Rochester Institute of Technology
RIT Scholar Works
Theses
Thesis/Dissertation Collections
2-1-2002
"fluid"
Jill Galloway
Follow this and additional works at:
http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion
in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact
Recommended Citation
Rochester Institute of Technology
College of Imaging Arts and Sciences
Imaging Art Graduate Program
Written Thesis
Jill
Galloway
Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Master of Fine Arts degree
''fluid''
February 2002
Thesis Board:
CHAIR: Elaine O'Neil
Professor, School of Photographic Arts and Sciences
Dan Larkin
Assistant Professor, School of Photographic Arts and Sciences
Therese Mulligan
Rochester Institute of Technology
College of Imaging Arts and Sciences
Imaging Art Graduate Program
Written Thesis
Jill
Galloway
Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Master of Fine
Art
Degree
"fluid"
February 2002
I, Jill Galloway, grant Rochester Institute of Technology permission to copy the
written portion of this thesis, in full or part, assuming due credit will be given to the
author when needed. The image portion of this thesis may only be copied with
permission granted by author.
Name
Name
Date
fig. 1
...FIAMD
Jill Galloway/Master
ofFine Art
Thesis/
Rochester
Institute
ofTechnology
Table
of
Contents
*
Preface
*
List
ofImages
Thesis
installation
Introduction
History
Sr.
Thesis,
Hartwick
College,
1998
FaU
Walk-through,
2000
Winter
Walk-through,
2001
Spring Walk-through,
2001
Body
*
Beauty
Abstraction
Dimensions
Biological
Conclusion
Preface
To
achieve anunderstanding
ofvisual artit is
important to
questionboth
the
artwork andthe
artist'sintentions.
Interpretation
by
the
artistis
notalways more privileged
than that
ofthe
viewer.Many
times
the
artist'sinten
tion
in creating the
artworkis
based
solely
oneliciting
viewers' reactions and
compelling the
audienceto
completethe
creative act.A
personalinterpretation
of a photograph or a sculptureis
created when a viewer observes andforms
thoughts
and emotions.Visual
artdoes
not always needto
be
explainedthrough
the
words ofthe
artist.In
the
workI
createI
amspecifically
interested in
aiding
the
viewerin
a conversationbetween
themselves
andthe
artwork.Observing
the
visualartwork,
a conversationoccurswherethe
viewermust askand answer questions about
the
abstract photographs andthen
draw
their
own conclusions.However,
the
artisthas
controlin the combining the
art pieces andthe
installation
to
guidethe
viewertowards
onetype
ofunderstanding.Installation
andabstraction,
key
elementsin
visualart,
shapethe
audience's
interaction
and perception.The
artisthas
more control overthe
viewers' perception ofthe
work wheninstallation
is
usedthoughtfully.
The
display
ofthe
work,
roomdesign,
and arrangement effectshow
something
is interpreted. In
using abstraction;
"expressing
ornaming
aquality,
idea
or otherconcept,
ratherthan
a particular object or concretething1"
the
artist usesvisual aidsin guiding
the
viewer.Using
a macrolens I
am ableto
manipulatehow
objects appearthrough the
camera.I
usethe
characteristics of certain objectsto
obtainimages
that
look
asif
they
couldbe
biological images
through
abstraction.The
power of artis
speaking
its
ownlanguage.
Feeling
challenged attimes
by
communicating
ideas
through
language;
the
visual artist can provide anew
kind
oflanguage,
whereforms
arephysically
createdcontaining
imagery
l
The World
Book
that
develops its
owndefinition
or story.Through
introspection
andtime to
study the
different
elements ofthe
artwork,the
artist recognizesthe
importance
ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure
Page
1.
Jill
Galloway,
Cell,
2001
cover2.
Jim
Johnson,
5 photographs, 20015
3.
Jim
Johnson,
5
photographs,2001
5
4.
Nathan
Sherman,
Practices
in
seeing, 20016
5.
Nathan
Sherman,
Practices
in
seeing, 20016
6.
Nathan
Sherman,
Practices
in
seeing,2001
6
7.
Jill
Galloway fluid,
2001
6
8.
Jill
Galloway, hairs,
2001
6
9.
Jill
Galloway fluid,
2001
7
10.
Jill
Galloway, Cabinet,
2001 711.
Jill
Galloway
Cabinet (side
view) 2001 712.
Jill
Galloway, Mucus, Skin, Que,
2001 713.
Jill
Galloway, Ugly Tomatoe,
20018
14.
Jill
Galloway fluid,
20018
15.
Jill
Galloway Study
1,
2001
8
16.
Jill
Galloway
Sudy
2,
2001
8
17.
Jill
Galloway
Specimen tank,
20018
18.
Jill
Galloway
Specimen
1, 2,
3
(detail),
2001
8
19.Jill
Galloway
Senior
Show,
1998 1120.
Jill
Galloway,
Senior
Show
(detail
Photographs),
1998
.... 1121.
Jill
Galloway,
Senior Show
(detail),
1998 1122.
Jill
Galloway, Television,
1999 1323.
Jill
Galloway,
Television
(detail),
1999 1324.
Jill
Galloway
Television
(detail),
1999
1325.
Jill
Galloway, Television,
199913
26.
Jill
Galloway, Embryo,
2000
1427.
Jill
Galloway, Botfly,
2000
1428.
Jill
Galloway, Yello,
2000
1429.
Jill
Galloway,
Installation
3,
2000 1430.
Jill
Galloway,
5 Fur
Specimens,
2000
1531.
Eva
Hesse,
Hang Up,
196625
Thesis Installation
The
experiencebegins
in
the parking
lot
ofbuilding
100
atMeridian
Centre
onWinton Road.
Entering
the
corporatebuilding,
alarge
skylightillu
minates
the
entranceway
directing
youtowards the
elevators.The
building
is
the
dwelling
for
severaldifferent
offices,
ranging
from
Strong
Optics
Lab
to
atemp
agency.It
feels
very
sterile,
morelike
going to
adoctor's
office or afinan
cial consultant
than
an art space.The
gallery
is located
onthe third
floor.
After
stepping
offthe
elevatorthere
is
a signto
assistin
locating
the
offices and"stu
dio"
.
One
mustthen
meanderdown
the
doorless
corridorto
find
ahallway
in
which
the
studiois
located
atthe
very
end.At
the
end ofthe
long hallway
lit
by
florescent
lights,
youhave
reachedthe
studio.There is
signageup
atthe
entrance:
"Jim
Johnson,
5
photographs;
Nathan
Sherman,
Practices
in
seeing;
Jill
Galloway,
fluid.
"As
one passesthrough
a glassdoor, immediately
eyes needto
adjustto
the
dimly
lit
space.The
first
roomis
aninstallation
done
by
Jim Johnson.
Five black
squaresline
the
wall.The black
squareslook like
mirrors
reflecting
the
limited fight
ofthe
room.
The
colortemperatures
ofthe
fights
cause a cooland
calming
responseto the
space.
Upon
walking
up to the
squares youcan
then
seeglowing
images
behind
the
glass.
The
images
fit behind
the
glassplay
with perspective and space
because
they
look
asif
they
arehovering deep
withinthe
glass.Examining
each ofthe
five
images
creates afeel
ing
ofvoyeurism as onelooks
into
another per son's private space.At
the
end ofthis
wall awarmer
light
leaks
outfrom
the
next room.fig.5
The
roomis
arrangedwithframed
images
onthe
wall and a carpetedarea with severalpieces of
furniture.
There
are several plants
that
decorate
the
room.Along
withthe
furniture
and adesk
in
the
corner
there
arebooks
and magazinescreating
|
the
feel
of a"waiting
room."The framed
photographs,
by
Nathan
Sherman,
that
line
the
wall are
decoration,
althoughthe
spotlights fig.4that
illuminate
the
images
cause youto take
moretime to
viewthe
photos.The framed
photographsII R
~I
areinteresting
andpleasing to
look
athowever,
not
the
mainfocus
ofthe
room.While
standing in
this
space,
the
viewerbecomes
awarethat there
is
yet another room on
the
other side ofthe
wall.There
aretwo
glasswindows,
setin the
middle ofthe
"waiting
room,"reminis
cent of a
fish
tank,
which allowthe
viewerto
see
into
the
next room.However,
in
this
"tank,"
there
arefour
pedestalsthat
hold
jars
filled
withliquid.
They
arebrightly
lit
so
that the
observer can viewthe
secludedspecimens
from
the
"waiting
room."The
specimens,
displayed
asbeautiful
objects,
f fj
entice
the
viewerto
comecloser, observe,
andstudy
whatis inside.
The
sculp
tures
arethere to
lure
the
audienceto take
notice ofthis tank
as well asto
seeinto
the
nextroomcreating
adesire
to
enterthe
space onthe
other side ofthe
wall.
At
the
left
end ofthis
wallthere
is
astep
up
into
adark hallway.
Spaced
evenly along the
floor
arefive
photographic
images
that
arelit
from
below. The
.
20"x20"
red andwhite
images
onthe
floor
illumi-fig. ifig.9
unrecognizable.
They
look like
studies of particlesfloating
in liquid
encasedbelow
the
surface.There
arethree images down
the
first
leg
ofthe
hallway
andafter
turning
rightthere
aretwo.
At
the
end ofthe
hallway
the
viewer enters a clean and white openspace.This
areais
the
final
room,
a sterilelooking
environment with white walls and soft white
lights.
The lights
that
illuminate
the
room are spotlights onthe
sevenimages
aroundthe
room.There is
also acabinet
that
has
its
ownlight
source withinthe
structure.
The
spacein
the
center ofthe
room allowsthe
viewerto take
in
the
surroundings,
noticing the
windows withthe
encased specimens
that
look
back
through to the
"waiting
room."When
stepping
into
the
roomyou notice a silver and white cabinet
that
illuminates four
photographicimages.
The
back
lit
photographs areencased
between
two
pieces ofPlexiglas.
The
5"x7"xl"
red and 6g.10
orange
images
are suspendedby
metal springsthat
causethe
block
to tilt
toward the
backside
ofthe
cabinet.The
images in
the
Plexiglas
appearto
be
the
samesubject as
the
floor
piecesin the
hallway. The
colors aresimilar,
however,
they
are a moredetailed
and abstract viewthan those in the
hallway.
Photographs
framed
onthe
walldirectly
acrossfrom
the
specimenroom contain colors similar
to those
ofthe
four images
in the
cabinet.The
same redthat
is in
the
floor
pieces andin
the
cabinetimages is
usedagain
in
two
ofthese
framed
photographs onthe
wall.These
photographsmimicthe
softfocus
andthe
smoothness of color paintings.The
three
photographs onthe
walllook
like
fig. 12they
are anotherexamination ofthe
same subject.The
vieweris
unableto
deci
pher what
the
subject ofthe
photographis
withinthe
image,
leaving
the inter
pretation of
up to
the
viewer.The images
are createdspecifically to
be
ambiguous so
that
the
vieweris
forced
to
draw
their
own conclusions.One
photographis
hung
alone onthe
wall acrossfrom
the
cabinet.The
colors
in
the
image
aremainly
a soft red anddeep
blue. The
subjectis
different
from
the
previous
images. The
photographhas
airbub
bles
in it
andthe
texture
looks
somewhatlike
ice,
fig.14
fig. 13
which
helps
the
viewer connectthe
image
to
liquid.
Seemingly
groundsthe
viewerin
reality.In
the
corner adjacentto the
specimentank there
arethree
images.
One large
photographhangs
on onewallandlooks like
an odd shapedcell2,
withatexture that
is
notfig. 15 fig.16
apparent
in any
other photograph.The
two
smallerimages
have
similarcolors andlook
like
they
are studies ofthe
same subjecttaken
from
different
angles.The
colorsin
these three
images
are yellows and oranges.
They
areframed
and sit onglass shelves
giving them
an object appeal.They
arephotographic
illustrations
ofthe
sculptures encasedin
the
specimentank.
Between
the
windows arefour
pedestals withsculptures
lit
by
a spotlightthat
hangs down from
the
railing.
Each
ofthe
four jars
arefilled
with clearliquid
and
different
objects.Three
ofthe
containershave
objectsthat
hover
in
the
center.They
look like
growths orspecimensthat
have been
contained andmonitoredin the
specimentank.
The
sculptureswithinthe
vitrinesare minimal
in
color,
the egg
shapes aretranslucent
with white and yellow
-IP
fig. 17
fig. 18
2
See
cover imageobjects
floating
withinthem.
One bottle
containedhair
that
floats
from
the
top
to the
bottom
ofthe
container.The installation
wasto
be
seen as awhole,
the
experiencefrom
entering
the
"wait
ing
room"all
the
way through to viewing the third
spaceis just
asimportant
asstudying
each
individual
photographorsculpture.Forcing
the
viewerto
absorb allthat
wasin the
space was an
important
part ofthe thesis
show.Through
the
useof abstractimagery
anddisplay
the
viewer waslead
to
believe
that the installation
is
abiological
experiment.The
workrelied on
the
experiencesandknowledge
ofthe
viewerto
create anexplanationfor
what
the
images
represented.However,
the
artistled
them towards
onekind
ofinterpreta
tion through the
use ofinstallation
anddisplay
ofthe
photographs andsculptures.The
workwas comprised of
pieces,
which relied on oneanotherto
createawhole;
the
experiIntroduction
Art
is
a product of choices madefrom
previous work.Through
critique andreflection,
anunderstanding is
reachedwhich clarifiesthe direction
ofthe
next piece.Questions
are answered abouthow
size, presentation,
materials and subject matterhave lead
into
the
next photographicimage
or sculpture.In
the
process ofmaking
artworkthere
has
alwaysbeen
satisfactionin
working
intu
itively.
There
is
a sense of comfort notknowing
wherethe
artwill go whenbeginning
a newbody
of work.Creating "fluid",
my thesis show,
has been
ajourney
that
began
about6
years ago.It
is important
to
seethe
progressionofimages
andideas
that
have led
to the
most recentartworkbecause
whenworking intuitively,
direct
connections are notdrawn from
onegroup
ofworkto
another untilthe
workhas
been
thoughtfully
examined.Conscious
and subcon scious choices are made as part ofthe
workitself
and atthis
pointthe
artist andthe
artwork can notbe
separated.The
work,the
artist andthe
journey
become
onething,
tied together
through
self-critique.History
My
undergraduatethesis
show atHartwick College
consisted of aninstalla
tion
offake-fur, fabric,
wire and photographs.
The
goal wasto
expandonbeau
ty
anduncertainty through the
cameraand manual manipulation of
material,
aswellas
combining two
andthree
dimen
sions.
Interested
in
how
the
viewer^
-1
fig.19fig. 20
would experience
the
artwork,
aninstallation
ofmixed media was created.
The
artwork wasarranged
to
overwhelm andinvite
the
viewerto
interact
withthe installation.
When
entering
the gallery,
various sizedphotographs
fined
the
walllike large blocks
of color.The
photoswere
randomly
lined
onthe
wallfading
from
one colorphotograph
into
the
next.There
were also circulartubes
hanging
down from
the
ceiling
as well asprotruding
outfrom
the
wall.From
adistance
the installation
dealt
with color andshape,
however,
when moving
closerto
the
wallthe
viewer could seethat
some photographs were not
just
fields
of colorbut
actually
had
texture
within
them.
The
colorsin the
photographs werebrilliant
andappealing,
how
ever
texture
added an element ofdiscomfort.
It
washard
to
fig
ure out
if the texture
withinthe
photograph wasthe
same synthetic
fur
asin the
sculpture.This
occurredbecause
ofthe
color and perspective shiftedwithin
the
image.
The
viewer waschallenged
by
the
inability
to
recognize whatthe
source ofinformation
waswithin
the
photographs.The
photographs presented a sense ofuncertainty
causing the
viewersto
createtheir
owninterpreta-fig. 21
tion
of whatthe
photos represented.The
installation
became
more effectiveby
using the two
mediumstogether
because
the
sculpturesinvited
physicalinterac
tion.
Touching
the
sculptureshelped
to
answer whatthe
photographs weresince
the
syntheticfur
was usedin
both
the
photos and aroundthe
tube sculp
tures.
Interest
in
how
the
viewerinteracted
withthe
work as well ashow
to
guidethe
viewertowards
onetype
ofinterpretation
weretwo
areasthat
I
wanted
to
continuein
creating
new art work.After
graduating
from
Hartwick I had
the opportunity to stay
andworkin
the
artdepartment
for
ayear as anintern
and assistant phototeacher.
I
wasfortunate
to
be
allowedto
keep
my
studioin the
sculpturearea, routinely
showmy work,
andhad
critiqueswithmy
professors.By
the
end ofthe
yearI
had
been
acceptedinto
graduate school and movedfrom
Oneonta,
my
home for five
years and returned
to
Rochester
whereI had
grown up.Back
in
my
parentshome,
nolonger
having
accessto the
sculpturestudio,
I
began
searching my
new/oldsurrounding
for
something
interesting
to
photograph.Adapting
to
anew routine
I
became
interested
in
photographing
the television.
The
television
seemedto
alwaysbe
on,
a changefrom Oneonta
whereI
had
notelevision.
Through intuition
andthe
questfor
creating
interesting
images,
I
discovered
away
ofaltering the
light
from
the television.
Adding
an extensiontube to the
lens
ofthe
camera,
I
was ableto
changethe television's
image
to
anextremely
out of
focus
picture.Again
focusing
on abstraction andcolor,
the
light from
the
television
became
my
subjectI began
creating
work unsure of whereit
would go.Through
my
cameraI
saw a glow ofcolorthat
looked
nothing
like
what one expectsto
see whenlooking
atatelevision,
ratherit
wasreducedto
a continually
changing
color orb.The
discrepancy
between
the
source ofinformation
andthe
photograph printedwasfascinating
to
me.The
photographsvisually
sug
gested
the interaction
ofcolor andform. I
wasbeginning
to
questionhow
truth
ful
photographswere.Without
the
viewerknowing
the
source,
they
wereleft
with
their
ownimagination
asto
what wasin
front
ofmy
camera.The
viewer couldthen take
an active partin
searchfor
the
subject ofthe
photographrelying
on
imagination
and experience.I
continuedto
work withcolor photographs,abstracting
things
to
force
the
viewerto
useimagination in
creating
aninterpre
tation.
For
my
first
walk-throughI
displayed
two
grids,
one96"x80"
consisting
of24
photographs andthe
other was a80
"x60"mounted grid of
15
colorphoto-j
graphs.The larger
grid consisted of photographs
of spots ofcolor.
While
the
photographs which
comprised of
the
smaller grid were
Ge' 23
forms
that
filled
the
frame.
The
photographs on
the
smaller grid werearranged so
that the
eye wouldflow from
#[
#
%
zn
fig. 25 fig- 22
one photograph
to the
next,
creating
onelarge
image.
The
goal ofthis
walk-throughwas
to
display
the television
photo-e 24 graphs so
they
interacted
with oneanother
creating
a new view.The
format
ofthe
photograph,
together
withthe
shape ofthe
grid,
replicatedthe
shape ofthe televi
sion,
the
only
visual clueback
to
the
photograph's source ofinformation. I
wasinterested in
how
the
photographschangedwhen shownas agroup
ratherthan
as single
independent images.
The
individual
photograph was not successfulin
creating
astrong
reactionin
the
viewer;
ratherthe
images
neededto play
offone another
to
work effectively.This
workwas wellreceivedby
the
faculty however,
I
saw anopportunity
to
pushthe
abstractquality
further
in this
work.My
intention
then
became
to
guide
the
viewertowards
adifferent
perception ofmy
abstract photographs.Deduction,
as well asthe mystery
ofthe
source ofthe
nonrepresentationalphotographs
intrigued
me,
and soI
continuedto
usethe television
asmy
subjectoffig. 26
light
and colorin
the
next part ofmy
journey.
In
the
secondterm
walk-throughI
presentedthree
30"x40"
photographic
prints
that
hung
in
adark
studioilluminated
by
spotlights.The
goal wasfor
the
images
to
possess aquality that
couldhold
the
viewer's attentionbecause
ofthe
seductive color and
form
as well as causethem to
draw
onthe imagination.
The
photographic
images,
which seemedto
be forms
that
could existin the
"real
H^^^^^^^^^_
world,"
challenged
the
^
I
viewer'snaturalway
of^B
I
perceiving
because
the
V
I
source wasthe
out ofI
focus fight
ofthe
televi-HL
^k
sion.K
A
Interested
in
con-|
tinuing
to
photographthe
fig.27 fig.28same
subject,
I
experimentedwith
different
ways ofshooting,
manipulating the
images
onthe
computer and
concerning
myself withdisplay.
Using
light
asthe only
source ofinforrnation in the
photographs,
I
was ableto
capture aform
that
looked
asthough
it
couldbe
atthe
beginning
stages oflife. The
photographs referencedthe
notion ofbio-morphemic
or embryonic-like statesthrough
form
and color.The
images
visually
hinted
at cellssplitting
orthe
shape of an embryo whilestill
containing mystery
asto
wherethis
information
camefrom. The
display
ofthe
workwas animportant
aspect ofhow
the
viewer was affectedby
the
image.
The
prints werelarge,
enveloping
the
viewer andilluminated
by
dra
matic
lighting
wherethe
area surrounding
the
photographsfaded
away
allowing
the
viewerto
become
mesmerizedby
the
forms.
For
the
final
walk-throughI
built
three
24x40"
light
boxes.
The
I
fig. 29
light from
the
Duratrans
photographsilluminated
only
a small portionofthe
studio.
The
viewerssurrounding became less
important
because
the glowing
images had
asoothing
affect.Along
withthe
light
boxes,
five
specimenlike
photographic
images
were presentedthat
combinedthe
shapefrom
the television
image
withfur
to
providetexture.
This
workwas yet anotherinvestigation
ofthe
same subjectin
whichI
createdobjects,
photographicimages
that
suggesteda
biological
existence.I
choseto
focus
onthe
sense oflife
the
photographs contained.
I
wantedthe
images
to physically
glow as a referenceto
their
originalsource,
atelevision.
These
color-filledtransmitted
images
were a naturalprogression
from
my
earlierphotography
andinstallations.
They
further
emphasized
simple,
organic-likeforms,
reminiscent ofevolving
stages ofearly
life.
The
use ofthe
synthetictextured
fur
was away
to
causethe
images to
have
a new sense oflife.
This
was animportant
experimentfor
the
development
fig. 30
of
the
photographsbecause
they
nolonger
reliedsolely
onthe
shapebut
nowthere
wastexture
to
aidthe
viewerin
how
to
think
aboutthe
photograph.The
texture
provided aliving
quality
to
the
images
that
further
enhancedthe
idea
ofthe
biological. The
syntheticfur
usedalong
withthe
shape ofthe
previousimages
combined elements of pleasure and uneasiness.The
smooth shapes andsoft
fur
wereaesthetically
beautiful
but
the
obscurationto
whatthe
images
wasuninviting.
The
viewers'wide range ofreaction
to these
photographs wasthe
mostinspiring
aspect of allthree
walk-throughs.Some
weredrawn into
the
aesthetics
and some were repelledby
the
uncertainty.Eliciting
these two very
differ
ent reactionswas what was
missing
in
the
other work.I had
nowdealt
withbeauty,
abstraction,
repulsion andinstallation.
However, they
were not completely
connected.After
reflecting
onthe
last
few
years,themes,
whichhave
been
recurring through
outthe
different bodies
ofartwork,became
evident.Themes
ofbeauty,
abstraction,
dimension
andthe biological
became
the founda
tions
to
abody
of work.Beauty
"Beauty
is
almost neverfelt
to
be
universal;
it
is
almost always aproductofexperience.
The judgement
ofbeauty
is
notfree
ofinterest;
it
is
laden
with interest.3"Beauty
is
a complex conceptionin
art,
it
is
important to
acknowledgethat there
aretwo
cannons ofbeauty.
There
is the
attractiveimage
that
confirms
what wealready
believe
to
be
beautiful
andthere is
the
beautiful image
that
contains some sort ofdiscomfort.
Signifiers
ofbeauty
are connectedby
context,
giving
pleasureaccording to taste.
There
is
a universalcomfort,
avisualpleasure
that
occursin
the
viewerwhentraditional
beauty
is
seen,
whichmay
empower everyone.
However,
whendealing
withthe
other cannonofbeauty,
the
universal pleasureis
challengedby
the
pursuit of anotherlevel
ofmeaning,
andthis transgressive
beauty
only
empowers afew.
It is
easy to
seethe
uglinessin
the
worldbut it
takes
strengthto
seethe
beauty.
In
reading the
paper orlistening
to
newsthere is
little doubt
that there
is
uglinessin
society.A
trip
to
Ireland
to
study
politicsin
aninternational
pro gram calledPeace
andConflict
notonly increased
my
awareness of a new culture
but
alsoinfluenced
away
ofunderstanding
life.
The
mainfocus
ofthe
trip
was
learning
the
history
ofconflictin
Northern Ireland.
Books
can not give atrue
sense ofwhatit
felt
like
to the
people ofthis
county.Only
through
interac
tion
withthe
peopledid
I begin
to
get a sense ofwhatit
felt like
to
live
in
atime
ofwar.
Through
this
interaction
withthe
people ofIreland I
also gained anunderstanding
of a uniquekind
ofbeauty.
I
found it difficult
to
comprehendhow
ayoung
womanin
Derry
Northern
Ireland,
whohad
seenher father beaten
to
death
by
the
British RUC
in
her
ownhome,
could seebeauty
in the
simplest ofthings
beauty
that
was rightin
front
of
her
at alltimes just
waiting
to
be
defined.
It
washard
to
understand whatthe
Irish
peoplehad been
through.
Most
of allit
wasamazing to
feel
the
positive
attitudes ofthe
people whohad
experienced suchtraumatic
eventsin
their
3
Gilbert-Rolfe, Jeremy.
Beauty
andtheContemporary
Sublime.
New
York,
Mworth
Press,
1999.
lives.
I
sawthat through their
responseto
pain,
wehave
to
find
somebeauty
that
surrounds usevery
day
because
withoutit
we couldonly despair.
Independent
research,
onthe
Northern Ireland
artists,
who created workthat
dealt
withthe conflict,
emphasizedthe
passionthe
artistshad
towards their
work.
They
wouldchanneltheir
emotions aboutthe
conflictinto
their
work.I
understood
that
for
these
artistscreating
artworkwas notonly
away to
personally
deal
with andexpress emotions aboutthe
conflict,
but
alsoto
help
their
culture to
see anotherway
ofreacting to the
Troubles
instead
ofcontinualwar.Upon
my
returnto the
statesI
wasdetermined
to
keep
this
new outlookby
find
ing
away
to
expressbeauty
andpain withinthe
artworkI
was producing.I
wasable
to
keep
this
positive attitude andchannelit
through
my
art.Ireland
waswhere
I
learned
to
seethe
appreciation ofbeauty
in
responseto
feelings
of suffering.
Recently,
an acceptance ofaesthetics andbeauty
has
returnedto
the
artworld.
Artists
and students areattempting
to
develop
abroader
understanding
of
the term
"aesthetic".
Immanuel
Kant,
aphilosopher mostwellknown for his
essay
onthe
standard ofjudgement
wasinterested
in exploring the
idea
of aesthetics,
beauty
andthe
sublime.Kant
usesthe
term
"aesthetic"to
referto
the
"A
prioriexperience"4and a standard of
judgement
based
on "taste".5Taste is
defined
by
aculture,
like
the ideal
Greek figure
orthe
modernfigure
in today's
magazines.
Living
in
a culturethat
is
so saturatedby
the
mediait is
hard
to
believe
that there
couldpossibly
be
a universal standard ofjudgement
in
regardto
beauty. We
may
not always agree withthese
ideals
however,
there
is
a universal
judgement
or voicekeeping
ideals in the
publiceye,
declaring
them
beau
tiful
andleading
usto
believe
they
aretrue.
In
accepting this
universaljudge
ment we
do
not needto
make moraldecisions
on whatconstitutes abeautiful
object;
wejust know.
Are
weforming
our ownpersonalideal?
Is
the
media conditioning
us?Beauty
has
alwaysbeen
closely
associated withthe
perfectform,
however,
through
cultural changes we nolonger
know
what perfectform
may
be.
4 Apriori
knowledge;
isknowledgeacquiredby
themind orreasoningalone,withoutanyspecificbasis
inexperience.
5Immanuel
Kant,
Critique
ofJudgement,
1790.There
aretimes
when a viewermay
not questionwhy
they
believe
anobject
to
be
beautiful. It's
seen asuniversal,
disconnected from
morals orexperiences,
the
aesthetics create a pleasurablefeeling.
A
sunsetfor
example,
is beau
tiful
it
causes a pleasurableresponse;
it's
based
onobservation,
not opinion ortheory.
For
methis
definition
ofbeauty
has
nosubstance,
it leaves
the
viewerfeeling
pleasureit is
only sensory
stimulation.Throughout
any
periodin
the
history
ofart,
you can seethere
has
been
a shiftin
defining
the
publicpercep
tion
ofbeauty.
For
instance,
beginning
withthe
classicalform
ofbeauty,
aestheticswerephysically
manifested withthat
ofGreek
ideals,
images
where onthe
grandscale and
body
was rendered asidealized
forms.
More
recently,
the industrial
revolution
brought
a shiftin
aesthetics.Objects
andimages
manifestedthe
ideals
ofspeed,
dynamism
and velocity.The
machinebecame
the
perfectform;
artists were
interested
in aestheticizing the
apparatusto
create a sense ofbeau
ty.
Society,
seeing the
machine asless
threatening
viewedit
as a good andstrong
tool,
aswell as a symbol of progress.Artists
then
began
to
depict images
that
had
a social and political aestheticin
comparisonto that
of classical aesthetics.
"Today beauty
mightbe
praised as a conceptthat
acknowledges regularshifts
in
culturalperception."6It is impossible
to
divorce
societalinfluence
onthe
definition
ofbeauty
Beauty
andaestheticsin
art concernthe
relationship
between
the
individual
and
the
artwork.From
this
perspectivethe
aestheticsis
engaging the
intellect
of
the
viewer.In
contemporary
art"the
field
ofaestheticshas
significantly
broadened
to
encompass morethan
subjective experienceof,
orfeeling
for,
beau
ty
to
embraceeverything
consideredin the philosophy
ofart,
including
the
object of
art,
the
artist andthe
spectator."7The
underlying
idea is
that
beauty
elevatesthe
viewer."The
experienceof
beauty
as anunfolding
cognitive operationin
whichwe arefirst drawn
in
andmade receptive
by
the
sensory
pleasure ofbeauty,
andthen
confronted withthe
6
Benezra
Neal,
Olga
M. Viso.Hegarding
Beauty: A Viewof theTxite TuientiethCentury. Washington D.C.: Hirshhorn
Museumand
Sculpture Garden
SmithsonianInstitutioA 1999.a,
p.36. 7Benezra,
p.88.presence ofa
radically
different
subjectivity.Thus
artworkis
an expression ofthe
artist's own moral and political construction ofthe
visualworldthat
he
communicated
to the
viewerthrough techniques
ofbeauty
that
excited visual pleasure."8
This
elevationmixed with asensory
stimulationis
a newkind
ofbeauty,
which
has
become
part of a visual artists challenge.According
to
Kant,
images
or objects
that
produce afeeling
of pleasure whichis
separatefrom
subjectiveexperience andobjective
judgement
canbe declared
asbeautiful. He
alsobelieves
that
what weknow
and what wemorally
approve ordisapprove
of matters very
little
wherebeauty
is
concerned.Again,
this
idea
ofjudgement
oftaste
is
something that
is
free
ofthought.
The
objectthat
causesthe
viewer a pleasurable experience
then
canbe
calledbeautiful
regardless of whatthat
object'suse
may
be.
By
moving away
from
the
objecttowards
aconcept,
artistshave
createdalternative
forms
ofbeauty
in
whichabstraction,
the
questfor
the
sublime andinterest
in
the
reactions ofthe
viewershave become
the
important
aspectin
creating
art.Through
stimulation ofthe
sensesthe
viewerbecomes
more connected and more
interested
in the
image.
"Pleasure
(or
pain)
is
not an objectivefea
ture
of anobject,
it
is
a subjectivefeature
induced
by
how
those
objects effectus."9
The
term
"transgressive"10beauty
has
been
usedto
combinethese
ideas
ofattraction and repulsion.
This
type
ofbeauty
has been
seenin contemporary
work,
ranging
from Picasso
to
Damion Hirst. For
examplePicasso's
deconstruc-tion
ofthe
female
body
has
been
critiquedin
different
ways.The
distortions
and
disfigurement
ofthe
figures
canbe
seen as violentbut
through
his
use oftechnique
and colorthe images
have
a sense of appeal.He
abandonedthe
classical concept of
the
female
body
andbegan
to
create newforms
that
wereboth
challenging,
yet realistic.Awareness
ofworkdealing
withthis
kind
ofbeauty,
where
the
objectbecomes less
important than the thoughts
and attitude ofthe
viewer
is
animportant
conceptin
contemporary
art work11.In
transgressive
8
Hester,
Grant
H."Learning
from
aesthetics:Old
Mastersand newlessons."ArtJournal,
20-25. 1997.Benezra,
p.190.!0 Theterm transgressiveisusedinconnection withthis typeof representation of
beauty,
someinnate lawsarebeing
broken.
The"universal"
tasteof aestheticsis
being
challenged.11I do believethat thisideaof
beauty
hasgroundinginthepostmoderndialectic. Artist
areinsearchofa meanstoexpress a newkindof
beauty
that maychallenge"classical"
perception.
This
isnottosay that thereare notelementsoftheclassicalaestheticbuttheideatowhichthebeauty
isbound
tohas
amuchstronger purpose
art,
aesthetics are usedto
create a sense ofbeauty
in
an object ofunpleasantness.
Something
is
beautiful
because
it
has
a certaincharacteristicthat
we canidentify
as usefulbut
the
objectitself
is
useless.When
viewing a piece ofwork,the
visualpleasure a viewerexperiencesis
afeeling
ofwhichthey
may
notapprove,
but
can not resist.This
occursbecause
ofthe
way
the images
are perceived or
because
ofthe
aestheticchosenin
creating the
image.
Abstraction
and
Color
Abstraction
provides a newway
ofperceiving familiar
objects.I
useit
asa
tool to
shiftthe
viewers'attention
away
from
the
physical objectphotographed,to their
ownperceptual process.Because
the
photographis
seen as adocumen
tation
ofsomething
realthe
audienceis
more curious aboutthe
subject ofthe
image.
In
making
abstract photographsI
amcreating
contentwhichleads
the
viewer
to
oneinterpretation. Through
the
interplay
ofabstraction andcolor,
objects once recognizable assume a new existence.
The
photographsI have
made are
images
that
feel
asthough
they
arebiological
examinations ofthings
existing
outsidereality,
while atthe
sametime
explorethe
elusiveness ofbeauty
through
color andform. Photographs
that
are nonrepresentational create abio
logical
sense.By
choosing
colorsthat
representthe
internal
body,
orusing
abstract
forms
that
suggestthe
body,
I
create photographsthat
guidethe
viewers
interpretation.
My
approachto
image
making
is to
have
my
audiencetake
notice of
their altering
perception12;
taking
partin
a new experience offamiliar
objects.
I
choose specificobjects,
whichhave
the
shapes,
textures,
and colorsI
desire in
the
final
images.
Water, light,
mold,
hair
andfabric
werethe only
materials used
in the two-dimensional
work.Water,
a source oflife,
couldeasily
be
manipulatedin
any
containercreating
abstraction.Light
suggests meditation,
reflection,
beauty
and mortality.Mold
added elements ofnew growth andexperimentation.
Hair
was connectedto
life, living
anddead,
precious anddis
carded compulsive andobsessive.
Fabric
wasthen
used as an aidin
introducing
color.
By
photographing these objects,
more control overthe
final
image
wasachieved
than
whenphotographing
the
television, because
they
couldbe
manip
ulated
by
hand
whenworking
withthe
propsfor
the
camera.I
arranged modelsthen
began
to
examinethem through
the
lens
ofmy
camera.Using
the
cameraas
my tool
for
abstraction,I
manipulatedthe
subjects sothat,
through
imagina
tion,
a newbiological
worldexisted.12 The World
Book Dictionary.
Perception- acomplexmethod ofobtaining informationabout our surrounding world,specificallythroughoursenses,andapprehending thisinformationas
belief.
Photographs
andthree-dimensional
forms
were createdto
cause uneasein
the
viewerin
the
presence ofthe
object,
whilequestioning
the
source ofinfor
mation,
the
viewer also was seducedby
the
aesthetics ofthe image.
The
images
effect
the
viewerviscerally
through sensory
stimulation.Using
photographsthat
contain simple and undefinableforms,
I
left
the
viewerto
createtheir
ownpersonal
interpretation
ofthe
photograph.After
the
sculpturesandphotographsare
created,
the
installation
and presentationbecame
akey
rollin
leading
the
viewer
towards
a new perceptionInstallation
The
materialobjects,
whichI
used asmy subjects,
form
just
one aspect ofmy
investigation.
I
then
usepresentation,
whichfurther
enhancesthe
perceived connection
to the
biological.
By
using
installation
andparticular methods of
display
the
photographs guidethe
viewerin their interpretation.
When
creating the thesis
installation
I
wasvery
conscious ofheightening
the
connection to the
biological. The
dark
hallway
that
led
into
the
main room acted as atunnel
into
the
experiment.The images
lit
below
had
been
encasedfor
preservation.
In
the
cabinet piecesI
choseto
display
the
images
withlight
behind
them to
connectto
x-rays or a microscope.The images
were mountedbetween
Plexiglas
to
reference a microscope slide orto
look
asif
they
are encasedfor
future
study.The
presentation ofthe
specimen vitrinesin their
own roomallowed
the
viewerto
get closebut
nottoo
closewherethe
sculptures couldbe
disturbed. This
room created a sense ofquarantine,
there
was nodoor,
the
objects were
there to
be
observed.By
presenting the
images
in
away
that
emphasizes
the
biological
notion,
the
workdirects
andlimits
the
viewers'possi
bility
for interpretation.
Dimensions
Inspired
andinfluenced
by
artistEva
Hesse,
a painter andsculptor."An
innovator
influenced
by
Minimalism,
Surrealism
andConceptuafism,
shebecame known
for
her
sculpture, molding
latex into
drapery-like
sheets andthree-dimensional
shapes,
dipping
aluminum-screen armatureinto
fiberglass
resin,
pioneering
new materials and processesin
a searchfor
"non-art" art."
The
critics wereimpressed
but
mystified."Her
works are questions ratherthan
answers,"
the
Village Voice
wrote."They
arebundles
of eccentriccontradictions....
Eva Hesse
is
animportant
new artist.""13Hesse
useddifferent
materials
to
createforms
that
hinted
atthe
body,
yetvisually
dealt
withform
andrep
etition.
In
reading
aboutHesse,
I
found
her
work ethic wasmostly
intuitive,
always
struggling
with whereto
gowiththe
next piece.Hesse's
useofmaterial,subject matter as well as and
her
commitmentto
making
art werestrong
influ
ences on choices
I
have
madein
creating
visualartwork.The
mostinteresting
element ofHesse's
workis
that
she was ableto
create
three-dimensional
drawings
in
which she madethe
drawings
enterinto
athree-dimensional
space withoutlosing
the
element ofdrawing. Hesse did
alot
ofsketching,
notonly 2D
sketching
but
3D
sketching,
by
doing
this
shebegan
to
connectboth
dimensions.
"The
mid-careerworks reveal
how Hesse began
to
break
out ofthe
frame-and,
in
fig.31fact, "Hang
Up"(1966)
literally
showsjust
that,
with fis- 32a
long, loopy
cabledistended from
two
parts of an oversizedframe."14I feel
the
work contains
beauty
from
the
use ofmaterialandthe simplicity
ofthe
objects,
whichovertake
the
viewer.I3
Chang,
Scarlet.
"FragileWork,
FragdeLife."Los Angeles Times.
February
17th 2002.I4 Chang.
Biological
My
inspiration
is
drawn from
a widevariety
of sourcesincluding
scientific,
imaginary
andfictional
worldsdrawn from
my
experiences andfantasies.
My
workis
the
combination ofthese
worldsto
create ambiguousforms
that
require
the
viewerto
ask questions.By
blurring
the
distinctions
between
the
familiar
andthe
unknown andby
emphasizing the
biomedical
forms,
I
workto
disturb
initial
assumptions and engagethe
subconscious.The
Mutter Museum
in
Philadelphia
elicited astrong
reactionin
mewhen
I
visited.Dr.
Mutters' collection ofbones,
wetspecimens,
plastercasts,
wax and paper maiche
models,
dried
preparation andmedicalillustrations
aswell as obsolete medical
instruments
was anexaminationinto
medical monstrosities.
The
display
ofthe
collectionillustrated
the
fact
that
the
museums'purpose
lay
notin the
decorative
display
of selectedartifacts,
but
in
the
organized
grouping
ofteaching
materials,
displayed
to
help
us rationalize ourinterest
in them.
The
collection wasfirst
used as alibrary
for
studentsto
learn
aboutdifferent
medical abnormalities.Now
the
museumis
opento
anyone with acuriosity
of either medicine orhuman
anatomy.Creepy,
gross,
cool and morbidwere emotions
I
felt
whenlooking
through
the
installation
atthe
museum andthis
reaction was whatI
wanted viewersto
feel
whenlooking
atmy
work.After
visiting
this
museumI began
to
createimages
that
wereinterpret
ed as
biological
creations.Later,
I
thought
that
it
wouldbe
interesting
to
learn
how
to
photograph realbiological
specimens.To improve
my ability to take
these
kind
ofimages,
I
took
a macrophotography
classin the
bio-medical
department
atRIT.
In
macrophotography
powerfullenses
are usedto magnify
subjects
through
the
camera.The
classtaught
me aboutshooting
with alarge
format
camera andI
increased my
conscious oflight,
composition,
andfocus.
I
was also exposed
to
a use ofphotography
outside a"fine
art"
context.
The
students in this
class were notmaking
photographsto
hang
in
agallery
they
weremaking
photographsto
be
displayed
in
a sciencetextbook.
The
biomedical
photographers
weretrying
to
capture accurateinformation
about a subject andthey
were
trying
to
createaesthetically
beautiful images.
andthey
weretrying
to
create
aesthetically
beautiful
images.
Having
whatmy
momhas
titled
preciousbody
syndrome,
orPBS,
the
idea
of medicine andthe
body
is
always part ofmy
consciousness.I
have
always
been
highly
observantto abnormalities,
pains and affliction.She has
memories of me when
I
was young.I
would cometo
her
to
askwhat adark
spot was on
my
arm,
"a
freckle,"
she
said,
"and I
am surethat
it
wasthere
yesterday"
In
feeling
overly
conscious ofthe
amount ofradio,
Internet,
newspaperand
television
commercialsfor
prescriptiondrugs,
it
seems asif
we all couldbe
suffering
from
everything.There
now seemsto
be
adrug
for
every
genericsymptom; anxiety,
high
blood
pressure,
sexualdysfunction,
hair
loss,
depression,
acid reflux.
We
canhardly
escapethe
daily
news coverage of scientific andmedical research: stem
cell,
AIDS,
cloning, cancer,
heart
disease,
obesity
anddepression.
All
areinfluences
ofliving
in today's
society.I
amfascinated
withscience,
nervous aboutthe
power oftechnology
and medicine and oftenfeel
overwhelmed.
Nature
should notbe
played withmost ofthe time the
results areugly
andirreversible.
Regardless,
our species continuesto
poke and experimentand will never
be
satisfieduntilthe
all secretsthat
define
us arefinally
revealed.
Conclusion
Medical
andbiological
references cannotbe
avoidedwhendescribing
my
work.
I
create abiological
world out of objectsthat
have
no scientific connection.They
become
personal experimentswith abstraction andbeauty;
experimentsthat
write a newstory
oflife
and existence.Interested
in
constructing
images
that
deal
with aesthetics, comfort andrepulsion,
I
createforms
that
sitoddly
in
the
world,
hovering
between
reality
andfiction.
Bibliography
Barnhart,
Clarence
L.,
Robert
K
Barnhart.
THE WORLD BOOK
DICTIONARY.
Benezra,
NeaL Olga
M.
Visa
REGARDING
BEAUTY:
A
VlEW
Of
THE
LATE
TWE^nETH
CENTUKY.
Washington D.C.: Hirshhorn Museum
andSculpture
Garden
Smithsonian
Institution,
1999.
Chang,
Scarlet.
"Fragile
Work,
Fragile
Life."Los
Angeles
Times.
February
17th
2002.
Diffey,
T.J.
"A
note on some meanings ofthe term
'aesthetic'."The British Journal
ofAesthetics,
61-66.
1995.
Gilbert-Rolf
Jeremy.
BEAUTY
AND THE
CONTEMPORARY
SUBLIME.
New York:
Allworth
Press,
1999.
Hickey,
Dave.
THE INVISIBLE
DEAGON;
FOUR ESSAYS
On BEAUTY.
Los
Angeles:
Art issues.
Press,
1993.
Hluch,
Kevin.
"A
Revolutionary
Concept."Ceramics
Monthly,
98. 1998.
Hobson,
Marlena.
"The
whereabouts ofBeauty
in
late
20th
Century
art."
Art
Papers,
57-58 1998.
Hunter, Sam,
andJohn Jacobus.
MODERN
ART.
New
York;
The Vendome Press.
1992.
Kant,
Immanuel.
CRITIQUE
OF
JUDGEMENT,
1790.
Kester,
Grant H.
"Learning
from
aesthetics:Old
Masters
andnewlessons."Art
Journal,
20-25. 1997.
Lippard,
Lucy.
EVAHESSE.
New York: New York
University,
1976.
Matthews,
Patricia M.
"Kant's
sublime:aform
of pureaesthetic reflectivejudgment."The Journal
ofAesthetics
andArt
Criticism,
165-80. 1996
Rothstein,
Edward.
"Two
Faces
ofBeauty;
Timeless
andTimely."New
York
Times.
May
6th
2000.
Scarry,
Elaine.
On
BEAUTY
AND
BEING
JUST.
Princeton:
Princeton
University
Press,
1999.
Acknowledgements
I
wouldlike
to thank the
following
peoplefor making
the thesis
show possible.
My
Committee:
Elaine O'Neil
Dan Larkin
Therese
Mulligan
My
parentsDave
andDebbi
Galloway
Jeff Weiss
Kara Crombie
Nancy
Friedland
Biffy Borg
Jim
Johnson
And Nathan Sherman