Generating optimal strut-and-tie models in prestressed concrete beams by performance-based optimization
24
0
0
Full text
(2) !. "# %. $. &. & ' (" '() (. %%*. *. &. & + #. ). , '. -. ' /0$12. .. 3. 45. (. ' 6. %. &. ) * -. &.
(3) . 4. ( 5. 7. # 6. 3. &. /0$12 3 ,. ' 8. 7. ,. , &. ,4. #. & &. /0$12. 9 #. # #$ '. %. & $. #. :. , 0. & 9. !. 1.
(4) &. ; ! *. # &. $. #. $ #!. #. $ !. '#. (#. & &. & : 0. :. 9. # &. & 9 & ) & :. 9. , &. %.
(5) <. 45. -. #. &. :. &. :. #. =. % =∑. /2. / 2. =. :. &. −. ∗ &. ≤6. &'. / 2. % ,. ∗ &. &. &. &. ). #. 9. &. # $&. (. # &. $. #. ' & # ). *.
(6) :. & 4. & $ &. #. = @ & > A# ?@ >. /!2. @ &> @ >. ). & γ =. /B ";2. C. <. 6. 'D;. ). -.
(7) γ. = ∑∑ β &γ =. β&. &. /%2. &=. &. C. ∗ &. &. : & /". 2. & & 6. 3. # &. $. #. $ #!. $) *. #. $. ) ). 9. ) 9 .. ). :. & &. ..
(8) $. 3 45. 6. 4 5. 9 # , !6. =. #. <. %6. 6&. /*2. %. &. 6&. &. %6 % "9 /*2. # &. ) :. $. #. +$. #. #. #!" #. D $ /<"'2. & &. <"'. #. 4.
(9) & <. & &. 6. 3. &. 7 #. &. : ). , '. 9. ). &. /. 2. /. &. 2. ) # ( &. ,. &. 45. ) &. 5. ,.
(10) 0$1. #. #. 9. #!. # # #$. & < ( E *66 ,D *6. F. E 6 &. -6 G 6. B ! 5%6. 0. 0. +. H. +. ! E 6 *. )E 6. E !66. &. ( &. &. ". E I. #. < #. ! ). 9 F #. #. !4 '. , &. :. < &. ,. ! 6. 3. 6. #.
(11) & <. % <. ). % & <. %/ 2. &. '. <. %/ 2. $. ). $))*. #. #. #!. # # #$. $. , & 0 $. # !. '. E -*6 ,D. &. 9. <. &.
(12) & I. & <. ! &. #. <. !. *. */ 2. %/ 2 ). ) <. <. <. # <. <. E. #. 4* &. ). ". <. %/ 2. */ 2. <. */ 2 ). !. # & &. &"))*. #. #. #!. +. # # #$. & $. E *66 ,D <. # #. #. -. ). <. !.
(13) &. <. -. 7. # <. -/ 2. ( ,. & <. -/ 2 (. ". $ *. & /0$12. 9. &. ' #. 9 #. #. ). # , !. # ). !.
(14) ) 0$1. ). # 4. #. &. , 45. 9. <. ,. ) 9. $ ,. -)#!. #. & & (. 3. 0. J. '. ". ' <. , (. '. " 0. ". & K $. L. ; F. %. 0. , '.
(15) (#. &$. E. 6 6!5. ,D. E. 6. 0. E. %4 ,. %*. $. 6. E E. ). E. (. E. A# ?. E. H. +. #. E E E E E &. ,. E. ∗ &. E. ∗ &. E. 6&. #. E. & &. &. *.
(16) &. &. E. &. E. &. @ >. E. @ &>. E. %. E E. %6. E. %. E. !. E. β&. E. γ. E. γ. E. 0. +. 0 M$. &. #&# #. #. B 4 D. O O. ( ! ,. < P. N + O' -. ( 54* 8. ;. N *+ ,. -. %- *O. M&. B ! D ! M. $. & B 5 D %. O. ;. 54. 0. 1. 55%. -. (. ;. .% *6 ( *. *.4. N *+.
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
(19) 8. L ,. $. 545. 4 (. ! *, 5677 + % ("$ <)0 &. ,. '. ( 56 / 55!2 8. &. - 8. B. '. +. 55%. ,. +) (. 0. +. 9::7. 55-. "&1. 55!. * <)0 3. *. 55-. 8. ,. +. 555 0. +. M1. <. 2,. . ). &. (. B 4 D. (. 5.4. !. (. (. ;. $. 5 *. +. 0. +. 555 4 3. KK R. H. F. J 0 M1. ;. (. (. 0 , 5 3. B. ). ! D (4 ;. KK R. 1. $. 0. ). M1. ;. ' (" B 64 D. 0. ). ; 666 /. L. N ). .** .J 0 M' 0. 0 !6 8. + -. 555. H 0. &. $. #. &. (. N,. 2 '. &% 54. # 444 565. 5. N -. ,. N.
(20) (. 9;(. 6.
(21) (. <;,. ! * !. ! ! !. !. ! 6*. !. D 0 <. ! !. 6. ! 6. 6. %6. -6. ! !. (. 5;. !. ". 46.
(22) / 2&. / 2&. / 2. / 21. / 2. (. =;. 6. ). %6.
(23) / 2&. 6. / 2&. %6. / 21. / 2. / 2. (. >;. !.
(24) / 2&. 6. / 2&. %6. / 21. / 21. / 2. (. 6;. %.
(25)
Related documents
In a cross-sectional context, Conley (1999) models the spatial correlation with a metric of economic distance ; while Bai (2003) (and the reference therein) assumes that the
These lesions were not observed on rice growing without Striga calli (Figure 4.7c). hermonthica through somatic embryogenesis and direct organogenesis. a) Two weeks old
For exam- ple, generating a target word from a cue such as its definition or its antonym produces reliably better performance on direct memory tests such as recognition than does
Regarding trajectories of global cognitive decline, a significant decrease on follow-up mean MMSE total scores, compared to baseline, revealed a cognitive deterioration for
The developed multicomponent spectroscopy method for simultaneous estimation of Ketotifen fumarate and Salbutamol sulphate in combined tablet dosage form is
To address these issues, the Earth Science Department of an Italian university initiated a collaboration with a local high school a involving a group of high-school students,
Efficacy of geraniin on dengue virus type 2 infected BALB/c mice RESEARCH Open Access Efficacy of geraniin on dengue virus type 2 infected BALB/c mice Siti Aisyah Abdul Ahmad1, Uma
Earth Planets Space, 55, 139?151, 2003 Infrared excitation processes of C2H6 in comets Sang J Kim Department of Astronomy and Space Science, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Kyunggido 449
