• No results found

A comparative evaluation of clinical and radiological scoring systems in the early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Share "A comparative evaluation of clinical and radiological scoring systems in the early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis"

Copied!
10
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Acute Pancreatitis is non bacterial inflammation of Pancreatic Gland by

activation and digestion of the gland by its own enzymes. Acute pancreatitis

embodies a large spectrum of diseases which ranges from mild pancreatitis

comprising of parenchymal edema to severe necrotizing pancreatitis.

Identification of patients at risk for severe disease early in the course of acute

pancreatitis is an important step to guiding management and improving

outcomes.. Several scoring systems are used to assess the severity and predict

the outcome and prognosis of acute pancreatitis. An improved outcome in the

severe form of acute pancreatitis is based on early identification of disease

severity and subsequent focused management of the high risk patients. There is

a need to evaluate the efficacy of clinical scoring system versus CT severity

index to triage the patient into intensive care. The present study is designed to

examine the effect of using BISAP score on patient outcome and its value in

comparison with MCTSI.

STUDY DESIGN

(2)

MATERIALS AND METHOD

All patients with Acute Pancreatitis presenting to the Department of

General Surgery who fit the inclusion criteria were included in the study after

obtaining informed consent. Extensive demographic, radiographic and

laboratory data which includes complete haemogram, serum electrolytes , renal

function test, liver function test, serum amylase, lipid profile, chest X-ray, USG

abdomen etc were collected. BISAP score was calculated using data from the

first 24 hours from admission. A score of 1 is given for each criteria for a

maximum score of 5. MCTSI was calculated from CECT within 48 hours.

Patients were closely monitored during the entire stay in hospital and evidence

of organ failure documented. Patients were classified as mild acute pancreatitis

and severe acute pancreatitis based on the presence of organ failure that persist

for more than 48 hours . Pancreatic necrosis was assessed from CECT.

Pancreatic necrosis is defined as lack of enhancement of pancreatic parenchyma

with contrast. Comparison of prediction of severity of acute pancreatitis by

BISAP and MCTSI score is the primary outcome of interest and comparison of

prediction of mortality and pancreatic necrosis by both scores is the secondary

outcome of interest.

(3)

INCLUSION CRITERIA

All patients admitted with the diagnosis of Acute Pancreatitis based on the

presence of at least two of the following three criteria:

1. Characteristic epigastric abdominal pain , with or without radiation

to the back.

2. Serum amylase or lipase levels elevated to at least three times the

upper limit of normal.

3. Characteristic finding of Acute Pancreatitis on abdominal CT scan.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Patients with pre existing Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) which may be

associated with elevated Blood Urea Nitrogen values were excluded from the

study as they may result in high BISAP score.

OUTCOME

1. Organ Failure

2. Mortality

(4)

RESULTS

The study compares BISAP score which is a clinical scoring system with

MCTSI, which is a radiological score in predicting severity, mortality and

necrosis in 100 patients with acute pancreatitis..Mean age of patients presenting

with acute pancreatitis is 39 years. Males were 97% and females were

3%..Alcohol is the most common etiological agent contributing 46% followed

by gallstones contributing 27%..This may be attributed to the difference in

dietary, social, genetic and cultural factors between Indian population and

Western population. 29 out of 100 patients (29%) developed severe acute

pancreatitis. The AUC for prediction of severity by BISAP and MCTSI score

are 0.917 ( 95% CI 0.864 – 0.970) and 0.853 (95% CI 0.777 – 0.928)

respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate is 8%. Patients with BISAP≥3 had

thirty eight times more chance of ending up in death compared to those with

BISAP< 3. MCTSI was found to have higher sensitivity and positive predictive

value in predicting pancreatic necrosis..Patients with MCTSI ≥ 4 had 23 times

(5)

CONCLUSION

To classify patients with acute pancreatitis into mild and severe groups,

BISAP is a reliable prognostic tool. The components of BISAP are clinically

relevant and easy to obtain. The sensitivity of BISAP score ≥ 3 in predicting

severe acute pancreatitis was found to be 65.52%.AUC concludes that BISAP

score is an ideal tool in predicting severity in Acute Pancreatitis.

KEY WORDS

(6)

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Acute Pancreatitis is non bacterial inflammation of Pancreatic Gland by

activation and digestion of the gland by its own enzymes. Acute pancreatitis

embodies a large spectrum of diseases which ranges from mild pancreatitis

comprising of parenchymal edema to severe necrotizing pancreatitis.

Identification of patients at risk for severe disease early in the course of acute

pancreatitis is an important step to guiding management and improving

outcomes.. Several scoring systems are used to assess the severity and predict

the outcome and prognosis of acute pancreatitis. An improved outcome in the

severe form of acute pancreatitis is based on early identification of disease

severity and subsequent focused management of the high risk patients. There is

a need to evaluate the efficacy of clinical scoring system versus CT severity

index to triage the patient into intensive care. The present study is designed to

examine the effect of using BISAP score on patient outcome and its value in

comparison with MCTSI.

STUDY DESIGN

(7)

MATERIALS AND METHOD

All patients with Acute Pancreatitis presenting to the Department of

General Surgery who fit the inclusion criteria were included in the study after

obtaining informed consent. Extensive demographic, radiographic and

laboratory data which includes complete haemogram, serum electrolytes , renal

function test, liver function test, serum amylase, lipid profile, chest X-ray, USG

abdomen etc were collected. BISAP score was calculated using data from the

first 24 hours from admission. A score of 1 is given for each criteria for a

maximum score of 5. MCTSI was calculated from CECT within 48 hours.

Patients were closely monitored during the entire stay in hospital and evidence

of organ failure documented. Patients were classified as mild acute pancreatitis

and severe acute pancreatitis based on the presence of organ failure that persist

for more than 48 hours . Pancreatic necrosis was assessed from CECT.

Pancreatic necrosis is defined as lack of enhancement of pancreatic parenchyma

with contrast. Comparison of prediction of severity of acute pancreatitis by

BISAP and MCTSI score is the primary outcome of interest and comparison of

prediction of mortality and pancreatic necrosis by both scores is the secondary

outcome of interest.

(8)

INCLUSION CRITERIA

All patients admitted with the diagnosis of Acute Pancreatitis based on the

presence of at least two of the following three criteria:

1. Characteristic epigastric abdominal pain , with or without radiation

to the back.

2. Serum amylase or lipase levels elevated to at least three times the

upper limit of normal.

3. Characteristic finding of Acute Pancreatitis on abdominal CT scan.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Patients with pre existing Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) which may be

associated with elevated Blood Urea Nitrogen values were excluded from the

study as they may result in high BISAP score.

OUTCOME

1. Organ Failure

2. Mortality

(9)

RESULTS

The study compares BISAP score which is a clinical scoring system with

MCTSI, which is a radiological score in predicting severity, mortality and

necrosis in 100 patients with acute pancreatitis..Mean age of patients presenting

with acute pancreatitis is 39 years. Males were 97% and females were

3%..Alcohol is the most common etiological agent contributing 46% followed

by gallstones contributing 27%..This may be attributed to the difference in

dietary, social, genetic and cultural factors between Indian population and

Western population. 29 out of 100 patients (29%) developed severe acute

pancreatitis. The AUC for prediction of severity by BISAP and MCTSI score

are 0.917 ( 95% CI 0.864 – 0.970) and 0.853 (95% CI 0.777 – 0.928)

respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate is 8%. Patients with BISAP≥3 had

thirty eight times more chance of ending up in death compared to those with

BISAP< 3. MCTSI was found to have higher sensitivity and positive predictive

value in predicting pancreatic necrosis..Patients with MCTSI ≥ 4 had 23 times

(10)

CONCLUSION

To classify patients with acute pancreatitis into mild and severe groups,

BISAP is a reliable prognostic tool. The components of BISAP are clinically

relevant and easy to obtain. The sensitivity of BISAP score ≥ 3 in predicting

severe acute pancreatitis was found to be 65.52%.AUC concludes that BISAP

score is an ideal tool in predicting severity in Acute Pancreatitis.

KEY WORDS

References

Related documents

In this paper, we improve the efficiency of Koyuncu et al (2014)’s estimator of population mean of sensitive variable by replacing Traditional Randomized

member of the Virginia Constitutional Convention of 1776, he drafted the well-known declaration of rights, which was extensively copied by other American states,

More work is needed in order to reach the required achievement for maternal mortality reduction through ensuring accessible and high quality care provided by the governmental

Section A : This section describes introduction of α- amino phosphonates, α- hydroxyl amino phosphonates and previous approaches for the synthesis α- amino phosphonates.. Section B :

PD are delayed gastric emptying, pancreatic anastomotic leak leading to.. fistula, wound infection and post

In contrast, when a constant amount of T- antigen was cotransfected with increasing amounts of YB-1, we observed a dose-dependent alleviation of T-antigen-mediated suppression

Melanin is produced in the skin cell called melanocytes and it is the main determinant of the skin color of darker skinned humans. Gene MC1R produces more eumelanin and

Borderland Between Anthropology, Medicine, and Psychiatry (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980) and Chang Hsun 張珣 , Jibing yu wenhua: Taiwan minjian yiliao