence to declare specifically their exact nature. However,some
of themembers
presentmay
be able to give us further informationregardingthismatter.Beforeleavingthesection at
One
TreePoint,itisdesirable todraw
particular attention to the fault atd,fig. 1. Itis evident thatby
thefaultd, the beds aand
h have again been thrown up, so thatwe
have, in travelling towards Kingston,a repetitionofthe sectionetod.Between
e,fig.1,and
thenortherly limitoppositeSandy
Bay
Point, c, fig. 2,there is evidence that considerable denudation has taken
this point.
The
overlying sheetofbasaltis only about 6ft.thickat the extreme point, but becomes massive,probably
from
repeated flows,towardsthewest.The
observationswhichIwas enabled tomake
regarding the conditions under which theOne
Tree Point leaf beds were deposited, predisposedme
toexpect that inthe protected bays on either shore of the estuary at a similar level I should findfurther evidencesofthe lake system, which even thenIhad
reasonto infermust
have included the Geilston travertin, whichInow
regard asa depositformedin a small bay of this old lako. In this respectmy
expectations weremore
thanrealised, for in carefullyexamining the coastlines at the first three points I selected for examination, viz.,Sandy
Bay, Cornelian Bay, Lindisfarne Bay, I discovered sections provingtheir close relationship, evenmore
remark-ablethan thatatOne
Tree Point, which first arrestedmy
attention.SANDY BAY
DEPOSITS.At
Sandy
Bay
there are severalinteresting sections belong-ing to the formation.One
of them,beyond
Dunkley's PointontheBrown's Riverroad,is composed of a series of clayey andarenaceous beds,irregularly disposed about 30 to 40 feet high. It is caj^ped by what appears to be a tufaceous loamysoil.The
surface of this loamy bank, likemany
other pointson either side ofthe Derwent, is covered with alayer of thecomminuted
remains of existing marineshells,about 1 foot in thickness.
The
shellsappear to have beensubjectedto fire,forwhich alsothereis evidencein the abundance of wood-ashesand
charred remains of timber belongingto existingvegetation which enveloped the shells.The
bestand most
interesting section atSandy Bay
istobe seenat a small projecting sandy promontory nearly opposite the
new
Eifle Eange.At
this point a series of finelybedded
blueand
reddish claysmore
orless arenaceous are tilted at a very highangle against a thick-bedded reddish sandstone of doubtfulage. Thereappears to be a fault at the pointwherethe clays are inclined at a very high angle againstthe sandstone,and
it is evident that a stronglateral pressurehasbentthem
iipinto theirpresent form.When
we
takeintoconsideration the eruptive disturbances subsequent to theirdeposition, of which,in theirvicinity, Ihave already given evidence,
we
may
reasonably expect consideralde crumplingsand
fractures of this kind.Sketch 3 gives in outline the principal features,
and
therelationsof this section. (See PlateNo. S.J
The
fine blueandred claysh are extremely rich in fossilleafimpressions,butasthe purerclays are often very soft,
14
specimens.
The
formscommon
toOne
TreePoint,Geilston, Pipe Clay Bluff, Burnet-street,and
elsewhere, are found herein the greatestabundance (seefigs. 1, 34.)The
sapindaceous-likeformsocommon
about Launceston,isalsofound throughoutthelocal formations where the beds have beenexposed.
Between
the sandy point referred to,and
the elevated diabasicbluff to thenorthagainstwhichthe fossiliferousclayey beds are again seen to rejDOse, there is evidence ofthe great thickness ofthe system, although the denudation, which has been great, together with superficialdrifts, have obscured the junction with the series to the southward. There is every reason for the belief that the
district
known
asSandy
Bay
properwas
almost altogether beneaththewaters of thisancientlake.PIPECLAY BLUFF,
CORNELIAN
BAY.The
nextimportant section illustrative of the natureand
extent ofthesystem isto be found in Cornelian Bay, at a placecalled the Pipeclay Bluff.
The
beds at this j^lace are nearlyhorizontal,and
they quietly reposeupon
theDomain
diabaseat ashort distance
beyond
a small gravelly point whichjuts outintothe bay.The
lowermembers
are com-posedofa fine whitish pipeclay, which is sometimes usedby
the poorer classes as a whitewash. These clays are readily reducedto a milky state in water,and
have most probably been derived from the waste of the whitemud-stone rocksof palaeozoic age,which
abound
in the immediate neighbourhood,e.g.,Geilston. Itis inthesewhite clayey beds wherethe leafimpressions ofmany
extinct species of trees aremost
perfectand
abundant.The
impression of'the finesecondary veinlets oftheleaves are preserved with faithful delicacy.
The
impression of fruit valves are also seen occasionally. Ihaveon severaloccasionsobtained the casts of Pleisiocapparis leptocelyphis, F.V.M., both hereand
atOne
Tree Point. Thisparticular fruit is verycommon
on the opposite shoreinthe Geilston travertin beds. There is no doubt ofthe identity ofsome
of the leaf forms with thosefoundatBreadalbaneand
Muddy
CreekontheTamar, whiletheir relationswith allthelocal leaf dejDosits, which I believe to bemembers
of thesame
lake system, are so abundant as to j^lace the matterbeyond
reasonable dispute.The
uppermembers
of the Pipeclay Bluff series are of amore
arenaceous character,and
they are coloured red with the surfacewaterfromthe diabase above ontheDomain.
They
are, however,rich in similar leaf impressions, though ofcourse lessperfectlypreserved.15
notdenudation scooped
away
the beds in the direction, of CornelianBay
Cemeterywe
could trace the clays as they dipped underthebasalt at CornelianBay
Cemetery Bluff. (See PlateNo. 4<.JThe
basalt sheets at CornelianBay
Cemetery are soft,vesicular,
and
sometimesdisposedinhexagonal columnsinthe exposed vertical faces. There is scarcely any doubt but that the similar sheets, at a short distanceacrossthe estuary,(i.e.,atBeauty
and
Lindisfarne Bays),wereata recent period connected. Itis alsoprobable that thesoft vesicularmasses atCornelianBay
bear thesame
relation to themore
denseand
crystalline sheetoverlying thetravertin atGeilstonasthe denseand
poroussheetsatOne
Tree Point already described.The
basaltic sheets tothenorthand
westof Prince ofWales'Bay
are also mostlyvesicular.Most
frequently thecavities are filled with lime,and
are thus converted into true amygdaloids.The
best illustration of the extent of the pebbly drifts overlying thebasaltsmay
be seenat LindisfarneBay
on the seaward marginofHisHonor
Mr. JusticeDobson'sproperty, ofwhich No. 5is asketch. (See PlateNo.5.
The
water-worn
pebble bedsare sometimes ofconsiderable thickness.The
pebbles have been derivedfrom
various sources:—
Fossilpines silicifiedfrom
the coalmeasure sand-stones, fossiliferous water-worn blocksfrom
the palaeozoic mudslones, waterworn boulders of diabase of secondary age, feldspathic basaltfrom
the underlying rock,and
fossilized trunksofa well-known exogenoustree of tertiary age, evidently silicifiedm
situ.The
appearance of the latterwood, rough, angular, notworn, presents amarked
contrast
when
compared
with the polished water-worn
silicifiedpinesand otherpebbles from the older rocks.The
sections ofthefossilwood
of tertiary age under the micro-scope appearto be identical in every respect with similar sections obtained byme
from
kindred deposits near LittleBadger
Corner, Flinders' Island,and
also at Corra Lynn, Launceston.SHELL
BEDS.Ihave also
shown
that thepebbly beds occurin thesame
position relative tothebasalt onthe opposite western shore,and some
ofthem
with the shellydeposits at CornelianBay
16
CornelianBay, have been derived
from
the waste of the older gravel drifts which overlythe basalt.Mr. Wintleinferredthatthe pebbly beds with the over-lying surfacelayer of
comminuted
shells,and
theunderlying basalt, were upheavedata recent periodfromthebed
of the existing estuarinesea. Thatthe shelly accumulationsare in reality indications ofa " raised seabeach."The comminuted
shells which ar? all of existing littoralspecies, (viz. Ostreaedulis, Mytllus latus, Venus aplirodinoides^ Rupellariadiemenensis, Bisellamelanostoma,Littorina nnifas-ciata Trochocochlea constricta, etc., etc.), favour this very natural conception.
My
acquaintance withtheundoubted
raised sea beaches of theislands inBass' Straits,and
alongournorthern coasts, predisposedme
to concur with Mr. Wintle's view of the cjuestion prior tomy
discovery of the true relation of the basalts with the tertiary leaf beds at the various points already describedin this paper.But
a careful examination of the shell beds themselvesfrom
Blackman'sBay
to Rosetta Crossing on the western side,and
from Geilston toFrederickHenry
Bay
onthe eastern shore, has convincedme
thattheviews ofthelateMr. Grunn,themost
illustriousamong
Tasmanian
naturalists, aremost
in accord with allthe factswhichare
now known
to me.You
areall aware of theclose observing powerspossessed bythe late Mr.Gunn,
and
themany
opportunitieswhich hehad
ofmaking
obser-vations as regards thelife and habits ofthe aboriginaltribes which frequented the coasts, especially the sheltered coves and beautiful headlands of theDerwent
and
Tamar. I cannot dobetterthangive a description of their shell feasts in hisown
words:—
Inapapercontainedinvol.2 of the
Tasmanian
Journalof Science,1845,towhichmy
attentionwasfirstspeciallydirectedby
Mr. Calder, afterpreliminaryremarks regarding theshell heaps,Mr.Gunn
goesontosay:—
"Iwas
ledtoinfer,atfirst, thattheyhad
beenartificiallyand
recentlyappliedasmanure. It wasnotuntil long afterwhen
Ihad
an opportunity of observingsome
lately formed heaps of shells on theWest
Coast ofthe island that I ascertained the truth.
As
some
17
fishin anyquantity, thetestacese
and
crustaceseconstituted the principaland
almost only supplythey drewfrom
that element.From
the reports ofearlynavigators, itwould
seem that the aborigines existed in considerablenumbers
along the coast ofTasmania; andwe
may
thence infer that the con-sumptionofshell-fishmust
have beenvery great, asthey ate no vegetables or substituteforbread. Incooking, theshells appearinallinstancestohave been merely roasted in the simplest manner, asI havenever traced anyindications of ovens or stonesarrangedtobeheated.The
burning of the shellshas hastenedtheirdecay. In obtaining the shell-fishthe
women
were, I believe, almost exclusively employed, whereverdivingwasrequisite, as for the species of haliotisand
oyster, these being brought to the surface in basketsformed from
various sedge-leaved plants.In the majority ofcasesthey
consumed
their food as near as possible to their fishing stations; occasionally going a littleinland to avail themselves of a spring or stream of freshwater. I have, however, observed in a greatmany
instancesthatthere were unusually large accumulations of shells on projectingpoints, headlands, and places
command-ingextensive views, whence I suppose that they adopted these sitesfor theirrepasts to protect
them
from the attacks ofhostile tribes."He
elsewhere describes that the heaps ofcomminuted
shellsarevarious in extentand
thickness,and
invariably burntandintermingledwithcharcoal, etc.In corroboration, I have to offer the following observa-tions:
—
1.
Wherever
the shells are found undisturbed by recent landslips,* I have foundthem
alwaysmore
or less com-minutedwith a burnt-like appearance—
unlikethe northern raisedbeaches—
andenvelopedinwhat
appearsto be ashes, fortheyare invariably full of the charred embers of thewood
of existingtrees.2.
At
Pipeclay Bluff, Lindisfarne,New
Town
Bay, and elsewhere, Ihave frequentlyfoundthe ordinaryrude chippedflintsofthe natives intimatelyassociated with the shells. I have given samples of these flints to His Excellency the GovernorSir
John
Lefroy,and
to HisHonor
Mr. Justice Dobson,who
willbe able totestifyas to theirgenuineness so farastheyarechipped native flints. I have alsodug
out from the undisturbed beds the split bones of existing marsupials, which appearalso tohave undergoneroasting.* The sectionwhich Mr. Wintle refers toisdue,Ibelieve,to the
sub-sequentre-distributiou of landslips caused by the encroaching waves at
SandyBay.
18
The
shelly layers invariably follow the irregularities of the surface along the coast lineupon
a vegetableloam
irrespective oflevel.The
layers areveryirregular in thick-nessandextent.On
favourite promontories of the natives, such asNew
Town Bay
Point, theburnt heaps are over four feetthick.4. Inland wherethelevels, free
and
open, are far under theundisturbed heightsatwhichtheshelly layers frequently arefoundalong the coast, Ihave never found traces of the shellsanywhere at ornear the surface. This would not be the caseiftherewere an upheavalsufficienttohaveraisedthe shellsalong the estuaryto theirpresentposition.5.
The
gravellyand
pebblybeds have evidently beendis-tributed by fresh water, most probably at a period long anteriorto the introduction of the existing marine fauna, becausein
my
opinion they contain remains ofan
extinct tertiaryvegetation insitu; and I have never been able totrace anyrecentormarine shellsin their beds.
6. Extensive isolated patches occur, in every respect identical in character, at such heights
upon
theDomain
as tomake
it difficulttoconceive that they were deposited there byotherthanhuman
agency.7. Frequently where the surface soil gives evidence of having beenleastsubject toaerialerosiontheshelly accumula-tions suddenlycease entirely, toreappear again
and
again in such amanner
as would be difficult to account for ifwe
supposed they were produced in the bottom of a shallow estuary, oratanylimit within the influence ofitswaters.
8.
The
accumulations arecertainlynot due to the agency ofwinds.Takingall these pointsinto considerationIthinkit is clear that the accumulations are solelydue to
human
agency; thatthey are inreality, asdescribed by Mr.
Gunn,
the "kitchenmiddens"
oftheextinct Tasmaniaus.That
they are vast inextent
and
thickness along our estuaries is to be expectedwhen
we
considerhow
much
this rudepeople dependedupon
themarine shells for subsistence. It
must
be borneinmind
also thattheTasmanian
race, from an ethnological point of view,must
have existed for countless generations upon the island; for otherwisehow
can we account for themarked
racialtypewhen
compared withthe natives of ihe Australian mainlandand
elsewhere? I think therefore that Iam
justifiedin separating the surface shell layer fromthelacustrine defosit of tertiary age; the former, an artificial
accumulationbelongingto theexistingperiod.*
It
may
be wellnow
to summarisesome
of the leading features of the system with which, in detail, I have en-deavouredtomake
you familiar.If in imagination
we
carry ourselvesfarback to the epoch which immediatelypreceded the reign ofthe eucalypts,when
theAraucaria
and
Cinnamon
trees graced the slopes of the neighbouringhills,we
might fromsome commanding
eminence (suchasMount
Nelson) lookdown upon
a magnificent sheet ofwaterat our feetwhich would,in a general way, resemble inoutline the existing estuary oftheDerwent.With
a few minor exceptions its sinuous boundaries would follov^r thesame
lines, butits waterswouldbefresh, andtheDomain
and
TrinityHillwould be almost isolated in their midst.
The
greatfeatures ofthesurroundingcountry,
Mount
Wellington,Mount
Nelson, Knocklofty,The
Gunner's Quoin,Mount
Direction,wouldbe almost unchanged.On
astormy daywe
mightalsosee its surfacebroken into crestedwaves;and
intheneighbourhood of
One
Tree Pointand
Geilstonwe
might watchhow
the chalky-looking cliffs ofmudstone
rock were undermined and crushedby their repeated blows, and also seethemilky sediment the result of such waste as it wasfloated
away
toeventually settle inthe quieter waters of the sheltering bays.The
vegetationwhich luxuriouslyfringed its shores would appearnew, althoughits generalfeatures would notstrike us as being altogetherunfamiliar.The
botanistwould find, instead of the sombregum
and
the greenwattle,a large
number
of treeswith elm-like leaves andwalnut-likefruitswith4and5 valves. In theslopes ofthe baynear Geilston aspeciesofAraucaria(A. Johnstonii), like A. Cumiinghami, wouldrearitscuriouslyimbricated branches crowned with their singular spiny cones. Ifwe
searchedamong
the deadwood
in theshady placeswe
should find an abundance of strange land shells (Helix Huxleyana,H.
Geilstonensis, BulimusGunnii), oneofwhicha larger species (Helix Tasmaniensis) would be specially interesting in the eyes ofa conchologist.At
times our imaginaryconchologist might espie, however, a single individualwhom
he would recognise asanoldacquaintance (HelixSinclairi). Itiseven possible thatno fresh-waterUnio wouldbe found to inhabit the waters ofthe lake; and thus it would exhibit a similarrelation to that whichatpresent distinguishes the northern * Having examinedanumberoftheshellheapsnear Hobart,Ihave no doubt whateverof their aitificial character. They resemble shell heaps
20
andsouthern waters ofTasmania.
Of
the higher animalswe
can onlyconjecture, butwe
are at least surethatmany
ofthe marsupialtribe, alliedtotheexistingWallaby and Kangaroo
Eat, aboundedin the scrubclose by.
This imaginary scene
may
fairly be taken to representwhat
we
know
of the earlieststage ofthis ancient lakeof the Derwent, whichI considertobelong to thesame
horizon as thelower zoneoftheLaunceston Tertiary Basin.The
second stageis indicated by the disturbances caused by repeated eruptions of feldspathic basaltalong themargin
of the old lake, and spreading over a portion of its floor.
Cornelian
Bay
Cemeteryand
One
Tree Point represent this stageclearly. It is evident that a very long periodmust
haveelapsedbetweenthe formation of the first sedimentary deposit ofthe lakeandtheperiodwhen
the eruptions began. Itis also clearthat the period ofdisturbancemust
have been oflong duration.The
Sandy
Bay
deposits are goodillus-trations ofthefirstperiod referredto.
The
second stage I recognise as the equivalent of the middle zone of the LauncestonTertiary Basin.The
third stagemarks
thedistribution of the gravel beds withtheir agates, jaspers, cornelians,andfossilwoods.At
this timethe lakemust
have beenrapidly shallowing. It isevenpossiblethat the
mere
horizontaladvance ofthe sea is alone necessaryto explain thefinal draining of this ancient fresh-water system. Ifthe outerlipofthis lake basinwas piercedby
the slowlyadvancing sea, itwouldsufficiently account forall the appearanceswith whichI
am
now
acquainted.There isno needto assume a general depression of the landsurface or a subsequent elevation, although I do not wish to beunderstood to
mean
thata slightalteration of the generallevelmay
not have been associated with the causes alreadycited.The
horizontalencroachmentofthe seain the direction ofitspresentlimits
must
havebeenveryslow,and
longenough
induration to admit of a complete transformation of the characteristicflora and faunaoftheperiod.When
we
reflectthat thechangeswhich take place within ourown
observation, with respect to existing animalsand
plants, are so slowand
imperceptible thatmany
otherwise intelligentminds have a rooted repugnance to recognise thefacts whichsupport the evolution hypothesis,
we
can, even better than in terms of years, estimate the immensity of time which separatesthe extinct species ofvegetation of even the uppermembers
of the lake system from the artificialshelly accumulations ofrecent originwhich
now
aloneremain to give evidenceoftheextinctTasmanian
race.decipher from the clayey pages of this old lake of the Derwent. There are,however, myriads ofleaves still uncut, unread, andI trustthe
members
of this Societywill assist in the future in adding to our knowledgeregardingthem.DESCRIPTION
OF
TWO
NEW
MARINE
SHELLS
DREDGED
OFF
THREE HUT
POINT,
D'ENTRE-CASTEAUX CHANNEL,
TASMANIA.
By
C.E.Beddome.
[Bead 10th
May,
1881.]DeLPHINULA
JoHNSTONI, U.S.Shell minute, obliquely turbinate, nucleus smooth, whorls 3| to 4, convex, latticed
by
spiraland
diagon-ally transverse lirse; spiral lirae alternately fine
and
coarse, increasing in
number
towards aperture ; baseconvex, the surface ofwhichisalso finely latticed; thereisa
well-defined, relativelybroad,
and somewhat
concave band, transversely lirate,betweenlastspiral liraeand
the tortuous marginalrib of umbilicus, which latter joinsand
forms a partly closedchannel atanterior angle of aperture. Aper-tureround, outerlip simple, obsoletely channelledatanterior and posterior angles. Innerlip reflexedand
nearly conceal-ing umbilicusand
marginalrib.—
Long. 2mil. Lat. 2mil.This shell is closely allied to J), tetragonostoma,
Tenison-Woods
(fossil sp.),and
forms an interesting link with the marinelifeofthetertiary period.Hab.,off Three
Hut
Point,D'Entrecasteaux channel,about 17 fathoms.Ihave great pleasure in dedicating this species to
my
friendR,M.
Johnston, Esq.,who
has interested himself somuch
inthe i:)resentand
pastfaunaofthe country.Leda
Lefroyi, n.s.Shellminute, thin,translucent,
much
compressed,narrowly elongate.Under
the lens the exterior surface appearsfinely striated, radiately
and
concentrically,and
iscovered with a very delicate olive epidermis. Anterior side short, arched; posterior side with a gently curved
depression,